Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Infectious diseases publications in leading medical journals—a comparative analysis

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The representation of medical disciplines in leading journals may provide valuable information on their respective importance for both researchers and funding agencies. We were interested in the scientific contribution of infectious diseases to leading medical journals and their ranking compared to other medical disciplines. Original articles and short communications in three leading medical journals from 2003 to 2009 were analyzed by contributing medical discipline and by nation: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), The Lancet, and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). The medical disciplines were selected according to a standard textbook (Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine). Each article was categorized into one to three medical disciplines. The most frequently represented disciplines in 3,953 articles were cardiology (19.5 %), infectious diseases (18.6 %), and hematology/oncology (15.9 %). Each of the journals had another leading discipline: cardiology in JAMA, hematology/oncology in NEJM, and infectious diseases in The Lancet. In the American journals, contributions from US researchers dominated the field (52.6 % in NEJM, 73.6 % in JAMA), while the majority of papers in The Lancet originated from non-US residents (76.5 %). This study underlines the importance of infectious diseases as a medical discipline in clinical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hefler L, Tempfer C, Kainz C (1999) Geography of biomedical publications in the European Union, 1990–98. Lancet 353(9167):1856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. King DA (2004) The scientific impact of nations. Nature 430(6997):311–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Perel P, Miranda JJ, Ortiz Z, Casas JP (2008) Relation between the global burden of disease and randomized clinical trials conducted in Latin America published in the five leading medical journals. PLoS One 3(2):e1696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Soteriades ES, Falagas ME (2005) Comparison of amount of biomedical research originating from the European Union and the United States. BMJ 331(7510):192–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Soteriades ES, Rosmarakis ES, Paraschakis K, Falagas ME (2006) Research contribution of different world regions in the top 50 biomedical journals (1995–2002). FASEB J 20(1):29–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewison G, Grant J, Jansen P (2001) International gastroenterology research: subject areas, impact, and funding. Gut 49(2):295–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Michalopoulos A, Falagas ME (2005) A bibliometric analysis of global research production in respiratory medicine. Chest 128(6):3993–3998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramos JM, Masía M, Padilla S, Gutiérrez F (2009) A bibliometric overview of infectious diseases research in European countries (2002–2007). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28(6):713–716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tas F (2008) The contribution of countries and world regions in productivity of oncological publication. Ann Oncol 19(11):1962–1968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Read RC, Cornaglia G, Kahlmeter G; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Professional Affairs Workshop group (2011) Professional challenges and opportunities in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases in Europe. Lancet Infect Dis 11(5):408–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Journal Citation Report [database on the Internet]. Thomson Reuters. 2010. Available from: http://isisknowledge.com/JCR. Accessed: 16 Mar 2011

  12. Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson L, Loscalzo J (eds) (2008) Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, 18th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. MeSH. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2011. Home page at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh. Accessed 16 Mar 2011

  14. Oster MW (1976) Medical oncology in journals of internal medicine. Ann Intern Med 85(5):686–688

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Levi M (2009) How academic is internal medicine in the Netherlands? A bibliometric analysis. Neth J Med 67(10):318–319

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Frame JD, Narin F (1977) The international distribution of biomedical publications. Fed Proc 36(6):1790–1795

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stossel TP, Stossel SC (1990) Declining American representation in leading clinical-research journals. N Engl J Med 322(11):739–742. doi:10.1056/NEJM199003153221106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kolbitsch C, Balogh D, Hauffe H, Löckinger A, Benzer A (1999) National publication output in medical research. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 34(4):214–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ (2006) Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 367(9524):1747–1757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray CJ, Lopez AD (1997) Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 349(9061):1269–1276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization (WHO) (2004) The global burden of disease: 2004 update. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lown B, Banerjee A (2006) The developing world in The New England Journal of Medicine. Global Health 2:3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eckhouse S, Lewison G, Sullivan R (2008) Trends in the global funding and activity of cancer research. Mol Oncol 2(1):20–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. [No authors listed] (2006) The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Med 3(9):e291

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jackson A (2010) The impact factor game: the rising impact factor of the British Journal of Radiology—a success story? Br J Radiol 83(986):93–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Ulrich Korwitz (Director of “Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Medizin”, Köln) for his very valuable bibliometric advice.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

G. Fätkenheuer (BMBF 01KI0771) and O.A. Cornely (BMBF 01KN1106) have received funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Fätkenheuer.

Additional information

G. Fätkenheuer and F. Roer have equally contributed to this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fätkenheuer, G., Roer, F., Hirschel, B. et al. Infectious diseases publications in leading medical journals—a comparative analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31, 2585–2591 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1600-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1600-3

Keywords

Navigation