Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Erbium, chromium:yttrium scandium gallium garnet laser for caries removal: influence on bonding of a self-etching adhesive system

  • Original article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of the dental substrates obtained after the use of different caries removal techniques on bonding of a self-etching system. Forty, extracted, carious, human molars were ground to expose flat surfaces containing caries-infected dentine surrounded by sound dentine. The caries lesions of the specimens were removed or not (control—G1) either by round steel burs and water-cooled, low speed, handpiece (G2), or by irradiation with an erbium, chromium:yttrium scandium gallium garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser (2W, 20 Hz, 35.38 J/cm2, fiber G4 handpiece with 0.2826 mm2, non-contact mode at a 2 mm distance, 70% air/20% water—G3) or using a chemo-mechanical method (Carisolv—G4). Caries-infected, caries-affected and sound dentines were submitted to a bonding system followed by construction of a resin-based composite crown. Hour-glass shaped samples were obtained and submitted to a micro-tensile bond test. The bond strength data were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA), complemented by Tukey’s test (P ≤ 0.05). The samples of sound dentine presented higher bond strengths than did samples of caries-affected dentine, except for the groups treated with the Er,Cr:YSGG laser. The highest bond strengths were observed with the sound dentine treated with burs and Carisolv. The bond strengths to caries-affected dentine were similar in all groups. Additionally, bonding to caries-affected dentine of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser and Carisolv groups was similar to bonding to caries-infected dentine. Thus, caries-affected dentine is not an adequate substrate for adhesion. Moreover, amongst the caries removal methods tested, the Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation was the poorest in providing a substrate for bonding with the tested self-etching system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fusayama T (1979) Two layers of carious dentin: diagnosis and treatment. Oper Dent 4:63–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ericson D, Zimmerman M, Raber H, Gotrick B, Bornstein R, Thorell J (1999) Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries. Caries Res 33:171–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Frentzen M, Koort HJ (1990) Lasers in dentistry: new possibilities with advancing laser technology? Int Dent J 40:323–332

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wigdor H, Abt E, Ashrafi S, Walsh JT Jr (1993) The effect of lasers on dental hard tissues. J Am Dent Assoc 124:65–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wigdor HA, Walsh JT, Featherstone JD, Visuri SR, Fried D, Waldvogel JL (1995) Lasers in dentistry. Lasers Surg Med 16:103–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rizoiu I, Kohanghadosh F, Kimmel AI, Eversole LR (1998) Pulpal thermal responses to an erbium, chromium:YSGG pulsed laser hydrokinetic system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 86:220–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hossain M, Kimura Y, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Kinoshita J, Matsumoto K (2001) A study on acquired acid resistance of enamel and dentin irradiated by Er,Cr:YSGG laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg 19:159–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Murakami Y, Matsumoto K (2002) Microleakage of composite resin restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation and etched bur cavities in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatric Dent 26:263–268

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eversole LR, Rizoiu I, Kimmel AI (1997) Pulpal response to cavity preparation by an erbium, chromium:YSGG laser-powered hydrokinetic system. J Am Dent Assoc 128:1099–1106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rizoiu I, Kohanghadosh F, Kimmel AI, Eversole LR (1998) Pulpal thermal responses to an erbium, chromium:YSGG pulsed laser hydrokinetic system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 86:220–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Tamaki Y, Yamada Y, Murakami Y, Matsumoto K (2003) Atomic analysis and Knoop hardness measurement of the cavity floor prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 30:515–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakajima M, Ogata M, Okuda M, Tagami J, Sano H, Pashley DH (1999) Bonding to caries-affected dentin using self-etching primers. Am J Dent 12:309–314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cehreli ZC, Yazici AR, Taner A, Ozgunaltay G (2003) A morphological and micro-tensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected human dentine after four different caries removal techniques. J Dent 31:429–435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tao L, Pashley DH, Boyd L (1988) Effect of different types of smear layers on dentin and enamel shear bond strengths. Dent Mater 4:208–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, Ciucchi B, Russell CM, Pashley DH (1995) Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-affected dentin using dentin adhesives. J Dent Res 74:1679–1688

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Doi J, Nishitani Y, Yamada T, Itou K, Carvalho RM, Nakajima M, Pashley DH (2002) Bonding of self-etch and total-etch adhesives to carious dentin. J Dent Res 81:556–560

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Torii Y, Nishitani Y, Doi J, Itou K, Ciucchi B, Pashley DH (2003) Resin adhesion to carious dentin. Am J Dent 16:47–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshiyama M, Urayama A, Kimochi T, Matsuo T, Pashley DH (2000) Comparison of conventional vs self-etching adhesive bonds to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 25:163–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH (1994) Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength—evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10:236–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Perdigão J, Geraldelli S, Carmo ARP, Dutra R (2002) In vivo influence of residual moisture on microtensile bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives. J Esther Restor Dent 14:31–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Santos MJMC, Navarro MFL, Tam L, McComb D (2005) The effect of dentin adhesive and cure mode on film thickness and microtensile bond strength to dentin in indirect restorations. Oper Dent 30:50–57

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pashley DH (1989) Dentin: a dynamic substrate—a review. Scanning Microsc 3:161–174; discussion 174–176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Olgart L (1996) Neural control of pulpal blood flow. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 7:159–171

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW (2001) Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater 17:340–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ceballos L, Toledano M, Osorio R, Tay FR, Marshall GW (2002) Bonding to Er-YAG-laser-treated dentin. J Dent Res 81:119–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Yamada T, Otsuki M, Watanabe H, Tagami J, Ando Y, Yamamoto H (1998) Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment in vitro. J Dent Res 77:1404–1414

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Oliveira DC, Manhaes LA, Marques MM, Matos AB (2005) Microtensile bond strength analysis of different adhesive systems and dentin prepared with high-speed and Er:YAG laser: a comparative study. Photomed Laser Surg 23:219–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mello AM, Mayer MP, Mello FA, Matos AB, Marques MM (2006) Effects of Er:YAG laser on the sealing of glass ionomer cement restorations of bacterial artificial root caries. Photomed Laser Surg 24:467–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Doi J, Itota T, Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2004) Bonding to root caries by a self-etching adhesive system containing MDPB. Am J Dent 17:89–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Wadgaonkar B, Waller J, Agee K, Pashley DH (2005) Tensile strength of mineralized/demineralized human normal and carious dentin. J Dent Res 84:1075–1078

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pashley EL, Tao L, Pashley DH (1993) Effects of oxalate on dentin bonding. Am J Dent 6:116–118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Itou K, Torii Y, Suziki K, Makai H, Inoue K (1994) Adhesion of restorative resin to tooth-adhesion promoted by Liner Bond II. J Adhes Dent 12:174–181

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Carvalho RM, Russell CM (1995) Bond strength versus dentine structure: a modelling approach. Arch Oral Biol 40:1109–1118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hosoya Y, Kawashita Y, Marshall GW Jr, Goto G (2001) Influence of Carisolv for resin adhesion to sound human primary dentin and young permanent dentin. J Dent 29:163–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Erhardt MCG, Amaral CM, Castro AKBB, Ambrosano GMB, Pimenta LAF (2004) In vitro influence of Carisolv on shear bonds strength of dentin bonding agents. Quintessence Int 35:801–807

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cederlund A, Lindskog S, Blomlof J (1999) Effect of a chemo-mechanical caries removal system (Carisolv) on dentin topography of non-carious dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 57:185–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Morris MD, Lee KW, Agee KA, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH (2001) Effects of NaOCl and RC-prep on bond strengths of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod 27:753–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lai SC, Mak YF, Cheung GS, Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2001) Reversal of compromised bonding to oxidized etched dentin. J Dent Res 80:1919–1924

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out at Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo (USP) and Instituto de Matemática e Estatística (IME- USP), São Paulo, Brazil and was supported, in part, by grants: 03/12182-4 FAPESP and 98/14270-B CEPID/FAPESP, Brazil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriana Bona Matos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tachibana, A., Marques, M.M., Soler, J.M.P. et al. Erbium, chromium:yttrium scandium gallium garnet laser for caries removal: influence on bonding of a self-etching adhesive system. Lasers Med Sci 23, 435–441 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-007-0503-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-007-0503-5

Keywords

Navigation