Abstract
A process of ethanol production from wheat straw in Iran was simulated using SuperPro Designer. Wheat is the main cereal crop in Iran. Khuzestan Province was selected as a potential location for the construction of plant. A method was developed to estimate the plant capacity. The base plant size in Khuzestan was estimated to be 316 t day−1. The effect of plant size, logistics of residue collection, wheat yield, and agreements with local farmers on the profitability was calculated, and the minimum selling price was determined for different scenarios. In addition, the sensitivity analysis and economic risk assessment were conducted. The operating cost was mainly sensitive to the wheat straw and enzyme costs. The Monte Carlo simulation results showed that the risk of the base case biorefinery is fairly acceptable at moderate to high selling prices, and increasing the plant size could lessen the risk at lower ethanol selling prices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adomaitis RA (2015) Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index (CEPCI). Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and ISR, University of Maryland, College Park
Agricultural Jihad Organization of Khuzestan Province (2013) Crop production statistics. http://ajkhz.ir/main/index.php/pages/general/%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DA%A9%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%A7%D8%B7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%A7%D8%AA%DB%8C.html. Accessed 8 June 2016
Alvarado-Morales M, Terra J, Gernaey KV, Woodley JM, Gani R (2009) Biorefining: computer aided tools for sustainable design and analysis of bioethanol production. Chem Eng Res Des 87:1171–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2009.07.006
Asadi N, Zilouei H (2017) Optimization of organosolv pretreatment of rice straw for enhanced biohydrogen production using Enterobacter aerogenes. Biores Technol 227:335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.073
Asadi N, Karimi Alavijeh M, Zilouei H (2017) Development of a mathematical methodology to investigate biohydrogen production from regional and national agricultural crop residues: a case study of Iran. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:1989–2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.021
Avula SV, Reddy S, Reddy LV (2015) The feasibility of mango (Mangifera indica L.) peel as an alternative substrate for butanol production. BioResources 10(3):4453–4459
Bacovsky D, Ludwiczek N, Ognissanto M, Wörgetter M (2013) Status of advanced biofuels demonstration facilities in 2012: a report to IEA Bioenergy Task 39. http://task39.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2013/12/2013_Bacovsky_Status-of-Advanced-Biofuels-Demonstration-Facilities-in-2012.pdf
Bahrami M, Abbaszadeh P (2013) An overview of renewable energies in Iran. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 24:198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.043
Barrera I, Amezcua-Allieri MA, Estupiñan L, Martínez T, Aburto J (2016) Technical and economical evaluation of bioethanol production from lignocellulosic residues in Mexico: case of sugarcane and blue agave bagasses. Chem Eng Res Des 107:91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.10.015
Biomass Feedstock Composition and Property Database (2016) U.S. Department of Energy. http://www.afdc.energy.gov/biomass/progs/search1.cgi. Accessed 4.8.2016
Chen M, Smith PM (2017) The U.S. cellulosic biofuels industry: expert views on commercialization drivers and barriers. Biomass Bioenergy 102:52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.05.002
Conde-Mejía C, Jiménez-Gutiérrez A, El-Halwagi M (2012) A comparison of pretreatment methods for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic materials. Process Saf Environ Prot 90:189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.08.004
da Silva ARG, Torres Ortega CE, Rong B-G (2016) Techno-economic analysis of different pretreatment processes for lignocellulosic-based bioethanol production. Biores Technol 218:561–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.007
Damaso MCT, Machado CMM, Rodrigues DdS, Belem SG, Salum TFC (2014) Bioprocesses for biofuels: an overview of the Brazilian case chemical and biological technologies. Agriculture 1:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-014-0006-0
Delivand MK, Barz M, Gheewala SH (2011) Logistics cost analysis of rice straw for biomass power generation in Thailand. Energy 36:1435–1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.026
Edwards M (2011) Food security in an era of climate change. In: McNall SG, Hershauer JC, Basile G (eds) The business of sustainability: trends, policies, practices, and stories of success: trends, policies, practices, and stories of success, vol 3. ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara, pp 143–160
Ekşioğlu SD, Acharya A, Leightley LE, Arora S (2009) Analyzing the design and management of biomass-to-biorefinery supply chain. Comput Ind Eng 57:1342–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2009.07.003
El-Halwagi MM (2012) Overview of process economics. In: El-Halwagi MM (ed) Sustainable design through process integration. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 15–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85617-744-3.00002-3
Engel R, Long D, Carlson G, Wallander R (2005) Estimating straw production of spring and winter wheat. Montana State University, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Bozeman
Ghobadian B (2012) Liquid biofuels potential and outlook in Iran. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:4379–4384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.013
Global Finance Magazine (2016) Iran GDP and economic data. https://www.gfmag.com/global-data/country-data/iran-gdp-country-report. Accessed 19.10.2016
Gnansounou E, Dauriat A (2010) Techno-economic analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol: a review. Biores Technol 101:4980–4991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.009
Golecha R, Gan J (2016) Cellulosic biorefinery portfolio and diversification: strategies to mitigate cellulosic biorefinery risks in US Corn Belt. Energy Strategy Rev 13–14:147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2016.09.003
Gubicza K, Nieves IU, Sagues WJ, Barta Z, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO (2016) Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse using a liquefaction plus simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation process. Biores Technol 208:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.093
Haghighi Mood S, Hossein Golfeshan A, Tabatabaei M, Salehi Jouzani G, Najafi GH, Gholami M, Ardjmand M (2013) Lignocellulosic biomass to bioethanol, a comprehensive review with a focus on pretreatment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 27:77–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.033
Harun MY, Dayang Radiah AB, Zainal Abidin Z, Yunus R (2011) Effect of physical pretreatment on dilute acid hydrolysis of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Biores Technol 102:5193–5199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.001
Iran Renewable Energy Association (2015) Vision, goals and important policies. http://www.irrea.ir/IRECC_catalogue_10092016.pdf
Iranian Ethanol Producers Association (2013) The price of ethanol. Iranian Ethanol Producers Association. http://epa-iran.ir/farsi/news/1392/prices1392.html. Accessed 11.7.2016
Iran’s Ministry of Agriculture (2013) Agriculture statistics. http://www.maj.ir/Index.aspx?page_=form&lang=1&PageID=11583&tempname=amar&sub=65&methodName=ShowModuleContent. Accessed 8 June 2016
Izaurralde RC, Sahajpal R, Zhang X, Manowitz DH (2012) National geo-database for biofuel simulations and regional analysis. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington
Izquierdo NL (2012) Brazilian biofuels: infrastructure and crops. GRID-Arendal, Arendal
Juneja A, Kumar D, Murthy GS (2013) Economic feasibility and environmental life cycle assessment of ethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstock in Pacific Northwest US. J Renew Sustain Energy 5:023142. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4803747
Karimi Alavijeh M, Yaghmaei S (2016) Biochemical production of bioenergy from agricultural crops and residue in Iran. Waste Manag 52:375–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.025
Kazi FK, Fortman JA, Anex RP, Hsu DD, Aden A, Dutta A, Kothandaraman G (2010) Techno-economic comparison of process technologies for biochemical ethanol production from corn stover. Fuel 89(Supplement 1):S20–S28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.01.001
Keating EL (ed) (2007) Liquid fuels. In: Applied combustion, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 251–300
Khongsay N, Laopaiboon L, Jaisil P, Laopaiboon P (2012) Optimization of agitation and aeration for very high gravity ethanol fermentation from sweet sorghum juice by Saccharomyces cerevisiae using an orthogonal array design. Energies 5:561
Kim JH, Lee JC, Pak D (2011) Feasibility of producing ethanol from food waste. Waste Manag 31:2121–2125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.04.011
Koppram R et al (2013) Simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation for bioethanol production using corncobs at lab, PDU and demo scales. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-2
Kumar D, Murthy GS (2011) Impact of pretreatment and downstream processing technologies on economics and energy in cellulosic ethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-4-27
Kumar M, Goyal Y, Sarkar A, Gayen K (2012) Comparative economic assessment of ABE fermentation based on cellulosic and non-cellulosic feedstocks. Appl Energy 93:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.079
Li F, Wang H, Xin H, Cai J, Fu Q, Jin Y (2016) Development, validation and application of a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-evaporative light scattering detection based method for process control of hydrolysis of xylans obtained from different agricultural wastes. Food Chem 212:155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.118
Liu Z-H et al (2013) Effects of biomass particle size on steam explosion pretreatment performance for improving the enzyme digestibility of corn stover. Ind Crops Prod 44:176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.11.009
Maitan-Alfenas GP, Visser EM, Guimarães VM (2015) Enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: converting food waste in valuable products. Curr Opin Food Sci 1:44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2014.10.001
Moreira D, Pires JCM (2016) Atmospheric CO2 capture by algae: negative carbon dioxide emission path. Biores Technol 215:371–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.060
Mupondwa E, Li X, Falk K, Gugel R, Tabil L (2016) Technoeconomic analysis of small-scale farmer-owned Camelina oil extraction as feedstock for biodiesel production: a case study in the Canadian prairies. Ind Crops Prod 90:76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.05.042
Najafi G, Ghobadian B, Tavakoli T, Yusaf T (2009) Potential of bioethanol production from agricultural wastes in Iran. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:1418–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.010
Nguyen Q (2015) Cellulosic ethanol production by Abengoa using crop residues and switchgrass. University of Urbana Champaign, Abengoa Research, Champaign
NREL, Biomass Feedstock Composition and Property Database (2016) National Renewable Energy Laboratory. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/printable_versions/feedstock_databases.html. Accessed 4 Aug 2016
Petrides D, Siletti C (2008) Evaluation of bio-ethanol production from ligno-cellulosic biomass using process simulation tools. Intelligen Inc, Scotch Plains
Rabemanolontsoa H, Saka S (2016) Various pretreatments of lignocellulosics. Biores Technol 199:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.029
RFA (2015) Ethanol industry outlook. Renewable Fuels Association, Washington
Sanchez A, Sevilla-Güitrón V, Magaña G, Gutierrez L (2013) Parametric analysis of total costs and energy efficiency of 2G enzymatic ethanol production. Fuel 113:165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.034
Shafiei M, Kumar R, Karimi K (2015) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Karimi K (ed) Lignocellulose-based bioproducts. Springer, Cham, pp 85–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14033-9_3
Thakur A, Canter CE, Kumar A (2014) Life-cycle energy and emission analysis of power generation from forest biomass. Appl Energy 128:246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.085
Towler G, Sinnott R (2013) Capital cost estimating. Chemical engineering design. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 307–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096659-5.00001-8
Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA, Bhattacharyya D (2012a) Engineering economic analysis. In: Turton R (ed) Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes, 4th edn. Pearson Education, London, pp 233–268
Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA, Bhattacharyya D (2012b) Estimation of capital costs. In: Turton R (ed) Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes, 4th edn. Pearson Education, London, pp 177–220
Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA, Bhattacharyya D (2012c) Estimation of manufacturing costs. In: Turton R (ed) Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes, 4th edn. Pearson Education, London, pp 221–256
Viikari L, Vehmaanperä J, Koivula A (2012) Lignocellulosic ethanol: from science to industry. Biomass Bioenergy 46:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.05.008
Vijay Ramamurthi P, Cristina Fernandes M, Sieverts Nielsen P, Pedro Nunes C (2014) Logistics cost analysis of rice residues for second generation bioenergy production in Ghana. Biores Technol 173:429–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.102
Yang M, Rosentrater KA (2015) Techno-economic analysis (TEA) of low-moisture anhydrous ammonia (LMAA) pretreatment method for corn stover. Ind Crops Prod 76:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.06.023
Yang B, Tucker M (2013) Laboratory pretreatment systems to understand biomass deconstruction. Aqueous pretreatment of plant biomass for biological and chemical conversion to fuels and chemicals. Wiley, New York, pp 489–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470975831.ch23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hasanly, A., Khajeh Talkhoncheh, M. & Karimi Alavijeh, M. Techno-economic assessment of bioethanol production from wheat straw: a case study of Iran. Clean Techn Environ Policy 20, 357–377 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1476-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1476-0