Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Proposed adjustments and validation of different RMR89 geomechanical classification for Quadrilátero Ferrífero lithologies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geomechanical classifications of rock masses are of great interest and importance for the design of civil and mining works, as slopes, open pits, and underground excavations stability are directly related to the mechanical properties of the rock mass classes. Some of the most common geomechanical rock mass classifications currently used are the RMR (Rock Mass Rating), the Q system, and the GSI (Geological Strength Index). Recently (2011), it was presented a new approach for RMR in which the author had pointed an erroneous understanding by some of the RMR users related to the weights adopted for some parameters. Due to the great difficulty found by some professionals to classify highly weathered rock masses by using RMR89, various authors have proposed a correction of for RMR89 values by considering an adjustment index. On this context, the present work has the aim of verifying, for several rock masses from Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Minas Gerais, Brazil, the effectiveness of these three proposed adjustments on RMR89. The results has shown that the corrections proposed better represent the weathered rock masses usually found on open pit on Quadrilátero Ferrífero.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alkmin, F. F., Marshak., S. (1998) Transamazonian orogeny in the southern São Francisco Craton region, Minas Gerais, Brazil: evidence for paleoproterozoic collision and collapse in the Quadrilátero Ferrífero. Precambrian Research 30

  • Aydan, Ö., Ulusay, R., Tokashiki, N. (2013) A new rock mass quality rating system: rock mass quality rating (RMQR) and its application to the estimation of geomechanical characteristics of rock masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:1255–1276

  • Aydan ,O., Tokashiki, N., Ulusay, R. (2015) Rock mass quality rating (RMQR) for rock engineering. International Journal of the JCRM 11:17–20

  • Bieniawski, Z.T. (1989). Engineering rock mass classification: a complete manual for engineers and geologists in mining, civil and petroleum engineering. New York, USA. 251 pp.

  • Bieniawski, Z.T. (2011) Misconceptions in the applications of rock mass classifications and their corrections. ADIF Seminar on Advanced Geotechnical Characterization for Tunnel Design, Madrid

  • Brady, B.H., Brown, E.T. (1994) Rock Mechanics for Underground Mining, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 571

  • Brown, E.T. (1981) Suggested methods for rock characterization testing and monitoring: ISRM suggested methods. Pergamon, Oxford

  • Celada, B., Tardaguila, I., Varona, P., Rodriguez, A., Bieniawski, Z.T. (2014). Innovating tunnel design by an improved experience-based RMR system. In: World Tunnel Congress, May 9th to 15th 2014, Iguassu Falls, Brazil

  • Costa, T. A. (2009). Caracterização geológica-geotécnica e modos de ruptura do minério hematítico friável nas Minas da Vale, Borda Oeste do Quadrilátero Ferrífero – MG, M.Sc, Dissertação, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Brazil. (In Portuguese)

  • Cruz, F. A. R. (2017). Espacialização de parâmetro de rocha intacta em modelos de blocos utilizando krigagem da indicatriz. Dissertação. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre. (In portuguese)

  • Deere, D., Miller, R. (1966): “Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock” Tech. Report No AFWL - TR-65-116, Air Force Weapons Lab., Kirtland Air Base, New Mexico

  • Hoek, E. (1994) Strength of rock and rock masses. ISRM News Journal:4–16

  • International Society for Rock Mechanics. (2007). The complete ISRM suggested methods for characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. In: Ulusay, R. and Hudson, J.A. (eds.). ISRM

  • Kanik, M., Gurocak, Z., Alemdag, S. (2015) A comparison of support systems obtained from the RMR89 and RMR14 by numerical analyses: Macka Tunnel project, NE Turkey. J Afr Earth Sci 109:224–238

  • Lowson, A. R., Bieniawski, Z.T. (2013). Critical assessment of RMR tunnel design practices: a practical engineer’s approach. Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference. Washington, DC

  • MBR. (2004). Estudo geológico geotécnico da mina do Tamanduá – DNPM. Nova Lima - MG: Relatório interno (In Portuguese)

  • Palmstrom, A. (2005) Measurements of and correlations between block size and rock quality designation (RQD). Tunnels and Underground Space Technology 20:362–377

  • Rehman, H., Ali, W., Naji, A.M., Kim, J.J., Abdullah, R.A., Yoo, H.K. (2018a) Review of rock mass classification systems and tunnel quality index for tunnel design: development, refinement, application and limitation. Appl Sci 8(7):1250

  • Rehman, H., Najo, A.M., Kim, J.J., Yoo, H.K. (2018b) Empirical evaluation of the rock mass classification system and tunnel quality index for tunnel support project. Appl Sci 8(5):782

  • Santos, Y.L., Chaves, S., Paredes, J., Zenóbio, Â. (2012) Proposta de índice de ajuste (Aw) utilizando o grau de intemperismo no sistema RMR (Rock Mass Rating) de classificação do maciço rochosos. CBMINA 12

  • Serra Junior, E,. Ojima, L. M. (1998). Caracterização e classificação de maciços rochosos. In: Oliveira, a. M.; Brito, S. N. A. Geologia de Engenharia. São Paulo: ABGE, 2013. 211–226. (In Portuguese)

  • Ulusay, R., Ozkan, I., Unal, R. (1992) Characterization of weak, stratified and clay bearing rock masses for engineering applications. Proc Conference on Fractured and Jointed Rock Masses, Lake Tahoe, pp 233–240

  • VALE (2008). Mapeamento Litoestrutural e Geomecânico da Mina do Tamanduá. VALE (Relatório Técnico n° VL 707.07–09-E-CA-RT-03-034-01).123. (In Portuguese)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks Minas Gerais State research Foundation, Brazilian Federal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UFV, Vicosa, MG, Brazil

    Lucas Almeida Campos & Eduardo Antonio Gomes Marques

  2. VALE S.A., Nova Lima, MG, Brazil

    Teófilo Aquino Vieira Costa & Flávio Affonso Ferreira Filho

Authors
  1. Lucas Almeida Campos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eduardo Antonio Gomes Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Teófilo Aquino Vieira Costa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Flávio Affonso Ferreira Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucas Almeida Campos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Campos, L.A., Marques, E.A.G., Costa, T.A.V. et al. Proposed adjustments and validation of different RMR89 geomechanical classification for Quadrilátero Ferrífero lithologies. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79, 5031–5048 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01879-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01879-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation