Abstract
A road planning process runs through several phases, takes several years, incorporates many decision-making procedures and includes numerous experts and interest groups from different areas. Today, Virtual Reality (VR) systems can benefit this process. By simulating different future alternatives, together with their possible environmental impact, a common understanding of the consequences of the respective alternatives can be obtained. Furthermore, since many of the models are obtainable from the Internet, a wider public can be reached already in the early phases of the planning process. The goal of the paper is to provide a better understanding of the use of VR models for supporting involvement and collaboration in the road planning process. The background data are from two large road planning projects through cultural heritage areas in Sweden. Observations on using VR models to support public participation, and facilitate communication between different interested parties, are presented. The results argue for the benefits of using VR models during the whole road planning process and shed further light on a range of social issues associated with using this technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
(Up to date the 9 October 2006) http://www.hydro.com/en/our_business/oil_energy/exploration/cave.html.
(Up to date the 9 October 2006) http://www.rug.nl/rc/hpcv/projects/landscape.
(Up to date the 9 October 2006) http://www.cybergeography.org/atlas/geographic.html.
(Up to date the 9 October 2006) http://www.uea.ac.uk/∼e313/virtual.html.
(Up to date the 9 October 2006) http://www.urbansim.org/index.shtm.l
(Up to date the 9 October 2006) http://www.fit.fraunhofer.de/projekte/arthur/index_en.xml.
(Up to date the 9 October 2006) http://www.iti.gr/intelcities.
(Up to date the 9 October 2006) http://clime.tkk.fi/.
CAVE™ is a trademark of the University of Illinois at Chicago, originally designed by Cruz-Neira et al. (1993).
e-Science “means science increasingly done through distributed global collaborations enabled by the Internet, using very large data collections, terascale computing resources and high performance visualization. In the future, e-Science will refer to the large scale science that will increasingly be carried out through distributed global collaborations enabled by the Internet.” (Woolgar 2003, p. 11).
In this paper the terms professional and expert refer to the people involved in the project due to their professional role.
Linköping is a city near Norrköping.
http://www.dynagraph.se/produkter/roadview.html (RoadView was developed by Dynagraph AB).
People who had broadband and better desktop computers could use the larger model, but those who had only modem connection or a desktop computer with less performance could use the smaller ones.
The costs can vary depending on developers, the length of the road, details and geographical conditions. This approximately cost was given by Dynagraph AB for a 70-km road.
In the beginning of 2006 the government requested additional data, and at present SRA is waiting for the government to approve the suggestion.
Ian Foster and Carl Kesselman, inventors of the Globus approach to the Grid, define the Grid as an enabler for Virtual Organisations: ‘An infrastructure that enables flexible, secure, coordinated resource sharing among dynamic collections of individuals, institutions and resources.’ It is important to recognize that resource in this context includes computational systems and data storage and specialized experimental facilities.” (Woolgar 2003, p. 11)
(Up to date the 18 Jan 2006) http://www.accessgrid.org.
References
Al-Kodmany K (2002) Visualization tools and methods in community planning: from freehand sketches to virtual reality. J Plann Lit 17(2):189–211
Antonsson H (2004) Hur kommuniceras kulturmiljön? En kartläggning av visualiserings-tillämpningar i infrastrukturplanering (How is the Cultural Heritage Communicated? A Survey in Use of Visualization in Infrastructure Planning), Report for the Swedish Road Administration and the Swedish National Heritage Board. http://www.dialog.raa.se/cocoon/forlag/visa.html?id=2422
Argyris C, Putnam R, Smith D (1985) Action science. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Aspin R, Roberts D (2005) A model for distributed, co-located interaction in urban design/review visualization. In: Proceedings of distributed systems and real time applications (DSRT’05), Montreal, Canada, pp 70–77
Baltes BB, Dickinson MW, Sherman MP, Bauer CC, LaGanke JS (2002) Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: a meta-analysis. J Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 87(1):156–179
Baskerville RL (1999) Investigating information systems with action research. J Commun Assoc Inf Syst 2(4):1–32http://www.cais.isworld.org/articles/default.asp?vol=2&art=19
Billger M, Heldal I, Stahre B, Renström K (2004) Perception of color and space in virtual reality: a comparison between real room and virtual reality models. In: Proceedings of human vision and electronic imaging, IX, San Jose, CA, pp 90–98
Bishop I, Lange E (eds) (2005) Visualization in landscape and environmental planning. Technology and applications. Taylor & Francis, London, New York
Bowman DA (1999) Interaction techniques for common tasks in immersive virtual environments. Design, evaluation, and applications. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology
Borning A, Friedman B, Kahn PH Jr (2004) Designing for human values in an urban simulation system: value sensitive design and participatory design. In: Proceeding of the 8th biennial participatory design conference, Toronto, http://www.projects.ischool.washington.edu/vsd/files/borning04urbansimandvsd.pdf
Broll W, Lindt I, et al (2004) ARTHUR: a collaborative augmented environment for architectural design and Urban planning. J Virtual Real Broadcast 1:1–9
Champion E (2005) Games and geography. In: Cartwright W, Peterson MP, Gartner G, (eds) Multimedia cartography, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag. In press
Cruz-Neira C, Sandin D, DeFanti T (1993) Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: the design and implementation of the CAVE. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 93, New York, pp135–142
Curwell S, Hamilton A (2003) Intelcity Roadmap—Version 4, EU project report http://www.ndmodelling.scpm.salford.ac.uk/intelcity/documents/documents.htm
Heldal I (2004) The Usability of Collaborative Virtual Environments: Towards an Evaluation Framework. Ph.D. thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg
Heldal I, van Raalte S, Balot K (2005) Using virtual reality systems to support public participation in planning new roads. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on virtual systems and multimedia, VSMM2005, Ghent, Belgium, pp76–89
Hix D, Swan JE II, Gabbard JL, McGee M, Durbin J, King T (1999) User-centered design and evaluation of a real-time battlefield visualization virtual environment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE virtual reality conference, Houston, USA, pp 96–103
Hutchinson TC, Kuester F, Hsieh TJ, Chadwick R (2005) A hybrid reality environment and its application to the study of earthquake engineering. J Virtual Reality 9(1):17–33
James P, Fernando T, Hamilton A, Curwell S (2004) Enhancing the decision-making process in urban spatial planning using advanced ICT. EU project report: Intelcity, 1–25
Johnson I, Wilson A (2002) Making the Most of Maps: Field Survey on the Island of Kythera, Journal of GIS in Archaeology 1. ESRI, Redlands, California http://www.esri.com/library/journals/archaeology/volume_1/field_survey.pdf
Jude SR, Brown I et al (2005) Exploring future coastlines—Initial steps towards the development of an integrated coastal simulation and visualisation system. In: Buhmann E, Paar P, Bishop IJ, Lange E (eds) Trends in real-time landscape visualization and participation. Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Dessau, Germany, pp 69–76
Keenan PB (2002) Spatial information systems. In: Mora M, Forgionne GA, Gupta JNG (eds) Decision making support systems: achievements, trends and challenges for. Idea Group, Hershey, PA, USA, pp 28–39
Lange E (2005) Issues and questions for research in communicating with public through visualizations. In: Buhmann E, Paar P, Bishop I, Lange E (eds) Proceedings at anhalt university of applied sciences trends in real-time landscape visualization and participation. Wichmann Verlag, Heidelberg, http://www.masterla.de/conf/pdf/conf2005/11lange_c.pdf
Lepouras G, Vassilakis C (2005) Virtual museums for all: employing game technology for edutainment. Virtual Real J 8(2):96–106
van Raalte S, Wallin M (2003) IT i kulturmiljöer—En kunskapsöversikt (IT in Culture Heritage Environments—A Survey). Report, Dept. of Innovative Design, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg
Mahmoud AH, Clayden A, Higgin C (1999) A comparative study of environmental cognition in a real environment and its VRML (Virtual Reality Modelling Language) simulation. In: Proceeding of international conference on information visualization, IV1999, London, UK, pp208–213
Mente-Mejer E, Klamer L (2004) ICT capabilities in action: what people do. Report COST Action 269, Luxembourg
Noyes J, Bransby M (eds) (2001) People in control: human factors in control room design. Publ, IEE control engineering series, vol 60, London
Owen R, Buhalis D, Pletinckx D (2004) Identifying technologies used in cultural heritage. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on virtual reality, archeaology and cultural heritage, Brussels, Belgium pp 155–163
Persson J (2006) Environmental assessment, Conflicts and Communication in Planning and Management. Submitted for publication
Pidgeon NF, Gregory R (2004) Judgment, decision making and public policy. In: Koehler D, Harvey N (eds) Handbook of judgment and decision making, Oxford, pp 604–23
Rehal S (2004) Bild och ord som verktyg för dialog (Images and Words as Tools for Supporting Dialogues). Ph.D. thesis, Department of Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg
Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press, New York
Sarjakoski T (1998) Networked GIS for public participation—Emphasis on utilizing image data. J Comput Environ Urban Syst 22(4):381–392
Schroeder R, Huxor A, Smith A (2001) Activeworlds: geography and social interaction in virtual reality. Futures 33:569–587
Shiffer M (2001) Spatial multimedia for planning support. In: Brail RK, Klosterman RE (eds) Planning support systems, ESRI Press, Redlands, CA, pp 361–385
Slater M, Steed A, Chrisanthou Y (2001) Computer Graphics and Virtual Environments. From Realism to Real-time. Addison-Wesley, London
Suneson K, Wernemyr C, Westerdahl B, Roupé M, Allwood C-M (2003) Usability and perception of an architectural VR-model of an office building. In: Waard Dd, Brookhuis KA, et al (eds) Human factors in the age of virtual reality. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, pp 157–160
Stanney KM (2002) Handbook of Virtual Environments. Design, Implementation, and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London
Stahre B (2006) How to convert reality into virtual reality: exploring colour appearance in digital models. Licentiate Thesis, Department of Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg
Stock C, Bishop ID, O’Connor A (2005) Generating virtual environments by linking spatial data processing with a gaming engine. In: Buhmann E, Paar P, Bishop ID, Lange E (eds) Trends in real-time landscape visualization and participation. Wichmann, Heidelberg, pp 324–329
Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive work analysis toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
Wilson JR (2003) If VR Has Changed then have its Human Factors? In: Waard Dd, Brookhuis KA, et al (eds) Human factors in the age of virtual reality. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, pp 9–30
Whyte J, Bouchlaghem D, Thorpe T (1999) Visualization and information: a building design perspective. In: Proceeding of international conference on information visualization, IV1999, London, UK, pp104–109
Wolffram B (2001) Vägutredning—Slutrapport (Road Investigation—Final Report), Vägverket, Gothenburg
Woolgar S (2003) Social shaping perspectives on e-science and e-social science: the case for research support. A consultative study for economic and social research council (ESRC), http://www.ncess.ac.uk/docs/social_shaping_perspectives.pdf
Wuensche BC, Kot B, Gits A, Amor R, Hosking J, Grundy J (2005) A framework for game engine based visualisations. In: Proceedings of image and vision computing (IVCNZ ‘05), Dunedin, New Zealand pp 465–470
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to Kristina Balot, Erik Bohlin, Lars Bråthe, Jon van Leuven, Tomas Matsson, Susanne van Raalte and Maria Spante for support with this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heldal, I. Supporting participation in planning new roads by using virtual reality systems. Virtual Reality 11, 145–159 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0061-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0061-3