Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparison of three multi-site statistical downscaling models for daily rainfall in the North China Plain

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three statistical downscaling methods (conditional resampling statistical downscaling model: CR-SDSM, the generalised linear model for daily climate time series: GLIMCLIM, and the non-homogeneous hidden Markov model: NHMM) for multi-site daily rainfall were evaluated and compared in the North China Plain (NCP). The comparison focused on a range of statistics important for hydrological studies including rainfall amount, extreme rainfall, intra-annual variability, and spatial coherency. The results showed that no single model performed well over all statistics/timescales, suggesting that the user should chose appropriate methods after assessing their advantages and limitations when applying downscaling methods for particular purposes. Specifically, the CR-SDSM provided relatively robust results for annual/monthly statistics and extreme characteristics, but exhibited weakness for some daily statistics, such as daily rainfall amount, dry-spell length, and annual wet/dry days. GLIMCLIM performed well for annual dry/wet days, dry/wet spell length, and spatial coherency, but slightly overestimated the daily rainfall. Additionally, NHMM performed better for daily rainfall and annual wet/dry days, but slightly underestimated dry/wet spell length and overestimated the daily extremes. The results of this study could be applied when investigating climate change impact on hydrology and water availability for the NCP, which suffers from intense water shortages due to climate change and human activities in recent years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrosino C, Chandler RE, Todd MC (2010) Southern African monthly rainfall variability: an analysis based on generalized linear models. J Climate 24:4600–4617. doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3924.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates BC, Charles SP, Hughes JP (1998) Stochastic downscaling of numerical climate model simulations. Environ Model Softw 13(3–4):325–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler RE (2002) GLIMCLIM: Generalised linear modelling for daily climate Time Series (software and user guide). Research Report No.227, Department of Statistical Science, University College London. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Stats/research/abs02.html#227

  • Chandler RE (2005) On the use of generalized linear models for interpreting climate variability. Environmetrics 16:699–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler RE, Wheater HS (2002) Analysis of rainfall variability using generalized linear models: a case study from the west of Ireland. Water Resour Res 38(10):1192. doi:10.1029/2001WR000906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles SP, Bates BC, Hughes JP (1999) A spatial-temporal model for downscaling precipitation occurrence and amounts. J Geophy Res 104(D24):31657–31669. doi:10.1029/1999JD900119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles SP, Bates BC, Viney NR (2003) Linking atmospheric circulation to daily rainfall patterns across the Murrumbidgee River Basin. Water Sci Technol 48:233–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles SP, Bates BC, Smith IN, Hughes JP (2004) Statistical downscaling of daily precipitation from observed and modeled atmospheric fields. Hydrol Process 18:1373–1394. doi:10.1002/hyp.1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles SP, Bari MA, Kitsuos A, Bates BC (2007) Effect of GCM bias on downscaled precipitation and runoff projections for the Serpentine catchment, Western Australia. Int J Climatol 27: 1673–1690. doi:10.1002/joc.1508

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen ST, Yu PS, Tang YH (2010) Statistical downscaling of daily precipitation using support vector machines and multivariate analysis. J Hydrol 385:13–22. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiew FHS, Kirono DGC, Kent DM, Frost AJ, Charles SP, Timbal B, Nguyen KC, Fu GB (2010) Comparison of runoff modeled using rainfall from different downscaling methods for historical and future climates. J Hydrol 387:10–23. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu JT, Xia J, Xu CY, Singh VP (2010) Statistical downscaling of daily mean temperature, pan evaporation and precipitation for climate change scenarios in Haihe River, China. Theor Appl Climatol 99:149–161. doi:10.1007/s00704-009-0129-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibike YB, Coulibaly P (2005) Hydrologic impact of climate change in the Saguenay watershed: comparison of downscaling methods and hydrologic models. J Hydrol 307:145–163. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HJ, Kilsby CG, O'Connell PE, Burton A (2005) A weather-type conditioned multi-site stochastic rainfall model for the generation of scenarios of climatic variability and change. J Hydrol 308(1–4):50–66. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HJ, Blenkinsop S, Tebaldi C (2007) Linking climate change modeling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modeling. Int J Climatol 27:1547–1578. doi:10.1002/joc.1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost AJ, Charles SP, Timbal B, Chiew FHS, Mehrotra R, Nguyen KC, Chandler RE, McGregor JL, Fu GB, Kirono DGC (2011) A comparison of multi-site daily rainfall downscaling techniques under Australian conditions. J Hydrol 408:1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.06.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu GB, Charles SP (2011) Statistical downscaling of daily rainfall for southeastern Australia. In: Hydro-climatology: variability and change (Proceedings of symposium JH02 held during IUGG2011 in Melbourne, Australia, July 2011). IAHS Publ 344:69–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu GB, Charles SP, Chiew FHS (2007) A two-parameter climate elasticity of streamflow index to assess climate change effects on annual streamflow. Water Resour Res 43:W11419. doi:10.1029/2007WR005890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu GB, Charles SP, Yu JJ, Liu CM (2009) Decadal climatic variability, trends and future scenarios for the North China Plain. J Climate 22:2111–2123. doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2605.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gachon P, Dibike Y (2007) Temperature change signals in northern Canada: convergence of statistical downscaling results using two driving GCMs. Int J Climatol 27:1623–1641. doi:10.1002/joc.1582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotch SL, MacCracken MC (1991) The use of general circulation models to predict regional climatic change. J Climate 4:286–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpham C, Wilby RL (2005) Multi-site downscaling of heavy daily precipitation occurrence and amounts. J Hydrol 312:235–255. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay LE, Wilby RL, Leavesley GH (2000) A comparison of delta change and downscaled GCM scenarios for three mountainous basins in the Unites States. J Am Water Resour As 36:387–397. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04276.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JP, Guttorp P, Charles SP (1999) A non-homogeneous hidden Markov model for precipitation occurrence. J R Stat Soc C-Appl 48(1):15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MS, Coulibaly P, Dibike Y (2006) Uncertainty analysis of statistical downscaling methods. J Hydrol 319:357–382. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirshner S (2005) Modeling of multivariate time series using hidden Markov models. University of California, Irvine, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirshner S (2007) Learning with tree-average densities and distributions. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst, NIPS 2007, December 2007

  • Leith NA, Chandler RE (2010) A framework for interpreting climate model outputs. J Roy Stati Soc C 59:279–296. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2009.00694.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao Y, Zhang W, Chen D (2004) Stochastic modeling of daily precipitation in China. J Geogr Sci 114(4):417–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZF, Xu ZX, Charles SP, Fu GB, Liu L (2011) Evaluation of two statistical downscaling models for daily precipitation over and arid basin in China. Int J Climatol 31:2006–2020. doi:10.1002/joc.2211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maraun D, Wetterhall F, Ireson AM, Chandler RE, Kendon EJ, Widmann M, Brienen S, Rust HW, Suater T, Themeßl M, Venema VKC, Chun KP, Goodess CM, Jones RG, Onof C, Vrac M, Ehiele-Eich I (2010) Precipitation downscaling under climate change: recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Rev Geophys 48:RG3003. doi:10.1029/2009RG000314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra R, Sharma A (2007) Preserving low-frequency variability in generated daily rainfall sequences. J Hydrol 345(1–2):102–120. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raje D, Mujumdar PP (2011) A comparison of three methods for downscaling daily precipitation in the Punjab region. Hydrol Process 25(23):3575–3589. doi:10.1002/hyp.8083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson AW, Kershner S, Smyth P (2004) Downscaling of daily rainfall occurrence over Northeast Brazil using a hidden Markov model. J Climate 17:4407–4424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samel AN, Wang WC, Liang XZ (1999) The monsoon rainband over China and relationships with the Eurasian circulation. J Climate 12:115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timbal B, Hope P, Charles S (2008a) Evaluating the consistency between statistically downscaled and global dynamical model climate change projections. J Climate 21:6052–6059. doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2379.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timbal B, Fernandez E, Li Z (2008b) Generalization of a statistical downscaling model to provide local climate change projections for Australia. Environ Model Softw 24:342–358. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.07.007

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryhorn L, DeGaetano A (2010) A comparison of techniques for downscaling extreme precipitation over the Northeastern United States. Int J Climatol 31(13):1975–1989. doi:10.1002/joc.2208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal JP, Wade SD (2008) Multimodel projections of catchment-scale precipitation regime. J Hydrol 353:143–158. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetterhall F, Bárdossy A, Chen DL, Halldin S, Xu CY (2006) Daily precipitation-downscaling techniques in three Chinese regions. Water Resour Res 42:W11423. doi:10.1029/2005WR004573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Wigley TML (2000) Precipitation prdictors for dowscaling: observed and general circulation model relationships. Int J Climatol 20:641–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Dawson CW, Barrow EM (2002) SDSM—A decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts. Environ Model Softw 17:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Tomlinson OJ, Dawson CW (2003) Multi-site simulation of precipitation by conditional resampling. Climate Res 23:183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Charles SP, Zorita E, Timbal B, Whetton P, Mearns LO (2004) Guidelines for Use of Climate Scenarios Developed from Statistical Downscaling Methods. IPCC Task Group on Data and Scenario Support for Impact and Climate Analysis (TGICA), http://ipcc-ddc.cru.uea.ac.uk/gu-idelines/StatDown_Guide.pdf

  • Xu CY (1999) From GCM2 to river flow: a review of downscaling methods and hydrologic modeling approaches. Progr Phys Geogr 23(2):229–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan Z, Bate S, Chandler RE, Isham V, Wheater H (2006) Changes in extreme wind speeds in NW Europe simulated by generalized linear models. Theor Appl Climatol 83:121–137. doi:10.1007/s00704-005-0156-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Chandler RE, Isham VS, Wheater HS (2005) Spatial-temporal rainfall simulation using generalized linear models. Water Resour Res 41:W11415. doi:10.1029/2004WR003739

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2010CB428406) and Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA05090309). We wish to thank Dr. Richard E. Chandler from University College London (UK) and Dr. Chi Yang from Beijing Normal University (China) for the help of running GLIMCLIM model, and Dr. David Post, Ms. Jin Teng and two anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments and constructive suggestions used to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guobin Fu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, W., Fu, G., Liu, C. et al. A comparison of three multi-site statistical downscaling models for daily rainfall in the North China Plain. Theor Appl Climatol 111, 585–600 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0692-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0692-0

Keywords

Navigation