Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency analysis in two-stage structures using fuzzy data envelopment analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two-stage data envelopment analysis (TsDEA) models evaluate the performance of a set of production systems in which each system includes two operational stages. Taking into account the internal structures is commonly found in many situations such as seller-buyer supply chain, health care provision and environmental management. Contrary to conventional DEA models as a black-box structure, TsDEA provides further insight into sources of inefficiencies and a more informative basis for performance evaluation. In addition, ignoring the qualitative and imprecise data leads to distorted evaluations, both for the subunits and the system efficiency. We present the fuzzy input and output-oriented TsDEA models to calculate the global and pure technical efficiencies of a system and sub-processes when some data are fuzzy. To this end, we propose a possibilistic programming problem and then convert it into a deterministic interval programming problem using the α-level based method. The proposed method preserves the link between two stages in the sense that the total efficiency of the system is equal to the product of the efficiencies derived from two stages. In addition to the study of technical efficiency, this research includes two further contributions to the ancillary literature; firstly, we minutely discuss the efficiency decompositions to indicate the sources of inefficiency and secondly, we present a method for ranking the efficient units in a fuzzy environment. An empirical illustration is also utilised to show the applicability of the proposed technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The overview of fuzzy sets theory and fuzzy numbers are briefly provided in “Appendix 1”.

References

  • Agrell PJ, Hatami-Marbini A (2013) Frontier-based performance analysis models for supply chain management: state of the art and research directions. Comput Ind Eng 66(3):567–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aigner D, Lovell CK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econom 6(1):21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amirteimoori A (2013) A DEA two-stage decision processes with shared resources. Cent Eur J Operat Res 21(1):141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen P, Petersen N (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 39:1261–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Operat Res 2:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Park KS, Yu G (1999) IDEA and AR-IDEA: models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Manag Sci 45(4):597–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad A, Tavana M, Hatami-Marbini A (2014) The state of the art in fuzzy data envelopment analysis, in: Performance measurement with fuzzy data envelopment analysis, Studies in fuzziness and soft computing, Springer, vol 309, pp 1–45

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (2000) Network DEA. Soc Econ Plan Sci 34:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Primont D (1984) Efficiency measures for multiplant firms. Operat Res Lett 3(5):257–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatami-Marbini A, Emrouznejad A, Tavana M (2011) A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: two decades in the making. Eur J Operat Res 214(3):457–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatami-Marbini A, Ebrahimnejad A, Lozano S (2017) Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis using lexicographic multiobjective approach. Comput Ind Eng 105:362–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (2009) Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems. Eur J Operat Res 196(3):1107–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (2012) Efficiency decomposition for parallel production systems. Eur J Operat Res 63(1):64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Hwang SN (2008) Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. Eur J Operat Res 185(1):418–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Hwang SN (2011) Decomposition of technical and scale efficiencies in two-stage production systems. Eur J Operat Res 211(3):515–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Lin PH (2012) Efficiency of parallel production systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets Syst 198:83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Liu ST (2000) Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 113(3):427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Liu ST (2011) Efficiencies of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets Syst 176(1):20–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land KC, Lovell CA, Thore S (1993) Chance-constrained data envelopment analysis. Manag Decis Econ 14(6):541–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lertworasirikul S, Fang SC, Joines JA, Nuttle HLW (2003) Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): a possibility approach. Fuzzy Sets Syst 139(2):379–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ST (2014a) Fuzzy efficiency ranking in fuzzy two-stage data envelopment analysis. Optim Lett 8(2):633–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ST (2014b) Restricting weight flexibility in fuzzy two-stage DEA. Comput Ind Eng 74:149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano S (2014a) Process efficiency of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets Syst 243:36–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano S (2014b) Computing fuzzy process efficiency in parallel systems. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 13(1):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen W, van Den Broeck J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. Int Econ Rev 435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen HT (1978) A note on the extension principle for fuzzy sets. J Math Anal Appl 64(2):369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen OB, Petersen NC (2016) Stochastic data envelopment analysis—A review. Eur J Oper Res 251(1):2–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2017) Fuzzy cross-efficiency evaluation: a possibility approach. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 16(1):111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saati SM, Memariani A, Jahanshahloo GR (2002) Efficiency analysis and ranking of DMUs with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 1(3):255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM, Zhu J (1999) Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Manag Sci 45(9):1270–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta JK (1992) A fuzzy systems approach in data envelopment analysis. Comput Math Appl 24(8–9):259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen M, Qin Z, Kang R (2011) Sensitivity and stability analysis in fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 10(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu MM, Chen PC (2011) Measuring air routes performance using a fractional network data envelopment analysis model. Cent Eur J Operat Res 19(1):81–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann HJ (1996) Fuzzy set theory-and its applications, 3rd edn. Kluwer Academic, Boston

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Mojtaba Sajadi.

Appendix 1. Fuzzy sets theory

Appendix 1. Fuzzy sets theory

This appendix reviews some basic definitions of fuzzy sets theory and fuzzy numbers (Zimmermann 1996).

Let U be a universe set. A fuzzy set \( \tilde{M} \) in the universe set U is defined by the membership function \( \mu_{{\tilde{M}}} \left( x \right) \to \left[ {0,1} \right] \) where \( \forall x \in U \to \mu_{{\tilde{M}}} \left( x \right) \) stands for the grade of membership of \( \tilde{M} \) in U. A fuzzy subset \( \tilde{M} \) is said to be normal and convex if \( \mathop {\sup }\limits_{x \in U} \mu_{{\tilde{M}}} \left( x \right) = 1 \) and \( \mu_{{\tilde{M}}} \left( {\lambda x + \left( {1 - \lambda } \right)y} \right) \ge \left( {\mu_{{\tilde{M}}} \left( x \right) \wedge \mu_{{\tilde{M}}} \left( y \right)} \right), \forall x,y \in U, \forall \lambda \in \left[ {0,1} \right] \), respectively, where \( \wedge \) is the minimum operator. A fuzzy number is a normal and convex fuzzy subset with a given membership whose grade varies between 0 and 1. A triangular fuzzy number, denoted as \( \tilde{M} = \left( {l,m,u} \right) \), is the most widely used fuzzy numbers in practice and theory with the following membership function:

$$ \mu _{{\tilde{M}}} (x) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {\frac{{x - l}}{{m - l}},} \hfill & {l \le {\text{x}} \le m} \hfill \\ {\frac{{u - x}}{{u - m}},} \hfill & {m < {\text{x}} \le u} \hfill \\ {0,} \hfill & {{\text{otherwise}}} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right. $$

Note that a crisp number M is a special case of the triangular fuzzy number in which \( l = m = u. \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hatami-Marbini, A., Saati, S. & Sajadi, S.M. Efficiency analysis in two-stage structures using fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Cent Eur J Oper Res 26, 909–932 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0545-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0545-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation