Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management Forcing Increased Specialization in a Fishery System

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fisheries systems are shaped by dynamic social-ecological interactions that determine their capacity to provide ecosystem services. Human adaptation is often considered a key uncertainty, and there are few quantitative empirical analyses that address long-term social and ecological change in the analyses of fisheries systems. The aim of this study was twofold: (i) to understand how different drivers influenced the adaptations by fishers, and (ii) to evaluate different consequences of such adaptations, especially with regard to diversity of social and ecological links. We used the Baltic Sea as a case study, a system with different fisheries, largely managed with a single-stock advice, in a top-down basis. The study period 1995–2009 was characterized by profound inter-annual fluctuations in fish stock status and prices, and introduction of new types of management measures. We used multivariate statistical methods to define longitudinal changes in fishing tactics and strategies based on logbook data. Our results indicate that changes in fishing strategies have mainly been driven by regulations, and there were only weak linkages between fishing activities, fish stocks, and price fluctuations. We found contrasting trends between large- and small-scale fishers, where large-scale fishers became more specialized and inflexible, whereas small-scale fishers diversified over time. We conclude that management has had a dominating role in shaping fishing patterns, leading to a reduction of important qualities related to the resilience in this social-ecological system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockström J. 2005. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309:1036–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN. 2000. Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24:347–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beddington JR, Agnew DJ, Clark CW. 2007. Current problems in the management of marine fisheries. Science 316:1713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berggren M. 2013. Is Growing Larger the Same as Becoming Resilient? A case study of the Gothenburg Pelagic Offshore Fishery. M.Sc thesis. p 45.

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10:1251–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C. 1998. Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkvik E. 2013. Explaining the decline in Swedish Baltic Sea small-scale fisheries: A historical analysis of fishers in their social and ecological context. p 50.

  • Bodin Ö, Crona BI. 2009. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Glob Environ Chang 19:366–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin Ö, Tengö M. 2012. Disentangling intangible social–ecological systems. Glob Environ Chang 22:430–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra W, Hentati-Sundberg J. 2014. How to classify fishers’ behaviour—an invitation to Fishing Styles. Fish & Fisheries. doi:10.1111/faf.12092.

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Huyvaert KP. 2010. AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale M, Dörner H, Abella A, Andersen J, Casey J, Döring R, Kirkegaard E, Motova A, Anderson J, Simmonds EJ, Stransky C. 2013. Rebuilding EU fish stocks and fisheries, a process under way? Mar Policy 39:43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Walker BH, Anderies JM, Abel N. 2001. From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to What? Ecosystems 4:765–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casini M, Hjelm J, Molinero J-C, Lövgren J, Cardinale M, Bartolino V, Belgrano A, Kornilovs G. 2009. Trophic cascades promote threshold-like shifts in pelagic marine ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:197–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casini M, Lövgren J, Hjelm J, Cardinale M, Molinero J-C, Kornilovs G. 2008. Multi-level trophic cascades in a heavily exploited open marine ecosystem. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 275:1793–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin F, Carpenter SR, Kofinas GP, Folke C, Abel N, Clark WC, Olsson P, Smith DMS, Walker BH, Young OR, Berkes F, Biggs R, Grove JM, Naylor RL, Pinkerton E, Steffen W, Swanson FJ. 2010. Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends Ecol Evol 25:241–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen A-S, Raakjær J. 2006. Fishermen’s tactical and strategic decisions. Fish Res 81:258–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter A, Burt L, Paxton C, Fernandez C, Buckland S, Pan J-X. 2004. Are stock assessment methods too complicated? Fish Fish 5:235–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daw TM, Gray T. 2005. Fisheries science and sustainability in international policy: a study of failure in the European Union’s Common Fisheries Policy. Mar Policy 29:189–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deporte N, Ulrich C, Mahevas S, Demaneche S, Bastardie F. 2012. Regional métier definition: a comparative investigation of statistical methods using a workflow applied to international otter trawl fisheries in the North Sea. ICES J Mar Sci 69:331–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC. 2012. Council Regulation (EU) No 1256/2011 of 30 November 2011 fixing for 2012 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in the Baltic Sea and amending Regulation (EU) No 1124/2010.

  • Eero M, Köster FW, Vinther M. 2012. Why is the Eastern Baltic cod recovering? Mar Policy 36:235–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F. 1998. Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. J Dev Stud 35:1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nyström M, Peterson GD, Bengtsson J, Walker BH, Norberg J. 2003. Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front Ecol Environ 1:488–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everitt B, Landau S, Leese M, Stahl D. 2011. Cluster analysis. 5th edn. Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J. 2010. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15:20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C. 2006. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16:253–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton E, Smith ADM, Smith DC, van Putten IE. 2011. Human behaviour: the key source of uncertainty in fisheries management. Fish Fish 12:2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe K, Kappel CV, Micheli F, D’Agrosa C, Bruno JF, Casey KS, Ebert C, Fox HE, Fujita R, Heinemann D, Lenihan HS, Madin EMP, Perry MT, Selig ER, Spalding M, Steneck R, Watson R. 2008. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319:948–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hentati-Sundberg J, Hjelm J, Österblom H. 2014. Does fisheries management incentivize non-compliance? Estimated misreporting in the Swedish Baltic Sea pelagic fishery based on commercial fishing effort. ICES J Mar Sci. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsu036.

  • Hentati-Sundberg J, Hjelm J. 2014. Can fisheries management be quantified? Mar Policy 48:18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling C, Meffe GK. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10:328–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling C. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth LM, Roberts CM, Thurstan RH, Stewart BD. 2013. The unintended consequences of simplifying the sea: making the case for complexity. Fish Fish. doi:10.1111/faf.12041.

  • Hughes TP, Bellwood D, Folke C. 2005. New paradigms for supporting the resilience of marine ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 20:380–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ICES. 2013. Report of the Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group 2013 (WGBFAS), 10–17 April 2013, ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen. ICES CM 2013/ACOM:10.

  • ICES. 2014. ICES Historical Catch Statistics 1950-2010. http://www.ices.dk/marine-data/dataset-collections/Pages/Fish-catch-and-stock-assessment.aspx. Accessed 28 June 2014.

  • Jackson JBC, Kirby MX, Berger WH, Bjorndal K a, Botsford LW, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke R, Erlandson J, Estes J a., Hughes TP, Kidwell S, Lange CB, Lenihan HS, Pandolfi JM, Peterson CH, Steneck RS, Tegner MJ, Warner RR. 2001. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629–37.

  • Jackson JBC. 2001. What was natural in the coastal oceans? Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:5411–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juda L, Hennessey T. 2001. Governance profiles and the management of the uses of large marine ecosystems. Ocean Dev Int Law 32:43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperski S, Holland DS. 2012. Income diversification and risk for fishermen. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:2076–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman L, Rousseeuw P. 2005. Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindegren M, Möllmann C, Nielsen A, Stenseth NC. 2009. Preventing the collapse of the Baltic cod stock through an ecosystem-based management approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:14722–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon R, McConney P, Roy RN. 2008. Governing fisheries as complex adaptive systems. Mar Policy 32:104–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matson PA, Parton W, Power A, Swift M. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504–9.

  • Möllmann C, Lindegren M, Blenckner T, Bergström L, Casini M, Diekmann R, Flinkman J, Müller-Karulis B, Neuenfeldt S, Schmidt JO, Tomczak MT, Voss R, Gårdmark A. 2013. Implementing ecosystem-based fisheries management: from single-species to integrated ecosystem assessment and advice for Baltic Sea fish stocks. ICES J Mar Sci 71:1187–97.

  • Mori AS, Furukawa T, Sasaki T. 2013. Response diversity determines the resilience of ecosystems to environmental change. Biol Rev 88:349–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murawski S. 2007. Ten myths concerning ecosystem approaches to marine resource management. Mar Policy 31:681–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers RA, Worm B. 2003. Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature 423:280–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nyström M, Norström A, Blenckner T, de la Torre-Castro M, Eklöf J, Folke C, Österblom H, Steneck RS, Thyresson M, Troell M. 2012. Confronting feedbacks of degraded marine ecosystems. Ecosystems 15:695–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C. 2001. Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: a study of Lake Racken Watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems 4:85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Österblom H, Hansson S, Larsson U, Hjerne O, Wulff F, Elmgren R, Folke C. 2007. Human-induced trophic cascades and ecological regime shifts in the Baltic Sea. Ecosystems 10:877–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Österblom H, Merrie A, Metian M, Boonstra W, Blenckner T, Watson JR, Rykaczewski RR, Ota Y, Sarmiento JL, Christensen V. 2013. Modeling social–ecological scenarios in marine systems. Bioscience 63:735–44.

  • Österblom H, Sissenwine M, Symes D, Kadin M, Daw TM, Folke C. 2011. Incentives, social–ecological feedbacks and European fisheries. Mar Policy 35:568–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–22.

  • Palumbi SR, McLeod K, Grünbaum D. 2008. Ecosystems in action: lessons from marine ecology about recovery, resistance, and reversibility. Bioscience 58:33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D, Christensen V, Dalsgaard J, Froese R, Torres F. 1998. Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279:860–3.

  • Pauly D, Christensen V, Guénette S, Pitcher TJ, Sumaila RU, Walters CJ, Watson R, Zeller D. 2002. Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418:689–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier D, Ferraris J. 2000. A multivariate approach for defining fishing tactics from commercial catch and effort data. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry RI, Ommer RE, Barange M, Jentoft S, Neis B, Sumaila RU. 2011. Marine social-ecological responses to environmental change and the impacts of globalization. Fish Fish 12:427–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson GD, Allen C, Holling C. 1998. Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1:6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts C. 2007. The unnatural history of the sea. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochet M-J, Daurès F, Trenkel VM. 2012. Capacity management, not stock status or economics, drives fleet dynamics in the Bay of Biscay ecosystem on a decadal time scale. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 69:695–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shumway RH, Stoffer DS. 2000. Time series analysis and its applications. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer DB, Bascompte J. 2011. Compartmentalization increases food-web persistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:3648–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuvendal M, Elmqvist T. 2011. Ecosystem services linking social and ecological systems: river brownification and the response of downstream stakeholders. Ecol Soc 16:21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tvetera R, Eggert H. 2007. Potential rent and overcapacity in the Swedish Baltic Sea trawl fishery for cod (Gadus morhua). ICES J Mar Sci 64:439–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich C, Sølgaard Andersen B. 2004. Dynamics of fisheries, and the flexibility of vessel activity in Denmark between 1989 and 2001. ICES J Mar Sci 61:308–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Putten IE, Kulmala S, Thébaud O, Dowling N, Hamon KG, Hutton T, Pascoe S. 2012. Theories and behavioural drivers underlying fleet dynamics models. Fish Fish 13:216–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villasante S, Do Carme Garcia-Negro M, González-Laxe F, Rodriguez GR. 2011. Overfishing and the Common Fisheries Policy: (un)successful results from TAC regulation? Fish and Fisheries 12:34–50.

  • Walker BH. 1992. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv Biol 6:18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters CJ, Maguire J-J. 1996. Lessons for stock assessment from the northern cod collapse. Rev Fish Biol Fish 137:125–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D, Jacobsen R. 2013. Analyzing resilience with communicative systems theory an example from European fisheries. Marit Stud 12:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worm B, Barbier EB, Beaumont N, Duffy JE, Folke C, Halpern BS, Jackson JBC, Lotze HK, Micheli F, Palumbi SR, Sala E, Selkoe K, Stachowicz JJ, Watson R. 2006. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314:787–90.

  • Yachi S, Loreau M. 1999. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:1463–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Mistra through a core grant to the Stockholm Resilience Centre at Stockholm University. Support was also provided by the “Baltic Ecosystem Adaptive Management (BEAM)” and “Regime shifts in the Baltic Sea Ecosystem—Modeling complex adaptive ecosystems and governance implications” projects, funded by FORMAS. We are grateful to Katja Ringdahl, Johan Lövgren, and Michele Casini at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lysekil, Sweden for help with data preparation. Margit Eero and two anonymous reviewers provided substantial input on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Hentati-Sundberg.

Additional information

Author Contributions

JHS, JH, WB and HÖ designed study; JHS and JH analysed data; JHS, JH, WB and HÖ wrote the paper.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hentati-Sundberg, J., Hjelm, J., Boonstra, W.J. et al. Management Forcing Increased Specialization in a Fishery System. Ecosystems 18, 45–61 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-014-9811-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-014-9811-3

Keywords

Navigation