Skip to main content
Log in

Self-moving robots and pulverised urban displays: status quo, taxonomy, and challenges in emerging pervasive display research

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After almost a decade of relentless development, pervasive urban displays have fragmented into a diversity of approaches with radically distinct characteristics in terms of how mobile they are, as well as the materials they are made of. In this article, we investigate such a diversity in terms of the relationships between key conceptual entities of pervasive urban displays, namely the displayed content, the enabling display technology and the surrounding physical environment. First, we propose a taxonomy for pervasive urban displays through two dimensions: increasing levels of physical integration of content into the surrounding environment (attached, blended, physicalised), and increasing levels of mobility of the display technology within the environment (fixed, portable, self-moving). We extend this taxonomy through looking at the relationship between content and display technology from a conceptual lens and present two categories, namely Screens and Printers. We then provide a classification of current approaches to the design of pervasive displays along these two dimensions and categories, and introduce a new class of pervasive display, which we call pulverised urban displays (PUDs). These displays represent content in a physical form, entangled with the built and natural environment which are capable of an autonomous change to their position. Drawing on urban robotic devices and their capability to sense and manipulate the environment or act as a display itself, we present examples of PUDs. Finally, this article concludes with challenges for designing self-moving robotic and pulverised urban displays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ABB (2014) Teaser trailer luminale festival 2014 opens with robotic light art. https://www.abb-conversations.com/2014/03/teasertrailer-luminale-festival-2014-opens-with-robotic-light-art/, last accessed: January 2020

  2. Blythe M (2014) Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI’14. ACM, New York, pp 703–712, https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557098, (to appear in print)

  3. Brock AM, Chatain J, Park M, Fang T, Hachet M, Landay JA, Cauchard JR (New York) Flymap: Interacting with maps projected from a drone. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’18. ACM, pp 13:1–13:9, https://doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205877, (to appear in print)

  4. Caldwell GA, Foth M (2014) DIY media architecture: open and participatory approaches to community engagement. In: Proceedings of the 2nd media architecture biennale conference on world cities - MAB ’14, pp 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1145/2682884.2682893, (to appear in print)

  5. Cauchard J, Sharlin E (2019) Come to me nice butterfly drone form in collocated hdi. In: 1st international workshop on human-drone interaction, Ecole Nationale de l’Aviation Civile [ENAC]. Glasgow, United Kingdom

  6. Cauchard JR, Zhai KY, Spadafora M, Landay JA (2016) Emotion encoding in human-drone interaction. In: The eleventh acm/ieee international conference on human robot interaction, HRI ’16. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2906831.2906878. IEEE Press, Piscataway, pp 263–270

  7. Chandler A, Finney J, Lewis C, Dix A (2009) Toward emergent technology for blended public displays. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on ubiquitous computing, UbiComp ’09. ACM, New York, pp 101–104, https://doi.org/10.1145/1620545.1620562, (to appear in print)

  8. Clarke R, Heitlinger S, Light A, Forlano L, Foth M, DiSalvo C (2019) More-than-human participation: design for sustainable smart city futures. Interactions 26(3):60–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319075, https://eprints.qut.edu.au/128763/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coenen J, Wouters N, Moere AV (2016) Synchronized wayfinding on multiple consecutively situated public displays. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’16. ACM, New York, pp 182–196, https://doi.org/10.1145/2914920.2929906, (to appear in print)

  10. Coenen J, Claes S, Moere AV (2017) The concurrent use of touch and mid-air gestures or floor mat interaction on a public display. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’17. ACM, New York, pp 9:1–9:9, https://doi.org/10.1145/3078810.3078819, (to appear in print)

  11. Colley A, Häkkilä J, Forsman MT, Pfleging B, Alt F (2018) Car exterior surface displays: exploration in a real-world context. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’18. ACM, New York, pp 7:1–7:8, https://doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205880, (to appear in print)

  12. Colley A, Yliharju AJ, Häkkilä J (2018) Ice as an interactive visualization material: a design space. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’18. ACM, New York, pp 14:1–14:6, https://doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205895, (to appear in print)

  13. Dalsgaard P, Fritsch J (2008) Media facades beyond interaction. In: Position paper for workshop on public and situated displays to support communities, OzCHI 2008

  14. Dalsgaard P, Halskov K (2010) Designing urban media façades: cases and challenges. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’10. ACM, New York, pp 2277–2286, https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753670, (to appear in print)

  15. Dalsgaard P, Halskov K, Wiethoff A (2016) Designing media architecture: tools and approaches for addressing the main design challenges. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’16. ACM, New York, pp 2562–2573, https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858318, (to appear in print)

  16. Dancu A, Franjcic Z, Ünlüer AA, Fjeld M (2015) Interaction in motion with mobile projectors: design considerations. In: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’15. ACM, New York, pp 61–68, https://doi.org/10.1145/2757710.2757728, (to appear in print)

  17. Davies N (2018) Saturated display environments. Keynote at international symposium on pervasive displays (PerDis 18)

  18. Davies N, Langheinrich M, Jose R, Schmidt A (2012) Open display networks: towards a new communication media for the 21st century. IEEE Computer 45(1)

  19. Davies N, Clinch S, Mikusz M, Bates O, Turner H, Friday A (2017) Better off: when should pervasive displays be powered down?. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’17. ACM, New York, pp 19:1–19:9, https://doi.org/10.1145/3078810.3078821, (to appear in print)

  20. Dickinson K (2018) Bike-share companies accused of creating e-waste mountains. https://resource.co/article/bike-share-companies-accused-creating-e-waste-mountains-12784, last accessed: February 2020

  21. Ebsen T (2013) Materia screen intersections of media, art, and architecture. PhD thesis

  22. Elhart I, Langheinrich M, Memarovic N, Rubegni E (2016) A good balance of costs and benefits: convincing a university administration to support the installation of an interactive multi-application display system on campus. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays, association for computing machinery, New York, PerDis ’16, pp 197–203, https://doi.org/10.1145/2914920.2915029, (to appear in print)

  23. Elwood-Leach L (2013) Chalkbot - recreate digital drawing in the physical space with soluble chalk paint. https://elwoodleach.com/chalkbot, last accessed: April 2019

  24. Ergin E, Afonso A, Schieck AFG (2018) Welcoming the orange collars: robotic performance in everyday city life. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’18. ACM, New York, pp 17:1–17:7, https://doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205893, (to appear in print)

  25. Fedsquare (2018) Fed Square’s new digital experience initiative. https://fedsquare.com/

  26. Fischer PT, Hornecker E (2012) Urban HCI: spatial aspects in the design of shared encounters for media facades. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’12. ACM, New York, pp 307–316, https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207719, (to appear in print)

  27. Fischer PT, Gerlach F, Acuna JG, Pollack D, Schäfer I, Trautmann J, Hornecker E (2014) Movable, kick-/flickable light fragments eliciting ad-hoc interaction in public space. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on pervasive displays, perdis ’14. ACM, New York, pp 50:50–50:55, https://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611027, (to appear in print)

  28. Fischer PT, von der Heide A, Hornecker E, Zierold S, Kȧstner A, Dondera F, Wiegmann M, Millȧn F, Lideikis J, Cergelis A, Verde R, Drews C, Fastnacht T, Lu̇nsdorf KG, Merat D, Khosravani A (2015) Castle-sized interfaces - an interactive facade mapping. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on pervasive displays (PerDis’15)(1969) pp 91–97 https://doi.org/10.1145/2757710.2757715

  29. Fischer PT, Hornecker E, Gielen J, Hartmann J, Schmandt M, Rack A, Bornemann M, Dondera F (2015) Exploring the potential of depictions with sun reflections. In: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’15. ACM, New York, pp 217–224, https://doi.org/10.1145/2757710.2757712, (to appear in print)

  30. Forlano L (2016) Decentering the human in the design of collaborative cities. Design Issues 32 (3):42–54. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Foth M, Caldwell GA (2018) More-than-human media architecture. In: Proceedings of the 4th media architecture biennale conference, MAB18. ACM, New York, pp 66–75, https://doi.org/10.1145/3284389.3284495, (to appear in print)

  32. Fredericks J, Hespanhol L, Parker C, Zhou D, Tomitsch M (2018) Blending pop-up urbanism and participatory technologies: challenges and opportunities for inclusive city making. City, Culture and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.06.005

  33. Fritsch J, Brynskov M (2011) Between experience, affect, and information: experimental urban interfaces in the climate change debate. In: From social butterfly to engaged citizen: urban informatics, social media, ubiquitous computing, and mobile technology to support citizen engagement, MIT Press, p 115, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8744.003.0013

  34. Gandia RM, Antonialli F, Cavazza BH, Neto AM, Lima DAD, Sugano JY, Nicolai I, Zambalde AL (2019) Autonomous vehicles: scientometric and bibliometric review. Transport Reviews https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1518937

  35. Gentile V, Sorce S, Elhart I, Milazzo F (2018) Plantxel: towards a plant-based controllable display. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’18. ACM, New York, pp 16:1–16:8, https://doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205888, , (to appear in print)

  36. Haeusler MH (2009) Media facades: history, technology, content. avedition

  37. Halskov K, Ebsen T (2013) A framework for designing complex media facades. Design Studies, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.04.001

  38. Hespanhol L, Tomitsch M, McArthur I, Fredericks J, Schroeter R, Foth M (2015) Vote as you go: blending interfaces for community engagement into the urban space. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on communities and technologies, C&T ’15. ACM, New York, pp 29–37, https://doi.org/10.1145/2768545.2768553, (to appear in print)

  39. Hoggenmueller M, Hespanhol L (2017) P+: a test fit platform for generative design of 3d media architecture. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’17. ACM, New York, pp 15:1–15:7, https://doi.org/10.1145/3078810.3078816, (to appear in print)

  40. Hoggenmueller M, Tomitsch M (2019) Enhancing pedestrian safety through in-situ projections: a hyperreal design approach. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’19. ACM, New York, pp 29:1–29:2, https://doi.org/10.1145/3321335.3329682, (to appear in print)

  41. Hoggenmueller M, Wiethoff A (2014) Lightset: enabling urban prototyping of interactive media façades. In: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on designing interactive systems, DIS ’14, association for computing machinery, New York, pp 925–934, https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598551, (to appear in print)

  42. Hoggenmueller M, Wiethoff A (2016) Lightbricks: a physical prototyping toolkit for do-it-yourself media architecture. In: Proceedings of the 3rd conference on media architecture biennale, association for computing machinery, New York, MAB, https://doi.org/10.1145/2946803.2946811, (to appear in print)

  43. Hoggenmueller M, Tomitsch M, Wiethoff A (2018a) Understanding artefact and process challenges for designing low-res lighting displays. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’18. ACM, New York, pp 259:1–259:12, https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173833, (to appear in print)

  44. Hoggenmueller M, Wiethoff A, Moere AV, Tomitsch M (2018b) A media architecture approach to designing shared displays for residential internet-of-things devices. In: Proceedings of the 4th media architecture biennale conference, MAB18. ACM, New York, pp 106–117, https://doi.org/10.1145/3284389.3284391, (to appear in print)

  45. Hoonhout J, Jumpertz L, Mason J, Bergman T (2013) Exploration into lighting dynamics for the design of more pleasurable luminaires. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces, DPPI ’13. ACM, New York, pp 185–192, https://doi.org/10.1145/2513506.2513526, (to appear in print)

  46. Hörtner H, Gardiner M, Haring R, Lindinger C, Berger F (2012) Spaxels pixels in space - a novel mode of spatial display. In: Proceedings of international conference on signal processing and multimedia applications

  47. Hosio S, Goncalves J, Kukka H, Chamberlain A, Malizia A (2014) What’s in it for me: exploring the real-world value proposition of pervasive displays. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’14. ACM, New York, pp 174:174–174:179, https://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611012, (to appear in print)

  48. iartch (2016) Light frieze - new building for the Kunsthaus Basel, https://iart.ch/en/-/lichtfries-neubau-des-kunstmuseums-basel, last accessed: April 2019

  49. Ishii H, Wisneski C, Brave S, Dahley A, Gorbet M, Ullmer B, Yarin P (1998) ambientroom: integrating ambient media with architectural space. In: CHI 98 conference summary on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’98. ACM, New York, pp 173–174, https://doi.org/10.1145/286498.286652, (to appear in print)

  50. Ishii H, Lakatos D, Bonanni L, Labrune JBJ (2012) Radical atoms: beyond tangible bits, toward transformable materials. Interactions. https://doi.org/10.1145/2065327.2065337

  51. Kim LH, Follmer S (2017) Ubiswarm: ubiquitous robotic interfaces and investigation of abstract motion as a display. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol 1 (3):66:1–66:20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Knierim P, Maurer S, Wolf K, Funk M (2018) Quadcopter-projected in-situ navigation cues for improved location awareness. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’18. ACM, New York, pp 433:1–433:6, https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174007, (to appear in print)

  53. Koeman L, Kalnikaite V, Rogers Y, Bird J (2014) What chalk and tape can tell us: lessons learnt for next generation urban displays. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’14. ACM, New York, pp 130:130–130:135, https://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611018, (to appear in print)

  54. Lim YK, Stolterman E, Tenenberg J (2008) The anatomy of prototypes: prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 15(2):7:1–7:27. https://doi.org/10.1145/1375761.1375762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lupetti ML, Bendor R, Giaccardi E (2019) Robot citizenship: a design perspective. In: DeSForM19 Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.21428/5395bc37.595d1e58, https://desform19.pubpub.org/pub/robot-citizenship

  56. Mäkelä V, Sharma S, Hakulinen J, Heimonen T, Turunen M (2017) Challenges in public display deployments: a taxonomy of external factors. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems - CHI ’17 pp 3426–3475 https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025798

  57. Meagher M (2014) Responsive architecture and the problem of obsolescence. Archnet-IJAR 8:95–104. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v8i3.498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Memarovic N (2015) Construction on display: exploring the use of public displays on construction sites. In: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’15. ACM, New York, pp 155–162, https://doi.org/10.1145/2757710.2757711, (to appear in print)

  59. Milthers ADB, Bjerre Hammer A, Jung Johansen J, Jensen LG, Jochum EA, Löchtefeld M (2019) The helpless soft robot - stimulating human collaboration through robotic movement. In: Extended abstracts of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI EA ’19. ACM, New York, pp LBW2421:1–LBW2421:6, https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312807, (to appear in print)

  60. Moere AV, Hill D (2012) Designing for the situated and public visualization of urban data. Journal of Urban Technology https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2012.698065

  61. Moere AV, Wouters N (2012) The role of context in media architecture. In: Proceedings of the 2012 international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’12. ACM, New York, pp 12:1–12:6, https://doi.org/10.1145/2307798.2307810, (to appear in print)

  62. Müller J, Wilmsmann D, Exeler J, Buzeck M, Schmidt A, Jay T, Krüger A (2009) Display blindness: the effect of expectations on attention towards digital signage. In: Tokuda H, beigl M, friday A, brush AJB, Tobe Y (eds) Pervasive computing, Springer Berlin, pp 1–8

  63. Nabil S, Plötz T, Kirk DS (2017) Interactive architecture: exploring and unwrapping the potentials of organic user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, TEI ’17. ACM, New York, pp 89–100, https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3024981, (to appear in print)

  64. Nagenborg M (2018) Urban robotics and responsible urban innovation. Ethics and Information Technology pp 1–11 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9446-8

  65. Nguyen TT, Holländer K, Hoggenmüller M, Parker C, Tomitsch M (2019) Designing for projection-based communication between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on automotive user interfaces - AutoUI ’19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.334454

  66. Offenhuber D, Seitinger S (2014) Over the rainbow: information design for low-resolution urban displays. In: Proceedings of the 2nd media architecture biennale conference: world cities, MAB ’14. ACM, New York, pp 40–47, https://doi.org/10.1145/2682884.2682886, (to appear in print)

  67. Parker C, Hoggenmueller M, Tomitsch M (2018) Design strategies for overcoming failures on public interactive displays. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’18. ACM, New York, pp 2:1–2:7, https://doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205889, (to appear in print)

  68. Parker C, Tomitsch M, Kay J (2018) Does the public still look at public displays?: a field observation of public displays in the wild. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol 2(2):73:1–73:24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3214276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Pop S, Toft T, Calvillo N, Wright M, Arrigoni G, Taker L, Mandilari C, Langnese S (2016) What urban media art can do: why when where and how. avedition

  70. Qamar IPS, Groh R, Holman D, Roudaut A (2018) HCI meets material science: a literature review of morphing materials for the design of shape-changing interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’18. ACM, New York, pp 374:1–374:23, https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173948, (to appear in print)

  71. Quirke J (2015) Architect seeks funding to make worlds biggest smoke rings. http://www.globalconstructionreview.com/news/architect-seeks-funding-make-wo8rl6d8s-biggest/, last accessed: April 2019

  72. Ratti C (2019) Ufo. https://carloratti.com/project/ufo/, last accessed: January 2020

  73. Robles E, Wiberg M (2010) Texturing the “material turn” in interaction design. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, TEI ’10. ACM, New York, pp 137–144, https://doi.org/10.1145/1709886.1709911, (to appear in print)

  74. Rogers Y, Brignull H (2002) Subtle ice-breaking: encouraging socializing and interaction around a large public display. In: CSCW’02 Workshop Proceedings

  75. Rossiter J, Winfield J, Ieropoulos I (2016) Here today, gone tomorrow: biodegradable soft robots. In: Bar-Cohen Y, Vidal F (eds) electroactive polymer actuators and devices (EAPAD) 2016. International society for optics and photonics, SPIE, vol 9798, pp 312–321, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2220611

  76. Sareen H, Zheng J, Maes P (2019) Cyborg botany: augmented plants as sensors, displays and actuators. In: Extended abstracts of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI EA ’19. ACM, New York, pp VS13:1–VS13:2, https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3311778, (to appear in print)

  77. Scheible J, Funk M (2016) DroneLandArt: landscape as organic pervasive display. Proceedings of the 5th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays - PerDis ’16 (4):255–256, https://doi.org/10.1145/2914920.2939883

  78. Scheible J, Funk M (2016) In-situ-display drone: facilitating co-located interactive experiences via a flying screen. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’16. ACM, New York, pp 251–252, https://doi.org/10.1145/2914920.2940334, (to appear in print)

  79. Scheible J, Hoth A, Saal J, Su H (2013) Displaydrone: a flying robot based interactive display. In: Proceedings of the 2nd acm international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’13. ACM, New York, pp 49–54, https://doi.org/10.1145/2491568.2491580, (to appear in print)

  80. Schneegass S, Alt F, Scheible J, Schmidt A (2014) Midair displays: concept and first experiences with free-floating pervasive displays. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’14. ACM, New York, pp 27:27–27:31, https://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611013, (to appear in print)

  81. Schroeter R, Foth M, Satchell C (2012) People, content, location: sweet spotting urban screens for situated engagement. In: Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference, DIS ’12. ACM, New York, pp 146–155, https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317980, (to appear in print)

  82. Seitinger S, Perry DS, Mitchell WJ (2009) Urban pixels: painting the city with light. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’09. ACM, New York, pp 839–848, https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518829, (to appear in print)

  83. Shepard M (2009) Extreme informatics: toward the de-saturated city. In: Foth M (ed) Handbook of research on urban informatics: the practice and promise of the real-time city, IGI Global, pp 437–449, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-152-0.ch029

  84. Steinberger F, Foth M, Alt F (2014) Vote with your feet: local community polling on urban screens. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on pervasive displays, PerDis ’14. ACM, New York, pp 44:44–44:49, https://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611015, (to appear in print)

  85. Struppek M (2006) The social potential of Urban Screens. Visual Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357206065333

  86. Taylor N, Cheverst K, Wright P, Olivier P (2013) Leaving the wild: lessons from community technology handovers. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’13. ACM, New York, pp 1549–1558, https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466206, (to appear in print)

  87. Tomitsch M (2014) Towards the real-time city : an investigation of public displays for behaviour change and sustainable living, Jovis Berlin, July, 10–11

  88. Tomitsch M (2018) Making cities smarter: designing interactive urban applications

  89. Valkanova N, Jorda S, Tomitsch M, Vande Moere A (2013) Reveal-it! - The impact of a social visualization projection on public awareness and discourse. In: Proceedings of the international conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’13). https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466476

  90. Vempati AS, Kamel M, Stilinovic N, Zhang Q, Reusser D, Sa I, Nieto J, Siegwart R, Beardsley P (2018) Paintcopter: an autonomous uav for spray painting on three-dimensional surfaces. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 3(4):2862–2869. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2018.2846278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Wiethoff A, Blöckner M (2011) Lightbox: exploring interaction modalities with colored light. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, association for computing machinery, New York, TEI ’11, pp 399–400, https://doi.org/10.1145/1935701.1935799, (to appear in print)

  92. Wiethoff A, Hoggenmueller M (2017) Experiences deploying hybrid media architecture in public environments. In: Wiethoff A, Hussmann H (eds) Media architecture: using information and media as construction material, de gruyter. Berlin, Boston , pp 103–122

  93. Willett W, Jansen Y, Dragicevic P, Willett W, Jansen Y, Dragicevic P, Data E, Ieee R, Willett W, Jansen Y, Dragicevic P (2017) Embedded data representations to cite this version : embedded data representations, https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598608

  94. Winkler C, Seifert J, Dobbelstein D, Rukzio E (2014) Pervasive information through constant personal projection: the ambient mobile pervasive display (amp-d). In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’14. ACM, New York, pp 4117–4126, https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557365, (to appear in print)

  95. Wollherr D, Khan S, Landsiedel C, Buss M (2014) The interactive urban robot IURO: towards robot action in human environments. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  96. Wouters N, Keignaert K, Huyghe J, Moere AV (2016) Revealing the architectural quality of media architecture. In: Proceedings of the 3rd conference on media architecture biennale, MAB16. ACM, New York, pp 5:1–5:4, https://doi.org/10.1145/2946803.2946808, (to appear in print)

  97. Wu Y, Yim JK, Liang J, Shao Z, Qi M, Zhong J, Luo Z, Yan X, Zhang M, Wang X, Fearing RS, Full RJ, Lin L (2019) Insect-scale fast moving and ultrarobust soft robot. Science Robotics 4(32) https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aax1594

  98. Zielinska-Dabkowsk KM (2018) Make lighting healthier. Nature 553:274–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-00568-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marius Hoggenmueller.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoggenmueller, M., Hespanhol, L., Wiethoff, A. et al. Self-moving robots and pulverised urban displays: status quo, taxonomy, and challenges in emerging pervasive display research. Pers Ubiquit Comput 26, 749–765 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01422-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01422-2

Keywords

Navigation