Skip to main content
Log in

A fast surface-matching procedure for protein–ligand docking

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A very simple, fast, and efficient scheme is proposed for performing preliminary protein–ligand docking as the first step of intensive high-throughput virtual screening. The procedure acts as a surface-complementarity filter that first calculates the 2D-contour maps of both the protein cavity and of the ligands using a spherical harmonics description of the associated molecular surfaces. Next, the obtained 2D-fingerprint images are compared to detect their complementarity. This scheme was tested on three typical cases of protein cavities, namely, a well-closed pocket, a small open pocket, and a large open one. For that purpose, for each case, a sample of 101 ligand conformers was generated (the X-ray one and 100 different conformers generated using simulated annealing), and these conformational samples were ranked according to the complementarity with the protein cavity surface. Compared to traditional docking procedures such as FRED (considered as typical of a very fast rigid body docking algorithms) and GOLD (considered as typical of the more accurate flexible docking algorithms), our procedure was much faster and more successful in detecting the right X-ray conformation. We did, however, identify a certain weakness in the case of the very large pocket where results were not as expected. In general, our method could be used for incorporating indirectly flexibility in protein–ligand docking calculations as such a scheme can easily handle several conformational states of both the protein and the ligand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murray CW (2004) Principles and practice of high throughput screening. Blackwell Science

  2. Stahura FL, Bajorath J (2004) Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 7:259–269

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lengauer T, Lemmen C, Rarey M, Zimmermann M (2004) Drug Discov Today 9:27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fradera X, Mestres J (2004) Curr Top Med Chem 4:687–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh J, Chuaqui CE, Boriack-Sjodin PA, Lee WC, Pontz T, Corbley MJ, Cheung HK, Arduini RM, Mead JN, Newman MN, Papadatos JL, Bowes S, Josiah S, Ling LE (2003) Bioorg Med Chem Lett 13:4355–4359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cai W, Shao X, Maigret B (2002) J Mol Graph Model 20:313–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McConkey BJ, Sobolev V, Edelman M (2002) Curr Sci 7:845–856

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kontoyianni M, McClellan LM, Sokol GS (2004) J Med Chem 47:558–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schulz-Gasch T, Stahl M (2003) J Mol Model 9:47–57

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Hartshorn MJ, Murray CW, Taylor RD (2003) Proteins 52:609–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Puvanendrampillai D, Mitchell JBO (2003) Bioinformatics 19:1856–1857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Demiriz A (2004) Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 9:147–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kubo M, Aghbari Z, Oh KS, Makinouchi A (2003) IEICE Trans Inf Syst 8:1406T–1415

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tan PN, Kumar V, Srivastava J (2004) Inf Syst 29:293–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Golub GH, Loan CFV (1996) Matrix computation, 3rd edn. John Hopkins University Press

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the PRA B02-04 of the French–Chinese Association for Scientific and Technical Research (AFCRST), FAPESP 01/08895-0, FINEP 1945/01, and CNPq 401695/2003-4. BM was recipient of a CAPES visiting researcher fellowship while this work was performed. We thanks the CINES computer center in Montpellier for providing access to the GOLD program on their O3800 SGI machine, and OPENEYE for providing free access to all their software according to an academic license.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel E. B. Yamagishi.

Additional information

MB proposed the fingerprint-matching algorithm, carried out the fingerprint-matching experiments and helped to draft the manuscript. NM carried out the docking experiments with FRED and GOLD. GN participated in the coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. WC generated the fingerprints using MSSH. XS generated the fingerprints using MSSH. BM participated in the design of the study, coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamagishi, M.E.B., Martins, N.F., Neshich, G. et al. A fast surface-matching procedure for protein–ligand docking. J Mol Model 12, 965–972 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-006-0109-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-006-0109-z

Keywords

Navigation