Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Peripheral interaction: characteristics and considerations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In everyday life, we are able to perceive information and perform physical actions in the background or periphery of attention. Inspired by this observation, several researchers have studied interactive systems that display digital information in the periphery of attention. To broaden the scope of this research direction, a few recent studies have focused on interactive systems that can not only be perceived in the background but also enable users to physically interact with digital information in their periphery. Such peripheral interaction designs can support computing technology to fluently embed in and become a meaningful part of people’s everyday routines. With the increasing ubiquity of technology in our everyday environment, we believe that this direction is highly relevant nowadays. This paper presents an in-depth analysis of three case studies on peripheral interaction. These case studies involved the design and development of peripheral interactive systems and deployment of these systems in the real context of use for a number of weeks. Based on the insights gained through these case studies, we discuss generalized characteristics and considerations for peripheral interaction design and evaluation. The aim of the work presented in this paper is to support interaction design researchers and practitioners in anticipating and facilitating peripheral interaction with the designs they are evaluating or developing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tolmie P, Pycock J, Diggins T, et al (2002) Unremarkable computing. In: proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ‘02, pp 399–406

  2. Weiser M (1991) The computer for the twenty-first century. Sci Am 265:94–104. doi:10.1145/329124.329126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weiser M, Brown JS (1997) The coming age of calm technology. In: Denning PJ, Metcalfe RM (eds) Beyond calculation: the next fifty years of computing. Springer, New York, pp 75–85

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Pousman Z, Stasko J (2006) A taxonomy of ambient information systems: four patterns of design. In: proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces, AVI ’06, pp 67–74

  5. Matthews T, Rattenbury T, Carter S (2007) Defining, designing, and evaluating peripheral displays: an analysis using activity theory. Hum–Comput Interact 22:221–261

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hausen D, Boring S, Lueling C, Rodestock S, Butz A (2012) StaTube: facilitating state management in instant messaging systems. In: proceedings of the 6th international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction, TEI ’12, pp 283–290

  7. Edge D, Blackwell AF (2009) Peripheral tangible interaction by analytic design. In proceedings of the 3rd international conference on tangible and embedded interaction, TEI ’09, pp 69–76

  8. Olivera F, García-Herranz M, Haya PA, Llinás P (2011) Do not disturb: physical interfaces for parallel peripheral interactions. In: Campos P, Graham N, Jorge J, Nunes N, Palanque P, Winckler M (eds) Human-computer interaction—INTERACT 2011. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 479–486

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Bakker S, van den Hoven E, Eggen B (2013) FireFlies: physical peripheral interaction design for the everyday routine of primary school teachers. In: proceedings of the 7th international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction, TEI ’13, pp 57–64

  10. Bakker S, van den Hoven E, Eggen B, Overbeeke K (2012) Exploring peripheral interaction design for primary school teachers. In: proceedings of the 6th international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction, TEI ’12, pp 245–252

  11. Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wickens CD, Hollands JG (2000) Engineering psychology and human performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schneider W, Chein JM (2003) Controlled and automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cog Sci 27:525–559. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(03)00011-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aarts H, Dijksterhuis A (2000) Habits as knowledge structures: automaticity in goal-directed behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 78:53–63. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wood W, Neal DT (2007) A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychol Rev 114:843–863. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shallice T, Burgess P (1993) Supervisory control of action and thought selection. In: Baddeley AD, Weiskrantz L (eds) Attention: selection, awareness, and control : a tribute to Donald Broadbent. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 171–187

    Google Scholar 

  17. Salvucci DD, Taatgen NA, Borst JP (2009) Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: from concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption. In: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’09, pp 1819–1828

  18. Salvucci DD, Taatgen NA (2008) Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychol Rev 115:101–130. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wickens CD, McCarley JS (2008) Applied attention theory. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  20. Borst JP, Taatgen NA, van Rijn H (2010) The problem state: a cognitive bottleneck in multitasking. J Exp Psychol Learn 36:363–382. doi:10.1037/a0018106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hazlewood WR, Stolterman E, Connelly K (2011) Issues in evaluating ambient displays in the wild: two case studies. In: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’11, pp 877–886

  22. Heiner JM, Hudson SE, Tanaka K (1999) The information percolator: ambient information display in a decorative object. In: proceedings of the 12th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST ’99, pp 141–148

  23. Bakker S, Hoven E van den, Eggen B (2010) Design for the Periphery. In: Proceedings of the Eurohaptics 2010 symposium Haptic and Audio-Visual Stimuli: Enhancing Experiences and Interaction, pp 71–80

  24. Ishii H, Wisneski C, Brave S, Dahley A, Gorbet M, Ullmer B, Yarin P (1998) ambientROOM: integrating ambient media with architectural space. In: conference summary on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’98, pp 173–174

  25. Matthews T, Dey AK, Mankoff J, Carter S, Rattenbury, T (2004) A toolkit for managing user attention in peripheral displays. In: proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST ’04, pp 247–256

  26. Mynatt ED, Back M, Want R, Baer M, Ellis JB (1998) Designing audio aura. In: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’98, pp 566–573

  27. Ishii H, Ren S, Frei P (2001) Pinwheels: visualizing information flow in an architectural space. In: Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’01, pp 111–112

  28. Dahley A, Wisneski C, Ishii H (1998) Water lamp and pinwheels: ambient projection of digital information into architectural space. In: conference summary on human factors in computing systems, CHI ‘98, pp 269–270

  29. Visser T, Vastenburg MH, Keyson DV (2011) Designing to support social connectedness: the case of SnowGlobe. I J Design 5:129–142

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cohen J (1993) “Kirk here”: using genre sounds to monitor background activity. In: conference companion on human factors in computing systems, INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93, pp 63–64

  31. Loclair C, Gustafson S, Baudisch P (2010) PinchWatch: a wearable device for one-handed microinteractions. In: proceedings of the workshop on ensembles of on-body devices at the conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, MobileHCI ’10

  32. Hudson SE, Harrison C, Harrison B L, LaMarca A (2010) Whack gestures: inexact and inattentive interaction with mobile devices. In: proceedings of the 4th international conference on tangible and embedded interaction, TEI ’10, pp 109–112

  33. Hoven E van den, Frens J, Aliakseyeu D, Martens JB, Overbeeke K, Peters P (2007) Design research and tangible interaction. In: proceedings of the 1st international conference on tangible and embedded interaction, TEI ‘07, pp 109–115

  34. Zimmerman J, Forlizzi J, Evenson S (2007) Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’07, pp 493–502

  35. Norman DA (1998) The design of everyday things. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hartson HR (2003) Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behav Inf Technol 22:315–338. doi:10.1080/01449290310001592587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vermeulen J, Luyten K, Hoven E van den, Coninx K (2013) Crossing the bridge over norman’s gulf of execution: revealing Feedforward’s true identity. In: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’13

  38. Dourish P (2004) What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal Ubiquitous Comput 8:19–30. doi:10.1007/s00779-003-0253-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Abowd GD, Dey AK, Brown PJ, Davies N, Smith M, Steggles P (1999) Towards a Better understanding of context and context-awareness. In: proceedings of the 1st international symposium on handheld and ubiquitous computing, pp 304–307

  40. Oulasvirta A, Tamminen S, Höök K (2005) Comparing two approaches to context: realism and constructivism. In: proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on critical computing, pp 195–198

  41. Schmidt A, Beigl M, Gellersen H (1998) There is more to context than location. Comput Graph 23:893–901. doi:10.1016/S0097-8493(99)00120-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pedell S, Vetere F (2005) Visualizing use context with picture scenarios in the design process. In: proceedings of the 7th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, MobileHCI ‘05, pp 271–274

  43. Rhodes BJ, Minar N, Weaver J (1999) Wearable computing meets ubiquitous computing: reaping the best of both worlds. In: proceedings of the 3rd IEEE international symposium on wearable computers, pp 141–149

  44. Nakhimovsky Y, Eckles D, Riegelsberger J (2009) Mobile user experience research: challenges, methods and tools. In: extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, CHI ‘09, pp 4795–4798

  45. England D (2011) Whole body interaction: an introduction. human-computer interaction series 1–5. doi:10.1007/978-0-85729-433-3_1

  46. Wolf K, Naumann A, Rohs M, Müller J (2011) Taxonomy of microinteractions: defining microgestures based on ergonomic and scenario-dependent requirements. In: Campos P, Graham N, Jorge J, Nunes N, Palanque P, Winckler M (eds) Human–computer interaction—INTERACT 2011. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 559–575

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. van den Hoven E, Mazalek A (2011) Grasping gestures: gesturing with physical artifacts. AI EDAM 25:255–271. doi:10.1017/S0890060411000072

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rogers Y (2011) Interaction design gone wild: striving for wild theory. Interactions 18:58–62. doi:10.1145/1978822.1978834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pousman Z, Stasko J (2007) Ambient Information systems: evaluation in two paradigms. In: proceedings of the workshop ambient information systems at pervasive ‘07, pp 25–29

  50. Eggen B, Mensvoort K (2009) Making sense of what is going on “around”: designing environmental awareness information displays. In: Markopoulos P, de Ruyter B, Mackay W (eds) Awareness systems: advances in theory, methodology and design. Springer, London, pp 99–124

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Saskia Bakker, Elise van den Hoven & Berry Eggen

  2. Design, Architecture and Building Faculty, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

    Elise van den Hoven

Authors
  1. Saskia Bakker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elise van den Hoven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Berry Eggen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saskia Bakker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakker, S., van den Hoven, E. & Eggen, B. Peripheral interaction: characteristics and considerations. Pers Ubiquit Comput 19, 239–254 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0775-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0775-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation