Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro performance of six combinations of adjustable differential pressure valves and fixed anti-siphon devices with and without vertical motion

  • Original Article - CSF Circulation
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Adjustable differential pressure (DP) valves in combination with fixed anti-siphon devices are currently a popular combination in counteracting the effects of cerebrospinal fluid overdrainage following implantation of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt system. The study examined the flow performance of three DP valves in successive combination with an anti-siphon device in an in vitro shunt laboratory with and without vertical motion.

Methods

We analyzed three DP valves (Codman Hakim Medos programmable valve [HM], Codman CertasPlus [CP], and Miethke proGAV [PG], in combination with either Codman SiphonGuard [SG] or Miethke ShuntAssistant [SA]), resulting in the evaluation of six different valve combinations. Defined DP conditions between 4 and 40 cm H2O within a simulated shunt system were generated and the specific flow characteristics were measured. In addition, combinations with SA, which is a gravity-dependent valve, were measured in defined spatial positions (90°, 60°). All device combinations were tested during vertical motion with movement frequencies of 2, 3, and 4 Hz.

Results

All valve combinations effectively counteracted the siphon effect in relation to the chosen DP. Angulation-related flow changes were similar in the three combinations of DP valve and SA in the 60° and 90° position. In CP-SA and PG-SA, repeated vertical movement at 2, 3, and 4 Hz led to significant increase in flow, whereas in HM-SA, constant increase was seen at 4 Hz only (flow change at 4Hz, DP 40 cm H2O: PG (opening pressure 4 cm H2O) 90°: 0.95 ml/min, 60°: 0.71 ml/min; HM (opening pressure 4 cm H2O) 90°: 0.66 ml/min, 60°: 0.41 ml/min; CP (PL 2) 90°: 0.94 ml/min, 60°: 0.79 ml/min; p < 0.01); however, HM-SA showed relevant motion-induced flow already at low DPs (0.85 ml/min, DP 4 cm H2O). In combinations of DP valve with SG, increase of flow was far less pronounced and even led to significant reduction of flow in certain constellations. Maximum overall flow increase was 0.46 ± 0.04 ml/min with a HM (opening pressure 12 cm H2O) at 2 Hz and a DP of 10 cm H2O, whereas maximum flow decrease was 1.12 ± 0.08 with a PG (opening pressure 4 cm H2O) at 3 Hz and a DP of 10 cmH2O.

Conclusion

In an experimental setup, all valve combinations effectively counteracted the siphon effect in the vertical position according to their added resistance. Motion-induced increased flow was consistently demonstrated in combinations of DP valve and SA. The combination of HM and SA especially showed relevant motion-induced flow already at low DPs. In combinations of DP and SG, the pattern of the motion induced flow was more inconsistent and motion even led to significant flow reduction, predominantly at DPs of 10 and 20 cmH2O.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CERTASTM Plus Programmable Valves, Hydrocephalus Catalog, Codman Specialty Surgical https://www.integralife.com/file/general/1549983654.pdf. Last accessed 15 Apr 2020

  2. Chong CCW, van Gelder J, Sheridan M (2002) Clinical experience with the low pressure Novus valve in the treatment of adult hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci 9(5):539–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Czosnyka Z, Czosnyka M, Pickard JD (1999) Hydrodynamic performance of a new siphon preventing device: the SiphonGuard. JNNP 66(3):408–409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Czosnyka Z, Czosnyka M, Richards HK, Pickard JD (2002) Laboratory testing of hydrocephalus shunts – conclusion of the U.K. Shunt evaluation programme. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144(6):525–538 discussion 538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Czosnyka Z, Pickard D, Czosnyka M (2013) Hydrodynamic properties of the Certas hydrocephalus shunt - laboraty investigation. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:198–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis C, Lauritzen CG (2008) Spring-assisted remodeling for ventricular shunt-induced cranial deformity. J Craniofacial Surg 19:588–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis SE, Levy ML, McComb JG, Sposto R (2000) The delta valve: how does its clinical performance compare with two other pressure differential valves without antisiphon control? Pediatr Neurosurg 33(2):58–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox JL, McCullough DC, Green RC (1973) Effect ofcerebrospinal fluid shunts on intracranial pressure and on cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. 2. A new technique of pressure measurements: results and concepts. 3. A concept of hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 36:302–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Freimann FB, Kimura T, Stockhammer F, Schulz M, Rohde V, Thomale UW (2014) In vitro performance and principles of anti- siphoning devices. Acta Neurochir 156:2191–2199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Freimann FB, Luhdo ML, Rohde V, Vajkoczy P, Wolf S, Sprung C (2014) The Frankfurt horizontal plane as a reference for the implantation of gravitational units: a series of 376 adult patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2076-y

  11. Freimann FB, Vajkoczy P, Sprung C (2013) Patients benefit from low-pressure settings enabled by gravitational valves in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.06.010

  12. Gebert AF, Schulz M, Haberl H, Thomale U-W (2013) Adjustments in gravitational valves for the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus- a retrospective survey. Childs Nerv Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2160-2

  13. Gruber RW, Roehrig B (2010) Prevention of ventricular catheter obstruction and slit ventricle syndrome by the prophylactic use of the Integra antisiphon device in shunt therapy for pediatric hypertensive hydrocephalus: a 25-year follow-up study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5(1):4–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kestle JRW, Walker ML, Investigators S (2005) A multicenter prospective cohort study of the Strata valve for the management of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg 102(2 Suppl):141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiefer M, Eymann R, Meier U (2002) Five years experience with gravitational shunts in chronic hydrocephalus of adults. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144(8):755–767 discussion 767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kimura T, Schulz M, Shimoji K, Miyajima M, Arai H, Thomale UW (2016) In vitro performance of the fixed and adjustable gravity-assisted unit with and without motion - evidence of motion-induced flow. Acta Neurochir 158:2011–2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurtom KH, Magram G (2007) Siphon regulatory devices: their role in the treatment of hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Focus 22(4):E5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lemcke J, Meier U, Müller C, Fritsch MJ, Kehler U, Langer N, Kiefer M, Eymann R, Schuhmann MU, Speil A, Weber F, Remenez V, Rohde V, Ludwig HC, Stengel D (2013) Safety and efficacy of gravitational shunt valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a pragmatic, randomised, open label, multicentre trial (SVASONA). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84(8):850–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Major O, Fedorcsák I, Sipos L, Hantos P, Kónya E, Dobronyi I, Paraicz E (1994) Slit-ventricle syndrome in shunt operated children. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 127(1–2):69–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rainer JH (1988) Vibrations in structures induced by man and machine. Can J Civ Eng 15(6):1086–1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rekate HL (2004) The slit ventricle syndrome: advances based on technology and understanding. Pediatr Neurosurg 40:259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rohde V, Haberl E-J, Ludwig H, Thomale U-W (2009) First experiences with an adjustable gravitational valve in childhood hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3(2):90–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Serlo W, Heikkinen E, Saukkonen AL, von Wendt L (1985) Classification and management of the slit ventricle syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst 1:194–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Toma AK, Tarnaris A, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD (2011) Use of proGAV® shunt valve in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318214a809

  25. Weinzweig J, Bartlett SP, Chen JC, Losee J, Sutton L, Duhaime AC, Whitaker LA (2008) Cranial vault expansion in the management of post-shunt craniosynostosis and slit ventricle syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1171–1180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Fiss.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

UWT is consultant for Miethke Company and receives lecture honorarium from B. Braun-Aesculap Company. Author IF declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author PR declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author CVDB declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author CB declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author NH declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author FF declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author VR declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author SB declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on CSF Circulation

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 918 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fiss, I., Röhrig, P., Hore, N. et al. In vitro performance of six combinations of adjustable differential pressure valves and fixed anti-siphon devices with and without vertical motion. Acta Neurochir 162, 2421–2430 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04519-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04519-y

Keywords

Navigation