Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Proof of principle: supramarginal resection of cerebral metastases in eloquent brain areas

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cerebral metastases are not sharply delimitatable; therefore, microsurgical circumferential stripping of intracerebral metastases is often insufficient for preventing local tumor recurrence. Supramarginal resection significantly improves local tumor control but was suggested not to be suitable for metastases in eloquent brain areas. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed a series of patients with cerebral metastases situated in eloquent areas for newly occurring neurologic deficits after supramarginal resection performed as awake surgery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed for all patients who underwent supramarginal resection for a cerebral metastasis performed as awake surgery between June 2011 and April 2012. All metastases were localized in eloquent brain areas. Pre- and postsurgical neurologic status was documented as well as data regarding the primary cancer and histopathologic data. Postoperative MRI within 72 h was scheduled routinely to verify complete resection.

Results

A total of 19 patients underwent awake surgery for a cerebral metastasis in eloquent brain areas. Surgery was well tolerated in all patients. Neurologic symptoms improved in five patients after surgery. In three patients, neurologic deficits existing before surgery worsened. The postoperative median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score did not differ from the preoperative value.

Conclusions

Awake surgery is a feasible tool for metastases in eloquent areas, minimizing postoperative neurologic deficits and morbidity. Therefore, eloquently situated metastases may also be eligible for supramarginal resection. Further studies are needed in order to analyze the benefit of this method in achieving better tumor control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bannur U, Rajshekhar V (2000) Post operative supplementary motor area syndrome: clinical features and outcome. Br J Neurosurg 14:204–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baumert BG, Rutten I, Dehing-Oberije C, Twijnstra A, Dirx MJ, Debougnoux-Huppertz RM, Lambin P, Kubat B (2006) A pathology-based substrate for target definition in radiosurgery of brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66:187–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Benedictis A, Moritz-Gasser S, Duffau H (2010) Awake mapping optimizes the extent of resection for low-grade gliomas in eloquent areas. Neurosurgery 66(6):1074–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duffau H (2001) Acute functional reorganisation of the human motor cortex during resection of central lesions: a study using intraoperative brain mapping. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 70:506–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Duffau H, Bauchet L, Lehericy S, Capelle L (2001) Functional compensation of the left dominant insula for language. Neuroreport 12:2159–2163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Duffau H, Capelle L, Denvile S, Sichez N, Gatignol P, Taillandier L, Lopes M, Mitchell MC, Roche S, Muller JC, Bitar A, Sichez JP, van Effenterre R (2003) Usefulness of intraoperative electrical subcortical mapping during surgery for low-grade gliomas located within eloquent brain regions: functional results in a consecutive series of 103 patients. J Neurosurg 98:764–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fontaine D, Capelle L, Duffau H (2002) Somatotopy of the supplementary motor area: evidence from correlation of the extent of surgical resection with the clinical patterns of deficit. Neurosurgery 50:297–303

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kamp MA, Grosser P, Felsberg J, Slotty P, Steiger H-J, Reifenberger G, Sabel M (2012) 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-induced fluorescence in intracerebral metastases: a retrospective study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Korinth MC, Delonge C, Hutter BO, Gilsbach JM (2002) Prognostic factors for patients with microsurgically resected brain metastases. Onkologie 25:420–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Muacevic A, Kreth FW, Horstmann GA, Schmid-Elsaesser R, Wowra B, Steiger H-J, Reulen HJ (1999) Surgery and radiotherapy compared with gamma knife radiosurgery in the treatment of solitary cerebral metastases of small diameter. J Neurosurg 91:35–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Neves S, Mazal PR, Wanschitz J, Rudnay AC, Drlicek M, Czech T, Wustinger C, Budka H (2001) Pseudogliomatous growth pattern of anaplastic small cell carcinomas metastatic to the brain. Clin Neuropathol 20:38–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF, Dempsey RJ, Mohiuddin M, Kryscio RJ, Markesbery WR, Foon KA, Young B (1998) Postoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of single metastases to the brain: a randomized trial. JAMA 280:1485–1489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Walsh JW, Dempsey RJ, Maruyama Y, Kryscio RJ, Markesbery WR, Macdonald JS, Young B (1990) A randomized trial of surgery in the treatment of single metastases to the brain. N Engl J Med 322:494–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pereira LC, Oliveira KM, L’Abbate GL, Sugai R, Ferreira JA, da Motta LA (2009) Outcome of fully awake craniotomy for lesions near the eloquent cortex: analysis of a prospective surgical series of 79 supratentorial primary brain tumors with long follow-up. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151(10):1215–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Picht T, Kombos T, Gramm HJ, Brock M, Suess O (2005) Mulitmodal protocol for awake craniotomy in language cortex tumour surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148(2):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Regine WF, Schmitt FA, Scott CB, Dearth C, Patchell RA, Nichols RC Jr, Gore EM, Franklin RL III, Suh JH, Mehta MP (2004) Feasibility of neurocognitive outcome evaluations in patients with brain metastases in a multi-institutional cooperative group setting: results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial BR-0018. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:1346–1352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rogne SG, Ronning P, Helseth E, Johannesen TB, Langberg CW, Lote K, Scheie D, Meling TR (2011) Craniotomy for brain metastases: a consecutive series of 316 patients. Acta Neurol Scand. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2011.01590.x

  18. Russell SM, Kelly PJ (2003) Incidence and clinical evolution of postoperative deficits after volumetric stereotactic resection of glial neoplasms involving the supplementary motor area. Neurosurgery 52:506–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sawaya R, Hammoud M, Schoppa D, Hess KR, Wu SZ, Shi WM, Wildrick DM (1998) Neurosurgical outcomes in a modern series of 400 craniotomies for treatment of parenchymal tumors. Neurosurgery 42:1044–1055

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sills AK Jr (2005) Current treatment approaches to surgery for brain metastases. Neurosurgery 57(5 Suppl):S24–S32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T, Wiestler OD, Zanella F, Reulen HJ (2006) Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 7:392–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ulu MO, Tanriover N, Ozlen F, Sanus GZ, Tanriverdi T, Ozkara C, Uzan M (2008) Surgical treatment of lesions involving the supplementary motor area: clinical results of 12 patients. Turk Neurosurg 18:286–293

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vecht CJ, Haaxma-Reiche H, Noordijk EM, Padberg GW, Voormolen JH, Hoekstra FH, Tans JT, Lambooij N, Metsaars JA, Wattendorff AR (1993) Treatment of single brain metastasis: radiotherapy alone or combined with neurosurgery? Ann Neurol 33:583–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoo H, Kim YZ, Nam BH, Shin SH, Yang HS, Lee JS, Zo JI, Lee SH (2009) Reduced local recurrence of a single brain metastasis through microscopic total resection. J Neurosurg 110:730–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcel A. Kamp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamp, M.A., Dibué, M., Niemann, L. et al. Proof of principle: supramarginal resection of cerebral metastases in eloquent brain areas. Acta Neurochir 154, 1981–1986 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1463-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1463-5

Keywords

Navigation