Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency analysis of telescopic-legged bipedal robots

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the stability of underactuated bipedal walking incorporating telescopic-leg actuation. In human walking, knee joints of swing and support legs are bent and stretched. The telescopic legs mimic the motion of the center of mass of human legs via their telescopic motion during the stance phase. First, underactuated telescopic-legged biped robot models are introduced. Second, an output-following control law is applied to the linearized equation of motion of the robot, and the controlled robot’s equation is then specified as a linear time-varying system. The error transition equation is developed to evaluate the stability during the stance phase. Numerical calculations are performed to show the influences of leg telescopic motion on the stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McGeer T (1990) Passive dynamic walking. Int J Robot Res 9(2):62–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goswami A, Thuilot B, Espiau B (1996) Compass-like biped robot Part I: Stability and bifurcation of passive gaits. IINRIA Res Rep 2996

  3. Garcia M, Chatterjee A, Ruina A, Coleman M (1998) The simplest walking model: stability, complexity, and scaling. J Biomech Eng 120:281–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asano F, Luo ZW (2008) Energy-efficient and high-speed dynamic biped locomotion based on principle of parametric excitation. IEEE Trans Robot 24(6):1289–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hanazawa Y, Asano F (2015) High-speed biped walking using swinging-arms based on principle of up-and-down wobbling mass. In: Proc. the 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 5191–5196

  6. Schwab AL, Wisse M (2001) Basin of attraction of the simplest walking model. ASME 2001 design engineering technical conferences, pp 1–9

  7. Hobbelen DGE, Wisse M (2007) A disturbance rejection measure for limit cycle walkers: the gait sensitivity norm. IEEE Trans Robot 23:1213–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirata K, Kokame H (2003) Stability analysis of linear systems with state jump-motivated by periodic motion control of passive walker. In: Proc. of IEEE conference on control applications, pp 949–953

  9. Asano F (2015) Stability analysis of underactuated compass gait based on linearization of motion. Multibody Syst Dyn 33(1):93–111

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Asano F (2015) Fully analytical solution to discrete behavior of hybrid zero dynamics in limit cycle walking with constraint on impact posture. Multibody Syst Dyn 35(2):191–213

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by Grabt-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) no. 16K06154, provided by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuji Harata.

Additional information

This work was presented in part at the 2nd International Symposium on Swarm Behavior and Bio-Inspired Robotics, Kyoto, October 29–November 1, 2017.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harata, Y., Kato, Y. & Asano, F. Efficiency analysis of telescopic-legged bipedal robots. Artif Life Robotics 23, 585–592 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-018-0492-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-018-0492-4

Keywords

Navigation