Introduction

Carbapenems are considered to be the first-line therapy in the treatment of serious infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae [1]. Therefore, the emergence and prevalent dissemination of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae presented a serious therapeutic challenge. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), a member of the class A carbapenemase family, can hydrolyze all β-lactam molecules. Since it was first reported in a K. pneumoniae isolate in 2001 [2], KPC has disseminated widely among nosocomial pathogens, especially Enterobacteriaceae, and has become the most frequent class A carbapenemase worldwide [1]. Fortunately, most KPC-producing isolates are still susceptible to one or more aminoglycoside antibiotics [3, 4].

Since 2003, the production of 16S rRNA methylase has been reported to be a new mechanism of aminoglycoside resistance. So far, seven types of methylases have been identified (ArmA, RmtA, RmtB, RmtC, RmtD, RmtE, and NpmA) [57]. Their presence could confer a pan-resistance pattern to clinically useful aminoglycosides. The co-existence of 16S rRNA methylases and various ESBLs in Enterobacteriaceae has been reported from time to time [5, 7]. Recently, the co-existence of 16S rRNA methylase, such as ArmA and RmtB, has also been reported in KPC-producing pathogens [8, 9]. This co-existence is quite alarming because additional high-level resistance to aminoglycosides in KPC-producing isolates and their potential spread would strongly limit the therapeutic options.

In previous publications, methylase genes and bla KPC were reported to be mostly located on different plasmids [8, 9]. Only Jiang et al. have reported a K. pneumoniae plasmid co-carrying bla KPC-2 and armA to date [10]. Moreover, when their coexistence is observed, it is mainly confined to a single isolate, and there has been no epidemic reported to date.

In the present study, we describe a multiresistant Enterobacter amnigenus isolate and a K. pneumoniae isolate from the same patient, both co-carrying bla KPC-2 and rmtB genes on a single plasmid. Further studies revealed that the multidrug-resistant (MDR) K. pneumoniae co-harboring bla KPC-2 and rmtB had disseminated clonally in our neurosurgery department. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the detection of bla KPC and rmtB in E. amnigenus, and also the first documenting of the emergence and outbreak of MDR K. pneumoniae co-carrying bla KPC and rmtB on a single plasmid.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

Carbapenem-resistant E. amnigenus (EA76) and K. pneumoniae (KP76) and an additional 11 non-duplicate carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates were collected from the neurosurgery department of The First Affiliated Hospital of the School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China, from April 2010 to December 2010. EA76 and KP76 were isolated from the same patient simultaneously, with EA76 from blood samples and KP76 from fecal specimens. The other 11 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains were obtained from the following specimens: lower respiratory tract (LRT) (n = 7), upper respiratory tract (URT) (n = 1), blood (n = 1), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (n = 1), and secretion (n = 1). Azide-resistant Escherichia coli J53 and E. coli DH5α cells (TAKARA, China) were used as recipients in conjunction and transformation experiments, respectively.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of various antibiotics for KP76, EA76, and their E. coli transformants were determined with E-test strips according to the manufacturer’s instructions (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). The MICs for the other 11 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates were performed by the agar dilution method, as described in the guidelines from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [11]. The susceptibility results were interpreted according to the CLSI criteria [11]. For tigecycline, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) breakpoint values for Enterobacteriaceae were used (susceptible: ≤2 mg/L; resistant: ≥8 mg/L), and a concentration of 4 mg/L was used as the breakpoint of resistance for colistin [12]. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a quality control strain.

Conjugation, transformation, and plasmid analysis

Repeated attempts to transfer carbapenem resistance from EA76 and KP76 to sodium azide-resistant E. coli strain J53 by a mixed-broth mating procedure were performed. Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA) containing 0.5 mg/L meropenem and 200 mg/L sodium azide was used to select the transconjugants. Plasmids of EA76 and KP76 were extracted with the QIAGEN Plasmid Midi Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and transformed into competent E. coli DH5α (TAKARA, China). MHA plates containing 1 mg/L meropenem were used to select transformants. KP76-T and EA76-T, confirmed as bla KPC-positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, were designated as E. coli transformants of KP76 and EA76, respectively. The plasmids in EA76-T and KP76-T were extracted with the QIAGEN Plasmid Midi Kit and digested by BamHΙ, SmaΙ, and EcoRΙ (TAKARA, China). Plasmid DNAs and the digestion products were separated by gel electrophoresis in 0.8% agarose at 140 V for 2 h.

PCR screening and DNA sequencing

Total DNAs were prepared with the boiling method as described previously [13], and used as templates for PCR amplification. Amplification primers for bla KPC, bla TEM, bla SHV, bla CTX, bla IMP, bla VIM, armA, rmtA, rmtB, qnrA, qnrB, and qnrS were used as described previously [7, 1416]. All PCR products were sequenced by the dideoxynucleotide chain-termination method by ABI 377 (ABI, USA) and the sequences were compared with the nucleotide sequences from GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/).

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)

Genomic DNAs prepared from KP76 and the other 11 K. pneumoniae strains were embedded in agarose gel plugs. After digestion with restricted enzyme XbaΙ (TAKARA, China), DNA fragments were separated using a CHEF-Mapper XA PFGE system (Bio-Rad, USA) for 23 h at 6 V/cm and 14°C, with a pulse angle of 120° and pulse times from 5 s to 35 s. PFGE profiles were analyzed visually [17].

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST)

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) with seven housekeeping genes (gapA, infB, mdh, pgi, phoE, rpoB, and tonB) was carried out for all K. pneumoniae isolates, including KP76, according to protocols provided on the MLST website for K. pneumoniae (http://www.pasteur.fr/recherche/genopole/PF8/mlst/Kpneumoniae.html).

Results

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

EA76 and KP76 were resistant to almost all of the antimicrobial agents tested, including cephalosporins, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin, but they were susceptible to colistin and tigecycline (Table 1). Their E. coli transformants gained a β-lactam resistance pattern with elevated MICs of carbapenems. The MIC of ertapenem for EA76-T was as high as 16 mg/L. In addition, aminoglycoside resistance was also transferred to EA76-T and KP76-T.

Table 1 Clinical and in vitro characteristics of the clinical isolates and transformants of KP76 and EA76

The other 11 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates showed complete resistance to all of the β-lactams tested as well. Of them, eight were also resistant to ciprofloxacin and seven were highly resistant to amikacin. Moreover, all of the seven amikacin-resistant isolates were classified into the ciprofloxacin-resistant group. All of the 11 isolates were susceptible to colistin and tigecycline (Table 1).

Conjugation, transformation, and plasmid analysis

Repeated attempts to transfer carbapenem resistance from EA76 and KP76 to sodium azide-resistant E. coli strain J53 were unsuccessful. Two plasmids were extracted from EA76 and KP76, respectively. The larger plasmid extracted from each strain (both ~54 kb) was transformed into E. coli DH5α (Fig. 1a). Restriction analysis of plasmid DNAs showed different patterns between the two transformants, EA76-T and KP76-T (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Plasmid DNAs profiles of EA76, KP76, EA76-T, and KP76-T. M, E. coli V517 (used as a standard for plasmid size); lane 1, EA76; lane 2, KP76; lane 3, EA76-T; and lane 4, KP76-T. b Restriction patterns of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing plasmid DNAs from EA76-T and KP76-T. M, 1-kb DNA ladder; lanes 1, 3, and 5, EA76-T; lanes 2, 4, and 6, KP76-T. Plasmid DNAs were digested with BamHΙ, SmaΙ, and Eco

PCR screening and DNA sequencing

EA76 and KP76 were positive for bla KPC-2, bla TEM-1, bla SHV-12, bla CTX-M-3, bla CTX-M-14, and rmtB genes, whereas EA76-T and KP76-T were positive for bla KPC-2, bla TEM-1, bla CTX-M-14, and rmtB genes. This indicates that bla KPC-2 co-existed with bla TEM-1, bla CTX-M-14, and rmtB on a single plasmid in both KP76 and EA76 strains. Of the other 11 K. pneumoniae isolates, all seven amikacin-resistant isolates shared an identical resistance gene profile as KP76, whereas two of the four amikacin-susceptible isolates harbored all of the genes found in KP76, with the exception of rmtB. The remaining two amikacin-susceptible isolates (KP45 and KP54) harbored bla VIM-1 carbapenemase gene rather than bla KPC. KP45 also carried bla TEM-1 and bla CTX-M-10, while KP54 carried bla SHV-12 and bla CTX-M-56. No qnr genes were detected in any of the screened isolates.

PFGE

PFGE profile analysis revealed that 9 of the 11 K. pneumoniae isolates had identical or one-band-difference patterns relative to KP76. The remaining two isolates (KP45 and KP54), which were positive for bla VIM-1, had distinct PFGE patterns (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of XbaΙ-digested DNAs of K. pneumoniae isolates from our neurosurgery wards. M, λ DNA ladder; lane 1, KP31; lane 2, KP34; lane 3, KP35; lane 4, KP45; lane 5, KP48; lane 6, KP54; lane 7, KP86; lane 8, KP98; lane 9, KP104; lane 10, KP111; lane 11, KP215; and lane 12, KP76

MLST

MLST showed three sequence types (STs) based on the analysis of the seven housekeeping genes in the 12 K. pneumoniae isolates. Of the three sequence types, ST11 was the dominant type and was detected in ten isolates, including KP76. The remaining two isolates, KP45 and KP54, were found to belong to ST494 and ST23, respectively. These MLST results were in accordance with our PFGE findings. The nine ST11 isolates belonged to one PFGE type, and the ST494 and ST23 isolates belonged to two distinct PFGE types.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first report of an E. amnigenus isolate that is resistant to both carbapenems and aminoglycosides. E. amnigenus is a Gram-negative aerobic bacillus of the family Enterobacteriaceae. They are ubiquitous in nature and have been occasionally isolated from clinical specimens, such as sputum, wound, blood, and feces [18]. In 2006, an epidemic of post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis was reported to be caused by this pathogen in India [19]. E. amnigenus has been reported to be fully susceptible to almost all antimicrobial agents that are generally active against Enterobacteriaceae, including aminoglycosides, most β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, chloramphenicol, and nitrofurantoin [20]. Here, we reported an E. amnigenus isolate co-carrying bla KPC-2, bla TEM-1, bla SHV-12, bla CTX-M-3, bla CTX-M-14, and rmtB genes, with bla KPC-2, bla TEM-1, bla CTX-M-14, and rmtB on the same plasmid. This isolate was resistant to almost all of the antibiotics tested, except tigecycline and colistin. Therefore, antibiotic regimens for infections involving this pathogen would become rather limited if this multiresistant isolate were to become disseminated. In addition, due to their presence in the environment, the acquisition and accumulation of resistance determinants could make E. amnigenus a potential natural reservoir for these determinants.

The EA76 and KP76 isolates that were co-carrying bla KPC and rmtB were from the same patient. Their KPC-producing plasmids were of the same size and shared an identical resistance determinant profile. Nevertheless, restriction analysis of the two KPC-producing plasmids showed different patterns. Further screening of carbapenem-susceptible E. amnigenus isolates from fecal specimens of the same patient were unsuccessful. These results together argue against our initial expectation that EA76 obtained its bla KPC gene directly from KP76 via the in vivo transmission of a co-harboring plasmid as described previously [21]. It is possible that EA76 acquired the bla KPC gene via the mobility of transposon. Since bla KPC genes were reported to be located within a roughly 10-kb Tn-3-type transposon, Tn4401, which can facilitate their mobility between different clones of the same species or even between clones of different genera [1]. Or, perhaps most likely, EA76 could have acquired the KPC-producing plasmid elsewhere, given that KPC-producing K. pneumoniae were known to be disseminated widely in our hospital before the isolation of EA76 (data unpublished).

We found that 7 (63.64%) of the 11 other carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates from our neurosurgery wards were also highly resistant to aminoglycosides. PCR analysis revealed that these seven isolates had identical antimicrobial gene profiles as KP76. PFGE revealed that six of these seven isolates shared a common identical PFGE profile with KP76, whereas the remaining isolate showed a one-band-difference profile (Fig. 2). MLST analysis showed that all seven of these isolates together with KP76 belonged to ST11, which is also the dominant clone of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae in China [22]. These observations strongly suggest that the ST11 K. pneumoniae isolates containing bla KPC-2 and rmtB on a single plasmid had disseminated clonally in our neurosurgery wards. Two of the remaining four K. pneumoniae isolates fell into the same PFGE type as KP76, and belonged to the ST11 clone as well. They carried the same resistance genes as KP76, except rmtB. This could partly indicate that rmtB could have disseminated via the mobilization of transposon or other transposable elements between K. pneumoniae isolates as well, since rmtB has been reported to be located adjacent to mobile genetic elements [5, 13]. The other two remaining K. pneumoniae isolates carried totally different resistance genes and belonged to distinct PFGE and MLST types.

In our study, 9/12 (75%) carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates showed ciprofloxacin resistance, including all eight KPC–RmtB co-producing isolates. However, no qnr genes were identified in any of the K. pneumoniae isolates. Quinolone resistance in these strains could have been mediated by mutations of the gyrase and topoisomerase IV genes or by efflux pump mechanisms.

In conclusion, here, we have reported an E. amnigenus strain and a K. pneumoniae strain that each co-carried bla KPC-2 and rmtB on a single plasmid; nevertheless, the two plasmids were different. Further studies revealed that the MDR ST11 K. pneumoniae co-carrying bla KPC-2 and rmtB had disseminated widely in our neurosurgery wards. The co-carriage of various antibiotic resistance determinants on one plasmid can provide survival advantages and evolutionary benefits to bacteria in an antibiotic-rich environment, and facilitate their wide spread. In addition, it can also facilitate the co-transmission of various competent resistance determinants among different pathogens. These observations, together with the fact that few therapeutic options are available for these infections, compel us to take urgent actions to contain this outbreak and the persistent spread of KPC–RmtB co-producing K. pneumoniae in the hospital setting.