Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transcriptome analysis of grapevine under salinity and identification of key genes responsible for salt tolerance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Functional & Integrative Genomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The negative effects of soil salinity towards grape yield depend upon salt concentration, cultivar type, developmental stage, and rootstock. Thompson Seedless variety of grape plant is considered moderately sensitive to salinity when grown upon its own root stock. In recent epoch, identification of key genes responsive to salinity offers hope to generate salinity-tolerant crop plants by their overexpression through genetic manipulation. In the present report, salt responsive transcriptome analysis of Thompson Seedless grape variety was done to identify vital genes involved in salinity tolerance which could be used further to generate salt liberal grape plant or other crop plants. Transcriptome libraries for control and 150-mM-NaCl-treated grape leaves were sequenced on Illumina platform where 714 genes were found to be differentially expressed. Gene ontology analysis indicated that under salinity conditions, the genes involved in metabolic process were highly enriched. Keto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis revealed that, among the top 22 enriched pathways for the salt stress upregulated genes, the carbohydrate metabolism, signal transduction, energy metabolism, amino acid metabolism, biosynthesis of secondary metabolite, and lipid metabolism pathways possessed the largest number of transcripts. Key salinity-induced genes were selected and validated through qRT-PCR analysis which was comparable to RNA-seq results. Real-time PCR analysis also revealed that after 24 days of salinity, the expression of most of the selected key genes was highest. These salinity-induced genes will be characterized further in a model plant and also in Vitis vinifera through transgenic approach to disclose their role towards salt tolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adaodlu YS, Ergul A, Aras S (2004) Molecular characterization of salt stress in grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) and rootstocks. Vitis 43:107–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer GR (2010) Abiotic stress and plant responses from the whole vine to the genes. Aust J Grape Wine Res 16:86–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer GR, Ergul A, Grimplet J et al (2007) Water and salinity stress in grapevines: early and late changes in transcript and metabolite profiles. Funct Integr Genomics 7:111–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer GR, Urano K, Delrot S, Pezzotti M, Shinozaki K (2011) Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective. BMC Plant Biol 11:163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva FG, Iandolino A, Al-Kayal F, Bohlmann MC, Cushman MA, Lim H, Ergul A, Figueroa R, Kabuloglu EK, Osborne C, Rowe J, Tattersall E, Leslie A, Xu J, Baek J, Cramer GR, Cushman JC, Cook DR (2005) Characterizing the grape transcriptome. Analysis of expressed sequence tags from multiple Vitis species and development of a compendium of gene expression during berry development. Plant Physiol 139(2):574–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daldoul S, Guillaumie S, Reustle GM, Krczal G, Ghorbel A, Delrot S, Mliki A, Hofer MU (2010) Isolation and expression analysis of salt induced genes from contrasting grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars. Plant Sci 179:489–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daldoul S, Hoefer M, Mliki A (2012) Osmotic stress induces the expression of VvMAP kinase gene in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). J Bot. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/737035

  • Dapas M, Kandpal M, Bi Y, Davulur RV (2017) Comparative evaluation of isoform-level gene expression estimation algorithms for RNA-seq and exon-array platforms. Brief Bioinform 18(2):260–269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Das P, Nutan KK, Singla-Pareek SL, Pareek A (2015a) Oxidative environment and redox homeostasis in plants: dissecting out significant contribution of major cellular organelles. Front Environ Sci 2:70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das P, Nutan KK, Singla-Pareek SL, Pareek A (2015b) Understanding salinity responses and adopting ‘omics-based’ approaches to generate salinity tolerant cultivars of rice. Front. Plant Sci 2:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Filichkin SA, Priest HD, Givan SA, Shen R, Bryant DW, Fox SE, Wong WK, Mockler TC (2010) Genome-wide mapping of alternative splicing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Res 20:45–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisarakis IK, Stavrakas D (2001) Response of sultana vines (V. vinifera L.) on six rootstocks to NaCl salinity exposure and recovery. Agric Water Manag 51:13–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambino G, Perrone I, Gribaudo I (2008) A rapid and effective method for RNA extraction from different tissues of grapevine and other woody plants. Phytochem Anal 19:520–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garg R, Bhattacharjee A, Jain M (2015) Genome-scale transcriptomic insights into molecular aspects of abiotic stress responses in chickpea. Plant Mol Biol Rep 33:388–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-014-0753-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giraud E, Ivanova A, Gordon CS, Whelan J, Considine MJ (2012) Sulphur dioxide evokes a large scale reprogramming of the grape berry transcriptome associated with oxidative signalling and biotic defence responses. Plant Cell Environ 35:405–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González-Agüero M, García-Rojas M, Genova AD, Correa J, Maass A, Orellana A, Hinrichsen P (2013) Identification of two putative reference genes from grapevine suitable for gene expression analysis in berry and related tissues derived from RNA-Seq data. BMC Genomics 14:499–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal E, Amit SK, Singh RS, Mahato AK, Chand S, Kanika K (2016) Transcriptome profiling of the salt-stress response in Triticum aestivum cv. Kharchia local. Sci Rep 6:27752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson SW, Wege S, Qiu J, Blackmore DH, Walker AR, Tyerman SD, Walker RR, Gilliham M (2015) Grapevine and Arabidopsis cation-chloride cotransporters localize to the Golgi and trans-Golgi network and indirectly influence long-distance ion transport and plant salt tolerance. Plant Physiol 169:2215–2229

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig L (2012) Plant gene regulation in response to abiotic stress. Biochim Biophys Acta 1819:85–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hepaksoy S, Ben-Asher J, De Malach Y, David I, Sagih M, Bravdo BA (2006) Grapevine irrigation with saline water: effect of rootstocks on quality and yield of Cabernet Sauvignon. J Plant Nutr 29:783–795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang W, Perez-Garcia P, Pokhilko A, Millar AJ, Antoshechkin I, Riechmann JL et al (2012) Mapping the core of the Arabidopsis circadian clock defines the network structure of the oscillator. Science 336:75–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail AAAM (2013) Grapes for the desert: salt stress signaling in Vitis. Doctorate dissertation

  • Jin C, Huang XS, Li KQ, Yin H, Li LT, Yao ZH et al (2016) Overexpression of a bHLH1 transcription factor of Pyrus ussuriensis confers enhanced cold tolerance and increases expression of stress-responsive genes. Front Plant Sci 7:441

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leng X, Jia H, Sun X, Shangguan L, Mu Q, Wang B, Fang J (2015) Comparative transcriptome analysis of grapevine in response to copper stress. Sci Rep 5:17749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Lv J, Zhao X, Ai X, Zhu X, Wang M, Zhao S, Xia G (2010) TaCHP: a wheat zinc finger protein gene down-regulated by abscisic acid and salinity stress plays a positive role in stress tolerance. Plant Physiol 154:211–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Xu Z, Dong R, Chang S, Wang L, Khalil-Ur-Rehman M, Tao J (2017) An RNA-Seq analysis of grape plantlets grown in vitro reveals different responses to blue, green, red LED light, and white fluorescent light. Front Plant Sci 8:78

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2[−Delta Delta C(t)] method. Methods 25:402–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Cózatl DG, Zhai Z, Jobe TO, Akmakjian GZ, Song WY, Limbo O, Russell MR, Kozlovskyy VI, Martinoia E, Vatamaniuk OK et al (2010) Tonoplast-localized Abc2 transporter mediates phytochelatin accumulation in vacuoles and confers cadmium tolerance. J Biol Chem 285:40416–40426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Cozatl DG, Xie Q, Akmakjian GZ, Jobe TO, Patel A, Stacey MG, Song L, Demoin DW, Jurisson SS, Stacey G et al (2014) OPT3 is a component of the iron-signaling network between leaves and roots and misregulation of OPT3 leads to an over-accumulation of cadmium in seeds. Mol Plant 7:1455–1469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miras-Avalos JM, Intrigliolo DS (2017) Grape composition under abiotic constrains: water stress and salinity. Front Plant Sci 8:851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz-Espinoza C, Di Genova A, Correa J, Silva R, Maass A, Gonzalez-Aguero M, Orellana Aand Hinrichsen P (2016) Transcriptome profiling of grapevine seedless segregants during berry development reveals candidate genes associated with berry weight. BMC Plant Biol 16:104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2013) ABA signalling in stress-response and seed development. Plant Cell Rep 32(7):959–970

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Owais SJ (2015) Morphological and physiological responses of six grape genotypes to NaCl salt stress. Pak J Biol Sci 18:240–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prior LD, Grieve AM, Slavich PG, Cullis BR (1992) Sodium chloride and soil texture interactions in irrigated field grown ‘sultana’ grapevines: II. Plant mineral content, growth and physiology. Aust J Agric Res 43:1067–1083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues NF, da Fonseca GC, Kulcheski FR, Margis R (2017) Salt stress affects mRNA editing in soybean chloroplasts. Genet Mol Biol 40(1 suppl):200–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sah SK, Reddy KR, Li J (2016) Abscisic acid and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Front Plant Sci 7:571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfferth C, Tsuda K (2014) Salicylic acid signal transduction: the initiation of biosynthesis, perception and transcriptional reprogramming. Front Plant Sci 5:697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shani U, Ben-Gal A (2005) Long-term response of grapevines to salinity: osmotic effects and ion toxicity. Am J Enol Vitic 56:148–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar R, Bhattacharjee A, Jain M (2016) Transcriptome analysis in different rice cultivars provides novel insights into desiccation and salinity stress responses. Sci Rep 6:23719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharm J, Upadhyay AK (2008) Rootstock effect on Tas-A-Ganesh (Vitis vinifera L.) for sodium and chloride uptake. Acta Hort 785:113–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P, Jha AB, Dubey RS, Pessarakli M (2012) Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J Bot 2012:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/217037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song YP, Chen QQ, Ci D, Shao XN, Zhang DQ (2014) Effects of high temperature on photosynthesis and related gene expression in poplar. BMC Plant Biol 14:111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strohm AK, Baldwin KL, Masson PH (2012) Multiple roles for membrane-associated protein trafficking and signaling in gravitropism. Front Plant Sci 3:274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upreti KK, Murti GSR (2010) Response of grape rootstocks to salinity: changes in root growth, polyamines and abscisic acid. Biol Plant 54:730–734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Upreti KK, Varalakshmi LR, Jayaram HL (2012) Influence rootstocks on salinity tolerance of grapevine: changes in biomass, photosynthesis, abscisic acid and glycine betaine. Indian J Plant Physiol 17:128–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker RR, Blackmore DH, Clingeleffer PR, Correll RL (2002) Rootstock effects on salt tolerance of field-grown grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultana). 1. Yield and vigour inter-relationships. Aust J Grape Wine Res 8:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker RR, Blackmore DH, Clingeleffer PR, Godden P, Francis L, Valente P, Robinson E (2003) Salinity effects on vines and wines. Bulletin de L’O.I.V 76:200–227

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker RR, Blackmore DH, Clingeleffer PR (2010) Impact of rootstock on yield and ion concentrations in petioles, juice and wine of Shiraz and Chardonnay in different viticultural environments with different irrigation water salinity. Aust J Grape Wine Res 16:243–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Lin A, Loake GJ, Chu C (2013) H2O2-induced leaf cell death and the crosstalk of reactive nitric/oxygen species. J Integr Plant Biol 55:202–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Liu X, Meng Liang M, Fanglin Tan F, Wenyu Liang W, Yiyong Chen Y, Lin Y, Huang L, Xing J, Chen W (2014a) Proteomic analysis of salt-responsive proteins in the leaves of mangrove Kandelia candel during short-term stress. PLoS One 9(1):e83141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Uddin MI, Tanaka K, Yin L, Shi Z, Qi Y, Mano J, Matsui K, Shimomura N et al (2014b) Maintenance of chloroplast structure and function by overexpression of the rice monogalactosyldiacylglycerol synthase gene leads to enhanced salt tolerance in tobacco. Plant Physiol 165:1144–1155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf JBW (2013) Principles of transcriptome analysis and gene expression quantification: an RNA-seq tutorial. Mol Ecol Resour 13:559–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong L, Lee H, Ishitani M, Zhu JK (2002) Regulation of osmotic stress-responsive gene expression by the LOS6/ABA1 locus in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 277:8588–8569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Sibicky T, Huang B (2010) Protein profile analysis of salt-responsive proteins in leaves and roots in two cultivars of creeping bentgrass differing in salinity tolerance. Plant Cell Rep 29:595–615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Wu S, Lilley RM, Zhang R (2015) The diversity of membrane transporters encoded in bacterial arsenic-resistance operons. PeerJ 3:e943

  • Yao Y, Xiao X, Ou Y, Wu X, Xu G (2014) Root transcriptome analysis on the grape genotypes with contrast translocation pattern of excess manganese from root to shoot. Plant Soil 386:49–67

  • Zhang J, Klueva NY, Wang Z, WU R, TD HO, NGUYEN HT (2000) Genetic engineering for abiotic stress resistance in crop plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 36:108–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Liu Y, Yang T, Zhang L, Xu S, Xue L et al (2006) Diverse signals converge at MAPK cascades in plant. Plant Physiol Biochem 44:274–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu YN, Shi DQ, Ruan MB, Zhang LL, Meng ZH, Liu J et al (2013) Transcriptome analysis reveals crosstalk of responsive genes to multiple abiotic stresses in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). PLoS One 8:e80218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Facilities and co-operation from the laboratory staff at Madhyamgram Experimental Farm of the Institute are acknowledged.

Funding

This work was supported by Science and Engineering Research Board Young Scientist Scheme (SERB Grant No. - YSS/2015/001872) award received by PD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Priyanka Das or Arun Lahiri Majumder.

Electronic supplementary material

Fig. S1

Library profile of Thompson Seedless (TS) grapevine samples on agilent DNA HS Chip. (a) Library profile of TS-C samples. . (b) Library profile of TS-S samples. (PNG 1457 kb)

High Resolution image (TIF 3140 kb)

Fig. S2

GO enrichment analysis of different functional processes. (a) Enriched GO graph for biological process. (b) Enriched GO graph for molecular function. (c) Enriched GO graph for Cellular Component. Each Enriched Graph shows the GO graph of the significant terms with a node-coloring which is proportional to the significance value (p-value). This type of graphical representations helps to understand the biological context of the functional differences and to find pseudo-redundancies in the parent-child relationships of significant GO term. A node filter value of 0.05 for p-value was chosen. GO-Terms with a value higher than the given filter were not shown. The red boxes represent overrepresented and green boxes under-represented GO terms. The shades vary corresponding to the p-value where a lower p-value has a darker shade. (PNG 1091 kb)

High Resolution image (TIF 1764 kb)

Fig. S3

Expression pattern of randomly selected salinity mediated down-regulated genes in WT and salinity treated grapevine by RNA-seq and qRT-PCR. Expression pattern of selected salinity responsive (down regulated) genes through qRT-PCR after 24 h, 7 d and 24 d of salt (150 mM NaCl) treatment. The data are means ±SD from three independent replicates, and ‘*’ indicates statistical significance between WT and salinity treated samples (P < 0.05). (PNG 347 kb)

High Resolution image (TIF 993 kb)

Table S1

(DOCX 15 kb)

Table S2

(XLSX 84 kb)

Table S3

(XLSX 209 kb)

Table S4

(XLS 1991 kb)

Table S5

(XLSX 78 kb)

Table S6

(XLS 85 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, P., Majumder, A.L. Transcriptome analysis of grapevine under salinity and identification of key genes responsible for salt tolerance. Funct Integr Genomics 19, 61–73 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-018-0628-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-018-0628-6

Keywords

Navigation