Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experience of musculoskeletal ultrasound scanning improves physicians’ physical examination skills in assessment of synovitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) is more sensitive than physical examination in detecting synovitis and helps physicians to understand its pathophysiology. In this study, we aimed to determine if the experience in musculoskeletal US scanning is independently associated with improved physical examination skills to detect synovitis.

Method

Seventy patients with rheumatoid arthritis and twenty-three physicians were enrolled. Patients were first assessed by multiple physicians with a range of clinical/sonographic experience for the swelling of the wrist, metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints and next underwent US assessment performed by another physician experienced in musculoskeletal US. We then calculated the positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) of joint swelling to identify US-detected synovial hypertrophy. Finally, the factors independently associated with the accuracy of clinical assessment were identified by using multivariate analyses.

Results

One thousand five hundred forty joints were assessed 6116 times in total for swelling. Overall, PPV and NPV of joint swelling were 51.7% and 88.3%, respectively. Multivariate analyses identified wrist joint, tenderness, male and greater patients’ age as the factors significantly associated with higher PPV. In addition, there was a trend that longer experience in rheumatology clinical practice was associated with higher PPV (p = 0.058). On the other hand, longer experience in musculoskeletal US, PIP joint and positive rheumatoid factor were identified as the significant factors for higher NPV, while wrist joint, tenderness, presence of osteophyte and obesity as those for lower NPV.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that the experience in musculoskeletal US improves physical examination skills particularly to avoid overestimation.

Key Points

Physicians with longer US experience are less likely to overestimate synovitis by physical examination.

Musculoskeletal US is a useful tool for rheumatologists to improve their physical examination skill.

Presence of osteophytes, joint tenderness and obesity influence the accuracy of physical examination of joints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Bijlsma J, Burmester G, Chatzidionysiou K, Dougados M et al (2017) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis 76:960–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakagomi D, Ikeda K, Okubo A, Iwamoto T, Sanayama Y, Takahashi K et al (2013) Ultrasound can improve the accuracy of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis to predict the requirement for methotrexate treatment. Arthritis Rheum 65:890–898

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Paulshus Sundlisæter N, Aga AB, Olsen IC, Hammer HB, Uhlig T, van der Heijde D et al (2018) Clinical and ultrasound remission after 6 months of treat-to-target therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: associations to future good radiographic and physical outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis 77:1421–1425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kawashiri SY, Suzuki T, Okada A, Yamasaki S, Tamai M, Nakamura H, Origuchi T, Mizokami A, Uetani M, Aoyagi K, Eguchi K, Kawakami A (2013) Musculoskeletal ultrasonography assists the diagnostic performance of the 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol 23:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ikeda K, Nakagomi D, Sanayama Y, Yamagata M, Okubo A, Iwamoto T et al (2013) Correlation of radiographic progression with the cumulative activity of synovitis estimated by power Doppler ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis: difference between patients treated with methotrexate and those treated with biological agents. J Rheumatol 40:1967–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Naredo E, Bonilla G, Gamero F, Uson J, Carmona L, Laffon A (2005) Assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study of clinical evaluation with grey scale and power Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 64:375–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iwamoto T, Ikeda K, Hosokawa J, Yamagata M, Tanaka S, Norimoto A, Sanayama Y, Nakagomi D, Takahashi K, Hirose K, Sugiyama T, Sueishi M, Nakajima H (2014) Prediction of relapse after discontinuation of biologic agents by ultrasonographic assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission: high predictive values of total gray-scale and power Doppler scores that represent residual synovial inflammation before discontinuation. Arthritis Care Res 66:1576–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Naredo E, Moller I, Cruz A, Carmona L, Garrido J (2008) Power Doppler ultrasonographic monitoring of response to anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 58:2248–2256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Joplin SK, van der Zwan R, Bagga H, Joshua F, Wong PK (2016) Pilot study assessing the novel use of musculoskeletal ultrasound in patients with rheumatoid arthritis to improve patient attitudes and adherence to medication. Int J Rheum Dis 19:658–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Joplin S, van der Zwan R, Joshua F, Wong PK (2015) Medication adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the effect of patient education, health literacy, and musculoskeletal ultrasound. Biomed Res Int 2015:150658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheung PP, Lahiri M, Teng GG, Lim AY, Lau TC, Lateef A et al (2015) A randomized controlled trial for improving patient self-assessment of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis with education by ultrasonography: the RAEUS Study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 54:1161–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogasawara M, Murayama G, Yamada Y, Nemoto T, Kageyama M, Toyama S, Kusaoi M, Onuma S, Kon T, Sekiya F, Sugimoto K, Matsudaira R, Matsushita M, Tada K, Kempe K, Yamaji K, Tamura N, Takasaki Y (2012) Autofeedback from ultrasound images provides rapid improvement in palpation skills for identifying joint swelling in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 39:1207–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Murayama G, Ogasawara M, Nemoto T, Yamada Y, Ando S, Minowa K, Kon T, Tada K, Matsushita M, Yamaji K, Tamura N, Takasaki Y (2013) Clinical miscount of involved joints denotes the need for ultrasound complementation in usual practice for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 31:506–514

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sifuentes-Cantú C, Contreras-Yáñez I, Saldarriaga L, Lozada AC, Gutiérrez M, Pascual-Ramos V (2017) The added value of musculoskeletal ultrasound to clinical evaluation in the treatment decision of rheumatoid arthritis outpatients: physician experience matters. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18:390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd et al (2010) 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 62:2569–2581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D'Agostino MA, Terslev L, Aegerter P, Backhaus M, Balint P, Bruyn GA et al (2017) Scoring ultrasound synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR-OMERACT ultrasound taskforce-part 1: definition and development of a standardised, consensus-based scoring system. RMD Open 3:e000428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Terslev L, Naredo E, Aegerter P, Wakefield RJ, Backhaus M, Balint P et al (2017) Scoring ultrasound synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR-OMERACT ultrasound taskforce-part 2: reliability and application to multiple joints of a standardised consensus-based scoring system. RMD Open 3:e000427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Padovano I, Costantino F, Breban M, D’Agostino MA (2016) Prevalence of ultrasound synovial inflammatory findings in healthy subjects. Ann Rheum Dis 75:1819–1823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Witt M, Mueller F, Nigg A, Reindl C, Leipe J, Proft F, Stein N, Hammitzsch A, Mayer S, Dechant C, Schulze-Koops H, Grunke M (2013) Relevance of grade 1 gray-scale ultrasound findings in wrists and small joints to the assessment of subclinical synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 65:1694–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Woods R, Wisniewski SJ, Lueders DR, Pittelkow TP, Larson DR, Finnoff JT (2018) Can ultrasound be used to improve the palpation skills of physicians in training? A Prospective Study PM R 10:730–737

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruiz-Curiel A, Díaz-Barreda MD, González-Rodríguez M, Martín-Delgado T, Medrano-Antoñazas A, Muñoz-González R, Perales-Torres S, Sánchez-Montero J, Janta I, Nieto JC, Collado-Yurrita L, López-Longo FJ, Naredo E (2016) Musculoskeletal ultrasound: an effective tool to help medical students improve joint inflammation detection? Med Ultrason 18:294–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Swamy M, Searle RF (2012) Anatomy teaching with portable ultrasound to medical students. BMC Med Educ 12:99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rempell JS, Saldana F, DiSalvo D, Kumar N, Stone MB, Chan W, Luz J, Noble VE, Liteplo A, Kimberly H, Kohler MJ (2016) Pilot point-of-care ultrasound curriculum at Harvard Medical School: early experience. West J Emerg Med 17:734–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bauer EM, Ben-Artzi A, Duffy EL, Elashoff DA, Vangala SS, Fitzgerald J et al (2017) Joint-specific assessment of swelling and power Doppler in obese rheumatoid arthritis patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18:99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goossens J, Coustet B, Palazzo E, Dieudé P, Ottaviani S (2018) Overweight and obesity affect clinical assessment of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of ultrasonography and clinical exam. Clin Exp Rheumatol 37(1):49–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. George MD, Østergaard M, Conaghan PG, Emery P, Baker DG, Baker JF (2017) Obesity and rates of clinical remission and low MRI inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 76:1743–1746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vidal C, Barnetche T, Morel J, Combe B, Daïen C (2015) Association of body mass index categories with disease activity and radiographic joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Rheumatol 42:2261–2269

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all staffs in our department for the care and management of patients enrolled in this study and for their support in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shunsuke Furuta.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

None.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Chiba University School of Medicine (reference number: 2214). All procedures in this study were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and physicians who participated in this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saku, A., Furuta, S., Kato, M. et al. Experience of musculoskeletal ultrasound scanning improves physicians’ physical examination skills in assessment of synovitis. Clin Rheumatol 39, 1091–1099 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-04960-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-04960-5

Keywords

Navigation