Abstract
The extraordinary olfactory capabilities in detection and rescue dogs are well-known. However, the olfactory performance varies by breed and search environment (Jezierski et al. in Forensic Sci Int 237:112–118, 2014), as well as by the quantity of training (Horowitz et al. in Learn Motivation 44(4):207–217, 2013). While detection of an olfactory cue inherently demands a judgment regarding the presence or absence of a cue at a given location, olfactory discrimination requires an assessment of quantity, a task demanding more attention and, hence, decreasing reliability as an informational source (Horowitz et al. 2013). This study aims at gaining more clarity on detection and discrimination of olfactory cues in untrained dogs and in a variety of dog breeds. Using a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) paradigm, we assessed olfactory detection scores by presenting a varied quantity of food reward under one or the other hidden cup, and discrimination scores by presenting two varied quantities of food reward under both hidden cups. We found relatively reliable detection performances across all breeds and limited discrimination abilities, modulated by breed. We discuss our findings in relation to the cognitive demands imposed by the tasks and the cephalic index of the dog breeds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramson JZ, Hernández-Lloreda V, Call J, Colmenares F (2011) Relative quantity judgments in South American sea lions (Otaria flavescens). Anim Cognit 14(5):695
Agrillo C, Beran MJ (2013) Number without language: comparative psychology and the evolution of numerical cognition. Front Psychol 4:295
Aulet LS, Chiu VC, Prichard A, Spivak M, Lourenco SF, Berns GS (2019) Canine sense of quantity: evidence for numerical ratio-dependent activation in parietotemporal cortex. Biol Lett 15(12):20190666
Becker RF, King JE, Markee J (1962) Studies on olfactory discrimination in dogs: II. Discriminatory behavior in a free environment. J Comp Physiol Psychol 55(5):773
Beran MJ (2001) Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 115(2):181
Beran MJ (2007) Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) enumerate large and small sequentially presented sets of items using analog numerical representations. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 33(1):42
Beran MJ, Parrish AE (2016) Going for more: Discrete and continuous quantity judgments by nonhuman animals. In: Continuous issues in numerical cognition, Elsevier, New York, pp 175–192
Beran MJ, Evans TA, Harris EH (2008) Perception of food amounts by chimpanzees based on the number, size, contour length and visibility of items. Anim Behav 75(5):1793–1802
Bidder OR, Di Virgilio A, Hunter JS, McInturff A, Gaynor KM, Smith AM, Dorcy J, Rosell F (2020) Monitoring canid scent marking in space and time using a biologging and machine learning approach. Sci Rep 10(1):1–13
Bogale BA, Aoyama M, Sugita S (2014) Spontaneous discrimination of food quantities in the jungle crow, Corvus macrorhynchos. Anim Behav 94:73–78
Bräuer J, Blasi D (2021) Dogs display owner-specific expectations based on olfaction. Sci Rep 11(1):1–10
Cablk ME, Sagebiel JC, Heaton JS, Valentin C (2008) Olfaction-based detection distance: a quantitative analysis of how far away dogs recognize tortoise odor and follow it to source. Sensors 8(4):2208–2222
Cafazzo S, Natoli E, Valsecchi P (2012) Scent-marking behaviour in a pack of free-ranging domestic dogs. Ethology 118(10):955–966
Cantlon JF, Brannon EM (2006) Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans. Psychol Sci 17(5):401–406
Cordes S, Brannon EM (2009) Crossing the divide: infants discriminate small from large numerosities. Dev Psychol 45(6):1583
Dobson AJ, Barnett AG (2018) An introduction to generalized linear models. CRC Press, London
Evans HE, De Lahunta A (2013) Miller’s anatomy of the dog-e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences, London
Fechner GT (1860) Elemente der psychophysik, vol 2. Breitkopf u, Härtel
Fedurek P, Neumann C, Bouquet Y, Mercier S, Magris M, Quintero F, Zuberbühler K (2019) Behavioural patterns of vocal greeting production in four primate species. R Soc Open Sci 6(4):182181
Feigenson L, Dehaene S, Spelke E (2004) Core systems of number. Trends Cognit Sci 8(7):307–314
Foyer P, Wilsson E, Jensen P (2016) Levels of maternal care in dogs affect adult offspring temperament. Sci Rep 6(1):1–8
Franzen L, Delis I, De Sousa G, Kayser C, Philiastides MG (2020) Auditory information enhances post-sensory visual evidence during rapid multisensory decision-making. Nat Commun 11(1):1–14
Ginsburg N, Nicholls A (1988) Perceived numerosity as a function of item size. Percept Motor Skills 67(2):656–658
Haehner A, Rodewald A, Gerber JC, Hummel T (2008) Correlation of olfactory function with changes in the volume of the human olfactory bulb. Arch Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 134(6):621–624
Hall NJ, Glenn K, Smith DW, Wynne CD (2015) Performance of pugs, German shepherds, and greyhounds (Canis lupus familiaris) on an odor-discrimination task. J Comp Psychol 129(3):237
Hecht EE, Smaers JB, Dunn WD, Kent M, Preuss TM, Gutman DA (2019) Significant neuroanatomical variation among domestic dog breeds. J Neurosci 39(39):7748–7758
Hepper PG, Wells DL (2005) How many footsteps do dogs need to determine the direction of an odour trail? Chem Senses 30(4):291–298
Horowitz A (2014) Domestic dog cognition and behavior. In: The scientific study of Canis familiaris
Horowitz A (2021) Considering the“dog” in dog–human interaction. Front Vet Sci 8:299
Horowitz A, Hecht J, Dedrick A (2013) Smelling more or less: investigating the olfactory experience of the domestic dog. Learn Motivation 44(4):207–217
Jackson S (2020) The olfactory and auditory capabilities of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) for locating different quantities of food. Electronic thesis and dissertation repository (7243)
Jackson SM, Martin GK, Roberts WA (2021) The olfactory capability of dogs to discriminate between different quantities of food. Learn Behav 1–9
Jezierski T, Adamkiewicz E, Walczak M, Sobczyńska M, Gorecka-Bruzda A, Ensminger J, Papet E (2014) Efficacy of drug detection by fully-trained police dogs varies by breed, training level, type of drug and search environment. Forensic Sci Int 237:112–118
Kavoi BM, Jameela H (2011) Comparative morphometry of the olfactory bulb, tract and stria in the human, dog and goat
Kerepesi A, Jonsson G, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V, Magnusson M (2005) Detection of temporal patterns in dog-human interaction. Behav Process 70(1):69–79
Lévy F, Keller M, Poindron P (2004) Olfactory regulation of maternal behavior in mammals. Hormones Behav 46(3):284–302
Lindsay SR (2013) Handbook of applied dog behavior and training, adaptation and learning. vol 1. Wiley, New York
Lisberg AE, Snowdon CT (2009) The effects of sex, gonadectomy and status on investigation patterns of unfamiliar conspecific urine in domestic dogs, Canis familiaris. Anim Behav 77(5):1147–1154
Macpherson K, Roberts WA (2013) Can dogs count? Learn Motivation 44(4):241–251
McGreevy P, Grassi TD, Harman AM (2004) A strong correlation exists between the distribution of retinal ganglion cells and nose length in the dog. Brain Behav Evolut 63(1):13–22
McGreevy PD, Georgevsky D, Carrasco J, Valenzuela M, Duffy DL, Serpell JA (2013) Dog behavior co-varies with height, bodyweight and skull shape. PloS one 8(12):e80529
Mercier MR, Cappe C (2020) The interplay between multisensory integration and perceptual decision making. NeuroImage 222:116970
Pannunzi M, Nowotny T (2019) Odor stimuli: not just chemical identity. Front Physiol 10:1428
Petrazzini MEM, Wynne CD (2016) What counts for dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) in a quantity discrimination task? Behav Process 122:90–97
Petrazzini MEM, Wynne CD (2017) Quantity discrimination in canids: dogs (Canis familiaris) and wolves (Canis lupus) compared. Behav Process 144:89–92
Petrazzini MEM, Mantese F, Prato-Previde E (2020) Food quantity discrimination in puppies (Canis lupus familiaris). Anim Cognit 23(4):703–710
Pfeifer R, Iida F, Bongard J (2005) New robotics: design principles for intelligent systems. Artif Life 11(1–2):99–120
Piazza M (2011) Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations. In: Space, time and number in the brain, pp 267–285
Polgár Z, Kinnunen M, Újváry D, Miklósi Á, Gácsi M (2016) A test of canine olfactory capacity: comparing various dog breeds and wolves in a natural detection task. PloS one 11(5):e0154087
Prato-Previde E, Marshall-Pescini S, Valsecchi P (2008) Is your choice my choice? The owners’ effect on pet dogs’(Canis lupus familiaris) performance in a food choice task. Anim Cognit 11(1):167–174
Quignon P, Kirkness E, Cadieu E, Touleimat N, Guyon R, Renier C, Hitte C, André C, Fraser C, Galibert F (2003) Comparison of the canine and human olfactory receptor gene repertoires. Genome Biol 4(12):1–9
Roberts WA (2010) Distance and magnitude effects in sequential number discrimination by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 36(2):206
Robin S, Tacher S, Rimbault M, Vaysse A, Dréano S, André C, Hitte C, Galibert F (2009) Genetic diversity of canine olfactory receptors. BMC Genomics 10(1):1–16
Schöpper LM, Hilchey MD, Lappe M, Frings C (2020) Detection versus discrimination: the limits of binding accounts in action control. Attent Percept Psychophys 82(4):2085–2097
Selba MC, Bryson ER, Rosenberg CL, Heng HG, DeLeon VB (2021) Selective breeding in domestic dogs: how selecting for a short face impacted canine neuroanatomy. Anat Rec 304(1):101–115
Soproni K, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2002) Dogs’ (Canis familaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol 116(1):27
Stone HR, McGreevy PD, Starling MJ, Forkman B (2016) Associations between domestic-dog morphology and behaviour scores in the dog mentality assessment. PloS one 11(2):e0149403
Tacher S, Quignon P, Rimbault M, Dreano S, Andre C, Galibert F (2005) Olfactory receptor sequence polymorphism within and between breeds of dogs. J Hered 96(7):812–816
Teng KT, McGreevy PD, Toribio JAL, Dhand NK (2016) Trends in popularity of some morphological traits of purebred dogs in Australia. Canine Genet Epidemiol 3(1):1–9
Trevino M (2014) Stimulus similarity determines the prevalence of behavioral laterality in a visual discrimination task for mice. Sci Rep 4(1):1–12
Ward C, Smuts BB (2007) Quantity-based judgments in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Anim Cognit10(1):71–80
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the Startup-funding of Taipei Medical University (108-6402-004-112) and the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology research grant (110-2311-B-038-002) awarded to CDD. We thank Guillaume Dezecache, Ph.D., for comments on the manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded via the Ambizione Fellowship of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) (PZ00P3_154741), the Startup-funding of Taipei Medical University (108-6402-004-112) and the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology (110-2311-B-038-002) awarded to CDD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EF: study design, data collection, acquisition of resources; CDD: study design, analysis and interpretation, writing article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest, or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed, i.e., the Swiss law on animal protection and welfare. This study was approved by the Swiss Federal Veterinary Office (approval number VD3383) for experiments conducted in Switzerland. According to the local authorities (Comité d’Ethique de l’Expérimentation Animale Grand Campus Dijon, Université de Bourgogne, Maison de l’Université, Esplanade Erasme, 21078 Dijon, France), non-invasive studies on dogs are allowed to be conducted without any special permission in France.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferrando, E., Dahl, C.D. An investigation on the olfactory capabilities of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). Anim Cogn 25, 1567–1577 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01640-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01640-6