Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Wave Propagation Across Layered Rock Masses Considering Multiple Reflection Effects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impacts of multiple reflection within the interlayer on wave propagation across layered rock masses have remained unclear. To address this, we first derive the governing equations for the wave propagation in time domain based on an equivalent layer model. These equations are validated by comparing them with a previously used method in an idealized case. Subsequently, a systematic investigation is carried out, progressing from idealized to generalized cases, to explore the frequency-dependent characteristics of the transmission and reflection coefficients, as well as energy dissipation rate. The mechanisms behind these frequency-dependent features are thoroughly analyzed, in conjunction with the evolution of waveforms and the effects of multiple reflections. The results indicate that the proposed model and derived equations effectively simulate the multiple reflection effects in the wave propagation behavior of layered rock masses. Multiple reflections within the interlayer result in an oscillatory decay of the transmission coefficient in layered rock masses as wave frequency increases. Interestingly, stress waves with frequencies that are even multiples of the ratio of wave speed to interlayer thickness demonstrate a robust capability to propagate across the interlayer. This phenomenon arises from the superposition of multiple reflected waves in phase within the interlayer, and gradually disappears with a decrease in quality factor of interlayer or an increase in wave frequency. The underlying mechanisms of these features are convincingly explained by combining the effects of multiple wave reflections.

Highlights

  • A wave propagation equation accounting for multiple reflections in layered rock masses was derived.

  • A non-monotonic relationship was revealed between transmission coefficient and wave frequency.

  • A comprehensive analysis was conducted for the underlying mechanisms in frequency dependence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data and code are available by requesting on the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

x :

The number of contact surface

x , x + :

The downside or upside for the xth contact surface

u x , u x + :

The displacement at the downside or upside of xth contact surface

v x , v x + :

The vector velocity at the downside or upside of xth contact surface

v u x , v u x + :

The velocity of up-traveling wave at the downside or upside of xth contact surface

v d x , v d x + :

The velocity of down-traveling wave at the downside or upside of xth contact surface

σ x , σ x + :

The vector stress at the downside or upside of the xth contact surface

z x , z x + :

The wave impedance for the medium at the downside or upside of xth contact surface

ρ r, ρ f :

The density of rock or thin layer

c r, c f :

The wave speed of rock or thin layer

N :

The total number of thin layers

E :

Modulus of elasticity

μ :

Viscosity coefficient

k :

Stiffness coefficient of contact surface

η :

Viscosity coefficient of contact surface

d :

The thickness of thin layer

h :

The thickness of rock interlayer

t :

Time

Δt :

The time step size

i :

Time step

f :

Frequency

f k :

The central frequency for a transient wave of semi-sinusoidal

v In :

The velocity of incident wave

R :

Reflection coefficient

T :

Transmission coefficient

Δf :

Frequency interval

c :

The equivalent wave speed of interlayer

t 0 :

The phase difference between the primary and secondary up-traveling waves

T :

Period

Q :

Quality factor of interlayer

Q 0 :

The true quality factor of the interlayer under the fitting model parameters

E In, E Re, E Tr :

The energy of incident wave, reflected wave, and transmitted wave

e loss :

Energy dissipation rate

λ :

Wave length

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12272119) and Yalong River Joint Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1965101).

Funding

The authors are grateful to National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) via projects (12272119; U1965101).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiliang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Wang, Z. & Wang, J. Analysis of Wave Propagation Across Layered Rock Masses Considering Multiple Reflection Effects. Rock Mech Rock Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-03941-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-03941-3

Keywords

Navigation