Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trepanation and surgical infection in the 18th century

  • Review Article - History of Neurosurgery
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

It is widely believed that trepanation prior to modern surgical hygiene was dangerous because of surgical infection, especially in the hospital. There has been a wide variability in the success and risks of different historical studies

Purpose

To obtain a more accurate assessment of the risks of post-operative infection following 18th-century cranial trauma and to note what factors were of prognostic significance.

Material and methods

Seven 18th-century texts on head injury are reviewed and analyzed.

Results

Infection was the commonest cause of death (in over 60 % of patients) in five series but not in the other two. Hospital admission did not appear to be a major factor influencing mortality from infection. Delayed infection was the indication for patient referral and trepanation in more than two patients in two series. In one series, the patients were helped by the procedure, in the other they were not. The reasons for the difference are discussed. The most striking finding was that patients treated in rural areas had a much better prognosis.

Conclusions

The risks of suffering a surgical infection following head injury and trepanation are multifactorial. Admission to hospital seems to have been less risky than has been previously thought. It seems that the greatest risk factor for a lethal infection for these patients was living in an urban environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (1759) A collection of the yearly bills of mortality from 1657–1758 inclusive. A Millar, London, p 144

  2. (1759) A Collection of the yearly bills of mortality from 1657–1758 inclusive. A Millar, London, pp 131 – 135

  3. Abernethy J (1811) Surgical observations on injuries of the head. Thomas Dobson, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bell B (1785) A system of surgery. Charles Elliot, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bell J (1826) On fractures of the skull with depression in the principles of surgery. Thomas Tegg, London, pp 268–328

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bichat X (1814) The surgical works or statement of the doctrine and practice of P.J. Desault — in two volumes (trans: Smith ED. Thomas Dobson). Philadelphia

  7. Blake W (1972) London in William Blake complete writings. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 216

    Google Scholar 

  8. Botero JSH, Pérez MCF. (2012) The history of sepsis from ancient Egypt to the XIX Century. doi:10.5772/51484 accessed 2nd April 2013

  9. Bromfield B (1773) Sudorific opiates, recommended in concussions of the brain in chirurgical observations and cases Vol 1. T Cadell, London, pp 9–23

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burnside W (1799) Dumfries. In: Sinclair J (ed) Statistical accounts of Scotland of 1791–1799. William Creech, Edinburgh, p 131

    Google Scholar 

  11. Celsus C (1938) De Medicina (trans: Spencer WG) Books I-IV. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p 273

  12. Cockayne E (2007) Hubbub, Filth, Noise & Stench in England. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dagi TF (1997) The management of head trauma. In: Greenblatt SH (ed) A history of neurosurgery. American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Park Ridge Illinois, pp 301–302

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dease W (1776) Observations on wounds of the head. G Robinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Emsley C, Hitchcock T, Shoemaker R (2013) London history — a population history of London, Old Bailey Proceedings Online. http://www.oldbaileyonline.org, version 7.0. Accessed 16th March 2013

  16. Ganz JC (2013) The lucid interval associated with epidural bleeding: evolving understanding. J Neurosurg 118(4):739–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gross C (2009) A hole in the head: more tales in the history of neuroscience. The MIT Press, Cambridge Massachussetts, 23

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gross C (2003) Trepanation from the Paelaeolithic to the Internet. In: Arnott R, Finger S, Smith CUM (eds) Trepanation history, discovery, theory. Swets & Zeitlinger Lisse, Abingdon Exton, Tokyo, p 311

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hamdy MK, Barton ND (1965) Fate of staphylococcus aureus in bruised tissue. Appl Microbiol 1:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heister L (1750) A general system of surgery in three parts. W Innys, London

  21. Hill J (1772) Cases in surgery. John Balfour, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hippocrates (1928) In the surgery IV in Hippocrates Volume III, Loeb Classical Library, (trans: Withington ET). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 63 – 65

  23. Lamont D (1799) Kirkpatrick-Durham, County of Kirkcudbright. In: Sinclair J (ed) Statistical accounts of Scotland of 1791–1799. William Creech, Edinburgh, p 253

    Google Scholar 

  24. Latta J (1795) Of wounds and contusions of the head in a practical system of surgery. G Mudie and Son, Edinburgh, pp 111–180

    Google Scholar 

  25. Le Dran H-F (1740) Observations in surgery: containing one hundred and fifteen different cases with particular remarks on each for the improvement of young students (trans: by Surgeon JS). James Hodges at the Looking Glass, London Bridge

  26. Lennon C (2008) Dublin part II 1610–1756. Royal Irish Academy, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lovett P (1981) The Wellesley Bridge. The Old Limerick Journal; Winter (9), 28–31

  28. Mapother ED (1864) The sanitary state of Dublin. J Stat Soc Inq Soc Ireland 4:62–76

    Google Scholar 

  29. Muirhead J (1799) Parish of Urr, county of Kirkcudbright — synod and presbytery of Dumfries. In: Sinclair (ed) Statistical accounts of Scotland of 1791–1799. William Creech, Edinburgh, p 76

    Google Scholar 

  30. O’Halloran (1793) A New treatise on the different disorders arising from external injuries of the head. Zachariah Jackson, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pimentel L (2004) Scurvy: historical review and current diagnostic approach. Am J Emerg Med 21(4):328–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pott P (1768) Observations on the nature and consequences of those injuries to which the head is liable from external violence. Hawes L, Clarke W and Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  33. Putnam C (2007) Semmelweis Ignác Fülöp [Ignaz Philipp]. In: Bynum WF, Bynum H (eds) Dictionary of medical biography Volume 5. Greenwood Press, London, pp 1133–1135

    Google Scholar 

  34. Quesnay F (1848) Summary of observations on the use of the trepan. In: Ottley D (ed) Observations on surgical diseases of the head and neck selected form the memoirs of the royal academy of surgery of France. The Sydenham Society, London, pp 1–80

    Google Scholar 

  35. Riley JC (2001) Rising life expectancy: a global history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 32–34

    Google Scholar 

  36. Roche D (1987) The people of Paris: an essay in popular culture in the 18th century. University of California Press, Berkeley, p21

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sharp S (1740) A treatise on the operations of surgery with a description and representation of the instruments used in performing it. J Brotherton, W Innys and R Manby, London

    Google Scholar 

  38. Turner D (1736) The art of surgery. C Rivington, London

    Google Scholar 

  39. UK National Statistics, Publication Hub (2013) http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77-276695, Accessed 15th March 2013

  40. UK National Statistics, Publication Hub. (2013) http://www.statistics.gov.uk/hub/population/deaths/mortality-rates [Accessed 15th March 2013]

  41. Wallace AR (1898) The wonderful century it’s successes and it’s failures. George N. Morang, Toronto, pp 318–319

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Zimmerman LM, Veith I (1967) Great ideas in the history of surgery. Chapter 22: German Wound Surgeons, Dover Publications Inc., New York, pp 293–217

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy C. Ganz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganz, J.C. Trepanation and surgical infection in the 18th century. Acta Neurochir 156, 615–623 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1900-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1900-0

Keywords

Navigation