Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling tax evasion with genetic algorithms

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Economics of Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The U.S. tax gap is estimated to exceed $450 billion, most of which arises from non-compliance on the part of individual taxpayers (GAO 2012; IRS 2006). Much is hidden in innovative tax shelters combining multiple business structures such as partnerships, trusts, and S-corporations into complex transaction networks designed to reduce and obscure the true tax liabilities of their individual shareholders. One known gambit employed by these shelters is to offset real gains in one part of a portfolio by creating artificial capital losses elsewhere through the mechanism of “inflated basis” (TaxAnalysts 2005), a process made easier by the relatively flexible set of rules surrounding “pass-through” entities such as partnerships (IRS 2009). The ability to anticipate the likely forms of emerging evasion schemes would help auditors develop more efficient methods of reducing the tax gap. To this end, we have developed a prototype evolutionary algorithm designed to generate potential schemes of the inflated basis type described above. The algorithm takes as inputs a collection of asset types and tax entities, together with a rule-set governing asset exchanges between these entities. The schemes produced by the algorithm consist of sequences of transactions within an ownership network of tax entities. Schemes are ranked according to a “fitness function” (Goldberg in Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1989); the very best schemes are those that afford the highest reduction in tax liability while incurring the lowest expected penalty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. By “scheme” we shall mean a sequence of transactions arranged for the purposes of illegal tax evasion. It is worth noting, however, that in some instances the distinction between tax avoidance (which is legal) and tax evasion is not always clear.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Alan Plumley, Kim Bloomquist, Amalia Miller and the journal reviewers for their helpful comments and feedback. This work was supported in whole by The MITRE Corporation Innovation Program. This assistance is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanith Wijesinghe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warner, G., Wijesinghe, S., Marques, U. et al. Modeling tax evasion with genetic algorithms. Econ Gov 16, 165–178 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-014-0152-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-014-0152-7

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation