Abstract
Using gasoline additives is one of the economical approaches to achieving higher engine efficiency and lower pollutant emissions. However, a limited understanding of the actual effects of various additives is one obstacle to replacing outdated additive standards. In this study, the effects of 14 popular additives from the Chinese market on fuel consumption and carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon (HC) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions were evaluated based on the chassis dynamometer; then, one qualified additive was selected, and the on-road impacts on regulated gaseous and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions were investigated using a portable emission measurement system. The results of the dynamometer tests showed that 9 of the 14 additives were beneficial in reducing CO emissions, with eight and seven beneficial for HC and NOx, respectively. Most of the test additives reduced the fuel consumption by 0.9–3.5%, while three additives had significant adverse effects. The on-road tests showed that the qualified additive could not only reduce on-road regulated gaseous emissions but also decrease most of VOC group, with decreases of 81.7% for aromatics, 79.4% for alkanes, 43.7% for halocarbons and 66.3% for alkenes. The vehicle-specific power (VSP) analysis showed that the test additive reductions in CO and HC emissions primarily occurred on highway roads because of the smoother vehicle operation. The results of this study indicated that quite a few additives might deteriorate the fuel consumption and tailpipe emissions, so the standards should be updated and market supervision should be further strengthened.
Graphic abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All the data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China (2004) Detergent Additive for Vehicular Gasoline, GB 19592–2004. https://www.antpedia.com/standard/605561-1.html. Accessed 11 Mar 2021
Afzal S, Mumtaz MW, Rashid U, Danish M, Raza MA, Raza A, Mukhtar H, Al-Resayes SI (2018) Exhaust emission profiling of fatty acid methyl esters and NOx control studies using selective synthetic and natural additives. Clean Technol Environ 20:589–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1489-3
Bishop JDK, Molden N, Boies AM (2019) Using portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) to derive more accurate estimates of fuel use and nitrogen oxides emissions from modern Euro 6 passenger cars under real-world driving conditions. Appl Energy 242:942–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.047
Biswal A, Gedam S, Balusamy S, Kolhe P (2020) Effects of using ternary gasoline-ethanol-LPO blend on PFI engine performance and emissions. Fuel 281:118664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118664
Cao X, Yao Z, Shen X, Ye Y, Jiang X (2016) On-road emission characteristics of VOCs from light-duty gasoline vehicles in Beijing, China. Atmos Environ 124:146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.019
Celik M, Bayindirli C (2020) Enhancement performance and exhaust emissions of rapeseed methyl ester by using n-hexadecane and n-hexane fuel additives. Energy 202:117643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117643
Danilov AM (2015) Progress in research on fuel additives (Review). Pet Chem 55(3):179–190. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544115030020
Dardiotis C, Martini G, Marotta A, Manfredi U (2013) Low-temperature cold-start gaseous emissions of late technology passenger cars. Appl Energy 111:468–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.093
Han J, Forman GS, Elgowainy A, Cai H, Wang M, Divita VB (2015) A comparative assessment of resource efficiency in petroleum refining. Fuel 157:292–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.03.038
Jhang SR, Lin YC, Chen KS, Lin SL, Batterman S (2020) Evaluation of fuel consumption, pollutant emissions and well-to-wheel GHGs assessment from a vehicle operation fueled with bioethanol, gasoline and hydrogen. Energy 209:118436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118436
Jiang W, Chen Y, Gao L, Sun M, Wang X, Li Z, Ji X, Zhou G, Zhou H (2020) Hydroformylation for reducing the olefin content in the FCC light gasoline with magnetic rhodium-catalysts. Fuel 279:118508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118508
Kannaiyan K, Al Dosari A, Sadr R (2020) Effects of nanoscale fuel additives on properties and non-reacting spray performance of alternative, conventional and blended jet fuels at elevated ambient conditions. Fuel Process Technol 208:106436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106436
Lim CS, Lim JH, Cha JS, Lim JY (2019) Comparative effects of oxygenates-gasoline blended fuels on the exhaust emissions in gasoline-powered vehicles. J Environ Manag 239:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.039
Lyu M, Bao X, Zhu R, Matthews R (2020) State-of-the-art outlook for light-duty vehicle emission control standards and technologies in China. Clean Technol Environ 22(4):757–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01834-x
Ma L, Wu M, Tian X, Zheng G, Du Q, Wu T (2019) China’s Provincial vehicle ownership forecast and analysis of the causes influencing the trend. Sustainability 11(14):3928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143928
Magaril E, Magaril R (2016) Improving the environmental and performance characteristics of vehicles by introducing the surfactant additive into gasoline. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(17):17049–17057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6900-1
McCaffery C, Durbin TD, Johnson KC, Karavalakis G (2020) The effect of ethanol and iso-butanol blends on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) emissions from PFl and GDI vehicles. Atmos Pollut Res 11(11):2056–2067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.08.024
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China (2019) China mobile source environmental management annual report. http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/ydyhjgl/201909/P020190905586230826402.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2021
Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China, Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China (2013) Limits and measurement methods for emission from light-duty vehicles (China 5), GB 18352.5-2013. http://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/dqhjbh/dqydywrwpfbz/201309/W020131105534056881723.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2021
Mohamed KAA, Peng F, Hussein AY, Mohamed AAA, Essa FA, Ahmed E, Hou X (2018) Fuel economy in gasoline engines using Al2O3/TiO2 nanomaterials as nanolubricant additives. Appl Energy 211:461–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.013
Nadeina KA, Klimov OV, Pereima VY, Koryakina GI, Danilova IG, Prosvirin IP, Gerasimov EY, Yegizariyan AM, Noskov AS (2016) Catalysts based on amorphous aluminosilicates for selective hydrotreating of FCC gasoline to produce Euro-5 gasoline with minimum octane number loss. Catal Today 271:4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.01.010
Shirazi SA, Abdollahipoor B, Windom B, Reardon KF, Foust TD (2020) Effects of blending C3–C4 alcohols on motor gasoline properties and performance of spark ignition engines: a review. Fuel Process Technol 197:106194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106194
Sun S, Jin J, Xia M, Liu Y, Gao M, Zou C, Wang T, Lin Y, Wu L, Mao H, Wang P (2020) Vehicle emissions in a middle-sized city of China: current status and future trends. Environ Int 137:105514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105514
Wang M, Li S, Zhu R, Zhang R, Zu L, Wang Y, Bao X (2020a) On-road tailpipe emission characteristics and ozone formation potentials of VOCs from gasoline, diesel and liquefied petroleum gas fueled vehicles. Atmos Environ 223:117294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117294
Wang Y, Hao C, Ge Y, Hao L, Tan J, Wang X, Zhang P, Wang Y, Tian W, Lin Z, Li J (2020b) Fuel consumption and emission performance from light-duty conventional/hybrid-electric vehicles over different cycles and real driving tests. Fuel 278:118340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118340
Wei J, Yin Z, Qian Y, Wang C, Chen B (2019) Comparative effects of olefin content on the performance and emissions of a modern GDI engine. Energy Fuels 33(11):10499–10507. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b01894
Yang W, Zhang Q, Wang J, Zhou C, Zhang Y, Pan Z (2018) Emission characteristics and ozone formation potentials of VOCs from gasoline passenger cars at different driving modes. Atmos Pollut Res 9(5):804–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.01.002
Yang G, Zhang Y, Li X (2020) Impact of gasoline upgrade policy on particulate matter pollution in China. J Clean Prod 262:121336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121336
Yuan W, Frey HC, Wei T, Rastogi N, VanderGriend S, Miller D, Mattison L (2019) Comparison of real-world vehicle fuel use and tailpipe emissions for gasoline-ethanol fuel blends. Fuel 249:352–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.115
Zhang S, Wu Y, Liu H, Huang R, Un P, Zhou Y, Fu L, Hao J (2014) Real-world fuel consumption and CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions by driving conditions for light-duty passenger vehicles in China. Energy 69:247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.103
Zhang W, Zhang Z, Ma X, Award OI, Li Y, Shuai S, Xu H (2020) Impact of injector tip deposits on gasoline direct injection engine combustion, fuel economy and emissions. Appl Energy 262:114538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114538
Zhu R, Hu J, Bao X, He L, Lai Y, Zu L, Li Y, Su S (2017a) Investigation of tailpipe and evaporative emissions from China IV and Tier 2 passenger vehicles with different gasolines. Transport Res Part D-Transport Environ 50:305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.027
Zhu R, Hu J, Bao X, He L, Zu L (2017b) Effects of aromatics, olefins and distillation temperatures (T50 & T90) on particle mass and number emissions from gasoline direct injection (GDI) vehicles. Energy Policy 101:185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.022
Zhu R, Hu J, He L, Zu L, Bao X, Lai Y, Su S (2021) Effects of ambient temperature on regulated gaseous and particulate emissions from gasoline-, E10- and M15-fueled vehicles. Front Environ Sci Eng 15(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1306-1
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51808507), the National Engineering Laboratory for Mobile Source Emission Control Technology (NELMS2018A16), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0212400) and the Key Specialized Research and Development Program in Henan Province (212102310524). The authors would like to acknowledge Mr. Lei Zu, Mr. Yi Li and Mr. Xiaoyan Liu from the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences for their contributions to conducting the emissions tests, and Dr. Shijie Yu of Zhengzhou University for detecting VOCs and introducing the VOCs analyses procedures. The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the sponsors.
Funding
Funding was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51808507), the National Engineering Laboratory for Mobile Source Emission Control Technology (NELMS2018A16), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0212400) and the Key Specialized Research and Development Program in Henan Province (212102310524).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors contributed to the study conception and design. The material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by BJ, MW and RZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by BJ, and all the authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, B., Wang, M., Zhu, R. et al. Evaluation of additives used in gasoline vehicles in China: fuel economy, regulated gaseous pollutants and volatile organic compounds based on both chassis dynamometer and on-road tests. Clean Techn Environ Policy 23, 1967–1979 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02090-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02090-3