Abstract
Problem solving ability is affected by many factors, including physiology, personality, and cognition. However, how age and experience influence problem-solving ability during development is harder to untangle. We tested how age and experience affected problem solving in a native Australian rodent, the fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rat Melomys cervinipes. Juveniles were divided into two groups (different ages at start of testing) and then received a food-baited cardboard matchbox every 10 days for a total of three tests. We compared the problem-solving ability of individuals from both groups, which allowed us to separate the effects of age and experience. Juveniles with more experience solved the task faster than juveniles with less experience. Furthermore, inexperienced older juveniles interacted with the problems more than inexperienced younger juveniles. Previous solving experience may be important for short-term solving success, while age, in the absence of experience, might be associated with increased exploration, leading to increased investigation of novel problems. Previous experience at manipulating objects generally may also be important for problem-solving success, which likely provides an advantage as resources and habitats change seasonally and annually.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The dataset has been included as supplementary material.
Code availability
Please contact the authors for the statistical analyses code.
References
Aplin LM, Sheldon BC, Morand-Ferron J (2013) Milk bottles revisited: social learning and individual variation in the blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus. Anim Behav 85:1225–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.03.009
ASAB Ethical Committee, ABS Animal Care Committee (2022) Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Anim Behav 183:I–XI. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(21)00389-4
Benson-Amram S, Holekamp KE (2012) Innovative problem solving by wild spotted hyenas. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:4087–4095. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1450
Benson-Amram S, Weldele ML, Holekamp KE (2013) A comparison of innovative problem-solving abilities between wild and captive spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta. Anim Behav 85:349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.11.003
Biondi LM, Bó MS, Vassallo AI (2010) Inter-individual and age differences in exploration, neophobia and problem-solving ability in a Neotropical raptor (Milvago chimango). Anim Cogn 13:701–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0319-8
Boogert NJ, Reader SM, Hoppitt W, Laland KN (2008) The origin and spread of innovations in starlings. Anim Behav 75:1509–1518
Borrego N, Dowling B (2016) Lions (Panthera leo) solve, learn, and remember a novel resource acquisition problem. Anim Cogn 19:1019–1025
Bredy TW, Humpartzoomian RA, Cain DP, Meaney MJ (2003) The influence of maternal care and environmental enrichment on hippocampal development and function in the rat. Neuroscience 118:571–576
Brown RW, Kraemer PJ (1997) Ontogenetic differences in retention of spatial learning tested with Morris water maze. Dev Psychobiol 30:329–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(199705)30:4%3c329::AID-DEV6%3e3.0.CO;2-Q
Callaway WA, Turner AA, Croshaw OB et al (2018) Melomys cervinipes (Rodentia: Muridae). Mamm Species 50:134–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/mspecies/sey015
Cole EF, Cram DL, Quinn JL (2011) Individual variation in spontaneous problem-solving performance among wild great tits. Anim Behav 81:491–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.025
Delignette-Muller ML, Dutang C (2015) Fitdistrplus: an R package for fitting distributions. J Stat Softw 64:1–34
Emery NJ, Dally JM, Clayton NS (2004) Western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica) use cognitive strategies to protect their caches from thieving conspecifics. Anim Cogn 7:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0178-7
Fischer A, Sananbenesi F, Wang X et al (2007) Recovery of learning and memory is associated with chromatin remodelling. Nature 447:178–182. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05772
Forrest D, Hallböök F, Persson H, Vennström B (1991) Distinct functions for thyroid hormone receptors alpha and beta in brain development indicated by differential expression of receptor genes. EMBO J 10:269–275
Francis DD, Meaney MJ (1999) Maternal care and the development of stress responses. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:128–134
Friard O, Gamba M (2016) BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12584
Frick KM, Baxter MG, Markowska AL et al (1995) Age-related spatial reference and working memory deficits assessed in the water maze. Neurobiol Aging 16:149–160
Gallese V, Rochat M, Cossu G, Sinigaglia C (2009) Motor cognition and its role in the phylogeny and ontogeny of action understanding. Dev Psychol 45:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014436
Griffin AS, Guez D (2014) Innovation and problem solving: a review of common mechanisms. Behav Processes 109:121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.027
Griffin AS, Diquelou M, Perea M (2014) Innovative problem solving in birds: a key role of motor diversity. Anim Behav 92:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.04.009
Guenther A, Brust V (2017) Individual consistency in multiple cognitive performance: behavioural versus cognitive syndromes. Anim Behav 130:119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.06.011
Guenther A, Finkemeier M-A, Trillmich F (2014) The ontogeny of personality in the wild guinea pig. Anim Behav 90:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.01.032
Healy SD, Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1994) Development of hippocampal specialisation in two species of tit (Parus spp.). Behav Brain Res 61:23–28
Hopper LM, Price SA, Freeman HD et al (2014) Influence of personality, age, sex, and estrous state on chimpanzee problem-solving success. Anim Cogn 17:835–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0715-y
Keagy J, Savard J-F, Borgia G (2009) Male satin bowerbird problem-solving ability predicts mating success. Anim Behav 78:809–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.011
Krackow S (2003) Motivational and heritable determinants of dispersal latency in wild male house mice (Mus musculus musculus ): dispersal propensity in wild house mice. Ethology 109:671–689. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00913.x
Kummer H, Goodall J (1985) Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 308:203–214
Laurance WF (1994) Rainforest fragmentation and the structure of small mammal communities in tropical Queensland. Biol Conserv 69:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(94)90325-5
Lynn DA, Brown GR (2009) The ontogeny of exploratory behavior in male and female adolescent rats (Rattus norvegicus). Dev Psychobiol 51:513–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20386
Milgram NW (2003) Cognitive experience and its effect on age-dependent cognitive decline in beagle dogs. Neurochem Res 28:1677–1682
Moriceau S, Roth TL, Sullivan RM (2010) Rodent model of infant attachment learning and stress. Dev Psychobiol 52:651–660
Paulling K, Wilson D, Rymer TL (2019) Olfactory recognition of snake cues by fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rats Melomys cervinipes. Behaviour 156:1235–1253
Rader R, Krockenberger A (2006) Three-dimensional use of space by a tropical rainforest rodent, Melomys cervinipes, and its implications for foraging and home-range size. Wildl Res 33:577. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR04117
Rowell MK, Rymer TL (2020a) Innovation in a native Australian rodent, the fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rat (Melomys cervinipes). Anim Cogn 23:301–310
Rowell MK, Rymer TL (2020b) Growth and behavioural development of the fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rat (Melomys cervinipes). Aust Mammal 43:330–334
Rowell MK, Rymer TL (2021a) Memory enhances problem solving in the fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rat Melomys cervinipes. Anim Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01556-7
Rowell MK, Rymer TL (2021b) Exploration influences problem solving in the fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rat (Melomys cervinipes). Ethology 127:592–604
Rowell MK, Pillay N, Rymer TL (2021) Problem solving in animals: proposal for an ontogenetic perspective. Animals 11:866
Shaw RC (2017) Testing cognition in the wild: factors affecting performance and individual consistency in two measures of avian cognition. Behav Processes 134:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.004
Shukitt-Hale B, Casadesus G, Cantuti-Castelvetri I, Joseph JA (2001) Effect of age on object exploration, habituation, and response to spatial and nonspatial change. Behav Neurosci 115:1059–1064. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.115.5.1059
Stamps JA, Swaisgood RR (2007) Sompleace like home: experience, habitat selection and conservation biology. Appl Anim Behav Sci 102:392–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.038
Thornton A, Samson J (2012) Innovative problem solving in wild meerkats. Anim Behav 83:1459–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.03.018
van Horik JO, Madden JR (2016) A problem with problem solving: motivational traits, but not cognition, predict success on novel operant foraging tasks. Anim Behav 114:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.02.006
Wood DH (1971) The ecology of Rattus fuscipes and Melomys cervinipes (Rodentia: Muridaae) in a south-east Queensland rain forest. Aust J Zool 19:371–392
Workel JO, Oitzl MS, Fluttert M et al (2001) Differential and age-dependent effects of maternal deprivation on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis of brown norway rats from youth to senescence. J Neuroendocrinol 13:569–580
Yom-Tov Y (1985) The reproductive rates of Australian rodents. Oecologia 66:250–255
Brooks M, Bolker B, Kristensen K, et al (2022) glmmTMB: Generalized Linear Mixed Models using Template Model Builder
Jackman S, Tahk A, Zeileis A, et al (2015) Package ‘pscl.’ Polit Sci Comput Lab. 18
Lenth R, Singmann H, Love J, et al (2020) Package “emmeans”
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Nh (2013) Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes. Natl Health Med Res Counc Canberra.
R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr Ben Hirsch for providing comments on the manuscript. We would also like to thank the Australasian Society for the Study of Animal Behaviour and James Cook University for funding this research, and the Australian Government for providing a research training scholarship to MKR. Finally, we would like to thank the volunteers who assisted in maintaining the mosaic-tailed rat colony in captivity.
Funding
This research was supported by James Cook University, College of Science and Engineering and the Australasian Society for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analyses were performed by MKR. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MKR and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest or competing interests.
Ethical approval
This research was approved by the Animal Ethics Screening Committee of James Cook University (clearance number: A2539).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rowell, M.K., Rymer, T.L. Both age and experience are important for successful problem solving in juvenile fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rats Melomys cervinipes. Anim Cogn 26, 781–789 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01718-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01718-1