Abstract
Many radiology departments are unwilling to perform studies that require contrast administration to adult emergency department patients over the age of 35 without having a documented serum creatinine concentration of less than 2.0 mg/dl within a week of the study. Significant diagnostic delays may ensue waiting for this serum test. The present study was performed to determine whether a negative urine protein test, obtained by dip testing, will serve as a marker for a serum creatinine concentration below 2.0 mg/dl in emergency department patients who give no history of a disease which potentially could cause renal insufficiency. Emergency patients aged 35 years or more presenting to a university hospital who did not volunteer a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, multiple myeloma, or systemic lupus erythematosus in triage were enrolled. Only patients with a negative urine protein test whose serum creatinine was tested for other reasons were included. Of the 310 patients who had no protein in their urine and no history of disease which potentially could cause renal insufficiency, none had a serum creatinine concentration greater than 2.0 mg/dl (mean=0.82 mg/dl, SD 0.28). Ages ranged from 35 to 96 years (mean=59.7 years, SD=17.5). All patients would have qualified for a contrast load for contrast computed tomography studies or for intravenous pyelogram. In patients who do not have a known history of hypertension, multiple myeloma, systemic lupus erythematosus, diabetes mellitus, or specific renal disease, urine dip testing for protein in the emergency department may be a rapid and safe screen for imaging studies requiring contrast without having to await serum creatinine testing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee JK, Warshauer DM, Bush WE et al (1995) Determination of serum creatinine level before intravenous administration of iodinated contrast medium. A survey. Invest Radiol 30:700–705
Olsen JC, Salomon B (1996) Utility of the creatinine prior to intravenous contrast studies in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 14:543–546
Cochran S (1997) Determination of serum creatinine level prior to administration of radiographic contrast media [letter]. JAMA 277:517–518
Safadi R, Dranitzki-Elhalel M, Popovtzer M, et al (1996) Metformin-induced lactic acidosis associated with acute renal failure. Am J Nephrol 16:520–522
Hou SH, Bushinsky DA, Wish JB, et al (1983) Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency: a prospective study. Am J Med 74:243–248
Choyke PL, Cady J, DePollar SL, Austin H (1998) Determination of serum creatinine prior to lodinated contrast media: is it necessary in all patients? Tech Urol 4:65–69
Mehra MR, Sharif K, Bode FR (1992) Radiocontrast-induced nephropathy. Prevention is better than cure. Postgrad Med 92:215–223
Cochran ST, Wong WS, Roe DJ (1983) Predicting angiography-induced acute renal function impairment: clinical risk model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 141:1027–1033
Stevens MA, McCullough PA, Tobin KF et al (1999) A prospective randomized trial of prevention measures in patients at high risk for contrast nephropathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:403–411
Van Zee BE, Hoy WE, Talley TE, Jaenike JR (1978) Renal injury associated with intravenous pyelography in nondiabetic and diabetic patients. Ann Intern Med 89:51–54
Byrd L, Sherman RL (1979) Radiocontrast-induced acute renal failure: a clinical and pathophysiologic review. Medicine 58:270–279
Eisenberg RL, Bank WO, Hedgock MW (1981) Renal failure after major angiography can be avoided by hydration. AJR Am J Roentgenol 136:859–861
Harkonen 5, Kjellstrand CM (1982) Exacerbation of diabetic renal failure following intravenous pyelography. Am J Med 72:719–725
D’Elia JA, Gleason RE, Alday M et al (1982) Nephrotoxicity from angiographic contrast material: a prospective study. Am J Med 72:719–725
Salamon R (1998) Radiocontrast-induced nephropathy. Semin Nephrol 6:551–557
Lautin EM, Freeman NJ, Schoenfeld AH (1991) Radiocontrast-associated renal dysfunction: a comparison of lower-osmolality and conventional high-osmolality contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol 157:59–65
Moore RD, Steinberg EP, Powe NR et al (1992) Nephrotoxicity of high-osmolality versus low-osmolality contrast media: randomized clinical trial. Radiology 182:649–655
Thomsen HS, Dorph 5, Larsen 5, et al (1994) Urine profiles and kidney histology after intravenous injection of ionic and nonionic radiologic and magnetic resonance contrast media in normal rats. Acad Radiol 1:128–135
Rudnick MR, Berns JS, Cohen RM, Goldfarb S (1997) Contrast media-associated nephrotoxicity. Semin Nephrol 17:15–26
Fontanarosa PB (1988) Radiologic contrast-induced renal failure. Emerg Med Clin North Am 6:601–616
Mehra MR, Sharif K, Bode FR (1992) Radiocontrast nephropathy: prevention is better than cure. Postgrad Med 92:215–223
Parfrey PS, Griffiths SM, Barrett BJ, et al (1989) Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both: a prospective controlled study. N Engl J Med 320:143–149
Barrett BJ, Carlisle EJ (1993) Meta-analysis of the relative nephrotoxicity of high and low-osmolarity iodinated contrast media. Radiology 188:171–178
McCarthy CS and Becker JA (1992) Multiple myeloma and contrast media. Radiology 183:519–521
Cigarroa RG, Lange PA, Williams RH et al (1989) Dosing of contrast material to prevent contrast nephropathy in patients with renal disease. Am J Med 86:649–652
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glauser, J., Montgomery, A. Urine protein as a rapid screen for renal function in the ED: can it replace serum creatinine in selected patients?. Emergency Radiology 10, 319–322 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-004-0349-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-004-0349-0