Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the prevalence and clinical relevance of positive abdominal and pelvic CT findings in senior patients presenting to the emergency department

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the prevalence and clinical relevance of positive abdominal and pelvic CT findings for patients 65 years of age and older, when compared with all other scanned adult Emergency Department (ED) patients, at a single tertiary care hospital. Our hypothesis was that there is an increased prevalence and clinical relevance of positive abdominal/pelvic CT findings in senior patients. A research ethics board-approved retrospective review of all adult patients who underwent an emergency CT of the abdomen and pelvis for acute nontraumatic abdominal and/or pelvic signs and symptoms was performed. Two thousand one hundred two patients between October 1, 2011, and September 30, 2013, were reviewed. Six hundred thirty-one patients were included in the <65 group (298 men and 333 women; mean age 46, age range 18–64), and 462 were included in the >65 group (209 men and 253 women; mean age 77.6, age range 65–99). Overall, there were more positive CT findings for patients <65 (389 positive cases, 61.6 %) compared with the >65 group (257 positive cases, 55.6 %), which was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.03). Moreover, with the exception of complicated appendicitis cases, which were more common in the >65 group, there were no statistically significant differences in the clinical/surgical relevance of the positive CT findings between the two groups. The findings of our retrospective study therefore refute our hypothesis that there is an increased prevalence of positive abdominal CT findings in patients >65. This may be related to ED physicians at our institution being more hesitant to order CT examinations for the younger population, presumably due to radiation concerns. However, older patients in our series were more likely to present with complicated appendicitis, and a lower threshold for ordering CT examinations of the abdomen and pelvis in this patient population should therefore be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2011 Emergency Department Summary Tables. (2011) CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/2011_ed_web_tables.pdf. Accessed March 2015

  2. Lyon C, Clark DC (2006) Diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in older patients. Am Fam Physician 74(9):1537–1544

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanson TG, O'Keefe KP (1996) Evaluation of abdominal pain in the elderly. Emerg Med Clin North Am 14(3):615–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spangler R, Van Pham T, Khoujah D, Martinez JP (2014) Abdominal emergencies in the geriatric patient. Int J Emerg Med 7:43

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Flasar MH, Goldberg E (2006) Acute abdominal pain. Med Clin N Am 90(3):481–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Macaluso CR, McNamara RM (2012) Evaluation and management of acute abdominal pain in the emergency department. Int J Gen Med 5:789–797

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis LM, Banet GA, Blanda M, Hustey FM, Meldon SW, Gerson LW (2005) Etiology and clinical course of abdominal pain in senior patients: a prospective, multicenter study. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Med Sci 60(8):1071–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arenal JJ, Bengoechea-Beeby M (2003) Mortality associated with emergency abdominal surgery in the elderly. Can J Surg J Canadien de chirurgie 46(2):111–116

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mehta SS (2008) Abdominal Pain in the Elderly. Bichile SK (ed) Med Update vol 18:239–245

    Google Scholar 

  10. Samaras N, Chevalley T, Samaras D, Gold G (2010) Older patients in the emergency department: a review. Ann Emerg Med 56(3):261–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hustey FM, Meldon SW, Banet GA, Gerson LW, Blanda M, Lewis LM (2005) The use of abdominal computed tomography in older ED patients with acute abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 23(3):259–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Esses D, Birnbaum A, Bijur P, Shah S, Gleyzer A, Gallagher EJ (2004) Ability of CT to alter decision making in elderly patients with acute abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 22(4):270–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis LM, Klippel AP, Bavolek RA, Ross LM, Scherer TM, Banet GA (2007) Quantifying the usefulness of CT in evaluating seniors with abdominal pain. Eur J Radiol 61(2):290–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Macari M, Nevsky G, Bonavita J, Kim DC, Megibow AJ, Babb JS (2011) CT colonography in senior versus nonsenior patients: extracolonic findings, recommendations for additional imaging, and polyp prevalence. Radiology 259(3):767–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gardner RL, Almeida R, Maselli JH, Auerbach A (2010) Does gender influence emergency department management and outcomes in geriatric abdominal pain? J Emerg Med 39(3):275–281

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael N. Patlas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alabousi, A., Patlas, M.N., Meshki, M. et al. Assessing the prevalence and clinical relevance of positive abdominal and pelvic CT findings in senior patients presenting to the emergency department. Emerg Radiol 23, 111–115 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-015-1362-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-015-1362-1

Keywords

Navigation