Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Variation in CTA evaluation of ED patients suspected of aortic dissection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study was performed to investigate the variation in CTA imaging for AoD in an ED to determine if limiting the scanned region to the chest can effectively rule-out AoD without delaying care.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients belonging to a geographically isolated health maintenance organization who underwent CTA evaluation for possible acute AoD in the emergency department between 2016 and 2020. We evaluated for the regions included in the CTA, the presence of an acute AoD, and clinical outcomes. For those who were ruled-out of an AoD with a CTA limited to the chest, we investigated clinical follow-up up to 6 months after their initial presentation.

Results

Over the study period, there were 1143 CT scans ordered by ED physicians to evaluate for AoD in patients without a history of AoD. Only 23.0% of screening studies were of the chest only. There were 29 acute AoDs diagnosed (14 type A and 15 type B) making for a prevalence of 2.5%. Only one patient with an acute AoD detected on a chest-only CTA required farther imaging, which did not delay clinical care. No patients ruled-out for acute AoD with a chest-only CTA had a return ED visit or repeat CTA within 6 months diagnosing a missed AoD. There were no AoDs limited to the abdominal aorta that would have been missed on a chest-only study.

Conclusion

In patients in the ED with suspected new acute AoD, a CTA limited to the chest can effectively evaluate the condition without delaying care in this integrated healthcare system with 24/7 CT availability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Society for Vascular Medicine, North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (2010) 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 55(14):e27-129. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181d4739e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Smedberg C, Steuer J, Leander K, Hultgren R (2020) Sex differences and temporal trends in aortic dissection: a population-based study of incidence, treatment strategies, and outcome in Swedish patients during 15 years. Eur Heart J 41(26):2430–2438. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa446

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu J, Zafar M, Qiu J et al (2019) A systematic review and meta-analysis of isolated abdominal aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 70(6):2046–2053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169(22):2078–2086. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ohle R, Anjum O, Bleeker H, Wells G, Perry JJ (2018) Variation in emergency department use of computed tomography for investigation of acute aortic dissection. Emerg Radiol 25(3):293–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-018-1587-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lovy AJ, Bellin E, Levsky JM, Esses D, Haramati LB (2013) Preliminary development of a clinical decision rule for acute aortic syndromes. Am J Emerg Med 31(11):1546–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2013.06.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jarren KT Takaki: original study design, data collection, analysis, manuscript preparation, and editing. Isabella Ford: data collection, analysis, manuscript preparation, and editing. Hyo-Chun Yoon: original study design, data collection, analysis, manuscript preparation, and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jarren K. T. Takaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takaki, J.K.T., Ford, I. & Yoon, HC. Variation in CTA evaluation of ED patients suspected of aortic dissection. Emerg Radiol 29, 709–713 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02054-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02054-0

Keywords

Navigation