Skip to main content
Log in

Stellenwert der Metastasenchirurgie beim fortgeschrittenen Pankreaskarzinom

Impact of surgery of metastases in advanced pancreatic cancer

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Onkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Entsprechend den aktuell geltenden Leitlinien werden resezierende Verfahren im metastasierten Stadium beim Pankreaskarzinom nicht empfohlen. In der klinischen Praxis werden Tumor- und Metastasenresektionen jedoch in individuellen Einzelfällen durchgeführt.

Ziel

Diese Übersichtsarbeit fasst die aktuell vorhandene Evidenz anhand der veröffentlichten Studienlage zusammen.

Material und Methoden

Eine systematische Literaturrecherche (PUBMED und MEDLINE) zum Thema resezierender Eingriffe im metastasierten Stadium des Pankreaskarzinoms wurde durchgeführt

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt stellt sich das Evidenzniveau als schwach dar, es sind aktuell keine prospektiven Studien zu diesem Thema verfügbar. Die vorhandenen retrospektiven Arbeiten zeigen eine technische Machbarkeit synchroner Tumor- und Metastasenresektionen mit möglicherweise onkologischen Vorteilen für spezifische Patientensubgruppen.

Schlussfolgerung

Das Evidenzniveau ist zu schwach, um grundsätzliche Therapieentscheidungen für Patienten im oligometastasierten Stadium ableiten zu können. Prospektive Studien zu dem Thema sind notwendig, um feststellen zu können, ob eine Metastasenchirurgie, eingebettet in multimodale Therapiekonzepte, sinnvoll durchzuführen ist.

Abstract

Background

According to the current guidelines surgery is not recommended in the metastasized stage of pancreatic cancer; however, in clinical practice surgery including resection of the primary tumor and metastases is performed in individual cases.

Aim

This review article summarizes the currently available evidence based on the published studies.

Material and methods

A systematic search in MEDLINE and PubMed was performed with respect to metastasized pancreatic cancer and surgical resection.

Results

The evidence level is not sufficient to answer the question as to whether patients in an oligometastasized stage should be operated on or not. The available retrospective studies show a technical feasibility of synchronous resection of the primary tumor and metastases with a possibly beneficial oncological outcome for specific patient groups.

Conclusion

Based on the currently available evidence, a general treatment decision for patients in an oligometastatic stage cannot be derived. Therefore, prospective clinical trials are necessary to answer the question of which patients could benefit from a combined resection of primary tumor and metastases embedded in a multimodal treatment concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2017) Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 67(1):7–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rahib L, Smith BD et al (2014) Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 74(11):2913–2921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Werner J, Combs SE et al (2013) Advanced-stage pancreatic cancer: therapy options. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 10(6):323–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hartwig W, Strobel O et al (2013) CA19-9 in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer: perspective to adjust surgical and perioperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 20(7):2188–2196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gillen S, Schuster T et al (2010) Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med 7(e1000267):4

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morgan DE, Waggoner CN et al (2010) Resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in patients with locally advanced disease downstaged by preoperative therapy: a challenge for MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(3):615–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Seufferlein T, Porzner M et al (2013) S3-guideline exocrine pancreatic cancer. Z Gastroenterol 51(12):1395–1440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tempero MA, Malafa MP et al (2014) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2014: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 12(8):1083–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fahy BN, D’Angelica M et al (2009) Synchronous hepatic metastases from colon cancer: changing treatment strategies and results of surgical intervention. Ann Surg Oncol 16(2):361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin RC 2nd, Augenstein V et al (2009) Simultaneous versus staged resection for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Am Coll Surg 208(5):842–850 (discussion 850–2)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Klempnauer J, Ridder GJ et al (1996) Is liver resection in metastases of exocrine pancreatic carcinoma justified? Chirurg 67(4):366–370

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gleisner AL, Assumpcao L, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, Choti MA, Herman JM, Schulick RD, Pawlik TM (2007) Is resection of periampullary or pancreatic adenocarcinoma with synchronous hepatic metastasis justified? Cancer 110(11):2484–2492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shrikhande SV, Kleeff J et al (2007) Pancreatic resection for M1 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 14(1):118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de Jong MC, Tsai S et al (2010) Safety and efficacy of curative intent surgery for peri-ampullary liver metastasis. J Surg Oncol 102(3):256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Klein F, Puhl G et al (2012) The impact of simultaneous liver resection for occult liver metastases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012:939350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tachezy M, Gebauer F et al (2016) Synchronous resections of hepatic oligometastatic pancreatic cancer: Disputing a principle in a time of safe pancreatic operations in a retrospective multicenter analysis. Surgery 160(1):136–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hackert T, Niesen W et al (2017) Radical surgery of oligometastatic pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(2):358–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van Roessel S, Kasumova GG et al (2018) International validation of the eighth edition of the American joint committee on cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system in patients with Resected pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surg 153:e183617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paiella S, Sandini M et al (2016) The prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(5):616–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Komo T, Murakami Y et al (2016) Prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node Micrometastasis in pancreatic ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 23(6):2019–2027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sho M, Murakami Y et al (2015) Postoperative prognosis of pancreatic cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a multicenter study on 822 patients. J Gastroenterol 50(6):694–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Disibio G, French SW (2008) Metastatic patterns of cancers: results from a large autopsy study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132(6):931–939

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kneuertz PJ, Cunningham SC et al (2011) Palliative surgical management of patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: trends and lessons learned from a large, single institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 15(11):1917–1927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Michalski CW, Erkan M et al (2008) Resection of primary pancreatic cancer and liver metastasis: a systematic review. Dig Surg 25(6):473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nikfarjam M, Shereef S et al (2009) Survival outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastases following hepatic resection or ablation in the era of effective chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 16(7):1860–1867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hua YQ, Wang P et al (2017) Radiofrequency ablation for hepatic oligometastatic pancreatic cancer: an analysis of safety and efficacy. Pancreatology 17(6):967–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Crippa S, Bittoni A et al (2016) Is there a role for surgical resection in patients with pancreatic cancer with liver metastases responding to chemotherapy? Eur J Surg Oncol 42(10):1533–1539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kandel P, Wallace MB et al (2018) Survival of patients with oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with combined modality treatment including surgical resection: a pilot study. J Pancreat Cancer 4(1):88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Arnaoutakis GJ, Rangachari D et al (2011) Pulmonary resection for isolated pancreatic adenocarcinoma metastasis: an analysis of outcomes and survival. J Gastrointest Surg 15(9):1611–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kruger S, Haas M et al (2016) Isolated pulmonary metastases define a favorable subgroup in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 16(4):593–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakajima M, Ueno T et al (2017) Novel indications for surgical resection of metachronous lung metastases from pancreatic cancer after curative resection. J Clin Gastroenterol 51(5):e34–e38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Conroy T, Desseigne F et al (2011) FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 364(19):1817–1825

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang-Gillam A, Li CP et al (2016) Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1): a global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 387(10018):545–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Von Hoff DD, Ervin T et al (2013) Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med 369(18):1691–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiane Bruns.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

C. Bruns, F. Gebauer, F. Scheufele und H. Friess geben an, dass in Hinblick auf diese Arbeit kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren, nur eine Zusammenstellung der vorhandenen Literatur.

Additional information

C. Bruns und F. Gebauer: gleichwertige Erstautorenschaft

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bruns, C., Gebauer, F., Scheufele, F. et al. Stellenwert der Metastasenchirurgie beim fortgeschrittenen Pankreaskarzinom. Onkologe 25, 690–695 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-019-0547-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-019-0547-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation