Abstract
The aim of this paper is to investigate, empirically, what components of public spending imply a decreasing effect on organized crime and what components create opportunities for organized crime, discussing also the role of government efficiency. Using a panel data analysis, the results show a strikingly consistent pattern for the EU Member States. Organized crime mainly operates in the distribution of government spending for local public goods and public provision of private services. There is a decreasing effect on organized crime of the public expenditure devoted to education and social policy. Government efficiency in public spending is beneficial to limit the opportunities of the organized crime.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albanese JS (2015) Organized crime. from the mob to transnational organized crime, 7th edn. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, London
Bandiera O (2003) Land reform, the market for protection, and the origins of the Sicilian mafia: theory and evidence. J Law Econ Organ 19:218–244
Barone G, Narciso G (2015) Organized crime and business subsidies: Where does the money go? J Urban Econ 86:98–110
Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishement: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 76:169–217
Ben-Porath Y (1967) The production of human capital and the life-cycle of earnings. J Polit Econ 75:352–365
Buonanno P, Montolio D (2008) Identifying the socio-economic and demographic determinants of crime across Spanish provinces. Int Rev Law Econ 28(2):89–97
Caruso R (2009) Public spending and organized crime in Italy. A panel-data analysis over the period 1997–2003. Istituto di Politica Economica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano
Cayli B (2013) Italian civil society against the Mafia: from perceptions to expectations. Int J Law Crime Justice 41:81–99
Dawson A (2013) The social determinants of the rule of law: a comparison of Jamaica and Barbados. World Dev 45:314–324
Gambetta D (1993) The sicilian mafia: the business of private protection. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Gennaioli C, Onorato M (2010) Public spending and organized crime: the case of the 1997 Marche and Umbria Earthquake. Mimeo, New York
Gutmann J, Voigt S (2015) The rule of law: measurement and deep roots. CESifo Working Paper, No. 5670
Kollias C, Mylonidisb N, Paleologou S (2013) Crime and the effectiveness of public order spending in Greece: policy implications of some persistent findings. J Policy Model 35(1):121–133
Konrad K, Skaperdas S (2012) The market for protection and the origin of the state. Econ Theor 50:417–443
Kotera G, Okada K (2017) How does democratization affect the composition of government expenditure? J Econ Behav Organ 137:145–159
Levitt S, Rubio M (2005) Understanding crime in Colombia and what can be done about it Institutional Reforms: the case of Colombia. MIT Press, Boston
Lochner L, Moretti E (2004) The effect of education on crime: evidence from prison inmates, arrests and self-reports. Am Econ Rev 94:155–189
Neanidis KC, Rana MP (2014) Crime versus organized crime in Italy: Do their drivers differ? Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research, Discussion Paper Series, University of Manchester
Paoli L, Varese F (2014) The Oxford handbook of organized crime. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Pascual DS (2017) Measuring organized crime: complexities of the quantitative and factorial analysis. In: Larsen HL, Blanco JM, Pastor RP, Yager RR (eds) Using open data to detect organized crime threats: factors driving future crime. Springer, New York
Van Dijk J (2007) Mafia markers: assessing organized crime and its impact upon societies. Trends Organ Crime 10(4):39–56
Varese F (2011) Mafias on the move: how organized crime conquers new territories. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berrittella, M. Organized crime and public spending: a panel data analysis. Econ Gov 19, 119–140 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-018-0206-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-018-0206-3