Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of magnetic resonance imaging of brachial plexus neuralgia

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the incidence of peripheral neurological diseases increases, the precise display of nerves becomes important in imaging examinations. Among them, the pain caused by brachial plexus neuropathy is very prominent, and the magnetic resonance imaging of nerve is quite complex and messy. This paper will systematically elaborate from the aspects of brachial plexus neuropathy, morphological and functional imaging, and post-processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cejas C, Rollan C, Michelin G et al (2016) High resolution neurography of the brachial plexus by 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Radiologia 58(2):88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rx.2015.12.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chhabra A, Thawait GK, Soldatos T et al (2013) High-resolution 3T MR neurography of the brachial plexus and its branches, with emphasis on 3D imaging[J]. Am J Neuroradiol 34(3):486–497. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lutz AM, Gold G, Beaulieu C (2014) MR Imaging of the brachial plexus[J]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 24(1):91–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung T, Prasad K, Lloyd TE (2014) Peripheral neuropathy: clinical and electrophysiological considerations[J]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 24(1):49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kollmer J, Bendszus M, Pham M (2015) MR neurography: diagnostic imaging in the PNS[J]. Clin Neuroradiol 25(S2):283–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-015-0412-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chhabra A, Lee PP, Bizzell C et al (2011) 3 Tesla MR neurography—technique, interpretation, and pitfalls[J]. Skeletal Radiol 40(10):1249–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1183-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin NT, Luna AA, Beltran LS et al (2017) Advanced MR imaging techniques for differentiation of neuropathic arthropathy and osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot[J]. Radiographics 37(4):1161–1180. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chhabra A, Belzberg AJ, Rosson GD et al (2016) Impact of high resolution 3 tesla MR neurography (MRN) on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic patient management[J]. Eur Radiol 26(5):1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3958-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wadhwa V, Hamid AS, Kumar Y et al (2017) Pudendal nerve and branch neuropathy: magnetic resonance neurography evaluation[J]. Acta Radiol 58(6):726–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185116668213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang L, Niu Y, Kong X et al (2016) The application of paramagnetic contrast-based T2 effect to 3D heavily T2W high-resolution MR imaging of the brachial plexus and its branches[J]. Eur J Radiol 85(3):578–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eppenberger P, Andreisek G, Chhabra A (2014) Magnetic resonance neurography- diffusion tensor imaging and future directions[J]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 24(1):245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grayev A, Reeder S, Hanna A (2016) Use of chemical shift encoded magnetic resonance imaging (CSE-MRI) for high resolution fat-suppressed imaging of the brachial and lumbosacral plexuses[J]. Eur J Radiol 85(6):1199–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.04.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Baltodano PA, Tong AJW, Chhabra A et al (2014) The role of magnetic resonance neurography in the postoperative management of peripheral nerve injuries[J]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 24(1):235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirkman MA (2015) The role of imaging in the development of neurosurgery[J]. J Clin Neurosci 22(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2014.05.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin NT, Barousse R, Socolovsky M et al (2017) Quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) neurography for evaluation of peripheral nerves and plexus injuries[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg 7(4):398–421. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2017.08.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Madhuranthakam A, Lenkinski R (2015) Technical advancements in MR neurography[J]. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 19(02):86–93. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1547370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chhabra A, Carrino J (2015) Current MR neurography techniques and whole-body MR neurography[J]. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 19(02):79–85. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1545074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Qin BG, Yang JT, Yang Y, Wang HG, Fu G, Gu LQ, Li P, Zhu QT, Liu XL, Zhu JK (2016) Diagnostic value and surgical implications of the 3D DW-SSFP MRI on the management of patients with brachial plexus injuries. Sci Rep 6:35999. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35999

  19. Andreisek G, Chhabra A (2015) MR neurography: pitfalls in imaging and interpretation[J]. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 19(02):94–102. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1546301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao L, Wang Y, Jia Y et al (2017) Microstructural abnormalities of basal ganglia and thalamus in bipolar and unipolar disorders: a diffusion kurtosis and perfusion imaging study[J]. Psychiatry Investig 14(4):471. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2017.14.4.471

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma G, Xu X, Hu H et al (2018) Utility of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging-based diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating malignant from benign masses in head and neck region[J]. Korean J Radiol 19(3):443. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.3.443

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang X, Harrison C, Mariappan YK et al (2017) MR neurography of brachial plexus at 3.0 T with robust fat and blood suppression[J]. Radiology 283(2):538–546. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016152842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chalian M, Behzadi AH, Williams EH et al (2014) High-resolution magnetic resonance neurography in upper extremity neuropathy[J]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 24(1):109–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chhabra A, Flammang A, Padua A et al (2014) Magnetic resonance neurography technical considerations[J]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 24(1):67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thawait GK, Chhabra A, Carrino JA et al (2014) Magnetic resonance neurography research evaluation of its effectiveness[J]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 24(1):257–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lozeron P, Lacour M, Vandendries C et al (2016) Contribution of plexus MRI in the diagnosis of atypical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies[J]. J Neurol Sci 360:170–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2015.11.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chhabra A, Andreisek G, Soldatos T et al (2011) MR neurography: past, present, and future[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(3):583–591. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.6012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Upadhyaya V, Upadhyaya DN, Kumar A et al (2015) MR neurography in traumatic brachial plexopathy[J]. Eur J Radiol 84(5):927–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.02.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ahlawat S, Chhabra A, Blakely J (2014) Magnetic resonance neurography of peripheral nerve tumors and tumorlike conditions[J]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 24(1):171–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aran S, Duran GS, Potigailo V et al (2017) Radiologic manifestation of the malignant peripheral nerve sheet tumor involving the brachial plexus[J]. Radiol Case Rep 12(3):615–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2017.02.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Crim J, Ingalls K (2017) Accuracy of MR neurography in the diagnosis of brachial plexopathy[J]. Eur J Radiol 95:24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.07.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jongbloed BA, Bos JW, Rutgers D et al (2017) Brachial plexus magnetic resonance imaging differentiates between inflammatory neuropathies and does not predict disease course[J]. Brain Behav 7(5):e632. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.632

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanfeng Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and Informed consent

The authors declare that no experiments with human beings or animals have been performed while conducting this investigation.

Conflict of interest

All the authors have no disclosures to make and no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, R., Chen, J., Zeng, C. et al. Development of magnetic resonance imaging of brachial plexus neuralgia. Neurol Sci 43, 1685–1693 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-05915-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-05915-1

Keywords

Navigation