Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Using eco-efficiency in sustainable supply chain management; a case study of furniture production

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, a three-step method, proposing how small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can improve the environmental performance in their supply chain, is presented. The method is based on (1) an assessment of their products, (2) identification of critical processes that should be improved, and (3) identification of actors in the supply chain that should be focussed upon not only based on environmental performance, but also based on the abilities that the end producer has to influence them. This article is exemplified with a case study of furniture production in Norway. The case shows that the potential for improvement of processes under direct control by the end producer is limited. However, the three steps, as a whole, show how an SME with limited resources and supply chain power can identify key actors in the supply chains for further improvements, based on a potential for improvements of environmental performance and the possibilities that the end producer has to impose improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. EPDs are available on http://www.epd-norge.no/.

  2. NOK—Norwegian kroner. 100 NOK ≈ 16.5 US$ (25 August 2009).

  3. See Diaz and Redondo (2002) and Michelsen (2007a) for details.

  4. http://www.ecoinvent.ch/.

  5. http://www.lca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/lcainfohub/datasetArea.vm.

  6. http://www.pre.nl/simapro/.

  7. http://www.gabi-software.com/.

References

  • Ammenberg J, Hjelm O (2003) Tracing business and environmental effects of environmental management systems—a study of networking small and medium-sized enterprises using a joint environmental management system. Bus Strategy Environ 12:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher M (1998) Logistics and supply chain management. Strategies for reducing cost and improving service, 2nd edn. Financial Times/Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement S, Plas G, Erdmenger C (2003) Local experiences: green purchasing practices in six European cities. In: Erdmenger C (ed) Buying into the environment: experiences, opportunities and potential for eco-procurement. Sheffield, Greenleaf, pp 69–93

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato A (2007) Environmental issues in public procurement: How much decentralization? In: Piga G, Thai KV (eds) The economics of public procurement. Basingstoke, Palgrave, pp 207–223

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSimone LD, Popoff F (1997) Eco-efficiency: the business link to sustainable development. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz R, Redondo P (2002) Life Cycle Analysis applied to an innovative material obtained using secondary resources. In: Abstracts from SETAC 10th LCA case symposium 2–3. December. Barcelona, pp 99–101

  • Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strategy Environ 11:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fet AM, Johansen LB (2000) Miljøprestasjonsindikatorer og miljøregnskaper ved møbelproduksjon. Report 2/2000, IØT, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim [in Norwegian]

  • Fet AM, Skaar C (2006) Eco-labeling, product category rules and certification procedures based on ISO 14025-requirements. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fet AM, Michelsen O, Skaar C (2009) Creating environmental product declarations (EPDs)—case study in the Norwegian furniture industry. In: Fullana P, Betz M, Hischier R, Puig R (eds) Life Cycle Assessment applications: results from COST Action 530. Aenor, Madrid, pp 238–244

    Google Scholar 

  • French ML (2008) Improving sustainability through effective reuse of product returns: minimizing waste in a batch blending process environment. J Cleaner Prod 16:1679–1687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2001) The Eco-indicator 99. A damage oriented method for life cycle assessment. Methodology report, 3rd edn. PRé Consultans, http://www.pre.nl/

  • Håkansson H, Johanson J (1992) A model of industrial networks. In: Axelsson B, Easton G (eds) Industrial networks. Routledge, London, pp 28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson H, Snehota I (eds) (1995) Developing relationships in business networks. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmen E, Pedersen AC (2003) Strategizing through analyzing and influencing the network horizon. Ind Mark Manage 32:409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huesemann MH (2003) The limits of technological solutions to sustainable development. Clean Technol Environ Policy 5:21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Hukkinen J (2001) Eco-efficiency as abandonment of nature. Ecol Econ 38:311–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huppes G, Ishikawa M (2005) Why eco-efficiency? J Ind Ecol 9:2–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huppes G, Ishikawa M (2009) Eco-efficiency guiding micro-level actions towards sustainability: ten basic steps for analysis. Ecol Econ 68:1687–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (1996) International standard 300-3-3. Dependability management—part 3: application guide—section 3: life cycle costing

  • Klöpffer W (2003) Life-cycle based methods for sustainable product development. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:157–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessments of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraljic P (1983) Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review. September–October 109–117

  • Lambert DM, Cooper MC (2000) Issues in supply chain management. Ind Mark Manage 29:65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough W, Braungart M (2000) A world of abundance. Interfaces 30:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen O (2006) Eco-efficiency in extended supply chains—methodological development with regulatory and organizational implications. Doctoral thesis at NTNU 2006:216. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim. Available at http://www.diva-portal.org/ntnu/abstract.xsql?dbid=1926

  • Michelsen O (2007a) Eco-efficiency in redesigned extended supply chains; furniture as an example. In: Huppes G, Ishikawa M (eds) Eco-efficiency in industry and science vol 22: quantified eco-efficiency. An introduction with applications. Springer, Dordrecht. pp 163–179

  • Michelsen O (2007b) Investigation of relationships in a supply chain in order to improve environmental performance. Clean Technol Environ Policy 9:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen O, de Boer L (2009) Green procurement in Norway; a survey of practices at the municipal and county level. J Environ Manage 91:160–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen O, Fet AM, Dahlsrud A (2006) Eco-efficiency in extended supply chains: a case study of furniture production. J Environ Manage 79:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monczka R, Trent R, Handfield R (2005) Purchasing and supply chain management, 3rd edn. Thomson South-Western, Mason, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Östlin J, Sundin E, Björkman M (2009) Product life-cycle implications for remanufacturing strategies. J Cleaner Prod 17:999–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuss L (2005) Rhetoric and reality of corporate greening: a view from the supply chain management function. Bus Strategy Environ 14:123–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebitzer G, Hunkeler D (2003) Life cycle costing in LCM: ambitions, opportunities, and limitations. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:253–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruud A (2002) Industry and environmental responsibility. From proactive to reactive public policies. In: Lafferty WM, Nordskag M, Aakre HA (eds) Realizing Rio in Norway. Evaluative studies of sustainable development. Prosus, University of Oslo, Oslo, pp 63–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Burritt R (2000) Contemporary environmental accounting. Issues, concepts and practice. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiny S (ed) (1992) Changing course. A global perspective on development and the environment. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt I, Meurer M, Saling P, Kicherer A, Reuter W, Gensch CO (2004) SEEbalance. Managing sustainability of products and processes with the socio-eco-efficiency analysis by BASF. Greener Manage Int 45:79–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuring S, Müller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable chain management. J Cleaner Prod 16:1699–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tella E, Virolainen VM (2005) Motives behind purchasing consortia. Int J Prod Econ 93–94:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2006) UN millennium development goals. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/

  • Vachon S, Klassen RD (2008) Environmental management and manufacturing performance: the role of collaboration in the supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 111:299–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Geibler J, Kuhndt M, Seifert EK, Lucas R, Lorek S, Bleischwitz R (2004) Sustainable business and consumption strategies. In: Bleischwitz R, Hennicke P (eds) Eco-efficiency, regulations and sustainable business. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp 116–164

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway

    Ottar Michelsen & Annik Magerholm Fet

Authors
  1. Ottar Michelsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annik Magerholm Fet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ottar Michelsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michelsen, O., Fet, A.M. Using eco-efficiency in sustainable supply chain management; a case study of furniture production. Clean Techn Environ Policy 12, 561–570 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-009-0266-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-009-0266-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation