Skip to main content
Log in

Safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic adult groin hernia repair in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgery is the recommended treatment of groin hernia, and laparoscopic approach is increasingly accepted due to lower risk of chronic pain. This systematic review aims to evaluate results of laparoscopic groin hernia repair (LGHR) in Africa.

Methods

We performed a literature search of published studies using electronic databases. Included African articles reported at least one of outcomes after LGHR in adult population. Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence of the post-operative outcomes.

Results

We included 19 studies from 6 countries which totalized 2329 hernia cases. Mean age was 44.5 years and male patients were predominant (sex-ratio 19.8). The mean operative time was 69.1 min. The pooled prevalence of conversion to open procedure was 2.578% (95% IC: 1.209–4.443). The pooled prevalence of surgical site infection and Hematoma/Seroma was respectively 0.626% (95%IC: 0.332–1.071) and 4.617% (95% IC: 2.990–6.577). The pooled prevalence of recurrence and chronic pain was respectively 2.410% (95% IC: 1.334–3.792) and 3.180% (95% IC: 1.435–5.580). We found that total morbidity for TAPP procedure was higher than TEP procedure (p = 0.0006; OR 1.8443).

Conclusion

These results confirm that LGHR is safe and feasible and would be recommended in our African context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No patient identifiable data were collected or stored for this study.

References

  1. HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22:1–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jenkins JT, O’Dwyer PJ (2008) Inguinal hernias. BMJ 336(7638):269–272. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39450.428275.AD

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Konate I (2019) Primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia repair, which is the procedure most frequently, performed in operating theaters the world over? Situat Afr Hernia 23:623–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01937-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Il L, Ag S, Pk A, Mm M (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157(2):188193

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haladu NU, Alabi A, Brazzelli M, Imamura M, Ahmed I, Ramsay G, Scott NW (2022) Open versus laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: an overview of systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials Neil W. Scott Surg Endosc 36:4685–4700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09161-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Corbitt Jd (1991) Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(1):23–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuhry E, Van Veen RN, Langeveld HR et al (2007) Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? a systematic review. Surg Endosc 21(2):161–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0167-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon MI, Abrams KR (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90(12):1479–1492. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001785

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ndong A, Tendeng JN, Diallo AC, Diao ML, Sow O, Mawuli SD, Kalli M, Harissou A, Choua O, Doumga AD, Togo AP, Seck M, Ka I, Touré AO, Diop B, Ba PA, Diop PS, Cissé M, Sani R, Konaté I (2022) Adult groin hernia surgery in sub-Saharan Africa: a 20-year systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02669-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M et al (2000) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Oxford

  13. Essola B, Himpens J, EngbangNdamba J, Limgba A, Djomo D, Landenne J, Ngaroua E, Hermans PM, Mboudou ET, Lingier P, Souopgui J, Loi P (2022) Prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using conventional versus custom-made (mosquito) mesh performed in Cameroon: a short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 36:6558–6566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09046-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. AbolKher S, Aldardeer AAK, AbdulRaheem OA, Ali AMA, Redwan AA (2021) This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-SA) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair; Sohag Experience Mahmoud. Egy J Hosp Med 85:2678–2687

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rachid MD, Sadok T, Narjiss Y, Benelkhaiat RB (2020) Surgical treatment of inguinal hernia in north african patients, experience of marrakesh morocco. Int J Curr Med Pharm Res 6(1):4931–4934. https://doi.org/10.24327/23956429.ijcmpr202001836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhekithemba S, Modise K, Chukwuemeka O, Hermanus S (2021) Comparison of outcomes of open tension-free mesh repair and totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of inguinoscrotal hernias. Ann Afr Surg 8(1):29

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moodie B, Koto ZM (2020) Retrospective audit of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair at a South African tertiary academic hospital. South Afr J Surg 58(4):187–191. https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-5151/2020/v58n4a3232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sherpiny WYE (2020) Comparative study between laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal and open mesh hernioplasty in repair of non-complicated inguinal hernia. Int Surg J 7(1):24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Faye PM, Thiam O, Ml Gueye A, Niasse IS, Yacine S, AoToure M, Seck MC (2020) La cure laparoscopique des hernies inguinales simples par voie trans-abdomino-preperitoneale (TAPP): resultats preliminaires. J Afr Chir Digest 20(2):3154–3159

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scout EF, Scriba MF, Crous M, Kloppers JC (2020) Current practice of inguinal hernia repair at University of Cape Town affiliated hospitals: implications for training. South Afr J Surg 58(4):182–186. https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-5151/2020/v58n4a3255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tamer AAM, Habeeb MM, Mokhtar BS, Osman G, Ibrahim A, Metwalli A-EM, Riad M, Khalil OMH, Mansour MI, Elshahidy TM, Abdelhamid MI, Mohamed MB (2020) Changing the innate consensus about mesh fixation in trans-abdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty in adults Short and long term outcome Randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Surg 83:117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maghrebi H, Makni A, Sebai A, Chebbi F, Rebai W, Daghfous A, Ksantini R, Jouini M, Kacem M, Safta ZB (2018) Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for groin hernia repair : our experience in Tunisia. Pan Afr Med J 29:43. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.29.43.14013

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Latif BMA (2017) Early and late outcomes of trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia, a comparative study. Int Surg J 4(2):459–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shazi B, Koto MZ (2007) Comparing outcomes after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair versus open (Lichtenstein) repair of inguinoscrotal hernia at Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital. South Afr J Surg 55(2):77–79

    Google Scholar 

  25. Blondel NO, Aristide BG, Leroy GM, Bernadette NN, Arthur E, Aurélien SM (2016) Laparoscopic surgery for groin hernia in a third world country: a report of 9 cases of transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) repair in Yaoundé. Cameroon. Pan Afr Med J 23:246. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.23.246.8281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lasheen Ahmed E, Safwat K, Morsy M, Allam Z, Awad W (2014) Modified transabdominal external needle for mesh size estimation in laparoscopic hernia repair. Int J Surg 12:1074e1076

    Google Scholar 

  27. Abbas Ashraf E, Abd ME, Ellatif NN, Negm A, El-Morsy G, Amin M, Moatamed A (2012) Patient-perspective quality of life after laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a controlled randomized trial. Surg Endosc 26:2465–2470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McGuire CI, Baigrie RJ, Theunissen D, Fernandes NL, Chapman LR (2012) Outcome of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a South African private practice setting. SAJS 50(4):115

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yasser H, Gabr E, Hammadi H, Khalil R (2010) Four-arm randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open hernia repairs. Int J Surg 8:25–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Farthouat P, Ogougbemy M, Millon A, Sow A, Fall A, Diouf MB (2005) Abord coelioscopique des hernies de l’aine. Expérience de l’Hôpital Principal de Dakar. Le J Coelio-Chir 55:63–66

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hatzitheofilou C et al (1997) Laparoscopic Inguinale hernia repair by an intraperitoneal Onlay mesh techniques using expanded PTFE. Surg Lap and Endo 7(6):451–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Warren BL, Bornman PC (1995) A survey of South African endoscopic surgical practice. S Afr J Surg 33(1):6–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Obonna GC, Etonyeaku AC, Katung IA, Bamigbola KT, Okereke CE (2020) Early experience with laparoscopic surgical practice in Ondo State, South Western Nigeria. West Afr J Med 37(2):183–188

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O et al (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350(18):1819–1827. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M et al (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pallas G, Simon F, Sockeel P, Chapuis O, Jancovici R (2000) Inguinal hernia in Africa and laparoscopy: utopia or realism? Med Trop 60(4):389–394 (PMID: 11436598)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Chao TE, Mandigo M, Opoku-Anane J, Maine R (2016) Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: benefits, challenges, and strategies. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4201-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Butler RE, Burke R, Schneider JJ, Brar H, Lucha PA (2007) The economic impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: results of a double-blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 21(3):387–390

    Google Scholar 

  39. Eklund A, Carlsson P, Rosenblad A, Montgomery A, Bergkvist L, Rudberg C (2010) Long-term cost-minimization analysis comparing laparoscopic with open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 97(5):765–771. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Di Saverio S et al (2014) A cost-effective technique for laparoscopic appendectomy: outcomes and costs of a case-control prospective single-operator study of 112 unselected consecutive cases of complicated acute appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 218:51–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ndong A, Diao M, Tendeng J, Thiam O, Diallo A, Diouf A et al (2021) Limitations and challenges of laparoscopic surgery in a low-income country: example of the Gaston Berger Teaching Hospital of Saint-Louis (Senegal). J Surg Simul. https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shakya VC, Shrestha ARM, Byanjankar B, Pandit R (2014) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective evaluation at Eastern Nepal. Pan Afr Med J 17:241. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.241.2610

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19(2):188–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9126-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Voitk AJ (1998) The learning curve in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair for the community general surgeon. Can J Surg 42(6):446–450 (PMID: 9854534. PMCID: PMC3949801)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Burcharth J (2014) The epidemiology and risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia surgery Dan. Med J 61(5):B4846

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bittner R, Arregui ME (2011) Bisgaard T et al Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25(9):2773–2843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1799-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Poelman MM, van den Heuvel B, Deelder JD et al (2013) Consensus development conference on endoscopic repair of groin hernias. Surg Endosc 27(10):3505–3519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3001-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. M. Faye.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This is a review, no need ethical approval.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

No patients were involved in the editorial.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faye, P.M., Ndong, A., Niasse, A. et al. Safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic adult groin hernia repair in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 28, 355–365 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02931-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02931-8

Keywords

Navigation