Abstract
Many climate change adaptation scholars recognise the complexities in the governance of adaptation. Most have used the concept of ‘barriers to adaptation’ in an attempt to describe why governance of adaptation is challenging. However, these studies have recently been critiqued for over simplifying complex governance processes by referring to the static concept of barriers, thereby ignoring dynamic complexity as a root explanatory cause. This paper builds the argument that how barriers are currently used in the literature is insufficient to explain why the governance of adaptation often proves difficult. We adopt a so-called mechanism-based approach to investigate how and why the governance of ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) reaches impasses in five cases in Thailand and the Netherlands. Our findings show six causal mechanisms that explain impasses in the five case studies: (1) frame polarisation, (2) timing synchronisation, (3) risk innovation, (4) rules of the game, (5) veto players and (6) lost in translation. Several of these causal mechanisms are recurring and emerge under specific contextual conditions or are activated by other mechanisms. Our findings provide valuable insights into the impasses in the governance of EbA and allow for critical reflections on the analytical value of the mechanism-based approach in explaining why the governance of adaptation proves difficult and how this can be overcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams BE (2016) Assessing the merits of decentralization: a framework for identifying the causal mechanisms influencing policy outcomes. Polit Policy 44:820–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12172
Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE, Eds.. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK 717–743
Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni, I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wredford A (2009a) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Chang 93:335–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O'Brien KL (2009b) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596667
Anckar C (2008) On the applicability of the most similar systems design and the most different systems design in comparative research. Int J Soc Res Methodol 11:389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401552
Arcadis (2004) Reactienota De Doorbraak. Voorontwerp Bestemmingsplan. Artikel 19 Lid 1: Ontwerpbesluit WRD. Waterschap Regge en Dinkel, Provincie Overijssel, Gemeente Almelo, Wierden, Tubbergen. http://www.dedoorbraak.info/publicaties/ Accessed on 18 April 2016
Beach D, Pedersen RB (2013) Process-tracing methods: foundations and guidelines. University of Michigan Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2556282
Bennett A, George AL (1997) Process tracing in case study research. MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Case Study Methods. Harvard University. https://www.uzh.ch/cmsssl/suz/dam/jcr:00000000-5103-bee3-0000-000059b16b9d/05.19.bennett_george.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2016
Bennett A, George AL (2005) Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Biesbroek GR, Klostermann JE, Termeer CJ, Kabat P (2013) On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Reg Environ Chang 13:1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0421-y
Biesbroek GR, Termeer CJ, Klostermann JE, Kabat P (2014) Rethinking barriers to adaptation: mechanism-based explanation of impasses in the governance of an innovative adaptation measure. Glob Environ Chang 26:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.004
Biesbroek GR, Dupuis J, Jordan A, Wellstead A, Howlett M, Cairney P, Rayner R, Davidson D (2015) Opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making. Nat Clim Chang 5:493–494. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2615
Biesbroek GR, Dupuis J, Wellstead A (2017) Explaining through causal mechanisms. Resilience and governance of social–ecological systems. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 28:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.08.007
Board of Investment (2012) Master Plan on Water Resources Management. Strategic Committee for Water Resource Management, Office of the Strategic Committee for Water Resource Management, Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. http://www.boi.go.th/upload/water_flood_th_master_0212_eng_98335.pdf. Accessed 03 March 2018
Bressers JTH, Hanegraaff SM, Lulofs KRD (2008) Space for water in physical planning: constructing an inhabited retention area and a new river. CSTM Studies and Reports: 340. Newcastle, UK: ISBP
Brink E, Aalders T, Ádám D, Feller R, Henselek Y, Hoffmann A, Ibe K, Matthey-Doret A, Meyer M, Negrut NL Rau AL, Riewerts B, von SL, Törnros S, von WH, Abson DJ, Wamsler C (2016) Cascades of green: a review of ecosystem-based adaptation in urban areas. Glob Environ Chang 36:111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.003
Cashmore M, Wejs A (2014) Constructing legitimacy for climate change planning: a study of local government in Denmark. Glob Environ Chang 24:203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.019
Collier D (2011) Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics 44(04):823–830. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429
Craver C, Tabery J (2016) Mechanisms in science. The Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/science-mechanisms/. Accessed 11 Dec 2016
Deltares (2015) Public wiki: Achteroever Wieringermeer: Climate and Water. https://publicwiki.deltares.nl/display/CAW/Achteroever+Wieringermeer. Accessed on 03.07.2016
DesAutels L (2011) Against regular and irregular characterizations of mechanisms. Philos Sci 78:914–925. https://doi.org/10.1086/592821
Dewulf A, Bouwen R (2012) Issue framing in conversations for change: discursive interaction strategies for “doing differences”. J Appl Behav Sci 48:168–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886312438858
Dow K, Berkhout F, Preston BL, Klein RJT, Midgely G, Shaw MR (2013) Limits to adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 3:305–307. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1847
Dupuis J (2014) L’intégration de l’adaptation au changement climatique dans la conduite des politiques publiques: déficit de mise en oeuvre ou déficit de légitimité? Dissertation, Idheap, Faculté de droit, des sciences criminelles et d'administration publique. Université de, Lausanne
van Eeten MJG (1999) ‘Dialogues of the deaf’ on science in policy controversies. Sci Public Policy 26:185–192. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782491
Eisenack K, Moser SC, Hoffmann E, Klein RJT, Oberlack C, Pechan A, Rotter, M, Temeer CJAM (2014) Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 4:867–872. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2350
Falleti TG, Lynch JF (2009) Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comp Polit Stud 42(9):1143–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331724
Goldstone JA (1991) Revolution and rebellion in the early modern world. University of California Press: 600. London, UK
Hajer M (2003) Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sci 36:175–195. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834510939
Hecht SS (2002) Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: chemical mechanisms and approaches to prevention. Lancet Oncol 3:461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(02)00815-X
Hedstrom P, Swedberg R (1998) Social mechanisms: an introductory essay. Social mechanisms: an analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hinterleitner M (2017) Policy failures, blame games and changes to policy practice. J Public Policy:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X16000283
Jones HP, Hole DG, Zavaleta ES (2012) Harnessing nature to help people adapt to climate change. Nat Clim Chang 2:504–509. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1463
Kay A, Baker P (2015) What can causal process tracing offer to policy studies? A review of the literature. Policy Study J 43:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12092
Klein RJT, GF, Midgley BL, Preston M, Alam FGH, Berkhout K, Dow MR Shaw, (2014) Adaptation opportunities, constraints, and limits. In: Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL, (eds.) Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 899–943
Klijn EH (2003) Does interactive decision making work? Expanding Rotterdam Port. In: Denters B, van Heffen O, Huisman J, Klok PJ (eds) The rise of interactive governance and quasi-markets. Library of public policy and public administration, Vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht
Klijn EH, Koppenjan JF (2000) Public management and policy networks: foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Manag: Int J Res Theory 2:135–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030000000007
Klijn EH, Koppenjan JF (2014) Complexity in governance network theory. Complexity, Governance & Networks 1:61–70. https://doi.org/10.7564/14-CGN8
Klijn EH, Koppenjan J (2015) Governance networks in the public sector. Routledge, Oxford
Klijn EH, Koppenjan J (2016) The impact of contract characteristics on the performance of public–private partnerships (PPPs). Public Money Manag 36:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1206756
Koppenjan JFM, Klijn E-H (2004) Managing uncertainties in networks: a network approach to problem solving and decision making. Routledge, London
Lukasiewicz A, Pittock J, Finlayson M (2016) Institutional challenges of adopting ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change. Reg Environ Chang 16:487–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0765-6
Martin A (2010) Emergent politics and the power of ideas. Stud Emergent Order 3:212–245 http://docs.sieo.org/SIEO_3_2010_Martin.pdf. Accessed on 3 January 2017
Mees HL, Driessen PP, Runhaar HA (2012) Exploring the scope of public and private responsibilities for climate adaptation. J Environ Policy Plann 14:305–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2012.707407
Mercier J (2006) American hesitations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions: an institutional interpretation. Int Rev Adm Sci 72:101–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852306061629
Merton RK (1967) On theoretical sociology: five essays, old and new. Free Press, New York
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:22026–22031. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007887107
Munksgaard KB, Evald MR, Clarke AH, Nielsen SL (2012) Open innovation in public-private partnerships? Ledelse & Erhvervs økonomi 77(2):41–51
Naumann S, Anzaldua G, Berry P, Burch S, Davis M, Frelih-Larsen A, Gerdes H and Sanders M (2011) Assessment of the potential of ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation and mitigation in Europe. Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment
Pawson R, Tilley N (2009) Realist evaluation. Sage Publications Ltd, London, UK
Renn O (2008) Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan, London
Sebesvari Z, Rodrigues S, Renaud F (2017) Mainstreaming ecosystem-based climate change adaptation into integrated water resources management in the Mekong region. Reg Environ Chang 17(7):1907–1920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1161-1
Simões E, de Sousa Junior WC, de Freitas DM, Mills M, Iwama A, Gonçalves I, Olivato D, Fidelman P (2017) Barriers and opportunities for adapting to climate change on the north coast of São Paulo, Brazil. Reg Environ Chang 17(6):1739–1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1133-5
Spires M, Shakleton S, Cundill G (2014) Barriers to implementing planned community-based adaptation in developing countries: a systematic literature review. Climate Dev 6(3):277–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2014.886995
Swart R, Biesbroek R, Lourenço TC (2014) Science of adaptation to climate change and science for adaptation. Front Environ Sci 2:29. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00029
Termeer C, Dewulf A, Breeman G (2013) Governance of wicked climate adaptation problems. Climate Change Governance 27–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29831-8_3
Tielrooij F (2000) Waterbeleid voor de 21e eeuw: Geef water de ruimte en de aandacht die het verdient (Water management in the 21th century). Commissie Waterbeheer 21e Eeuw. The Hague, The Netherlands
Torfing J, Peters BG, Pierre J, Sørensen E (2013) Interactive governance: advancing the paradigm public administration. Oxford University Press, New York, p 284
Tullock G (1965) The politics of bureaucracy. Washington, D.C. Public Affairs Press, Washington
Wellstead A, Rayner J, Howlett M (2014) Beyond the black box: forest sector vulnerability assessments and adaptation to climate change in North America. Environ Sci Pol 35:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.04.002
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all interviewees that contributed to this study. Further, we thank Erik van Slobbe and two anonymous reviewers for their diligent work and suggestions to earlier versions of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editor: Jamie Pittock
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sieber, I.M., Biesbroek, R. & de Block, D. Mechanism-based explanations of impasses in the governance of ecosystem-based adaptation. Reg Environ Change 18, 2379–2390 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1347-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1347-1