Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Design and optimisation of a protective device for bridge piers against debris flow impact

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Western China, a large number of bridges are located in debris flow gullies and are exposed to a great risk of damage in case of a geological disaster. To ensure the safety of the bridge and extend its service period, in this study, we propose a modular protective device for bridge piers against the impact of debris flow, especially large boulders. The device is composed of a set of independent modules in the form of a closed-cell aluminium foam-filled composite structure (AFCS) that are set at predetermined spacings and fixed by prestressed steel fasteners. The mechanical behaviour and energy absorption characteristics of five AFCS configurations were evaluated by quasi-static compression testing using both experimental and numerical modelling methods, which produced similar results. The two-layer foam-filled lattice structure AFCS05 exhibited the best comprehensive energy absorption performance, and the effects of the material and geometric parameters on the performance were investigated based on the validated finite element models. A prototype protective device based on the AFCS05 design was attached to a model bridge pier. The dynamic response of the prototype indicated that the device prolonged the impact duration and reduced the largest impact force by 84.89%, and absorbed 81.96% of the impact kinetic energy, which effectively protected the pier. The device design and production can be standardised, making it convenient for installation and on-site repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby MF, Evans T, Fleck NA, Hutchinson JW, Wadley HNG, Gibson LJ (2000) Metal foams: a design guide. Elsevier

  • Bhatti AQ, Kishi N (2010) Impact response of RC rock-shed girder with sand cushion under falling load. Nucl Eng Des 240(10):2626–2632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi Y, He S, Du Y, Sun X, Li X (2019) Effects of the configuration of a baffle–avalanche wall system on rock avalanches in Tibet Zhangmu: discrete element analysis. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(4):2267–2282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Fang H, Liu W, Zhu L, Zhuang Y, Wang J, Han J (2018) Energy absorption of foam-filled multi-cell composite panels under quasi-static compression. Compos Part B 153:295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi KY, Cheung RW (2013) Landslide disaster prevention and mitigation through works in Hong Kong. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5(5):354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compston P, Styles M, Kalyanasundaram S (2006) Low energy impact damage modes in aluminum foam and polymer foam sandwich structures. J Sandw Struct Mater 8(5):365–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowper GR, Symonds PS (1952) Strain hardening and strain rate effects in the impact loading of cantilever beams, Brown Univ., Div. of Appl. Mech (No. 28). report

  • Duarte I, Krstulović-Opara L, Vesenjak M (2015) Characterisation of aluminium alloy tubes filled with aluminium alloy integral-skin foam under axial compressive loads. Compos Struct 121:154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber W, Volkwein A, Denk M (2008) Impact of rockfalls on reinforced foam glass cushion systems. In: Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Rockfall Protection. pp. 31–33

  • He S, Liu W, Li X (2016) Prediction of impact force of debris flows based on distribution and size of particles. Environ Earth Sci 75(4):298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He S, Yan S, Deng Y, Liu W (2019) Impact protection of bridge piers against rockfall. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(4):2671–2680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julian RW, Mast RF, Schlechten JR, Warren GE, Zinserling MH (1988) U.S. Patent Application No. 07/043,272

  • Kurihashi Y, Komuro M, Schubert M, Custer R, Schellenberg K (2018) Failure probability for extreme load cases evaluated by FE-calculations–a case study for the rockfall protection gallery Rieinertobel. In 40th IABSE Symposium, Tomorrow’s Megastructures

  • Lam C, Kwan JS, Su Y, Choi CE, Ng CW (2018) Performance of ethylene-vinyl acetate foam as cushioning material for rigid debris-resisting barriers. Landslides 15(9):1779–1786

  • Lambert S, Gotteland P, Nicot F (2009) Experimental study of the impact response of geocells as components of rockfall protection embankments. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:459–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert S, Heymann A, Gotteland P, Nicot F (2014) Real-scale investigation of the kinematic response of a rockfall protection embankment. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14(5):1269–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann E, Peschmann J (2002) Energy absorption by the steel structure of ships in the event of collisions. Mar Struct 15(4–5):429–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li QM, Magkiriadis I, Harrigan JJ (2006) Compressive strain at the onset of densification of cellular solids[J]. J Cell Plast 42(5):371–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu KF, Jan CD, Lin PS, Li HC (2013) Advances of geo-disaster mitigation technologies in Taiwan. In: Progress of Geo-Disaster Mitigation Technology in Asia. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 77–103

  • Lorenzi L, Fuganti A, Todaro E, Fossat E (1997) Aluminum foam applications for impact energy absorbing structures. SAE Trans 106(5):27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Maleki S, Ahmadi F (2011) Using expanded polystyrene as a seismic energy dissipation device. J Vib Control 17(10):1481–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miltz J, Gruenbaum G (1981) Evaluation of cushioning properties of plastic foams from compressive measurements. Polym Eng Sci 21(15):1010–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizuyama T (2008) Structural countermeasures for debris flow disasters. Int J Erosion Control Eng 1(2):38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motz C, Pippan R (2001) Deformation behaviour of closed-cell aluminium foams in tension. Acta Mater 49(13):2463–2470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettles AT, Douglas MJ (2002) A comparison of quasi-static indentation testing to low velocity impact testing. Composite Materials: Testing, Design, and Acceptance Criteria, 116

  • Ng CWW, Choi CE, Song D, Kwan JHS, Koo RCH, Shiu HYK, Ho KKS (2015) Physical modeling of baffles influence on landslide debris mobility. Landslides 12(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Choi CE, Su AY, Kwan JS, Lam C (2016) Large-scale successive boulder impacts on a rigid barrier shielded by gabions. Can Geotech J 53(10):1688–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Su Y, Choi CE, Song D, Lam C, Kwan JSH et al (2018) Comparison of cushioning mechanisms between cellular glass and gabions subjected to successive boulder impacts. J Geotech Geoenviron 144(9):04018058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ossa A, Romo MP (2011) Dynamic characterization of EPS geofoam. Geotext Geomembr 29(1):40–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran R, Moorthi A, Basu S (2009) Numerical simulation of drop weight impact behaviour of closed cell aluminium foam. Mater Des 30(8):2823–2830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg K, Volkwein A, Roth A, Vogel T (2006) Rockfall–falling weight tests on galleries with special cushion layers. In: Proceedings, 3rd international conference on protection of structures against hazards, September, pp. 28–29

  • Schellenberg K, Röthlin C, Ghadimi-Khasraghy S, Vogel T (2012) A review on the design of rock sheds with a cushion layer. In: 11th International and 2nd North American Symposium on Landslides ISL/NASL 2012

  • Su Y, Cui Y, Ng CWW, Choi CE, Kwan JSH (2019) Effects of particle size and cushioning thickness on the performance of rock-filled gabions used in protection against boulder impact. Can Geotech J 56(2):198–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Chu Z, Liu Y, Luo W, Wang M (2016) Performance of used tire cushion layer under rockfall impact. Shock Vib

  • Wang D, Chen Z, He S, Liu Y, Tang H (2018) Measuring and estimating the impact pressure of debris flows on bridge piers based on large-scale laboratory experiments. Landslides 15(7):1331–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi S, Nishi H, Kishi N, Komuro M, Roethlin C, Vogel T (2014). Full-scale impact tests of a rockfall protection gallery-cases using sand and gravel cushion. In: Proceedings of 5th Interdisciplinary Workshop on Rockfall Protection

  • Yan LL, Zhao ZY, Han B, Lu TJ, Lu BH (2018) Tube enhanced foam: a novel way for aluminum foam enhancement. Mater Lett 227:70–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Wang E, Li J, Zheng Z (2008) Static and low-velocity impact behavior of sandwich beams with closed-cell aluminum-foam core in three-point bending. Int J Impact Eng 35(8):885–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41790433), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41772312), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China-International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (NSFC-ICIMOD) Collaborative Project (Grant No. 41661144041).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Surface Process, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610041, China

    Shuaixing Yan, Siming He & Yong Wu

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Shuaixing Yan & Siming He

  3. CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China

    Siming He

  4. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, China

    Dongpo Wang

Authors
  1. Shuaixing Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Siming He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dongpo Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yong Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siming He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, S., He, S., Wang, D. et al. Design and optimisation of a protective device for bridge piers against debris flow impact. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79, 3321–3335 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01793-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01793-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation