Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Checking rounds for isolation precautions in the control of multidrug-resistant organisms: reduction achieved

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this investigation was to analyze the effectiveness of a quality improvement initiative in limiting the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in the hospital setting. During the period 2011–2013, a multimodal intervention was activated at a tertiary care center in Italy. The intervention included: laboratory-based surveillance, interdisciplinary training sessions, monitoring the adoption of isolation precautions and daily supervision provided by infection control nurses, and a monthly feedback. Time series analysis was used to evaluate the trends and correlations between the MDROs rate, intensity of checking rounds, and hospital-wide data (i.e., transfer of patients, patients’ days, site of isolation, etc.). A total of 149,251 patients were included in the study. The proportion of patients undergoing transmission-based isolation precautions within 24 h from a positive laboratory finding increased from 83% in 2011 to 99% in 2013 (p < 0.05). The wards appropriately adopting the correct isolation precaution increased from 83% in 2011 to 97.6% in 2013 (p < 0.05). The frequency of controls was significantly reduced after the observation of compliance in the appropriate wards (p < 0.05). After three years, the incidence rate changed from 5.8/1000 days of stay [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.6–6.1] in 2011 to 4.7 (95% CI 4.4–4.9) in 2013 (p < 0.0001). Moreover, microorganisms isolated from different types of specimens showed variable potential for transmission (i.e., skin as the most potential and urine the least). The results demonstrate the efficacy of the multimodal intervention, with sustained reduction of MDROs rate, besides check reduction, and highlight the long-term efficacy of checking rounds in changing professionals’ behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Angelis G, Cataldo MA, De Waure C et al (2014) Infection control and prevention measures to reduce the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:1185–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sprague E, Reynolds S, Brindley PG (2015) Patient isolation precautions: are they worth it? Can Respir J. pii: 17249

  3. Otter JA, Mutters NT, Tacconelli E, Gikas A, Holmes AH (2015) Controversies in guidelines for the control of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in EU countries. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:1057–1066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Flodgren G, Conterno LO, Mayhew A, Omar O, Pereira CR, Shepperd S (2013) Interventions to improve professional adherence to guidelines for prevention of device-related infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:1–144

    Google Scholar 

  5. Russell D, Beekmann SE, Polgreen PM, Rubin Z, Uslan DZ (2016) Routine use of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus: which way is the pendulum swinging? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 37:36–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen CC, Cohen B, Shang J (2015) Effectiveness of contact precautions against multidrug-resistant organism transmission in acute care: a systematic review of the literature. J Hosp Infect 90:275–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Waterson P, Catchpole K (2016) Human factors in healthcare: welcome progress, but still scratching the surface. BMJ Qual Saf 25:480–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbett SK, Yokoe DS, Lipsitz SR et al (2009) Proposed checklist of hospital interventions to decrease the incidence of healthcare-associated Clostridium difficile infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 30:1062–1069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan DJ, Murthy R, Munoz-Price LS et al (2015) Reconsidering contact precautions for endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 36:1163–1172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moriceau G, Gagneux-Brunon A, Gagnaire J et al (2016) Preventing healthcare-associated infections: residents and attending physicians need better training in advanced isolation precautions. Med Mal Infect 46:14–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (2007) Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in health care settings, 2006. Am J Infect Control 35:S165–S193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Available online at: http://www.eucast.org

  13. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB et al (2012) Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:268–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cornaglia G, Hryniewicz W, Jarlier V et al (2004) European recommendations for antimicrobial resistance surveillance. Clin Microbiol Infect 10:349–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kohlmann R, Gatermann SG (2016) Analysis and presentation of cumulative antimicrobial susceptibility test data—the influence of different parameters in a routine clinical microbiology laboratory. PLoS One 11:e0147965

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen AL, Calfee D, Fridkin SK et al (2008) Recommendations for metrics for multidrug-resistant organisms in healthcare settings: SHEA/HICPAC Position paper. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 29:901–913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singer S, Lin S, Falwell A, Gaba D, Baker L (2009) Relationship of safety climate and safety performance in hospitals. Health Serv Res 44:399–421

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Weaver SJ, Lubomksi LH, Wilson RF, Pfoh ER, Martinez KA, Dy SM (2013) Promoting a culture of safety as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 158:369–374

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gavaldà L, Pequeño S, Soriano A, Dominguez MA (2015) Environmental contamination by multidrug-resistant microorganisms after daily cleaning. Am J Infect Control 43:776–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Munoz-Price LS (2015) Controlling multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli in your hospital: a transformational journey. J Hosp Infect 89:254–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saladino L, Pickett LC, Frush K, Mall A, Champagne MT (2013) Evaluation of a nurse-led safety program in a critical care unit. J Nurs Care Qual 28:139–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Andersen SE, Knudsen JD; Bispebjerg Intervention Group (2013) A managed multidisciplinary programme on multi-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Danish university hospital. BMJ Qual Saf 22(11):907–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Prospero E, Barbadoro P, Esposto E et al (2010) Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases Klebsiella pneumoniae: multimodal infection control program in intensive care units. J Prev Med Hyg 51:110–115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Almyroudis NG, Osawa R, Samonis G et al (2016) Discontinuation of systematic surveillance and contact precautions for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) and its impact on the incidence of VRE faecium bacteremia in patients with hematologic malignancies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 37:398–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge all the healthcare workers participating in the adoption of isolation precautions and to the educational initiatives.

Authors’ contributions

All authors provided input into the design of the study and gave final approval of the version to be published. PB contributed to the conception and design, analysis of the data, and drafting and revising the article. MMDE contributed to the conception and design, revising the article, and is the guarantor of the study. MGG, EM, EM, RS, and SS contributed to the conception and implementation of the study, and revising the article. GS contributed in supervising the implementation of the intervention. EP contributed to critically revising the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. M. D’Errico.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was conducted as part of our routine work at the Ancona Associated Hospital and the Università Politecnica delle Marche.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

Not required, since the analysis was performed on data belonging to the routine care of patients.

Informed consent

Not required, since the procedures have been performed in the context of the routine care of patients.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barbadoro, P., Martini, E., Gioia, M.G. et al. Checking rounds for isolation precautions in the control of multidrug-resistant organisms: reduction achieved. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 36, 1105–1109 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2896-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2896-1

Keywords

Navigation