Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Thermopolymerization inhibitors generated via radiolysis of lignin

Abstract

The pyrogenic conversion of lignin to a phenolic tar can be significantly enhanced by combining dry distillation with simultaneous electron-beam treatment of lignin. The tar produced by the combined method contains three times more benzenediols in comparison with conventional pyrogenic distillation method. As shown, the tar of radiation-thermal origin can inhibit the thermopolymerization of certain monomers, such as styrene. The inhibiting ability of tar exceeds that of synthetic phenolic inhibitors. In the presence of 0.025 wt% of the tar, the induction period of styrene thermopolymerization at 120 °С is at least 120 min. Radiation-thermal formation of phenolic tar obeys the chain mechanism and thereby, is a highly efficient process.

Introduction

Many of the most commonly used monomers, such as styrene, are easily polymerized by heating. As a consequence, the use of polymerization retardants is necessary for the recovery, refining and storage of such monomers. Accordingly, the search for effective and safe polymerization retarders is an actual task.

Aromatic nitroxyl compounds or amines [1, 2], in particular, 2,6-ditertbutyl-4-dimethylaminomethylphenol (Mannich’s base), are usually used in the modern industry to inhibit thermal polymerization of styrene. However, degradation products of such unstable inhibitors contaminate the monomer. Besides, arylamines and nitroxyls possess considerable toxicity. Therefore, despite high reactivity of such inhibitors, they should be replaced with less harmful compounds, in particular, inhibitors of phenolic type.

Phenols are quite often taken into consideration from the point of view of practical inhibition of monomers polymerization and polymers stabilization. For example, 2,6-ditertbutyl-4-methylphenol (Avox BHT), bis-(2-oxy-5-methyl-3-tertbutylphenyl)-methane (Vanox MBPC), mixed phenolic inhibitor (PC-16), and also various compositions on the basis of technogenic phenols, are used as alternative polymerization retarders of styrene [3, 4]. Search of phenolic polymerization retarders also is important to advance researches on synthesis of new highly effective phenolic antioxidants via phenol/styrene interaction complicated because of secondary process of styrene polymerization [5].

The phenols forming by means of thermal processing of wood and coal are practically most available. The phenolic tar originating from wood is known since ancient times. It was used as lubricant, protective impregnant for wooden and leather products, insect repellant, odorant, cosmetic and edible ingredient, spice for meat, natural dye for production of paints, chemical reagent, etc. Till now tar is widely used as bio-protection agent. In the last century, tar has been recognized as inexpensive and available polymerization retarder, in particular, as inhibitor of styrene thermopolymerization.

However, the phenolic tar forming by means of conventional dry distillation of wood contains low-reactive phenols and, as the consequence, possesses rather low inhibiting effect in comparison with phenols of a coke-chemical origin [3].

As shown earlier [6, 7], the dry distilling combined with an electron beaming gives the chance to change considerably composition and properties of the organic tar being produced from a vegetative feedstock. In the present work, the tar produced via the combined method from lignin has been tested as inhibitor of styrene thermopolymerization.

Experimental

Materials

The hydrolytic coniferous lignin (Polyphepan from “ScienTech”, Russia) containing 8.5 wt% of cellulose and intended for medical application has been used as feedstock. Mineral impurities were mainly represented by Na ( ≈ 1 wt%), Fe ( ≈ 0.1%) and Si (0.012%). The content of each of Al, Ca, Cr, Cu and Mg was not higher than 10−3 wt%, whereas the content of Ag, B, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sn, Ti and Zn did not exceed 10−4 wt%. Such a composition of mineral impurities is characteristic of polyphepan [8].

Tar has been obtained by three ways. The first way (DD mode) consisted of conventional dry distillation of lignin by means of muffle heating. The second way (EBD mode) provided a combination of dry distillation with electron-beam irradiation of lignin. Unlike EBD, the third way (EBDW mode) was to distill the feedstock containing equal quotas of lignin and wax. Mixture of С17–С120 solid linear paraffins (wax) synthesized via Fischer–Tropsch process (from “Gazohim Techno”, Russia) served as additive into lignin at EBDW mode. The content of C atoms per an average molecule of the wax was na = 28.6 and boiling range of the wax was 350–700 °С.

Individual aromatic compounds representing alkylated derivatives of benzene, phenol, guaiacol, vanillin and benzenediols (5–8 compounds from each group, from Sigma-Aldrich and Reachem) were used in chromatographic quantitative analysis of tar.

Styrene and thermopolymerization inhibitors were purchased from PJSC “Nizhnekamskneftekhim” (Russia). Several recognized phenolic retarders, including 2,6-ditertbutyl-4-dimethylaminomethylphenol (Mannichʼs base, R1), 2,6-ditertbutyl-4-methylphenol (Avox BHT, R2), bis-(2-oxy-5-methyl-3-tertbutylphenyl)-methane (Vanox MBPC, R3), methylbenzylphenols (R4) and di(methylbenzyl)phenols (R5), have been tested among comparison inhibitors. The R4 methylbenzylphenols mixture contained 42 wt% of 2-methylbenzylphenol and 58 wt% of 4-methylbenzylphenol. The R5 di(methylbenzyl)phenols mixture contained 43 wt% of 2,4-di (methylbenzyl)phenol and 57 wt% of 2,6-di(methylbenzyl)phenol. Lewatit K 2629 macroporous heterogeneous catalyst of acid type (from BAYER; effective particle size, 0.5–0.62 mm; inner surface, 40–45 m2/g) was used for synthesis of methylbenzylphenols.

Irradiation

Samples were irradiated by the accelerated electrons (UELB-10-10T linac; beam energy, 8 MeV; pulse duration, 6 µs; pulse repetition frequency, 300 Hz; average beam current, 800 µA; scan width, 245 mm; and scan frequency, 1 Hz) under vacuum (5 mmHg) at 0.20 ± 0.01 kGy/s in 100 ml cylindrical quartz vessels without air access. Average bulk weight of samples was 0.15 g/ml. Film dosimetry with a phenazine dye-doped copolymer standard reference material SO PD(F)R-5/50 [GSO (Certified Reference Material) no. 7875-2000] was used.

Distillation

Distillation of lignin in DD, EBD and EBDW modes was performed using the same laboratory setup (Fig. 1). Under EBD and EBDW modes, the reaction vessel was placed in the irradiation area. Three consecutive coolers–condensers (cooled accordingly by air at 17 ± 2 °С, by water at 15 ± 2 °С and by ice-water mix at ~ 0 °С) were located outside radiation area and were adjusted for roughing-out and devaporation of light fragmentation products. Gaseous products were liberated by inertial separation and were evacuated by a gas pump. In DD mode, the constant 150 W power of the electric heater was used. In the DD mode, the constant power 150 W of electric heater was used, which provided the temperature rise up to 520 °C. In EBD and EBDW modes, the power of the electric heater was 86 W, providing the ultimate heating to 220 °C (below the pyrolysis start point). Radiation heating with an electron beam increased the temperature in the sample by 110°.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic diagram of distillation: (1) electron beam, (2) reactionary vessel (feedstock container), (3) electric heater, (4) air cooler, (5) water cooler, (6) and (8) condensate receivers, (7) ice cooler

Analysis

Gas chromatograph and mass spectrometer (Agilent 5977EMSD/7820AGC; helium as carrier gas; 60-m glass capillary column of 0.25 µm inner diameter) was used for analysis of tar. Typical chromatograms of the wax formed in the DD, EBD and EBDW modes are shown in Fig. 2. The NIST mass spectrometer library was used to identify the components of the wax. At least 99% of all components had mass spectra corresponding to known compounds included in the NIST library (91–99% similarity). Fractionation of the tar with a laboratory distillation column, as well as by changing the temperature in the air cooler (4) in Fig. 1, was used to concentrate the individual fractions and thereby improve the identification of the components. However, about 0.65, 0.37, and 0.26 wt% of the components obtained in DD, EBD and EBDW modes, respectively, remained unidentified.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Typical chromatograms of the tar formed via three modes of dry distillation. DD conventional dry distillation of lignin, EBD radiation-assisted dry distillation of lignin, EBDW radiation-assisted dry distillation of lignin/wax mixture

Individual alkylated derivatives of benzene, phenol, guaiacol, vanillin and benzenediols, as well as their artificial mixtures, were used in GC quantitative analysis of tar to compare and determine the response factors. The ion current corresponding to each chromatographic peak was analyzed by means of the AMDIS software (Automated Mass Spectral Deconvolution and Identification System) to identify and characterize overlapping peaks.

Inhibition test

Influence of phenolic inhibitors on styrene thermopolymerization has been measured at 120 °С in N2 atmosphere. Concentration of test inhibitor in styrene was 0.025 wt%. The thermopolymer content was determined by a dilatometric technique [9]. The inhibitor and styrene were loaded into a clean dry dilatometer and deaerated with nitrogen for 5 min. The dilatometer was then placed in an air thermostat at 120 °C. Periodic measurements of the change in the volume of styrene (ΔV) and the amount of the formed thermopolymer were calculated from the ratio between ΔV and the initial volume V, taking into account the difference in the styrene density at room temperature and at 120 °C. The induction period (τi) was defined as elapsed time to form 2 wt% of thermopolymer.

Influence of 0.025 wt% of particular inhibitors onto secondary process of styrene polymerization during phenol methylbenzylation (at 1.7-fold excess of styrene) has been studied also. Synthesis of methylbenzylphenols was made at 120 °С in the presence of the Lewatit K 2629 macroporous heterogeneous catalyst of acid type. Viscosity of the synthesized liquids was estimated on the basis of their efflux velocity by means of capillary Ubbelohde viscometer.

Results and discussion

The yield of the decomposition products of lignin depends on the distillation mode used. In the DD mode, the water, gas and tar yields are 20 ± 2, 21 ± 1 and 12 ± 1 wt%, respectively. The use of irradiation in the distillation process (EBD mode) leads to an increase in the yield of tar (32 ± 2%) simultaneously with a decrease in the yield of water (10 ± 2%), gases (18 ± 2%) and charcoal (40 ± 2%).

All aromatic products were assigned to five functional series (Table 1). Alkyl, alkenyl and methoxy derivatives of benzene and polycyclic hydrocarbons have been assigned to the alkylbenzenes series. Alkyl and alkenyl derivatives of phenol were assigned to the phenols series. Compounds that contain hydroxyl and a methoxy group have been included in the guaiacols series. Vanillin derivatives and other compounds containing carbonyl groups were assigned to the carbonyls series. Aromatic compounds with two hydroxyl groups were included in the benzenediols series. Table 1 shows the structures of aromatic compounds whose derivatives dominate in each series. The quantitative composition of each series is shown in Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.

Table 1 Assigning products to series
Fig. 3
figure 3

Composition of the alkylbenzenes series in the tar formed via three modes of dry distillation. DD conventional dry distillation of lignin, EBD radiation-assisted dry distillation of lignin, EBDW radiation-assisted dry distillation of lignin/wax mixture

Fig. 4
figure 4

Composition of the phenols series in the tar formed via three modes of dry distillation. DD conventional dry distillation of lignin, EBD radiation-assisted dry distillation of lignin, EBDW radiation-assisted dry distillation of lignin/wax mixture

Fig. 5
figure 5

Composition of the guaiacols series in the tar formed via three modes of dry distillation. DD conventional dry distillation of lignin, EBD radiation-assisted dry distillation of lignin, EBDW radiation-assisted dry distillation of lignin/wax mixture

Fig. 6
figure 6

Composition of the carbonyls series in the tar formed via three modes of dry distillation. DD conventional dry distillation of lignin, EBD radiation-assisted dry distillation of lignin, EBDW radiation-assisted dry distillation of lignin/wax mixture

Fig. 7
figure 7

Composition of the benzenediols series in the tar formed via three modes of dry distillation. DD conventional dry distillation of lignin, EBD radiation-assisted dry distillation of lignin, EBDW radiation-assisted dry distillation of lignin/wax mixture

Distinctions of the tar obtained from lignin via DD and EBD modes are shown on Fig. 8. DD mode gives lighter tar. Components whose boiling point is lower than 235 °С represent about 85 wt% of the tar. Among them there is the fraction (2.7 wt%) consisting of nonaromatic products of a fragmentation of lignin and extrinsic cellulose (acetone, methanol, light carboxylic acids, furfural, methylfurfural, furanmethanol, etc.). However, the prevailing fraction of tar consists of about 50 aromatic compounds among which alkylbenzenez, phenols, guaiacols, carbonyl compounds and benzenediols are the most significant. At the same time, among the carbonyl compounds ( ~ 14 wt%) the derivatives of dehydroabietic acid predominate, while the content of vanilloids is relatively small (4.8 wt%).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Series distribution in the tar formed via three modes of dry distillation. DD conventional dry distillation of lignin, EBD radiation-assisted dry distillation of lignin, EBDW radiation-assisted dry distillation of lignin/wax mixture

In comparison with DD mode, the EBD mode gives 13 times smaller quantity of aromatic products free of OH groups (alkylbenzenes series)—their total content in the tar is 1.2 ± 0.2 wt% (Figs. 3, 8). All other components of tar represented various phenols, including 64 wt% of monohydric phenols. The content of phenol itself was only 2.2 wt%. About 6 wt% of monohydric phenols falls to cresols and xylenols, whereas 7.5 wt% falls to vanillin and its derivatives. However, guaiacols are the main representatives of monohydric phenols at EBD mode. Among them 2-methoxyphenol (guaiacol, 23.9%), 4-methyl-2-methoxyphenol (creosol, 15.9%), and 4-ethyl-2-methoxyphenol (2.8%) are prevailing (Fig. 5). Guaiacol and creosol domination agrees with the fact that coniferous lignin represents a combination mainly of guaiacylpropane base units, i.e., coniferyl alcohol serves as the main monolignol [10]. The total radiation-chemical yield of tar components is about 30 µmol/J that testifies to the chain mechanism of their formation [11,12,13].

At the same time, almost the third part of tar (32.6 wt%) at EBD mode consisted of benzenediols about 69% of which have been represented by catechols (Figs. 7, 8). High yield of tar formation and the high content of benzenediols in the tar are the important advantages to radiation-stimulated distillation vs pyrolysis. The tar originated via DD mode contains from 6 to 14 wt% of benzenediols [10]. The total yield of such tar formation is three times less than that at EBD mode.

The ionization of the lignin with the formation of the primary radical–cation can occur in any structural unit of the macromolecule. However, aromatic units are statistically most preferable. In polar systems, the radical–cation, taking into account its instability, decomposes into a radical and a cation. Correspondingly, the appearance of a radical–cation in the phenol moiety (reaction (1)) and the subsequent proton transfer (reaction (2)) with the formation of a phenoxyl radical and a fragment of the macromolecule with a protonated polar group should be considered as a key reaction scheme of the primary radiolytic transformations of lignin [11,12,13,14].

(1)
(2)

Reaction (1) precedes the formation of other important intermediates responsible for the fragmentation of lignin: radical–anions and H adducts. They appear as a result of the following reaction:

(3)

The conversion of the radical anion into the H adduct is simplified due to the presence of acids among the products of lignin radiolysis (for example, acetic acid). Structurally similar adducts result from the addition of H atoms to the aromatic units of lignin [12,13,14]:

(4)

Typically, the aromatic radical is thermally degraded by cleavage of the bond in the β-position relative to the benzene ring [11,12,13]. The methoxy O–CH3 bond is in the β-position. The low dissociation energy of the O–CH3 bond and the high concentration of methoxy groups in the lignin macromolecule are responsible for the high probability of CH3 elimination. The benzene ring allows phenoxyl radicals to acquire a quinoid structure with the arrangement of an unpaired electron on any of the carbon atoms. Thus, the bonds of almost any side substituent can occur in the β-position relative to the ring to increase the probability of their thermally stimulated cleavage. Thus, degradation with the elimination of aromatic fragments is one of the most important radiolytic transformations of lignin at high temperatures. Monohydric and dihydric phenols are the main liquid products of the degradation.

When the feedstock contains equal quotas of lignin and wax, the use of the EBDW mode leads to an increase in the series of benzenedioles (~ 44%) and carbonyls (~ 12%) (Fig. 8). At the same time, there is a decrease in the guaiacols series (~ 30%) of the tar (R7). Threefold reduction of the guaiacol fraction (from 23.9 to 7.9%) is observed, whereas fractions of 4-methylguaiacol and 4-ethylguaiacol are decreasing to 13 and 2.6%, respectively, but vinylguaiacol is present in the tar in negligible quantity (0.1%). At the same time, fractions of other alkyl derivatives of guaiacol slightly increase.

Collaterally with decreasing of guaiacols fraction in the tar (Figs. 5, 8), yields of all registered representatives of benzenediol series (Figs. 7, 8)—catechols, resorcinols and hydroquinones—are increasing. Apparently, such changes are caused by the intensified involving of guaiacols and/or their predecessors into the formation of benzenediols in the presence of alkanes in the mixture being irradiated.

Radiolysis of wax can be considered as a source of H and CH3 radicals, whereas aromatic units of lignin serve as effective scavenger of these radicals [12, 13]. Correspondingly, the cleavage of the weak O–CH3 bond of the methoxy group is the most probable reaction path of the high-temperature conversion of the H and CH3 adduct:

(5)

In turn, the addition of radical ·R (predominantly, H or СН3) to the benzenediol unit can lead to the thermally stimulated β-cleavage of the propane bridge that connects this unit to the lignin macromolecule.

(6)

It is obvious that guaiacol and creosol can participate in the formation of catechols in reactions like reaction (5). In particular, they can be the direct precursors of 3-methylcatechol and 3,4-dimethylcatechol, respectively. A possible reaction path in the propagation of chain fragmentation is the high-temperature reproduction of methyl radicals [12, 13].

(7)

Presence of the branched aromatic components possessing two or three vacant hydroxyl groups is positive from the point of view to use the tar as polymerization retarder [1,2,3,4,5]. Figure 9 illustrates kinetics of styrene thermopolymer formation in the presence of 0.025 wt% of various inhibitors (R1–R5 and tar). Apparently, all compared phenolic inhibitors are less effective in comparison with Mannich’s base, R1 (the curve 1, τi ≈ 160 min). Figure 9 shows significant influence of a structure of phenolic compounds on their inhibiting effect. So, the monosubstituted phenols—methylbenzylphenols—are less efficient than disubstituted ones—di(methylbenzyl)phenols. Mixture of di(methylbenzyl)phenols (R5) and two species of radiation-originated tar (R6 and R7) display the inhibiting effect almost similar to that displayed by R1 reference inhibitor. Induction periods of styrene thermopolymerization at 120 °С in cases of R1 and R5–R7 inhibitors vary in a range of 110–160 min. At the same time R2–R4 industrial stabilizers, as well as tar obtained at the DD mode, possess smaller effect in comparison with the radiation-originated tar.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Formation of polystyrene at 120 °С in the presence of 0.025 wt% of various inhibitors

Certainly, the tar has brown coloring. Accordingly, it considerably colors synthesized methylbenzyl derivatives. However, viscosity of the phenols synthesized in the presence of 0.025 wt% of tar is approximately 4–5 times less (Table 2) than that obtained without inhibitor. Moreover, the product synthesized at presence of R2 or R5 also is more viscous than that in the presence of the tar (R6 or R7).

Table 2 The efflux time for methylbenzylphenols synthesized in the presence and absence of inhibitors

Conclusion

The molecular chain scission consisting in elimination of phenolic fragments is the main radiolytic transformation of lignin at high temperatures. Radiation stimulation of pyrogenous decomposition of lignin provides possibility to obtain high yield of the beneficiated phenolic tar differing in composition from a product forming via conventional dry distillation. The electron beam is convenient tool to initiate simultaneous and uniform destruction of lignin. The radiolytic product represents a concentrate of methoxyphenols and the diatomic substituted phenols. As consequence, such tar can serve as the convenient and accessible additive to inhibit efficiently the styrene thermopolymerization. Besides, an inhibiting effect of the tar is higher than many industrial inhibitors.

References

  1. Córdova A, Watanabe S, Tanaka F, Notz W, Barbas CF (2002) A highly enantioselective route to either enantiomer of both α- and β-amino acid derivatives. J Am Chem Soc 124:1866–1867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitsumori S, Zhang H, Ha-Yeon Cheong P, Houk KN, Tanaka F, Barbas CF (2006) Direct asymmetric anti-Mannich-type reactions catalyzed by a designed amino acid. J Am Chem Soc 128:1040–1041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fiege H, Voges H-W, Hamamoto T, Umemura S, Iwata T, Miki H, Fujita Y, Buysch HJ, Garbe D, Paulus W (2000) Phenol derivatives. In: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, pp 521–582

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moad G, Solomon D (1995) The chemistry of free radical polymerization. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maul J, Frushour BG, Kontoff JR, Eichenauer H, Ott KH, Schade C (2007) Polystyrene and styrene copolymers. In: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ponomarev AV, Makarov IE, Ershov BG (2014) Electron-beam distillation of natural polymers. Radiat Phys Chem 94:221–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ponomarev AV (2009) Electron-beam decomposition of phytogenous substances: solid-to-liquid conversion. Radiat Phys Chem 78:345–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Podterob AP, Bogdanovich YuV, Nizhnikova EV, Nechai OG (2004) Detoxicating properties of polyphepan evaluated in model experiments. Pharm Chem J 38:459–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hunkel M, Surm H, Steinbacher M (2018) Dilatometry. Handb Therm Anal Calorim 6:103–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fengel D, Wegener G (1984) Wood: chemistry, ultrastructure, reactions. Walter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Woods R, Pikaev A (1994) Applied radiation chemistry. Radiation Processing. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ponomarev AV, Metreveli PK, Chulkov VN, Bludenko AV (2017) Formation of benzenediols upon electron-beam distillation of lignin mixtures with alkanes. High Energy Chem 51:380–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ponomarev AV (2017) Radiolysis of lignin: prospective mechanism of high temperature decomposition. Radiat Phys Chem 141:160–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuzina SI, Shilova IA, Mikhailov AI (2011) Chemical and radiation-chemical radical reactions in lignocellulose materials. Radiat Phys Chem 80:937–946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank the CKP FMI IPCE RAS for technical support (the linac and evaluators).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander V. Ponomarev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorbarev, I.N., Kasterin, A.I., Metreveli, P.K. et al. Thermopolymerization inhibitors generated via radiolysis of lignin. J Wood Sci 64, 675–682 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-018-1746-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-018-1746-4

Keywords