Abstract
Test results of syphilis serology are critical due to inter- and intralaboratory variability. The accuracy of results is crucial in the control of the disease. This study was aimed to compare results of laboratories and performance of methods for syphilis serology. Results of Veneral Disease Reference Laboratory (VDRL) or rapid plasma reagin (RPR) tests of 25 microbiology laboratories were compared in six proficiency testing sentinel surveys. The performance of laboratories was compared with the results of a hypothetical average laboratory. Of the 141 participants, 104 (73.8%) responded. The inter-laboratory variability was exhibited by 62.2% of samples tested by VDRL and 58.7% by RPR test. Intralaboratory variability was observed in 46.7% samples. There was an insignificant improvement in proficiency testing (PT) performance over the years with a significant improvement in 2007. The common errors involved departure from testing protocols. Syphilis serology proficiency testing is needed in India for reliability in test results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gerbase AC, Rowley JT, Heymann DHL et al (1998) Global prevalence and incidence estimates of selected curable STDs. Sex Transm Infect 74(Suppl 1):S12–S16
Ray K, Bala M, Gupta SM et al (2006) Changing trends in sexually transmitted infections at a regional STD centre in North India. Indian J Med Res 124:559–568
Kerani RP, Handsfield HH, Stenger MS et al (2007) Rising rates of syphilis in the era of syphilis elimination. Sex Transm Dis 34:154–161 doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000233709.93891.e5
Larsen SA, Steiner BM, Rudolph AH (1995) Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clin Microbiol Rev 8:1–21
Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (1993) Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines: Syphilis. MMWR 42(RR-14):27–40
World Health Organization (1982) Treponemal infections. In technical report series 674. WHO, Geneva, pp 25–59
Neimeister RP, Teschemacher R, Yankevitch IJ et al (1975) Proficiency testing, trouble shooting and quality control for the RPR test. Am J Med Technol 41:13–17
Muller I, Brade V, Hagedorn HJ et al (2006) Is serological testing a reliable tool in laboratory diagnosis of syphilis? Meta-analysis of eight external quality control surveys performed by German infection serology proficiency testing program. J Clin Microbiol 44:1335–1341 doi:10.1128/JCM.44.4.1335-1341.2006
Hsu WS, Kao JT, Ho SW (2000) Quality assurance in clinical laboratories in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 99:235–242
Snell JJS, De Mello JV, Gardner PS (1982) The United Kingdom national microbiological quality assessment scheme. J Clin Pathol 35:82–93 doi:10.1136/jcp.35.1.82
Taylor RN, Fulford KM (1981) Assessment of laboratory improvement by the Centre for Disease Control diagnostic immunology proficiency testing program. J Clin Microbiol 13:356–368
Centres for Disease Control (1969) Manual of tests for syphilis. Publication 411. US Department of Health Education and Welfare, Washington, DC
World Health Organization (1999) Health laboratory services in support of primary health care in the South east Asia region. In: Kumari S, Sharma KB (eds) South-East Asia series no.24, 2nd edn. WHO, New Delhi, pp 151–196
Hurst J, Nickel K, Hilborne LH (1998) Are physicians’ office laboratory results of comparable quality to those produced in other laboratory settings? JAMA 279:468–471 doi:10.1001/jama.279.6.468
Taylor RN, Fulford KM, Przybyszewski VA et al (1978) Centre for Disease Control diagnostic immunology proficiency testing program results for 1977. J Clin Microbiol 8:388–395
Pettit DE, Larsen SA, Pope V et al (1982) Unheated serum reagin test as a quantitative test for syphilis. J Clin Microbiol 15:238–242
Dyckman JD, Wende RD, Gantenbein D et al (1976) Evaluation of reagin screen, a new serological test for syphilis. J Clin Microbiol 4:145–150
Creighton ET (1990) Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) 18-mm circle card test. In: Larsen SA, Hunter EF, Kraus SJ (eds) A manual of tests for syphilis, 8th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, pp 99–108
EL-Zaatari MM, Martens MG (1994) False-negative syphilis screening due to change in temperature. Sex Transm Dis 21:243–246
Miller JN (1975) Value and limitations of non-treponemal and treponemal tests in the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 18:191–203 doi:10.1097/00003081-197503000-00017
Acknowledgement
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Medical Superintendent, Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi for giving permission to conduct the study and to the National AIDS Control Organisation (NACO), Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi for financial support. The authors express appreciation to Mrs. Sudershan Trehan and Mr. Om Prakash Juneja for their technical support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, S.M., Bala, M., Muralidhar, S. et al. Evaluation of test results of microbiology laboratories of North India for standard tests for syphilis under an external quality assurance scheme. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28, 461–468 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-008-0651-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-008-0651-y