Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the performance of two models on calculating maize actual evapotranspiration in a semi-humid and drought-prone region of China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The two-step and one-step models for calculating evapotranspiration of maize were evaluated in a semi-humid and drought-prone region of northern China. Data were collected in the summers of 2013 and 2014 to determine relative model accuracy in calculating maize evaopotranspiration. The two-step model predicted daily evaoptranspiration with crop coefficients proposed by FAO and crop coefficient calibrated by local field data; the one-step model predicted daily evapotranspiration with coefficients derived by other researcher and coefficients calibrated by local field data. The predicted daily evapotranspiration in 2013 and 2014 growing seasons with the above two different models was both compared with the observed evapotranspiration with eddy covariance method. Furthermore, evapotranspiration in different growth stages of 2013 and 2014 maize growing seasons was predicted using the models with the local calibrated coefficients. The results indicated that calibration of models was necessary before using them to predict daily evapotranspiration. The model with the calibrated coefficients performed better with higher coefficient of determination and index of agreement and lower mean absolute error and root mean square error than before. And the two-step model better predicted daily evapotranspiration than the one-step model in our experimental field. Nevertheless, as to prediction ET of different growth stages, there still had some uncertainty when predicting evapotranspiration in different year. So the comparisons suggested that model prediction of crop evapotranspiration was practical, but requires calibration and validation with more data. Thus, considerable improvement is needed for these two models to be practical in predicting evapotranspiration for maize and other crops, more field data need to be measured, and an in-depth study still needs to be continued.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements. In: FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Howell TA, Jensen ME (2011) Evapotranspiration information reporting: II. Recommended documentation Agric Water Manage 98:921–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Perria LS, Smith M, Raes D, Wright JL (2005) FAO-56 dual crop coefficient method for estimating evaporation from soil and application extensions. Irrig Drain Eng 131(1):2–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco-Benavides M, Ortega-Farías S, Lagos LO, Kleissl J, Morales L, Poblete-Echeverría C, Allen RG (2012) Crop coefficients and actual evapotranspiration of a drip-irrigated merlot vineyard using multispectral satellite images. Irrig Sci 30:485–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chávez JL, Howell TA, Copeland KS (2009) Evaluating eddy covariance cotton ET measurements in an advective environment with large weighing lysimeter. Irrig Sci 28:35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YY, Chu CR, Li MH (2012) A gap-filling model for eddy covariance latent heat flux: estimating evapotranspiration of a subtropical seasonal evergreen broad-leaved forest as an example. Jour Hydrol 468-469:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng HF (2009) Meeting China’s water shortage crisis: current practices and challenges. Environmental Science & Technology feature 43:240–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1997) Guidelines for prediction crop water requirements. In: irrigation and drainage, paper 24. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p 179

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, ISRIC, ISSS (1998) World Reference Base for Soil Resources. In: World Soil Resources. Report No.84. ISSS-ISRIC-FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome, pp 88

  • Farahani HJ, Howell TA, Shuttleworth WJ, Bausch WC (2007) Evapotranspiration: process in measurement and modeling in agriculture. American society of agricultural and biological engineers 50(5):1627–1638

    Google Scholar 

  • Flumignan DL, Faria RT, Prete CEC (2011) Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production. Agric Water Manag 98:791–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao GL, Zhang XY, Yu TF, Liu B (2016) Comparison of three evapotranspiration models with eddy covariance measurements for a Populus Euphratica Oliv. Forest in an arid region of northwestern China. Journal of Arid Land 8(1):146–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo JX, Bian LG, Dai YJ (2009) Multiple time scale evaluation of the energy balance during the maize growing season, and a new reason for energy imbalance. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci 52(1):108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou LZ, Wenninger JC, Shen JG, Zhou YX, Bao H, Liu HJ (2014) Assessing crop coefficients for Zea mays in the semi-arid Hailiutu River catchment, northwest China. Agric Water Manag 140:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irmak S, Payero JO, Kilic A, Odhiambo LO, Rudnick D, Sharma V, Billesbach D (2014) On the magnitude and dynamics of eddy covariance system residual energy (energy balance closure error) in subsurface drip-irrigated maize field during growing and non-growing (dormant) seasons. Irrig Sci 32:471–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji XB, Zhao WZ, Kang ES, Zhang ZH, Jin BW (2011) Carbon dioxide, water vapor, and heat fluxes over agricultural crop field in an arid oasis of Northwest China, as determined by eddy covariance. Environ Earth Sci 64:619–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y (2009) China’s water scarity. J Environ Manag 90:3185–3196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang SZ, Cai HJ, Zhang JH (2000) Estimation of maize evapotranspiration under water deficits in a semiarid region. Agirc Water Manage 43(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang SZ, Gu BJ, Du TS, Zhang JH (2003) Crop coefficient and ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration of winter wheat and maize in a semi-humid region. Agric Water Manag 59(3):239–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katerji N, Rana G (2006) Modelling evapotranspiration of six irrigated crops under Mediterranean climate conditions. Agric For Meteorol 138:142–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katerji N, Rana G (2014) FAO-56 methodology for determining water requirement of irrigated crops: critical examination of the concepts, alternative proposals and validation in Mediterranean region. Theor Appl Climatol 116:515–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidston J, Brümmer C, BlacK TA, Morgenstern K, Nesic Z, McCaughey JH, Barr AG (2010) Energy balance closure using eddy covariance above two different land surfaces and implications for CO2 flux measurements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 136:193–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legates DR, McCabe GJ (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Res 35(1):233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee XH, Massman W, Law B (2005) Handbook of Micrometeorology: a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis. In: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp 1–4

  • Li YJ, Li Z, Xu ZZ, Zhou GS (2009) Comparison of water vapor, heat and energy exchanges over agricultural and wetland ecosystems. Hydrological process Hydrol Proc 3:2069–2080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZQ, Yu GR, Wen XF, Zhang LM, Ren CY, Fu YL (2005) Energy balance closure at ChinaFlUX sites. Science in China ser. D Earth Sciences 48(Suppl I):51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Zhang X, Zhang Y (2002) Determination of daily evaporation and evapotranspiration of winter wheat and maize by large-scale weighing lysimeter and micro-lysimeter. Agric For Meterorl 111(2):109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu GS, Liu Y, Hafeez M, Xu D, Vote C (2012) Comparison of two methods to derive time series of actual evapotranspiration using eddy covariance measurements in the southeastern Australia. Jour Hydrol.454–455:1–6

  • Meyers TP (2001) A comparison of summertime water and CO2 fluxes over rangeland for well watered and drought conditions. Agric Forest Meteorol 106:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and environment. Symp Soc Exp Biol 19:205–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Moratiel R, Martinez-Cob A (2013) Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under sprinkler irrigation in a semiarid climate determined by the surface renewal method. Irrig Sci 31:411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Farias S, Poblete-Echeverría BN (2010) Parameterization of a two-layer model for estimating vineyard evapotranspiration using meteorological measurements. Agric For Meteorol 150:276–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng SQ (2011) Water resources strategy and agricultural development in China. J Exp Bot 62(6):1709–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccinni G, Ko J, Marek T, Howell T (2009) Determination of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients (kc) of maize and sorghum. Agric Water Manag 96:1698–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana G, Katerji N (2000) Measurement and estimation of actual evapotranspiration in the field under Mediterranean climate: a review. Europ Jour Agron 13:125–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana G, Katerji N (2008) Direct and indirect methods to simulate the actual evapotranspiration of irrigated overhead table grape vineyard under Mediterranean conditions. Hydrol Process 22:181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana G, Katerji N (2009) Operational model for direct determination of evapotranspiration for well watered crops in Mediterranean region. Theor Appl Climatol 97:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana G, Katerji N, Ferrara RM, Martinelli N (2011) An operational model to estimate hourly and daily crop evapotranspiration in hilly terrain: validation on wheat and oat crops. Theor App Climatol 103(3–4):413–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana G, Katerji N, Lazzara P, Ferrara R (2012) Operational determination of daily actual evapotranspiration of irrigated tomato crops under Mediterranean conditions by one-step and two-step models: multiannual and local evaluations. Agric Water Manag 115:285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rim CS (2009) A comparison of approaches for evapotranspiration estimation. Water Engineering 44:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuepp PH, Leclerc MY, Macpherson JI, Desjardins RL (1990) Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes from analytical solutions of the diffusion equation. Bound-Layer Meteorol 50:335–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suyker AE, Verma SB (2009) Evapotranspiration of irrigated and rainfed maize-soybean cropping systems. Agric For Meteorol 149:443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb EK, Pearman GI, Leuning R (1980) Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer. Quart J R Met Soc 106:85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott CJ (1981) On the validation of models. Phys Geogr 2:184–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson K, Goldstein A, Falge E, Aubinet M, Baldocchi D, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Ceulemans R, Dolman H, Field C, Grelle A, Ibrom A, Law BE, Kowalski A, Meyers T, Moncrieff J, Monson R, Oechel W, Tenhunen J, Valentini R, Verma S (2002) Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites. Agric For Meteorol 113:223–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson K, Meyers TP (2001) The spatial variability of energy and carbon dioxide fluxes at the floor of a deciduous forest. Boundary-Layer meteorol 98:443–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan HF, Zhang C, Oue H, Wang GQ, He B (2015) Study of evapotranspiration and evaporation beneath the canopy in a buckwheat field. Theor Appl Climatol 122:721–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zha TS, Barr AG, Kamp GV (2010) Interannual variation of evapotranspiration from forest and grassland ecosystems in western Canada in relation to drought. Agric Forest Meteorol 150:1476–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang BZ, L Y, Xu D, Zhao NN, Lei B, Rosa RD, Paredes P, Paço TA, Pereira LS (2012) The dual crop coefficient approach to estimate and partitioning evpotranspiration of the winter wheat-summer maize crop sequence in North China plain. Irrig Sci 31:1303–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Yan HF, Shi HB, Sugimoto H (2013) Study of crop coefficient and the ratio of soil evaporation to evapotranspiration in an irrigated maize field in an arid area of Yellow River Basin in China. Meteorog Atmos Phys 121:207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the financial support by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No.31371574; No.31671627) and National Key Research and Development Program  of China (No. 2016YFD0300306; No.2016YFD0300803). The study was partially funded by the National Key Technology R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2011BAD09B01-2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Science, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shanxi, 712100, China

    J. Wang & G.D. Wang

  2. Science and Information College, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266109, China

    J. Wang

  3. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Dryland Farming Technology, College of Agronomy and Plant Protection, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266109, China

    J. Wang, J.L. Wang & C.X. Zhao

  4. Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, College of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521-0124, USA

    M.E. McGiffen

  5. Department of modern agricultural demonstration farm, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266109, China

    J.B. Liu

Authors
  1. J. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J.L. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C.X. Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M.E. McGiffen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J.B. Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. G.D. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G.D. Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Wang, J., Zhao, C. et al. Assessing the performance of two models on calculating maize actual evapotranspiration in a semi-humid and drought-prone region of China. Theor Appl Climatol 131, 1147–1156 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-2032-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-2032-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation