Abstract
A fundamental challenge is to understand and navigate trade-offs between ecosystem services (ES) in dynamic landscapes and to account for interactions between local people and broad-scale drivers, such as agricultural intensification. Many analyses of ES trade-offs rely on static mapping and biophysical indicators while disregarding the multiple uses, values, and desires for ES (UVD-ES) that local people associate with their changing landscapes. Here, a participatory UVD-ES framework was applied to assess differences in the use, values, and desire of ES between three zones with different land-use intensities (with pre-frontier, frontier, and post-frontier landscapes) in West Kalimantan (Indonesia). The analysis revealed that (1) almost the full suite of ES uses has become destabilized as a result of agricultural intensification; (2) ES more closely associated with agricultural intensification were largely desired by local people yet they still valued a diversity of traditional ES, such as those derived from the provision of non-timber forest products, fish, and other ES associated with non-material aspects including those tied to traditional culture; (3) the mismatch in used ES versus valued ES increased with agricultural intensification due to a decrease in the flow of non-timber forest products, aquatic, regulating, and non-material (cultural) ES. Together, exploring UVD-ES patterns in a participatory way helped to reveal locally relevant social-ecological drivers of ES and a multidimensional perspective of ES trade-offs. Our UVD-ES framework offers an opportunity to foster participation as a way to reconnect global environmental research agendas with local and regional landscape contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Contact the corresponding author concerning data availability.
References
Albizua A, Pascual U, Corbera E (2019) Large scale irrigation impacts socio-cultural values of agroecosystems: an example from Navarre. Ecol Econ 159(2019):354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.017
Armitage DR, Plummer R, Berkes F, Arthur RI, Charles AT et al (2009) Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity. Front Ecol Environ 7(2):95–102. https://doi.org/10.1890/070089
Aryal K, Maraseni T, Apan A (2022) How much do we know about trade-offs in ecosystem services? A systematic review of empirical research observations. Sci Total Environ 806:151229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151229
Austin KG, Mosnier A, Pirker J, McCallum I, Fritz S et al (2017) Shifting patterns of oil palm driven deforestation in Indonesia and implications for zero-deforestation commitments. Land Use Policy 69:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.036
Baudron F, Chavarría JYD, Remans R, Yang K, Sunderland T (2017) Indirect contributions of forests to dietary diversity in Southern Ethiopia. Ecol Soc 22(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09267-220228
Bennett EM (2017) Changing the agriculture and environment conversation. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-016-0018
Bernués A, Alfnes F, Clemetsen M, Eik LO, Faccioni G et al (2019) Exploring social preferences for ecosystem services of multifunctional agriculture across policy scenarios. Ecosyst Serv 39:101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101002
Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D, Bohensky EL, BurnSilver S et al (2012) Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu Rev Environ and Resou 37:421–448. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
Bodin Ö, Alexander SM, Baggio J, Barnes ML, Berardo R et al (2019) Improving network approaches to the study of complex social–ecological interdependencies. Nat Sustain 2(7):551–559. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0308-0
Brown GG, Reed P (2012) Social landscape metrics: measures for understanding place values from public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS). Landsc Res 37(1):73–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2011.591487
Brown G, Fagerholm N (2015) Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: a review and evaluation. Ecosyst Serv 13:119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007
Brown G, Reed P, Raymond CM (2020) Mapping place values: 10 lessons from two decades of public participation GIS empirical research. Appl Geogr 116:102–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102156
Burkhard B, Kandziora M, Hou Y, Müller F (2014) Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landscape online 34:1–32. https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.201434
Chan KM, Boyd DR, Gould RK, Jetzkowitz J, Liu J et al (2020) Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability. People Nat 2(3):693–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10124
Comte I, Colin F, Whalen JK, Grünberger O, Caliman JP (2012) Agricultural practices in oil palm plantations and their impact on hydrological changes, nutrient fluxes and water quality in Indonesia: a review. Advances in Agronomy 116:71–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394277-7.00003-8
Cord AF, Bartkowski B, Beckmann M, Dittrich A, Hermans-Neumann K et al (2017) Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead. Ecosyst Serv 28:264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.012
Costanza R, De Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti L, Sutton P, Grasso M (2017) Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv 28:1–16
Dade MC, Mitchell MG, McAlpine CA, Rhodes JR (2019) Assessing ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: the need for a more mechanistic approach. Ambio 48(10):1116–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1127-7
Dawson NM, Grogan K, Martin A, Mertz O, Pasgaard M (2017) Environmental justice research shows the importance of social feedbacks in ecosystem service trade-offs. Ecol Soc 22(3):13. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09481-220312
Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT et al (2018) Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359(6373):270–272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826
Díaz S, Settele J, Brondízio ES, Ngo HT, Agard J (2019) Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366(6471). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100
Dislich C, Keyel AC, Salecker J, Kisel Y, Meyer KM et al (2017) A review of the ecosystem functions in oil palm plantations, using forests as a reference system. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 92(3):1539–1569. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12295
Ellis EC, Pascual U, Mertz O (2019) Ecosystem services and nature’s contribution to people: negotiating diverse values and trade-offs in land systems. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 38:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.001
Fischer AP (2018) Forest landscapes as social-ecological systems and implications for management. Landsc Urban Plan 177:138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.001
Fischer A, Eastwood A (2016) Coproduction of ecosystem services as human–nature interactions—an analytical framework. Land Use Policy 52:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.004
Fitzherbert EB, Struebig MJ, Morel A, Danielsen F, Brühl CA et al (2008) How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends Ecol Evol 23(10):538–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.012
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772
Friant SR, Ayambem WA, Obaji AA, Ifebueme NM, Okoi OM et al (2019) Life on the rainforest edge is associated with improved food security in the agriculture-forest frontier of Cross River State, Nigeria. Front Sustain Food Syst 3:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00113
García-Llorente M, Castro JA, Quintas-Soriano C, Oteros-Rozas E, Iniesta-Arandia I et al (2020) Local perceptions of ecosystem services across multiple ecosystem types in Spain. Land 9(9):330. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090330
Gaveau DL, Locatelli B, Salim MA, Yaen H, Pacheco P et al (2018) Rise and fall of forest loss and industrial plantations in Borneo (2000–2017). Conserv Lett 12(3):e12622. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12622
Gergel SE, Powell B, Baudron F, Wood SLR, Rhemtulla JM et al (2020) Conceptual links between landscape diversity and diet diversity: a roadmap for transdisciplinary research. BioSci 70(7):563–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa048
Grass I, Loos J, Baensch S, Batáry P, Librán-Embid F et al (2019) Land-sharing/-sparing connectivity landscapes for ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation. People Nat 1(2):262–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.21
Guibrunet L, Gerritsen PRW, Sierra-Huelsz JA, Flores-Díaz AC, García-Frapolli E et al (2021) Beyond participation: how to achieve the recognition of local communities’ value-systems in conservation? Some insights from Mexico. People Nat 3(2):528–541. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10203
Hejnowicz AP, Rudd MA (2017) The value landscape in ecosystem services: value, value wherefore art thou value? Sustain 9(5):850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050850
Ickowitz A, Powell B, Rowland D, Jones A, Sunderland TCH (2019) Agricultural intensification, dietary diversity, and markets in the global food security narrative. Glob Food Sec 20:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.11.002
Jaligot R, Chenal J, Bosch M (2019) Assessing spatial temporal patterns of ecosystem services in Switzerland. Landsc Ecol 34(6):1379–1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00850-7
Jiren TS, Dorresteijn I, Schultner J, Fischer J (2018) The governance of land use strategies: institutional and social dimensions of land sparing and land sharing. Conserv lett 11(3):e12429. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12429
Jiren T, Hanspach J, Schultner J, Fischer J, Bergsten A et al. (2020) Reconciling food security and biodiversity conservation: participatory scenario planning in southwestern Ethiopia. Ecol Soc 25(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11681-250324
Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113(2):363–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x
Kenter JO, Hyde T, Christie M, Fazey I (2011) The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries—evidence from the Solomon Islands. Glob Environ Change 21(2):505–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.001
Kenter JO (2016) Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 21:291–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.010
Koffi CK, Djoudi H, Gautier D (2016) Landscape diversity and associated coping strategies during food shortage periods: evidence from the Sudano-Sahelian region of Burkina Faso. Reg Environ Change 17:1369–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0945-z
Kropp I, Nejadhashemi AP, Deb K, Abouali M, Roy PC et al (2019) A multi-objective approach to water and nutrient efficiency for sustainable agricultural intensification. Agric Syst 173:289–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.014
Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A et al (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environ Change 11(4):261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3
Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2010) Land use transitions: socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy 27(2):108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.003
Laumonier Y, Setiabudi, Hadi D (2013) Kapuas Hulu land cover maps 1:50,000. Bogor, Indonesia: the French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development–Center for International Forestry Research. Accessible from https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/dataset/0202
Lee H, Lautenbach S (2016) A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 66:340–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.004
Leonald L, Rowland D (2016) Drivers and effects of agrarian change in Kapuas Hulu Regency, West Kalimantan, Indonesia In E.L. Deakin, M. Kshatriya, T.C.H. Sunderland (eds.). Agrarian change in tropical landscapes: 91-138. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
Lliso B, Mariel P, Pascual U, Engel S (2020) Increasing the credibility and salience of valuation through deliberation: lessons from the Global South. Glob Environ Change 62:102065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102065
MA [Millennium Assessment] (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being (Vol. 5). Island Press, Washington, DC, p 563
Manning P, Van Der Plas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT et al (2018) Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol 2(3):427–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7
Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I et al (2012) Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS one 7(6):e38970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038970
Mathys AS, Van Vianen J, Rowland D, Narulita S, Palomo I et al (2023) Participatory mapping of ecosystem services across a gradient of agricultural intensification in West Kalimantan. Indonesia. Ecosyst People 19(1):2174685. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2023.2174685
Meyfroidt P, Chowdhury RR, de Bremond A, Ellis EC, Erb KH et al (2018) Middle-range theories of land system change. Glob Environ Change 53:52–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.006
Meyfroidt P, de Bremond A, Ryan CM, Archer E, Aspinall R et al (2022) Ten facts about land systems for sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119(7):e2109217118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109217118
Mitchell MG, Devisscher T (2022) Strong relationships between urbanization, landscape structure, and ecosystem service multifunctionality in urban forest fragments. Landsc Urban Plan 228:104548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104548
Muhamad D, Okubo S, Harashina K, Gunawan B, Takeuchi K (2014) Living close to forests enhances people’s perception of ecosystem services in a forest–agricultural landscape of West Java, Indonesia. Ecosyst Serv 8:197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.003
Nyström M, Jouffray JB, Norström AV, Crona B, Jørgensen PS et al (2019) Anatomy and resilience of the global production ecosystem. Nature 575(7781):98–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1712-3
Olander LP, Johnston RJ, Tallis H, Kagan J, Maguire LA et al (2018) Benefit relevant indicators: ecosystem services measures that link ecological and social outcomes. Ecol Indic 85:1262–1272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.001
Palomo I, Martín-López B, Potschin M, Haines-Young R, Montes C (2013) National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosyst Serv 4:104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001
Palomo I, Felipe-Lucia MR, Bennett EM, Martín-López B, Pascual U (2016) Disentangling the pathways and effects of ecosystem service co-production. In: Advances in Ecological Research 54:245-283. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.003
Pascual U, Balvanera P, Díaz S, Pataki G, Roth E et al (2017) The value of nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 26–27:7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
Pascual U, Adams WA, Díaz S, Lele S, Mace G (2021) Biodiversity and the challenge of pluralism. Nat Sustain. 4:567–572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00694-7
Pascual U, McElwee PD, Diamond SE, Ngo HT, Bai X et al. (2022a) Governing for transformative change across the biodiversity-climate-society nexus. BioSci. 72. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac031
Pascual U, Balvanera P, Christie M, Baptiste B, González-Jiménez D et al (2022b) IPBES secretariat, Bonn Germany. Summary for policymakers of the methodological assessment of the diverse values and valuation of nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6522392
Paudyal K, Baral H, Burkhard B, Bhandari SP, Keenan RJ (2015) Participatory assessment and mapping of ecosystem services in a data-poor region: case study of community-managed forests in central Nepal. Ecosyst Serv 13:81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.007
Phalan B, Onial M, Balmford A, Green RE (2011) Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333(6047):1289–1291. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1208742
Power AG (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365(1554):2959–2971. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
Pramudya EP, Hospes O, Termeer CJAM (2017) Governing the palm-oil sector through finance: the changing roles of the Indonesian State. Bull Ind Econ Stud 53(1):57–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2016.1228829
Qiu J, Carpenter SR, Booth EG, Motew M, Zipper SC et al (2018) Scenarios reveal pathways to sustain future ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecol Appl 28(1):119–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1633
Rasmussen LV, Coolsaet B, Martin A, Mertz O, Pascual U et al (2018) Social-ecological outcomes of agricultural intensification. Nat Sust 1(6):275. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0070-8
Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(11):5242–5247. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907284107
Renard D, Rhemtulla JM, Bennett EM (2015) Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(43):13411–13416. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502565112
Renard D, Tilman D (2019) National food production stabilized by crop diversity. Nature 571(7764):257–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1316-y
Reyers B, Selig ER (2020) Global targets that reveal the social–ecological interdependencies of sustainable development. Nat Ecol Evol 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1230-6
Rieb JT, Bennett, EM (2020) Landscape structure as a mediator of ecosystem service interactions. Landsc Ecol 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01117-2
Rockström J, Williams J, Daily G, Noble A, Matthews N et al (2017) Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio 46(1):4–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0793-6
Rudel TK, Defries R, Asner GP, Laurance WF (2009) Changing drivers of deforestation and new opportunities for conservation. Conserv Biol 23:1396–1405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01332.x
Schirpke U, Candiago S, Vigl LE, Jäger H, Labadini A et al (2019) Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 651:928–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.235
Selomane O, Reyers B, Biggs R, Hamann M (2019) Harnessing insights from social-ecological systems research for monitoring sustainable development. Sustain 11(4):1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041190
Sharma SK, Baral H, Laumonier Y, Okarda B, Komarudin H et al (2019) Ecosystem services under future oil palm expansion scenarios in West Kalimantan Indonesia. Ecosyst Serv 39:100978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100978
Spake R, Lasseur R, Crouzat E, Bullock JM, Lavorel S et al (2017) Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services. Glob Environ Change 47:37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004
Spangenberg JH, Görg C, Truong DT, Tekken V, Bustamante JV (2014) Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 10(1):40–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2014.884166
Sunderland T, Abdoulaye R, Ahammad R, Asaha S, Baudron F et al. (2017) A methodological approach for assessing cross-site landscape change: understanding socio-ecological systems. For Policy Econ 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.013
Sutherland IJ, Bennett EM, Gergel SE (2016) Recovery trends for multiple ecosystem services reveal non-linear responses and long-term tradeoffs from temperate forest harvesting. For Ecol Manage 374:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.037
Sutherland IJ, Villamagna AM, Dallaire CO, Bennett EM, Chin AT et al (2018) Undervalued and under pressure: a plea for greater attention toward regulating ecosystem services. Ecol Indic 94:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.047
Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Bhagwat SA, Buchori D, Faust H et al (2011) Multifunctional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes–a review. J Appl Ecol 48(3):619–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01939.x
Verburg PH, Alexander P, Evans T, Magliocca NR, Malek Z et al (2019) Beyond land cover change: towards a new generation of land use models. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 38:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.consust.2019.05.002
Walker BH, Carpenter SR, Rockstrom J, Crépin AS, Peterson GD (2012). Drivers, ‘slow’ variables, ‘fast’ variables, shocks, and resilience. Ecol Soc 17(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05063-170330
Watson SC, Newton AC, Ridding LE, Evans PM, Brand S et al (2021) Does agricultural intensification cause tipping points in ecosystem services? Landsc Ecol 36(12):3473–3491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01321-8
Wei H, Fan W, Wang X, Lu N, Dong X et al (2017) Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: A review. Ecosyst Serv 25:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.017
Winkler KJ, Dade MC, Rieb JT (2021) Mismatches in the ecosystem services literature—a review of spatial, temporal, and functional-conceptual mismatches. Current Landscape Ecology Reports 6:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-021-00063-2
Wolff S, Schulp CJE, Verburg PH (2015) Mapping ecosystem services demand: a review of current research and future perspectives. Ecol Indic 55:159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016
Yang YE, Passarelli S, Lovell RJ, Ringler C (2018) Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: a systematic review. Ecosyst Serv 31:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.015
Yuliani E, de Jong E, Knippenberg L, Bakara D, Salim M et al. (2018) Keeping the land: indigenous communities’ struggle over land use and sustainable forest management in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Ecol Soc 23(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10640-230449
Yuliani EL, De Groot WT, Knippenberg L, Bakara DO (2020) Forest or oil palm plantation? Interpretation of local responses to the oil palm promises in Kalimantan Indonesia. Land Use Policy 96:104616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104616
Zaehringer JG, Llopis JC, Latthachack P, Thein TT, Heinimann A (2018) A novel participatory and remote-sensing-based approach to mapping annual land use change on forest frontiers in Laos, Myanmar, and Madagascar. J Land Use Sci 13(1–2):16–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2018.1447033
Zafra-Calvo N, Balvanera P, Pascual U, Merçon J, Martín-López B (2020) Plural valuation of nature for equity and sustainability: insights from the Global South. Glob Environ Change 63:102115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102115
Zimmerer KS (2013) The compatibility of agricultural intensification in a global hotspot of smallholder agrobiodiversity (Bolivia). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(8):2769–2774. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216294110
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. New York: springer. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v032.b01
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Tomscha, A. Ickowitz, and Y. Laumonier for their comments, L. Leonald for fieldwork contributions, several anonymous reviewers for their constructive reviews, and Jaqueline Loos for editorial suggestions. This work is part of CGIAR Research on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry. We are indebted to workshop participants from Kapuas Hulu.
Funding
Research funding was provided by USAID’s Biodiversity Fund, UK Department for International Development (DfID), Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under BC3 “Unit of excellence” (MIMECO, MDM-2017-0714) and IJCI-2016-28475, and a Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Jacqueline Loos
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sutherland, I.J., Van Vianen, J., Rowland, D. et al. Use, value, and desire: ecosystem services under agricultural intensification in a changing landscape in West Kalimantan (Indonesia). Reg Environ Change 23, 148 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02134-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02134-y