Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Noise level based equivalency factors for different mobility options within heterogeneous traffic flow

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study employs a novel approach of comparing the effects of different types of mobility options on noise levels around arterials with the use of noise-level based passenger car unit (PCU) factors. The study area of this research was Karachi, Pakistan, although the methodology can be applied elsewhere. A regression model was developed for calculating PCUs based on noise level. To ensure maximum spread of data collection and variance in levels of traffic presence, the data was collected from five arterials of Karachi. Traffic volume count included mobility options of motorbikes, cars, pickup, rickshaws, buses, and trucks. It was found that the noise-based PCU factors differ greatly compared to those calculated based on traffic flow. Highest noise based PCU factor was for trucks, used for freight mobility, and lowest one was for rickshaws, a very common shared mobility option for passengers. These equivalency factors can provide a convenient approach for prediction of noise levels, along arterials, for transportation planners at the project development stage. Consequently, they can be utilized for planning and development of sustainable and healthy communities. Their importance is also justified on the basis of recent trend which includes introduction of various shared mobility options in Karachi, such as metro bus, online delivery, and ride-hiring services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References 

  1. Al-Mutairi NZ (2011) Traffic-generated noise pollution: exposure of road users and populations in Metropolitan Kuwait. Environ Monit Assess 183:65–75

  2. Abbaspour M, Karimi E, Nassiri P, Monazzam MR, Taghavi L (2015) Hierarchal assessment of noise pollution in urban areas–a case study. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 34:95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Graaff E, van Blokland G (2011) Stimulation of low noise road vehicles in the Netherlands. Proceedings of Internoise, Osaka

    Google Scholar 

  4. WHO (World Health Organization) (2011) Burden of disease from environmental noise: Quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/326424. Accessed 25 Aug 2023

  5. Sakieh Y (2017) Green and calm: Modeling the relationships between noise pollution propagation and spatial patterns of urban structures and green covers. Urban For Urban Green 24:195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tonne C, Milà C, Fecht D, Alvarez M, Gulliver J, Smith J, ... Kelly F (2018) Socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in exposure to air and noise pollution in London. Environ Int 115:170–179

  7. De Vos P, Licitra G (2012) Noise maps in the European Union: an overview. Noise Map EU: Models Proc 13:285–310

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shukla AK, Jain SS, Parida M, Srivastava JB (2009) Performance of FHWA model for predicting traffic noise: A case study of Metropolitan city, Lucknow (India). Transport 24(3):234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jadaan K, Al-Dakhlallah A, Goussous J, Gammoh H (2013) Evaluation and mitigation of road traffic noise in Amman, Jordan. Journal of Traffic and Logistics Engineering 1:51–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yuen FK (2014) A vision of the environmental and occupational noise pollution in Malaysia. Noise Health 16(73):427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Prasetyo S, Kusnoputranto H, Alikodra H, Koestoer R (2016) Model of noise propagation in urban area: A case study in Jakarta. OIDA Int J Sustain Dev 9(02):45–50

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haron Z, Darus N, Yahya K, Halim H, Mazlan AN, Hezmi MA, Jahya Z (2019) Review on traffic noise problem in Malaysia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ Sci 220(1):012015. IOP Publishing

  13. Mehdi MR, Arsalan MH, Gazder U, Kim M, Seong JC, Namdeo A, Chang SI (2018) Who is the bigger culprit? Studying impacts of traffic and land use on noise levels in CBD area of Karachi, Pakistan. Environ Dev Sustain 20(3):1421–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Debnath A, Singh PK (2018) Environmental traffic noise modelling of Dhanbad township area–a mathematical based approach. Appl Acoust 129:161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu J, Zou C, He S, Sun X, Wang X, Yan Q (2019) Traffic noise exposure of high-rise residential buildings in urban area. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(9):8502–8515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chaudhry B, El-Amine S, Shakshuki E (2018) Passenger safety in ride-sharing services. Procedia Comput Sci 130:1044–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Y, Gu J, Wang S, Wang J (2019) Understanding consumers’ willingness to use ride-sharing services: the roles of perceived value and perceived risk. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 105:504–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang Y, Zhang Y (2018) Examining the relationship between household vehicle ownership and ridesharing behaviors in the United States. Sustainability 10(8):2720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chaturvedi M, Srivastava S (2022) A multi-modal ride sharing framework for last mile connectivity. In: 2022 14th International Conference on COMmunication Systems & NETworkS (COMSNETS), Bangalore India 824–829 IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMSNETS53615.2022.9668583x

  20. Hasan A, Pervaiz A, Raza M (2017) Drivers of climate change vulnerability at different scales in Karachi. IIED Working Paper, IIED London. http://pubs.iied.org/10805IIED. Accessed 25 Aug 2023

  21. Iqbal S, Woodcock A, Osmond J (2020) The effects of gender transport poverty in Karachi. J Transp Geogr 84:102677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. KCCI (2017) Karachi traffic chaos, jamming the wheels of economy infoanalysis. Report by Karachi Chamber of Commerce Institute, Research and Development Department Karachi, available at https://www.kcci.com.pk/research/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Karachi-Traffic-Chaos-Jamming-the-Wheels-of-Economy.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2021

  23. Monazzam MK (2015) Spatial traffic noise pollution assessment-a case study. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 28(3):625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ali S, Mehdi R, Noman SM (2019) Comparison of carbon monoxide for metropolitan city at traffic stressed sites–a case study of Karachi 2002–2018. J Mech Continua Math Sci 14(6):190–204

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ali MS, Adnan M, Noman SM, Baqueri SFA (2014) Estimation of traffic congestion cost-a case study of a major arterial in Karachi. Proc Eng 77:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahmed A, Mehdi MR, Rizvi SMA, Fatima T (2019) Evaluation of existing performance and potential for optimization of traffic signals in Karachi. Arab J Sci Eng 44(10):8747–8759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aamir M, Masroor S, Ali ZA, Ting BT (2019) Sustainable framework for smart transportation system: a case study of Karachi. Wireless Pers Commun 106(1):27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Adnan M (2014) Passenger car equivalent factors in heterogenous traffic environment- are we using the right numbers? Procedia Engineering 77:106–113

  29. Al-Kaisy A, Jung Y, Rakha H (2005) Developing passenger car equivalency factors for heavy vehicles during congestion. J Transp Eng 131(7):514–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mallikarjuna C, Rao KR (2006) Modelling of passenger car equivalency under heterogeneous traffic conditions. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ARRB Conference–Research into Practice, Canberra Autralia, 1–13. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/K-Ramachandra-Rao/publication/272828381_Modelling_of_passenger_car_equivalency_under_heterogeneous_traffic_conditions/links/57d8e62808ae0c0081ee1357/Modelling-of-passenger-car-equivalency-under-heterogeneous-traffic-conditions.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2023

  31. Shalini K, Kumar B (2014) Estimation of the passenger car equivalent: a review. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 4(6):97–102

    Google Scholar 

  32. Praveen PS, Ashalatha R (2019) Passenger car equivalency factors under platooning conditions. Transp Dev Econ 5(2):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hutcheson GD, Moutinho L, Hutcheson, GD (2011) Ordinary least-squares regression. In: The SAGE Dictionary of Quantitative Management Research:224–228. Available at https://datajobs.com/data-science-repo/OLS-Regression-%5BGD-Hutcheson%5D.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2023

  34. Rizvi NL (2006) Distribution and circumstances of injuries in squatter settlements of Karachi, Pakistan. Accid Anal Prev 38(3):526–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhu H, You X, Liu S (2019) Multiple ant colony optimization based on Pearson correlation coefficient. IEEE Access 7:61628–61638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mukaka MM (2012) A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J 24(3):69–71

    Google Scholar 

  37. Henseler J, Ringle C, Sinkovics R (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv Int Mar (AIM) 20:277–320

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ahmed A, Ngoduy D, Adnan M, Baig MAU (2021) On the fundamental diagram and driving behavior modeling of heterogeneous traffic flow using UAV-based data. Transp Res Part A: Policy Practice 148:100–115

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lan Z, Cai M (2021) Dynamic traffic noise maps based on noise monitoring and traffic speed data. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 94:102796

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support provided by Engr. Sajjad Ali and Danyal Ahmed in collecting data for this study. The authors also acknowledge the support provided by the Department of Urban and Infrastructure Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, in conducting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design—Mohammed Raza Mehdi, Uneb Gazder; data collection—Mohammed Raza Mehdi; analysis and interpretation of results—Uneb Gazder, Mudassar Arslan, Fatma Outay; draft manuscript preparation—Mohammed Raza Mehdi, Uneb Gazder, Fatma Outay. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uneb Gazder.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gazder, U., Mehdi, M.R., Outay, F. et al. Noise level based equivalency factors for different mobility options within heterogeneous traffic flow. Pers Ubiquit Comput 27, 1681–1690 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-023-01741-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-023-01741-0

Keywords

Navigation