Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Efficacy of different treatments of root canal walls on the pull-out bond strength of the fiber posts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different irrigation protocols, including laser, on the retention of the fiber-reinforced composite posts to root canal dentinal walls using pull-out tests. Root canals of 60 single-rooted human teeth were filled and post spaces were prepared. Finally, specimens were divided randomly into five groups, each consisting of 12 specimens as follows: 5 % NaOCl (control group), 17 % EDTA, ultrasonic with 17 % EDTA, single 1.5-W Er:YAG laser application, and the combined use of Er:YAG laser and 17 % EDTA. After the root canal procedures, fiber posts were cemented to the root canal. Pull-out tests were performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. The data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test (p = 0.05). Irradiation by the Er:YAG laser with/without EDTA positively affected the pull-out bond strength (p < 0.001). The pull-out strength was significantly higher in the ultrasonic group than that of the single irrigation with NaOCl or EDTA (p < 0.001). Er:YAG laser irradiation with/without EDTA enhanced the bond strength of fiber posts to root canal dentin walls. Additionally, ultrasonic-EDTA combination increased the bond strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goracci C, Ferrari M (2011) Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J 56(Suppl 1):77–83. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01298.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chuang SF, Yaman P, Herrero A, Dennison JB, Chang CH (2010) Influence of post material and length on endodontically treated incisors: an in vitro and finite element study. J Prosthet Dent 104:379–388. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60171-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chieruzzi M, Pagano S, Pennacchi M, Lombardo G, D’Errico P, Kenny JM (2012) Compressive and flexural behaviour of fibre reinforced endodontic posts. J Dent 40:968–978. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kedici SP, Aksut AA, Kilicarslan MA, Bayramoglu G, Gokdemir K (1998) Corrosion behaviour of dental metals and alloys in different media. J Oral Rehabil 25:800–808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baba NZ, Golden G, Goodacre CJ (2009) Nonmetallic prefabricated dowels: a review of compositions, properties, laboratory, and clinical test results. J Prosthodont 18:527–536. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00464.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonfante EA, Pegoraro LF, de Goes MF, Carvalho RM (2008) SEM observation of the bond integrity of fiber-reinforced composite posts cemented into root canals. Dent Mater 24:483–491. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M (2002) Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 18:596–602. doi:10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00003-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR (2001) Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 14:58–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gu XH, Mao CY, Kern M (2009) Effect of different irrigation on smear layer removal after post space preparation. J Endod 35:583–586. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Serafino C, Gallina G, Cumbo E, Ferrari M (2004) Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97:381–387. doi:10.1016/S1079210403006061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cecchin D, de Almeida JF, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC (2011) Influence of chlorhexidine and ethanol on the bond strength and durability of the adhesion of the fiber posts to root dentin using a total etching adhesive system. J Endod 37:1310–1315. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cecchin D, de Almeida JF, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC (2011) Effect of chlorhexidine and ethanol on the durability of the adhesion of the fiber post relined with resin composite to the root canal. J Endod 37:678–683. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohammadi N, Savadi Oskoee S, Abed Kahnamoui M, Bahari M, Kimyai S, Rikhtegaran S (2013) Effect of Er, Cr:YSGG pretreatment on bond strength of fiber posts to root canal dentin using a self-adhesive resin cement. Lasers Med Sci 28:65–69. doi:10.1007/s10103-012-1063-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagase DY, de Freitas PM, Morimoto S, Oda M, Vieira GF (2011) Influence of laser irradiation on fiber post retention. Lasers Med Sci 26:377–380. doi:10.1007/s10103-010-0861-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paghdiwala AF (1991) Does the laser work on hard dental tissue? J Am Dent Assoc 122:79–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Armengol V, Jean A, Rohanizadeh R, Hamel H (1999) Scanning electron microscopic analysis of diseased and healthy dental hard tissues after Er:YAG laser irradiation: in vitro study. J Endod 25:543–546. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80376-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brugnera A Jr, Zanin F, Barbin EL, Spano JC, Santana R, Pecora JD (2003) Effects of Er:YAG and Nd:YAG laser irradiation on radicular dentine permeability using different irrigating solutions. Lasers Surg Med 33:256–259. doi:10.1002/lsm.10214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kivanc BH, Ulusoy OI, Gorgul G (2008) Effects of Er:YAG laser and Nd:YAG laser treatment on the root canal dentin of human teeth: a SEM study. Lasers Med Sci 23:247–252. doi:10.1007/s10103-007-0474-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW (2004) Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 30:289–301. doi:10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Glazer B (2000) Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts—a prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 66:613–618

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F (2000) Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 13:15B–18B

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ebert J, Leyer A, Gunther O, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R et al (2011) Bond strength of adhesive cements to root canal dentin tested with a novel pull-out approach. J Endod 37:1558–1561. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lotfi M, Vosoughhosseini S, Saghiri MA, Zand V, Ranjkesh B, Ghasemi N (2012) Effect of MTAD as a final rinse on removal of smear layer in ten-minute preparation time. J Endod 38:1391–1394. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Violich DR, Chandler NP (2010) The smear layer in endodontics—a review. Int Endod J 43:2–15. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01627.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Keller U, Hibst R (1989) Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: II. Light microscopic and SEM investigations. Lasers Surg Med 9:345–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Burnett LH, Conceicao EN, Pelinos JE, Eduardo CD (2001) Comparative study of influence on tensile bond strength of a composite to dentin using Er : YAG laser, air abrasion, or air turbine for preparation of cavities. J Clin Laser Med Sur 19:199–202. doi:10.1089/104454701316918970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bitter K, Noetzel J, Volk C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM (2008) Bond strength of fiber posts after the application of erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser treatment and gaseous ozone to the root canal. J Endod 34:306–309. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2007.12.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Macedo VC, Faria e Silva AL, Martins LR (2010) Effect of cement type, relining procedure, and length of cementation on pull-out bond strength of fiber posts. J Endod 36:1543–1546. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. D’Arcangelo C, Cinelli M, De Angelis F, D’Amario M (2007) The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. J Prosthet Dent 98:193–198. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60055-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kremeier K, Fasen L, Klaiber B, Hofmann N (2008) Influence of endodontic post type (glass fiber, quartz fiber or gold) and luting material on push-out bond strength to dentin in vitro. Dent Mater 24:660–666. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ari H, Yasar E, Belli S (2003) Effects of NaOCl on bond strengths of resin cements to root canal dentin. J Endod 29:248–251. doi:10.1097/00004770-200304000-00004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A, Monticelli F, Raffaelli O, Cardoso PC et al (2004) The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 112:353–361. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00146.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank VOCO for obtaining the products used in this study.

Author disclosure statement

No conflicting financial interests exist.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endodontics, Dental Faculty, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, 35620, Turkey

    Hakan Arslan

  2. Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Faculty, Ataturk University, Erzurum, 25340, Turkey

    Cenk Burak Yılmaz

  3. Department of Endodontics, Dental Faculty, Ataturk University, Erzurum, 25340, Turkey

    Ertugrul Karatas & Kübra Yesildal Yeter

  4. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Faculty, Akdeniz University, Antalya, 07058, Turkey

    Cagatay Barutcigil

  5. Department of Endodontics, Dental Faculty, Erciyes University, Kayseri, 38039, Turkey

    Hüseyin Sinan Topcuoglu

Authors
  1. Hakan Arslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cenk Burak Yılmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ertugrul Karatas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cagatay Barutcigil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hüseyin Sinan Topcuoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kübra Yesildal Yeter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hakan Arslan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arslan, H., Yılmaz, C.B., Karatas, E. et al. Efficacy of different treatments of root canal walls on the pull-out bond strength of the fiber posts. Lasers Med Sci 30, 863–868 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1457-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1457-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation