Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Amplicon-based next-generation sequencing for comparative analysis of root canal microbiome of teeth with primary and persistent/secondary endodontic infections

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the root canal microbiome profiles of primary and persistent/secondary infections using high-throughput sequencing with the help of a reliable bioinformatics algorithm.

Materials and methods

Root canal samples of 10 teeth in the primary endodontic infection (PEI) group and 10 teeth in the persistent/secondary endodontic infection (SEI) group were included resulting in a total of 20 samples. After DNA extraction from the samples, sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Pair-end Illumina reads were imported to QIIME 2; amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) generated by DADA2 were mapped to GreenGenes database. Weighted UniFrac distances were calculated and principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) was used to compare beta diversity patterns. The multiple response permutation procedure (MRPP), the analysis of similarities (ANOSIM), and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (adonis) were conducted for testing group differences. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis was utilized to identify differentially abundant taxa between the groups. The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score threshold was set to 4.0.

Results

Within the Gram-negative facultative anaerobic Gammaproteobacteria class outgroup, two orders (Pasteurellales, Vibrionales) and two families (Pasteurellaceae, Vibrionaceae) were significantly more abundant in the PEI group, whereas Gram-positive bacteria, Actinomycetales order, and Gram-positive anaerobic taxa, one genus (Olsenella) and one species (Olsenella uli), were identified as significantly more abundant in the SEI group.

Conclusions

A few taxa were differentially abundant within either the PEI or SEI group.

Clinical relevance

Reliable bioinformatic tools are needed to define microbial profiles of endodontic infections. Based on a limited number of samples, no distinct variation was determined between the bacterial diversity of initial and recurrent endodontic infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available as consent for publication of raw data was not obtained from study participants, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Kakehashi S, Stanley H, Fitzgerald R (1965) The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 20:340–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(65)90166-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Signoretti FG, Gomes BP, Montagner F, Jacinto RC (2013) Investigation of cultivable bacteria isolated from longstanding retreatment-resistant lesions of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 39:1240–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr (2010) Biofilms and apical periodontitis: study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopathologic findings. J Endod 36:1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sundqvist G (1992) Associations between microbial species in dental root canal infections. Oral Microbiol Immunol 7:257–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302x.1992.tb00584.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2009) Community as the unit of pathogenicity: an emerging concept as to the microbial pathogenesis of apical periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107:870–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.01.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tzanetakis GN, Azcarate-Peril MA, Zachaki S, Panopoulos P, Kontakiotis EG, Madianos PN et al (2015) Comparison of bacterial community composition of primary and persistent endodontic infections using pyrosequencing. J Endod 41:1226–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.03.010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Keskin C, Demiryürek EÖ, Onuk EE (2017) Pyrosequencing analysis of cryogenically ground samples from primary and secondary/persistent endodontic infections. J Endod 43:1309–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bouillaguet S, Manoil D, Girard M, Louis J, Gaïa N, Leo S et al (2018) Root microbiota in primary and secondary apical periodontitis. Front Microbiol 2374. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02374

  9. Hong B-Y, Lee T-K, Lim S-M, Chang SW, Park J, Han SH et al (2013) Microbial analysis in primary and persistent endodontic infections by using pyrosequencing. J Endod 39:1136–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Amaral RR, Braga T, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, da Costa Rachid CTC, Oliveira AGG et al (2022) Root canal microbiome associated with asymptomatic apical periodontitis as determined by high-throughput sequencing. J Endod 48:487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2022.01.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Bella JM, Bao Y, Gloor GB, Burton JP, Reid G (2013) High throughput sequencing methods and analysis for microbiome research. J Microbiol Methods 95:401–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2013.08.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Delikan E, Caliskan S, Cankilic MY, Aksu S, Kesim B, Ulger ST (2021) Microbiota of endodontically infected primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 43:102–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tikhonov M, Leach RW, Wingreen NS (2015) Interpreting 16S metagenomic data without clustering to achieve sub-OTU resolution. ISME J 9:68–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maruyama H, Masago A, Nambu T, Mashimo C, Okinaga T (2020) Amplicon sequence variant-based oral microbiome analysis using QIIME 2. J Osaka Dent Univ 54:273–281. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202008.0206.v1

  15. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Holmes SP (2017) Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J 11:2639–2643. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.119

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Prodan A, Tremaroli V, Brolin H, Zwinderman AH, Nieuwdorp M, Levin E (2020) Comparing bioinformatic pipelines for microbial 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. PLoS One 15:e0227434. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227434

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nearing JT, Douglas GM, Comeau AM, Langille MG (2018) Denoising the denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence error-correction approaches. PeerJ 6:e5364. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5364

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Callahan B, McMurdie P, Rosen M, Han A, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP (2016) DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Eren AM, Maignien L, Sul WJ, Murphy LG, Grim SL, Morrison HG et al (2013) Oligotyping: differentiating between closely related microbial taxa using 16S rRNA gene data. Methods Ecol Evol 4:1111–1119. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12114

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Eren AM, Morrison HG, Lescault PJ, Reveillaud J, Vineis JH, Sogin ML (2015) Minimum entropy decomposition: unsupervised oligotyping for sensitive partitioning of high-throughput marker gene sequences. ISME J 9:968–979. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Glassman SI, Martiny JB (2018) Broadscale ecological patterns are robust to use of exact sequence variants versus operational taxonomic units. MSphere 3:e00148-e218. https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00148-18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Demmer RT, Breskin A, Rosenbaum M, Zuk A, LeDuc C, Leibel R et al (2017) The subgingival microbiome, systemic inflammation and insulin resistance: the oral infections, glucose intolerance and insulin resistance study. J Clin Periodontol 44:255–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12664

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Benahmed AG, Gasmi A, Doşa A, Chirumbolo S, Mujawdiya PK, Aaseth J et al (2021) Association between the gut and oral microbiome with obesity. Anaerobe 70:102248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuch A, Willems RJ, Werner G, Coque TM, Hammerum AM, Sundsfjord A, Sadowy E (2012) Insight into antimicrobial susceptibility and population structure of contemporary human Enterococcus faecalis isolates from Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:551–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gomes BP, Pinheiro ET, Gadê-Neto CR, Sousa EL, Ferraz CC, Zaia AA, Souza-Filho FJ (2004) Microbiological examination of infected dental root canals. Oral Microbiol Immunol 19:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0902-0055.2003.00116.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pourhajibagher M, Ghorbanzadeh R, Bahador A (2017) Culture-dependent approaches to explore the prevalence of root canal pathogens from endodontic infections. Braz Oral Res 31:e108. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sakamoto M, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr, Benno Y (2006) Molecular analysis of bacteria in asymptomatic and symptomatic endodontic infections. Oral Microbiol Immunol 21:112–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.2006.00270.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Benno Y (2008) Molecular analysis of the root canal microbiota associated with endodontic treatment failures. Oral Microbiol Immunol 23:275–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.2007.00423.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zandi H, Kristoffersen AK, Ørstavik D, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr, Enersen M (2018) Microbial analysis of endodontic infections in root-filled teeth with apical periodontitis before and after irrigation using pyrosequencing. J Endod 44:372–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Siqueira JF Jr, Alves FR, Rôças IN (2011) Pyrosequencing analysis of the apical root canal microbiota. J Endod 37:1499–1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferrari PHP, Cai S, Bombana AC (2005) Effect of endodontic procedures on enterococci, enteric bacteria and yeasts in primary endodontic infections. Int Endod J 38:372–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00947.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Anderson AC, Hellwig E, Vespermann R, Wittmer A, Schmid M, Karygianni L, Al-Ahmad A (2012) Comprehensive analysis of secondary dental root canal infections: a combination of culture and culture-independent approaches reveals new insights. PLoS One 7:e49576. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049576

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ersahan S, Hepsenoglu YE (2022) Microbial analysis of endodontic infections in teeth with post-treatment apical periodontitis before and after medication. Aust Endod J. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Iweriebor BC, Obi LC, Okoh AI (2016) Macrolide, glycopeptide resistance and virulence genes in Enterococcus species isolates from dairy cattle. J Med Microbiol 65:641–648. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hou Y, Wang L, Zhang L, Tan X, Huang D, Song D (2022) Potential relationship between clinical symptoms and the root canal microbiomes of root filled teeth based on the next-generation sequencing. Int Endod J 55:18–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nardello LC, Amado PP, Franco DC, Cazares RX, Nogales CG, Mayer MP et al (2020) Next-generation sequencing to assess potentially active bacteria in endodontic infections. J Endod 46:1105–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hillman ET, Lu H, Yao T, Nakatsu CH (2017) Microbial ecology along the gastrointestinal tract. Microbes Environ 32:300–313. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.me17017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Korona-Glowniak I, Piatek D, Fornal E, Lukowiak A, Gerasymchuk Y, Kedziora A et al (2021) Patterns of oral microbiota in patients with apical periodontitis. J Clin Med 10:2707. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122707

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Nuh Naci Yazgan University Scientific Research Projects Department (project number: 2020-SA.DH-BP/13).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bertan Kesim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were approved by Mersin University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Mersin, Turkey) (number 2020/359) and were carried out in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Figure 1

Shannon-Weaver index plot shows species richness in the microbiome of the two types of infection (PNG 1242 kb)

High resolution image (TIF 147103 kb)

Figure 2

The percentages of bacteria in endodontic infections based on the oxygen requirement (PNG 926 kb)

High resolution image (TIF 105495 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kesim, B., Ülger, S.T., Aslan, G. et al. Amplicon-based next-generation sequencing for comparative analysis of root canal microbiome of teeth with primary and persistent/secondary endodontic infections. Clin Oral Invest 27, 995–1004 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04882-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04882-x

Keywords

Navigation