Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Musculoskeletal examination—an ignored aspect. Why are we still failing the patients?

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past two decades, rheumatologists from around the world have not only championed the musculoskeletal system examination but also modified the undergraduate teaching curriculum. This has led to the development and adoption of the gait, arms, legs and spine (GALS) screening along with regional examination techniques. The purpose of this study is to review current practice, determining the frequency of patient exposure to appropriate examination and confidence of junior doctors when dealing with MSK conditions. Two district-general hospitals (non-teaching) and one teaching hospital in North-East London were chosen. At each site, 50 patient notes were reviewed from the acute admission wards for medicine and surgery and the medical assessment unit. Factors considered included whether GALS screenings had taken place, documentation of MSK examinations and assessment of confidence of junior doctors in assessing MSK conditions. GALS screenings were performed for 4% of patients on the medical assessment unit, 7% of acute medical and 0% of acute surgical patients on admission. Examination of the MSK system yielded better results with 16%, 22% and 10% on each of the respective wards. Interviews with junior doctors found 10% routinely screening for MSK conditions, despite 87% feeling confident in taking MSK histories. This prospective audit of clinical practice highlights that patients failed to have a minimal assessment of the MSK system through GALS screenings. When examining the MSK system, results were somewhat better, although still fewer than expected. It is curious that the majority of junior doctors in training felt confident in dealing with MSK disease but few did it in practice. This begs the question of whether current teaching curricula and strategies are adequate. At a time where there is ever-increasing national momentum to address issues on obesity and cardiovascular health, our patients are still deprived of a standard MSK examination by the medical faculty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Office of National Statistics UK (2003) Recipients of disability living allowance (DLA): by main disabling condition, 2003: Social Trends 34. (www.statistics.gov.uk/StatBase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=7403&More=Y)

  2. Doherty M, Abawi J, Pattrick M (1990) Audit of medical inpatient examination: A cry from the joint. J R Coll Physicians Lond 24(2):115–118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Abou-Raya A, Abou-Raya S (2010) The inadequacies of musculoskeletal education, Clin Rheumatol. In press

  4. Menon J, Patro DK (2009) Undergraduate orthopedic education: Is it adequate? Indian J Orthop 43(1):82–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Freedman KB, Bernstein J (2002) Educational deficiencies in musculoskeletal medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(4):604–608

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dequeker J, Rasker JJ, Woolf AD (2000) Educational issues in rheumatology. Baillières Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 14(4):715–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oswald AE, Bell MJ, Snell L, Wiseman J (2008) The current state of musculoskeletal clinical skills teaching for preclerkship medical students. J Rheumatol 35(12):2419–2426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McCarthy EM, Sheane BJ, Cunnane G (2009) Greater focus on clinical rheumatology is required for training in internal medicine. Clin Rheumatol 28(2):139–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Queally JM, Kiely PD, Shelly MJ, O'Daly BJ, O'Byrne JM, Masterson EL (2008) Deficiencies in the education of musculoskeletal medicine in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 177(2):99–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Day CS, Yeh AC (2008) Evidence of educational inadequacies in region-specific musculoskeletal medicine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(10):2542–2547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Day CS, Yeh AC, Franko O, Ramirez M, Krupat E (2007) Musculoskeletal medicine: An assessment of the attitudes and knowledge of medical students at Harvard Medical School. Acad Med 82(5):452–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahern MJ, Soden M, Schultz D, Clark M (1991) The musculo-skeletal examination, a neglected clinical skill. Aust NZ J Med 21:303–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lawry GV, Schuldt SS, Kreiter CD, Densen P, Albanese MA (1999) Teaching a screening musculoskeletal examination: A randomized, controlled trial of different instructional methods. Acad Med 74(2):199–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Woolf AD, Walsh NE, Akesson K (2004) Global core recommendations for a musculoskeletal undergraduate curriculum. Ann Rheum Dis 63(5):517–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Coady DA, Walker DJ, Kay LJ (2004) Teaching medical students musculoskeletal examination skills: Identifying barriers to learning and ways of overcoming them. Scand J Rheumatol 33(1):47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Woolf AD (2003) How to assess musculoskeletal conditions. History and physical examination. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 17(3):381–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones A, Ledingham J, Regan M, Doherty M (1991) A proposed minimal rheumatological screening history and examination. The joint answers back. J R Coll Physicians Lond 25(2):111–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Doherty M, Dacre J, Dieppe P, Snaith M (1992) The ‘GALS’ loco motor screen. Ann Rheum Dis 51(10):1165–1169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lillicrap MS, Byrne E, Speed CA (2003) Musculoskeletal assessment of general medical in-patients - Joints still crying out for attention. Rheumatology 42:951–954

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Beattie KA, Bobba R, Bayoumi I, Chan D, Schabort I, Boulos P, Kean W, Obeid J, McCallum R, Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Cividino A (2008) Validation of the GALS musculoskeletal screening exam for use in primary care: A pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 27(9):115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fox RA, Dacre JE, Clark CL, Scotland AD (2000) Impact on medical students of incorporating GALS screen teaching into the medical school curriculum. Ann Rheum Dis 59(9):668–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Haywood BL, Porter SL, Grana WA (2006) Assessment of musculoskeletal knowledge in primary care residents. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 35(6):273–275

    Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Nammari SS, James BK, Ramachandran M (2009) The inadequacy of musculoskeletal knowledge after foundation training in the United Kingdom. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(11):1413–1418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Freedman KB, Bernstein J (1998) The adequacy of medical school education in musculoskeletal medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(10):1421–1427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mulhall KJ, Masterson E (2005) Relating undergraduate musculoskeletal medicine curricula to the needs of modern practice. Ir J Med Sci 174(2):46–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Knobe M, Münker R, Sellei RM, Holschen M, Mooij SC, Schmidt-Rohlfing B, Niethard FU, Pape HC (2009) Peer teaching: A randomised controlled trial using student-teachers to teach musculoskeletal ultrasound. Med Educ 44(2):148–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Saleh K, Messner R, Axtell S, Harris I, Mahowald ML (2004) Development and evaluation of an integrated musculoskeletal disease course for medical students. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(8):1653–1658

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Perry ME, Burke JM, Friel L, Field M (2010) Can training in musculoskeletal examination skills be effectively delivered by undergraduate students as part of the standard curriculum? Rheumatology (Oxford). Jun 4. In press

  29. Schrieber L, Hendry GD, Hunter D (2000) Musculoskeletal examination teaching in rheumatoid arthritis education: Trained patient educators compared to nonspecialist doctors. J Rheumatol 27(6):1531–1532

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bideau M, Guerne PA, Bianchi MP, Huber P (2006) Benefits of a programme taking advantage of patient-instructors to teach and assess musculoskeletal skills in medical students. Ann Rheum Dis 65(12):1626–1630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Modica RF, Thundiyil JG, Chou C, Diab M, Von Scheven E (2009) Teaching musculoskeletal physical diagnosis using a web-based tutorial and pathophysiology-focused cases. Med Educ Online 14:13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bilderback K, Eggerstedt J, Sadasivan KK, Seelig L, Wolf R, Barton S, McCall R, Chesson AL Jr, Marino AA (2008) Design and implementation of a system-based course in musculoskeletal medicine for medical students. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(10):2292–2300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wright SA, Bell AL (2008) Enhancement of undergraduate rheumatology teaching through the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47(10):1564–1566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Vivekananda-Schmidt P, Lewis M, Coady D, Morley C, Kay L, Walker D, Hassell AB (2007) Exploring the use of videotaped objective structured clinical examination in the assessment of joint examination skills of medical students. Arthritis Rheum 57(5):869–876, 15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith CC, Newman L, Davis RB, Yang J, Ramanan R (2005) A comprehensive new curriculum to teach and assess resident knowledge and diagnostic evaluation of musculoskeletal complaints. Med Teach 27(6):553–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Williams SC, Gulihar A, Dias JJ, Harper WM (2010) A new musculoskeletal curriculum: Has it made a difference? J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(1):7–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Exercise Physiology, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK

    Dinesh Sirisena

  2. Department of General Practice, Newham General Hospital, Glen Road, Newham, E13 8SL, UK

    Hamida Begum

  3. Department of Medicine, Queens Hospital, Rom Valley Way, Romford, RM7 0AG, UK

    Mathura Selvarajah

  4. Department of Rheumatology, Queen’s Hospital, BHR University NHS Trust, Rom Valley Way, Romford, Essex, RM7 0AG, UK

    Kuntal Chakravarty

  5. Post Graduate Medical School, University of Bedfordshire, Bedford, UK

    Kuntal Chakravarty

Authors
  1. Dinesh Sirisena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hamida Begum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mathura Selvarajah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kuntal Chakravarty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuntal Chakravarty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sirisena, D., Begum, H., Selvarajah, M. et al. Musculoskeletal examination—an ignored aspect. Why are we still failing the patients?. Clin Rheumatol 30, 403–407 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-010-1632-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-010-1632-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation