Skip to main content
Log in

An experimental study on cutting tool hardness optimization for shield TBMs during dense fine silty sand ground tunneling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The estimation of soil abrasivity and cutting tool wear during soft ground tunneling is complicated and arduous work due to the lack of a generally accepted testing system. To date, geotechnical baseline reports (GBRs) and geotechnical data reports (GDRs) still cannot provide reliable soil abrasion indices for tool life prediction. This is considered a deficiency in the geotechnical investigation of shield-driven tunnel projects. In this study, the Multifunctional Shield Test System (MSTS) developed by the Key Laboratory of Safety for Geotechnical and Structural Engineering of Hubei Province at Wuhan University is presented. The MSTS was motivated by the need for a test platform with the ability to simulate undisturbed soil conditions and actual tool working environments to explore the mechanism of cutting tool wear, bentonite slurry penetration, and filter cake formation in various geomaterials with grain sizes including clay, silt, sand, and gravel (< 15 mm). Experimental studies on the effect of alloy hardness on cutting tool wear are conducted. The soil samples used in the tests are dense fine silty sand from the Sutong GIL Yangtze River Crossing Cable Tunnel. When the wear extent is plotted against the alloy hardness, an inverted S-shaped band bounded by the highest and lowest alloy hardnesses is formed. The sensitive hardness interval is HRC = [47, 52]. If the alloy hardness is higher than 52 HRC, the wear extent is relatively small. Since alloy hardness is negatively correlated with bending strength, using a cutting tool material with a hardness slightly higher than the upper limit of the sensitive hardness interval is optimal. Thus, an alloy with a hardness interval of HRC = [52, 63] is recommended for the dense fine silty sand ground at the Sutong GIL Yangtze River Crossing Cable Tunnel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Hardness:

The ability of a material to resist hard objects pressed into its surface locally

Relative hardness:

The ratio of the hardness of one material to that of another

Sensitive hardness interval:

The hardness interval in which the wear extent decreases significantly as the hardness increases

Sensitive relative hardness interval:

The relative hardness interval in which the wear extent decreases significantly as the hardness increases

References 

  • Adachi K, Hutchings IM (2003) Wear-mode mapping for the micro-scale abrasion test. J Wear 255(1–6):23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adachi K, Hutchings IM (2005) Sensitivity of wear rates in the micro-scale abrasion test to test conditions and material hardness. J Wear 255(1–6):23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi Gharahbagh E, Rostami J, Palomino AM (2011) New soil abrasion testing method for soft ground tunneling applications. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26(5):604–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi Gharahbagh E, Qiu T, Rostami J (2013) Evaluation of granular soil abrasivity for wear on cutting tools in excavation and tunneling equipment. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 139(10):1718–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi Gharahbagh E, Qiu T, Rostami J (2014a) Effect of water content on the abrasivity of granular soils in soft ground tunneling applications. In: Proceedings of Geo-Congress 2014 Technical Papers, pp 485–494

  • Alavi Gharahbagh E, Rostami J, Talebi K (2014b) Experimental study of the effect of conditioning on abrasive wear and torque requirement of full face tunneling machines. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 41:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2010) G65-Standard test method for measuring abrasion using the dry sand/rubber wheel apparatus. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Axén N, Jacobson S, Hogmark S (1994) Influence of hardness of the counterbody in three-body abrasive wear—an overlooked hardness effect. Tribol Int 27(4):233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakar MA, Majeed Y, Rostami J (2018) Influence of moisture content on the LCPC test results and its implications on tool wear in mechanized tunneling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 81:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakar MA, Zafar Z, Majeed Y (2020) Abrasiveness evaluation of selected river gravels of Pakistan using LCPC rock abrasivity test. Bull Eng Geol Environ 1–17

  • Barzegari G, Uromeihy A, Zhao J (2013) A newly developed soil abrasion testing method for tunnelling using shield machines. Quart J Eng Geol Hydrol 46(1):63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzegari G, Uromeihy A, Zhao J (2014) EPB tunneling challenges in bouldery ground: a new experience on the Tabriz metro line 1. Iran Bull Eng Geol Environ 73(2):429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzegari G, Uromeihy A, Zhao J (2015) Parametric study of soil abrasivity for predicting wear issue in TBM tunneling projects. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 48:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolster RN, Singer IL (1981) Surface hardness and abrasive wear resistance of ion-implanted steels. ASLE Trans 24(4):526–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borio L, Peila D, Oggeri C, Pelizza S (2007) Characterization of soil conditioning for mechanized tunneling. In: Mediterranean NO-DIG XXV International Conference and Exhibition, Roma, Italy

  • Burwell JT (1957) Survey of possible wear mechanisms. J Wear 1(2):119–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pellegrin DV, Stachowiak GW (2002a) Assessing the role of particle shape and scale in abrasion using ‘sharpness analysis’: Part I. Technique Development J Wear 253(9–10):1016–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pellegrin DV, Stachowiak GW (2002b) Assessing the role of particle shape and scale in abrasion using ‘sharpness analysis’: Part II. Technique Evaluation J Wear 253(9–10):1026–1034

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pellegrin DV, Stachowiak GW (2004) Evaluating the role of particle distribution and shape in two-body abrasion by statistical simulation. Tribol Int 37(3):255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pellegrin DV, Corbin ND, Baldoni G, Torrance AA (2009a) Diamond particle shape: Its measurement and influence in abrasive wear. Tribol Int 42(1):160–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pellegrin DV, Torrance AA, Haran E (2009b) Wear mechanisms and scale effects in two-body abrasion. J Wear 266(1–2):13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker P (2011) Abrasivität von Lockergesteinen und der Werkzeugverschleiß im Tief-und Tunnelbau. Österreichische Ingenieur Und Architekten-Zeitschrift 156(1–12):219–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre TS (1976) Wear characteristics of metals. Tribol Int 9(5):203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China (2005) Steels-determination and verification of the depth of carburized and hardened cases (GB/T 9450–2005). Standards Press of China, Beijing (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gille G, Szesny B, Dreyer K, Van Den Berg H, Schmidt J, Gestrich T, Leitner G (2002) Submicron and ultrafine grained hardmetals for microdrills and metal cutting inserts. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 20(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudbjartsson JT, Iversen K (2003) High-quality wear-resistant paving blocks in Iceland. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Concrete Block Paving (PAVE AFRICA 2003). Sun City, South Africa

  • Gurland J (1954) A study of the effect of carbon content on the structure and properties of sintered WC-Co alloys. Trans AIME 200(3):285–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Habig KH (1980) Wear and Hardness in Metals (Verschleiss und Harte von Werkstoffen). Carl Hanser Verlag 303

  • Hamblin MG, Stachowiak GW (1996) Description of abrasive particle shape and its relation to two-body abrasive wear. Tribol Trans 39(4):803–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsha AP, Tewari US (2003) Two-body and three-body abrasive wear behaviour of polyaryletherketone composites. Polym Test 22(4):403–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemnejad H, Ghafoori M, Lashkaripour GR, Tarigh Azali S (2012) Effect of geological parameters on soil abrasivity using LCPC machine for predicting LAC. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 2(12):71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemnejad A, Ghafoori M, Azali ST (2016) Utilizing water, mineralogy and sedimentary properties to predict LCPC abrasivity coefficient. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75(2):841–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirano F, Ura A (1970) Effect of difference in hardness of rubbing surfaces on abrasive wear. Proc. Conf. Tribology in Iron and Steel Works, Institution of Mechanical Engineers and Iron and Steel Institute, pp 163–167

  • Home L (2010) Trends in the us of TBMs worldwide. Presented at NFF TBM seminar Bergen

  • Jakobsen PD, Lohne J (2013) Challenges of methods and approaches for estimating soil abrasivity in soft ground TBM tunnelling. J Wear 308(1–2):166–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen PD, Bruland A, Dahl F (2013a) Review and assessment of the NTNU/SINTEF Soil Abrasion Test (SATTM) for determination of abrasiveness of soil and soft ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 37:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen PD, Langmaack L, Dahl F, Breivik T (2013b) Development of the Soft Ground Abrasion Tester (SGAT) to predict TBM tool wear, torque and thrust. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 38:398–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman S, Fener M, Käsling H, Thuro K (2016) The influences of textural parameters of grains on the LCPC abrasivity of coarse-grained igneous rocks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 58:216–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katavic I (1978) Untersuchungen über die beeinflussung des gefüges karbidischer gusseisen bei abrasiver verschleissbean-spruchung. J Wear 48(1):35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khruschov MM (1974) Principles of abrasive wear. J Wear 28(1):69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HS (2000) On the rule of mixtures for the hardness of particle reinforced composites. Mater Sci Eng A 289(1–2):30–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler M, Maidl U, Martak L (2011) Abrasiveness and tool wear in shield tunnelling in soil. Geomechanik Und Tunnelbau 4(February):36–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küpferle J, Roettger A, Alber M, Theisen W (2015) Assessment of the LCPC abrasiveness test from the view of material science. Geomech Tunnelling 8(3):211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küpferle J, Röttger A, Theisen W, Alber M (2016) The RUB Tunneling Device–A newly developed test method to analyze and determine the wear of excavation tools in soils. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 59:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küpferle J, Röttger A, Theisen W (2017) Excavation tool concepts for TBMs–Understanding the material-dependent response to abrasive wear. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 68:22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küpferle J, Zizka Z, Schoesser B, Röttger A, Alber M, Thewes M, Theisen W (2018) Influence of the slurry-stabilized tunnel face on shield TBM tool wear regarding the soil mechanical changes–Experimental evidence of changes in the tribological system. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 74:206–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan H, Xia YM, Ji ZY, Fu J, Miao B (2019) Online monitoring device of disc cutter wear–Design and field test. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 89:284–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Basse J (1983) Effect of relative hardness on transitionin abrasive wear mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the Conference Wear of Materials, ASME, New York, pp 161–166

  • Mahmutoğlu Y (2011) Surface subsidence induced by twin subway tunnelling in soft ground conditions in Istanbul. Bull Eng Geol Environ 70(1):115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majeed Y, Bakar MA (2019) Effects of variation in the particle size of the rock abrasion powder and standard rotational speed on the NTNU/SINTEF abrasion value steel test. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(3):1537–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Construction of the People’s Republic of China (2002) GB50021-2001 Code for Investigation of Geotechnical Engineering. China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirmehrabi H, Ghafoori M, Lashkaripour G (2016) Impact of some geological parameters on soil abrasiveness. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75(4):1717–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosleh M, Alavi Gharahbagh E, Rostami J (2013) Effects of relative hardness and moisture on tool wear in soil excavation operations. J Wear 302(1–2):1555–1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosleh M, Hu W, Rostami J (2019) Introduction to Rock and Soil Abrasivity Index (RSAI). J Wear 432:202953

  • Mostafaei M, Far AHR, Rastegarnia A (2019) Assessment of the impact of case parameters affecting abrasion and brittleness factors in alluviums of line 2 of theTabriz subway. Iran Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(5):3851–3861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore MA (1974) A review of two-body abrasive wear. J Wear 27(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahvi SM, Shipway PH, McCartney DG (2009) Particle motion and modes of wear in the dry sand–rubber wheel abrasion test. J Wear 267(11):2083–2091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen B, Dahl F, Raleigh P, Holzhäuser J (2006a) Abrasivity of soils in TBM tunneling. Tunnels Tunnel Int 36–38

  • Nilsen B, Dahl F, Holzhäuser J, Raleigh P (2006b) Abrasivity testing for rock and soils. Tunnels Tunnel Int 47–49

  • Nilsen B, Dahl F, Holzhäuser J, Raleigh P (2006c) SAT: NTNU’s new soil abrasion test. Tunnels Tunnel Int 43–45

  • Nilsen B, Dahl F, Holzhäuser J, Raleigh P (2007) New test methodology for estimating the abrasiveness of soils for TBM tunneling. In: Proceedings of the RETC, pp 104–116

  • Peila D, Picchio A, Chieregato A, Barbero M, Dal Negro E, Boscaro A (2012) Test procedure for assessing the influence of soil conditioning for EPB tunneling on the tool wear. World Tunneling Congress, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Rostami J, Alavi Gharahbagh E, Palomino AM, Mosleh M (2012) Development of soil abrasivity testing for soft ground tunneling using shield machines. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 28:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostami J, Hedayatzadeh M, Peila D, Frough O, Salazar CGO (2017) Development of a soil abrasion test and analysis of impact of soil conditioning on tool wear for soft ground mechanized tunneling using EPB machines. Proceedings of the WTC 2017:1401–1409

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson RCD (1967) The wear of metals by hard abrasives. J Wear 10(4):291–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson RCD (1968) The wear of metals by relatively soft abrasives. J Wear 11(4):245–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snilsberg B (2008) Pavement wear and airborne dust pollution in Norway: characterization of the physical and chemical properties of dust particles. In: Proceedings of Doctoral Thesis 2008: 133. Dept. of Geology and Mineral Resources Engineering. NTNU, Trondheim

  • Stachowiak GW (2000) Particle angularity and its relationship to abrasive and erosive wear. J Wear 241(2):214–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stachowiak GB, Stachowiak GW (2001) The effects of particle characteristics on three-body abrasive wear. J Wear 249(3–4):201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson ANJ, Hutchings IM (1996) Development of the dry sand/rubber wheel abrasion test. J Wear 195(1–2):232–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang SH, Zhang XP, Liu QS, Chen P, Sun XT, Sun L, Dai Y, Chen ST (2020) Prediction and analysis of replaceable scraper wear of slurry shield TBM in dense sandy ground: A case study of Sutong GIL Yangtze River Crossing Cable Tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 95:103090

  • Tang SH., Zhang XP, Liu QS, Xie WQ, Yang XM, Chen P, Tu XB (2021a) Analysis on the excavation management system of slurry shield TBM in permeable sandy ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 113:103935

  • Tang SH, Zhang XP, Liu QS, Xie WQ, Wu XL, Chen P, Qian YH (2021b) Control and prevention of gas explosion in soft ground tunneling using slurry shield TBM. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 113:103963

  • Thakare MR, Wharton JA, Wood RJK, Menger C (2012) Effect of abrasive particle size and the influence of microstructure on the wear mechanisms in wear-resistant materials. J Wear 276:16–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuro K, Singer J, Käsling H, Bauer M (2007) Determining abrasivity with the LCPC test. In: Proceedings of the 1st Canada - U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium. Vancouver, Canada

  • Thuro K, Kasling H (2009) Classification of the abrasiveness of soil and rock. Geomech Tunn 2(2):179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinai R, Oggeri C, Peila D (2008) Soil conditioning of sand for EPB applications: a laboratory research. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23(3):308–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl H (1951) Verschleißprobleme im Braunkohlenbergbau. Braunkohle Wärme Und Energie 3(5/6):75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang PL, Xia YM, Ouyang T, Tang L, Guo B (2014) Development and application of test apparatus for cutting performance of cutters of large excavation equipment. Appl Mech Mater 670:497–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellinger K, Uetz H (1957) Gleit-, Spül-und strahlverschleiss-prüfung. J. Wear 1(3):225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woldman M, van der Heide E, Schipper DJ, Tinga T, Masen MA (2012) Investigating the influence of sand particle properties on abrasive wear behaviour. J Wear 294:419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia YM, Guo B, Cong GQ, Zhang XH, Zeng GY (2017) Numerical simulation of rock fragmentation induced by a single TBM disc cutter close to a side free surface. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 91:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XP, Ji PQ, Liu QS, Liu Q, Zhang Q, Peng ZH (2018a) Physical and numerical studies of rock fragmentation subject to wedge cutter indentation in the mixed ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 71:354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XH, Lin LK, Xia YM, Tan Q, Zhu ZM, Mao QS, Zhou M (2018b) Experimental study on wear of TBM disc cutter rings with different kinds of hardness. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 82:346–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zum Gahr KH (1987) Microstructure and wear of materials. In: Tribology series. vol. 10, Amsterdam: Elsevier

  • Zum Gahr KH (1988) Modelling of two-body abrasive wear. J Wear 124(1):87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zum Gahr KH (1998) Wear by hard particles. Tribol Int 31(10):587–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received financial support from the State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51839009), State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Economic Research Institute (Project No. JSJS1600328), State Grid Economic and Technological Research Institute Co., Ltd. and China Railway 14th Bureau Group Shield Engineering Co., Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-Ping Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, XP., Tang, SH., Liu, QS. et al. An experimental study on cutting tool hardness optimization for shield TBMs during dense fine silty sand ground tunneling. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80, 6813–6826 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02327-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02327-x

Keywords

Navigation