Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of statistical clustering techniques for the classification of modelled atmospheric trajectories

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we used and compared three different statistical clustering methods: an hierarchical, a non-hierarchical (K-means) and an artificial neural network technique (self-organizing maps (SOM)). These classification methods were applied to a 4-year dataset of 5 days kinematic back trajectories of air masses arriving in Athens, Greece at 12.00 UTC, in three different heights, above the ground. The atmospheric back trajectories were simulated with the HYSPLIT Vesion 4.7 model of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The meteorological data used for the computation of trajectories were obtained from NOAA reanalysis database. A comparison of the three statistical clustering methods through statistical indices was attempted. It was found that all three statistical methods seem to depend to the arrival height of the trajectories, but the degree of dependence differs substantially. Hierarchical clustering showed the highest level of dependence for fast-moving trajectories to the arrival height, followed by SOM. K-means was found to be the least depended clustering technique on the arrival height. The air quality management applications of these results in relation to PM10 concentrations recorded in Athens, Greece, were also discussed. Differences of PM10 concentrations, during certain clusters, were found statistically different (at 95% confidence level) indicating that these clusters appear to be associated with long-range transportation of particulates. This study can improve the interpretation of modelled atmospheric trajectories, leading to a more reliable analysis of synoptic weather circulation patterns and their impacts on urban air quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Artíñano B, Querol X, Salvador P, Rodríguez S, Alonso DG, Alastuey A (2001) Assessment of airborne particulate levels in Spain in relation to the new EU-Directive. Atmos Environ 35:S43–S53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borge R, Lumbreras J, Vardoulakis S, Kassomenos P, Rodriguez E (2007) Analysis of long-range transport influences on urban PM10 using two-stage atmospheric trajectory clusters. Atmos Environ 41:4434–4450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cape JN, Methven J, Hudson LE (2000) The use of trajectory cluster analysis to interpret trace gas measurements at Mace Head, Ireland. Atmos Environ 34:3651–3663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorling SR, Davis TD (1995) Extending cluster analysis-synoptic meteorology links to characterize chemical climates at six northwest European monitoring stations. Atmos Environ 29:145–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorling SR, Davies TD, Pierce CE (1992) Cluster analysis: a technique for estimating the synoptic meteorological controls on air and precipitation chemistry. Atmos Environ 26:2575–2581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draxler RR, Hess GD (1998) An overview of the HYSPLIT 4 modelling system for trajectories, dispersion and deposition. Aust Meteorol Mag 47:295–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt B (1980) Cluster analysis. Halstead, New York, p 136

    Google Scholar 

  • Grivas G, Chaloulakou A, Kassomenos P (2008) An overview of the PM10 pollution problem, in the Metropolitan Area of Athens, Greece. Assessment of controlling factors and potential impact of long range transport. Sci Total Environ 389:165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SC (1967) Hierarchical Clustering Schemes. Psychometrika 2:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorba O, Perez C, Rocadenbosch F, Baldasano J (2004) Cluster Analysis of 4-Day back Trajectories arriving in the Barcelona area, Spain, from 1997 to 2002. J Appl Meteorol 43:887–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamitsu M (1989) Description of the NMC Global Data Assimilation and Forecast System. Weather Forecasting 4:335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassomenos P (2003a) Anatomy of the synoptic conditions occurring over southern Greece during the second half of 20th century. Part I. Summer and Winter. Theor Appl Climatol 75(1–2):65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassomenos P (2003b) Anatomy of the synoptic conditions occurring over southern Greece during the second half of 20th century. Part II. Spring and Autumn. Theor Appl Climatol 75(1–2):79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocak M, Mihalopoulos N, Kubilay N (2007) Contributions of natural sources to high PM10 and PM2.5 events in the eastern Mediterranean. Atmos Environ 41:3806–3818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen T (2001) Self organizing maps. Springer

  • Kolehmainen M, Martikainen H, Hiltunen T, Ruuskanen J (2000) Forecasting air quality parameters using hybrid neural network modelling. Environ Monit Assess 65:277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolehmainen M, Martikainen H, Ruuskanen J (2001) Neural networks and periodic components used in air quality forecasting. Atmos Environ 35:815–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavey M, Sweeny J (1990) The influence of long range transport of air pollutants on summer visibility at Dublin. Int J Climatol 10:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen JB (1967) Some methods for classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1. University of California Press, Los Angeles, pp 281–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Melas D, Ziomas I, Klemm O, Zerefos CS (1998) Anatomy of the Sea breeze circulation in Athens area under weak large-scale ambient winds. Atmos Environ 32:2223–2237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihalopoulos N, Stephanou E, Kanakidou M, Pilitsidis S, Bousquet P (1997) Troposheric aerosol ionic composition in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Tellus B Chem Phys Meteorol 49:314–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody JL, Oltmans SJ, Levy H II, Merrill T (1995) Transport climatology of tropospheric ozone. Bermuda, 1988–1991. J Geophys Res 100:7179–7194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell R, Thuret V, Cho J, Stoller P, Marenco A, Smit H (1999) Ubiquity of quasi-horizontal layers in the troposphere. Nature 398:316–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolph G.D., 2003. READY: Real time Environmental Applications and Display system. NOAA Air resources Laboratory (http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready.html).

  • Salvador S, Chan P (2005) Learning States and rules for detecting anomalies in Time Series. Appl Intell 23:241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schädler G, Sasse R (2006) Analysis of the connection between precipitation and synoptic scale processes in the Eastern Mediterranean using self-organizing maps. Meteorol Z 15(3):273–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlink U, Herbarth O, Richter M, Dorling S, Nunnari G, Cawley G, Pelikan E (2006) Statistical models to assess the health effects and to forecast ground-level ozone. Environ Model Softw 21:547–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohl A, Eckhartdt S, Forster C, James P, Spichtinger N, Seibert P (2002) A replacement for simple back trajectory calculations in the interpretation of atmospheric trace substance measurement. Atmos Environ 36:4635–4648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott RW (1984) Virtues of the Haversine. Sky Telescope 68:159

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardoulakis S, Kassomenos P (2008) Comparison of factors influencing PM10 levels in Athens (Greece) and Birmingham (UK). Atmos Environ 42:3949–3963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernli H, Davies H (1997) A Langrangian-based analysis of extratropical cyclones. I: the method and some applications. Q J R Meteorol Soc 123:467–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao CS (1998) A loading correlation model for climatic classification in terms of synoptic climatology. Theor Appl Climatol 61:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the NOAA Air resources (ARL) for the provision of the FNL-HYSPLIT data, the HYSPLIT transport and dispersion model and the READY web site (http://www.alr.noaa.gov/ready.htm) used in this work. The authors would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable and constructive suggestions that improve this work substantially.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Kassomenos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kassomenos, P., Vardoulakis, S., Borge, R. et al. Comparison of statistical clustering techniques for the classification of modelled atmospheric trajectories. Theor Appl Climatol 102, 1–12 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-009-0233-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-009-0233-7

Keywords

Navigation