Abstract
Discontinuities largely influence the mechanical properties of rock joints. However, discontinuity orientation clustering methods often rely on the aggregation and separation of orientation data without full consideration of the prior probability structure of orientation data. This paper proposes a method of optimal clustering by Fisher mixed distribution (OCFMD) for automatic grouping of discontinuity orientation. Based on the Fisher prior probability structure of orientation data, OCFMD can identify optimal group centers and group numbers by balancing the fitting accuracy and dominance of Fisher mixed distributions, and optimal grouping results can be generated by membership calculation. A Newton–Raphson expectation maximization (NR-EM) algorithm is derived for the parameter fitting of Fisher mixed distributions. The Fibonacci sequence is used to generate sample points. In addition, the neighbor probability and density of sample points based on Fisher mixed distributions is derived for fitting accuracy calculation. Several cases of rock slopes and rock tunnel excavation faces are adopted for analyzation. Three clustering algorithms combined with four clustering validity indexes of discontinuity grouping are used for comparison. The results show that OCFMD is more accurate and robust than the other automatic grouping methods in optimal grouping result generation.
Highlights
-
An automatic optimal clustering method of discontinuity orientation is proposed based on Fisher mixed distributions.
-
The balance between fitting accuracy and dominance of Fisher mixed distributions is derived for the selection of optimal grouping results.
-
The grouping results of several traditional clustering algorithms combined with clustering validity indexes are observed to be inconsistent with manual results.
-
The proposed method is more accurate and robust than the compared traditional methods in optimal grouping result generation.
-
The convergence effectiveness, sensitivity of neighbor angle selection and robustness to normal vector variations are validated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data of case 1 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.06.014, data of case 2 is available at ISBN: 978-90-90-25364-0, data of case 3 and case 4 cannot be shared due to legal restrictions.
References
Abellan A, Oppikofer T, Jaboyedoff M, Rosser N, Lim M, Lato M (2014) Terrestrial laser scanning of rock slope instabilities. Earth Surf Process Landf 39:80–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3493
Alberto Villarreal C, Guillermo Garzon C, Pedro Mora J, David Rojas J, Alberto Rios C (2022) Workflow for capturing information and characterizing difficult-to-access geological outcrops using unmanned aerial vehicle-based digital photogrammetric data. J Ind Inf Integr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100292
Barton N (1978) Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses: International Society for Rock Mechanics. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15:319–368
Battulwar R, Zare-Naghadehi M, Emami E, Sattarvand J (2021) A state-of-the-art review of automated extraction of rock mass discontinuity characteristics using three-dimensional surface models. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 13:920–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.01.008
Burden RL, Faires JD, Burden AM (2015) Numerical Analysis. Cengage Learning
Caliński T, Harabasz J (1974) A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Commun Stat 3:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610927408827101
Chen J, Huang H, Zhou M, Chaiyasarn K (2021) Towards semi-automatic discontinuity characterization in rock tunnel faces using 3D point clouds. Eng Geol 291:106232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106232
Chen J, Zhu H, Li X (2016) Automatic extraction of discontinuity orientation from rock mass surface 3D point cloud. Comput Geosci 95:18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.06.015
Chen Na, Cai X, Li S, Zhang X, Jiang Q (2020) Automatic extraction of rock mass discontinuity based on three-dimensional laser scanning. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 54:54
Cui X, Yan E (2020a) Fuzzy C-means cluster analysis based on variable length string genetic algorithm for the grouping of rock discontinuity sets. KSCE J Civ Eng 24:3237–3246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-2188-2
Cui X, Yan E (2020b) A clustering algorithm based on differential evolution for the identification of rock discontinuity sets. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 126:104181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.104181
Daghigh H, Tannant DD, Daghigh V, Lichti DD, Lindenbergh R (2022) A critical review of discontinuity plane extraction from 3D point cloud data of rock mass surfaces. Comput Geosci 169:105241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105241
Davies DL, Bouldin DW (1979) A Cluster Separation Measure. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766909
Dempster AP, Laird NM (1977) Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 39:1–38
Dershowitz W, Busse R, Geier J, Uchida M (1996) A Stochastic Approach For Fracture Set Definition. Presented at the 2nd North American Rock Mechanics Symposium, OnePetro.
Dimitrov D (2008) Geometric applications of principal component analysis. https://doi.org/10.17169/refubium-17663
Dunning SA, Massey CI, Rosser NJ (2009) Structural and geomorphological features of landslides in the Bhutan Himalaya derived from Terrestrial Laser Scanning. Geomorphology, Dating, Triggering, Modelling, and Hazard Assessment of Large Landslides 103:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.04.013
Esmaeilzadeh A, Shahriar K (2019) Optimized Fuzzy Cmeans – Fuzzy Covariance – Fuzzy Maximum Likelihood Estimation Clustering Method Based on Deferential Evolutionary Optimization Algorithm for Identification of Rock Mass Discontinuities Sets. Period Polytech Civ Eng 63:674–686. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.13885
Fernandes LP (2020) A clustering-based approach to identify petrofacies from petrographic data. Identificação automatizada de petrofacies através de clustering de dados petrográficos.
Fisher NI, Lewis T, Embleton BJJ (1993) Statistical Analysis of Spherical Data. Cambridge University Press
Fisher R (1953) Dispersion on a Sphere. Proc r Soc Math Phys Eng Sci 217:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1953.0064
Friedel M, Souza Filho O, Iwashita F, Silva A, Yoshinaga S (2012) Data-driven modeling for groundwater exploration in fractured crystalline terrain, northeast Brazil. Hydrogeol J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-012-0855-1
Gao F, Chen D, Zhou K, Niu W, Liu H (2019) A fast clustering method for identifying rock discontinuity sets. KSCE J Civ Eng 23:556–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-1244-7
González Á (2010) Measurement of areas on a sphere using fibonacci and latitude–longitude lattices. Math Geosci 42(1):49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-009-9257-x
Guo J, Liu S, Zhang P, Wu L, Zhou W, Yu Y (2017) Towards semi-automatic rock mass discontinuity orientation and set analysis from 3D point clouds. Comput Geosci 103:164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.03.017
Hack H (1998) Slope stability probability classification (SSPC) 258 p.
Hammah R, Curran J (2000) Validity measures for the fuzzy cluster analysis of orientations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22:1467–1472. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.895981
Hammah R, Curran J (1999) On distance measures for the fuzzy K-means algorithm for joint data. Rock Mech Rock Eng 32:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s006030050041
Hammah R, Curran J (1998) Fuzzy cluster algorithm for the automatic identification of joint sets. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35:889–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(98)00011-4
Hou Q, Wang S, Yong R, Xiu Z, Han W, Zhang Z (2023) A method for clustering rock discontinuities with multiple properties based on an improved netting algorithm. Geomech Geophys Geo-Energy Geo-Resour 9:23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-023-00533-3
Jaboyedoff M, Oppikofer T, Abellan A, Derron M, Loye A, Metzger R, Pedrazzini A (2012) Use of LIDAR in landslide investigations: a review. Nat Hazards 61:5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9634-2
Jimenez R (2008) Fuzzy spectral clustering for identification of rock discontinuity sets. ROCK Mech ROCK Eng 41:929–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-007-0155-6
Jimenez-Rodriguez R, Sitar N (2006) A spectral method for clustering of rock discontinuity sets. Int J ROCK Mech Min Sci 43:1052–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.02.003
Davis JC (2002) Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology, 2nd, edition. John Wiley and Sons, Singapore
Jung Y-B, Sunwoo C (2005) Automatic Discontinuity Set Identification Using Genetic Algorithm Based Clustering Technique. In: Presented at the ISRM International Symposium - EUROCK 2005, OnePetro.
Kemeny J, Post R (2003) Estimating three-dimensional rock discontinuity orientation from digital images of fracture traces. Comput Geosci 29:65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(02)00106-1
Khaloo A, Lattanzi D (2017) Robust normal estimation and region growing segmentation of infrastructure 3D point cloud models. Adv Eng Inform 34:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.07.002
Kong D, Wu F, Saroglou C (2020) Automatic identification and characterization of discontinuities in rock masses from 3D point clouds. Eng Geol 265:105442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105442
Krishna K, Murty M (1999) Genetic K-means algorithm. IEEE Trans. Syst MAN Cybern PART B-Cybern 29:433–439. https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.764879
Kulatilake P, Jh D (2015) A Monte Carlo simulation for discontinuity orientations using bivariate empirical distribution. Monte Carlo Simul Discontinuity Orientat Using Bivariate Empir Distrib. https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.0982
Kulatilake PHSW (1985) Fitting Fisher Distributions to Discontinuity Orientation Data. J Geol Educ 33:266–269. https://doi.org/10.5408/0022-1368-33.5.266
Lato M, Kemeny J, Harrap R, Bevan G (2013) Rock bench: Establishing a common repository and standards for assessing rockmass characteristics using LiDAR and photogrammetry. Comput Geosci 50:106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.06.014
Lato M, Voge M (2012) Automated mapping of rock discontinuities in 3D lidar and photogrammetry models. Int J ROCK Mech Min Sci 54:150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.06.003
Li X, Chen J, Zhu H (2016) A new method for automated discontinuity trace mapping on rock mass 3D surface model. Comput Geosci 89:118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.12.010
Li X, Chen Z, Chen J, Zhu H (2019) Automatic characterization of rock mass discontinuities using 3D point clouds. Eng Geol 259:105131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.05.008
Liu J, Zhao X-D, Xu Z (2017) Identification of rock discontinuity sets based on a modified affinity propagation algorithm. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 94:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.02.012
Liu T, Jiang A, Deng J, Zheng J, Zhang Z (2022a) A new multiple-factor clustering method considering both box fractal dimension and orientation of joints. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 14:366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.07.014
Liu Y, Chen J, Tan C, Zhan J, Song S, Xu W, Yan J, Zhang Y, Zhao M, Wang Q (2022b) Intelligent scanning for optimal rock discontinuity sets considering multiple parameters based on manifold learning combined with UAV photogrammetry. Eng Geol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106851
Ma GW, Xuzhenhao Z, Zhang W, Li SC (2014). An Enriched K-Means Clustering Method for Grouping Fractures with Meliorated Initial Centers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1379-x
Mahtab MA, Yegulalp TM (1983) Rejection criterion for definition of clusters in orientation data. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 20:98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(83)91604-2
Marcotte D, Henry E (2002) Automatic joint set clustering using a mixture of bivariate normal distributions. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:323–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00033-3
Pagano M, Palma B, Ruocco A, Parise M (2020) Discontinuity characterization of rock masses through terrestrial laser scanner and unmanned aerial vehicle techniques aimed at slope stability assessment. Appl Sci 10:2960. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082960
Priest SD (1993) Discontinuity Analysis for Rock Engineering. Springer, Berlin
Riquelme AJ, Abellán A, Tomás R, Jaboyedoff M (2014) A new approach for semi-automatic rock mass joints recognition from 3D point clouds. Comput Geosci 68:38–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.03.014
Rodriguez A, Laio A (2014) Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks. Science 344:1492–1496. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1242072
Rousseeuw PJ (1987) Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math 20:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
Ruiz Pereira S, Marquardt C, Beriain E, Lambert F (2021) Permafrost evolution in a mountain catchment near Santiago de Chile. J South Am Earth Sci 109:103293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103293
Salimzadeh S, Khalili N (2015) A three-phase XFEM model for hydraulic fracturing with cohesive crack propagation. Comput Geotech 69:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.05.001
Schmidt W (1925) XXIII Gefügestatistik Tschermaks Mineral Petrogr Mitteilungen 38:392–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02993943
Shanley RJ, Mahtab MA (1976) Delineation and analysis of clusters in orientation data. J Int Assoc Math Geol 8:9–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01039681
Singh SK, Banerjee BP, Lato MJ, Sammut C, Raval S (2022) Automated rock mass discontinuity set characterisation using amplitude and phase decomposition of point cloud data. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 152:105072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105072
Slob S (2010) Automated rock mass characterisation using 3-D terrestrial laser scanning, 1st ed. ed, ITC dissertation. ITC; TU Delft, [Enschede, Netherlands]: Delft.
Song S, Wang Q, Chen J, Li Y, Zhang W, Ruan Y (2017) Fuzzy C-means clustering analysis based on quantum particle swarm optimization algorithm for the grouping of rock discontinuity sets. KSCE J Civ Eng 21:1115–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1223-9
Stoica P, Selen Y (2004) Model-order selection: a review of information criterion rules. IEEE Signal Process Mag 21:36–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2004.1311138
Sturzenegger M, Stead D (2009) Quantifying discontinuity orientation and persistence on high mountain rock slopes and large landslides using terrestrial remote sensing techniques. Nat HAZARDS EARTH Syst Sci 9:267–287. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-267-2009
The MathWorks Inc (2022) MATLAB version: 9.12.0 (R2022a). https://www.mathworks.com
Tokhmechi B, Memarian H, Moshiri B, Rasouli V, Noubari HA (2011) Investigating the validity of conventional joint set clustering methods. Eng Geol 118:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.01.002
Wang Y, Feng H, Delorme F, Engin S (2013) An adaptive normal estimation method for scanned point clouds with sharp features. Comput-Aided Des. 45:1333–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2013.06.003
Wu W, Zhang K, Zhu H (2020) A fast automatic extraction method for rock mass discontinuity orientation using fast k-means++ and fast silhouette based on 3D point cloud. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 570:052075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/570/5/052075
Wu X, Wang F, Wang M, Zhang X, Wang Q, Zhang S (2021) A new method for automatic extraction and analysis of discontinuities based on TIN on Rock Mass Surfaces. Remote Sens 13:2894. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152894
Xie XL, Beni G (1991) A validity measure for fuzzy clustering. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 13:841–847. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.85677
Xu L, Chen J, Wang Q, Zhou F (2013) Fuzzy C-means cluster analysis based on mutative scale chaos optimization algorithm for the grouping of discontinuity sets. ROCK Mech ROCK Eng 46:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0244-z
Xu L, Jordan M (1996) On Convergence Properties of the EM Algorithm for Gaussian Mixtures. Neural Comput 8:129–151. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1996.8.1.129
Xu W, Zhang Y, Li X, Wang X, Ma F, Zhao J, Zhang Y (2020) Extraction and statistics of discontinuity orientation and trace length from typical fractured rock mass: A case study of the Xinchang underground research laboratory site. China Eng Geol 269:105553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105553
Yamaji A, Sato K (2011) Clustering of fracture orientations using a mixed Bingham distribution and its application to paleostress analysis from dike or vein orientations. J Struct Geol 33:1148–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2011.05.006
Yan J, Chen J, Zhan J, Song S, Zhang Y, Zhao M, Liu Y, Xu W (2022) Automatic identification of rock discontinuity sets using modified agglomerative nesting algorithm. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02724-w
Zhu Y, Ting K, Carman M (2016) Density-ratio based clustering for discovering clusters with varying densities. Pattern Recognit 60:983–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2016.07.007
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [42272338, 41827807, 41902275]; Shanghai Sailing Program [18YF1424400]; Joint Fund for Basic Research of High-speed Railway of National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Railway Corporation [U1934212]; China State Railway Group Co., Ltd. [P2019G038]; Department of Transportation of Zhejiang Province [202213]; China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd. [19-21-1, 2022KY53ZD(CYH)-10]; China Railway Tunnel Group Co., Ltd. [CZ02-02-08]; PowChina Hebei Transportation Highway Investment Development Co., Ltd. [TH-201908]; Sichuan Railway Investment Group Co., Ltd. [SRIG2019GG0004]; The Science and Technology major program of Guizhou Province [2018]3011.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interests
No financial or non-financial interest conflicts are directly or indirectly related to the submission of this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Formula Derivation
In Eq. (38), the Fisher probability density on \((\varphi ,\theta )\in \{[\mathrm{0,2}\pi ],[0,\pi /2]\}\) is defined as
In Eq. (39), L’s lower bound H is defined as
where \({v}_{ij}\) is defined as
The specific formulation of Eq. (40) is
The specific formulation of Eq. (41) is
In Eq. (42), the rotation matrix \(Rot\) is derived as
The specific formulation of Eq. (43) is
The specific formulation of Eq. (44) is
Appendix 2 List of symbols
- \(p\):
-
3D point
- \({M}_{p}\):
-
Covariance matrix
- \(\mathrm{knn}\):
-
Nearest point number for normal vector calculation
- \({e}_{i}\):
-
The \({i}\text{th}\) eigenvector of \({M}_{p}\)
- \({\lambda }_{i}\):
-
The \({i}\text{th}\) eigenvalue of \({M}_{p}\)
- M:
-
Sample point number
- m:
-
Elements in \(\{-M,-M+1,...,M-1,M\}\)
- M′:
-
Number of m
- \(\Phi\):
-
Fibonacci sample point threshold
- \({\mathrm{lon}}_{m}\):
-
Longtitude value corresponding to m
- \({\mathrm{lati}}_{m}\):
-
Latitude value corresponding to m
- \(x{s}_{m}\):
-
Coordinate x corresponding to m
- \(y{s}_{m}\):
-
Coordinate y corresponding to m
- \(z{s}_{m}\):
-
Coordinate z corresponding to m
- Vec:
-
Normal vector set
- \(N\):
-
Normal vector number
- \(\mathrm{vec}\):
-
The \({i}\text{th}\) normal vector
- Sp:
-
Sample point set
- \({\mathrm{sp}}_{i}\):
-
The \({i}\text{th}\) sample point
- Neig:
-
Neighbor normal vector set of sample points
- T:
-
Neighbor angle threshold
- \({r}_{0}\):
-
Radius of the circular sampling window on the stereographic projection plane
- \(\rho\):
-
Neighbor density set of sample points
- \({\rho }_{i}\):
-
Neighbor density of the \({i}\text{th}\) sample point
- \(\delta\):
-
Angle set of sample points to the nearest higher density sample points
- \({\delta }_{i}\):
-
Angle of the \({i}\text{th}\) sample point to the nearest higher density sample point
- \({\mathrm{src}}_{i}\):
-
Priority score for the \({i}\text{th}\) sample point
- Cen:
-
Grouping center set
- \({\mathrm{cen}}_{i}\):
-
The \({i}\text{th}\) grouping center
- Fcen:
-
Index set of the sample points selected as grouping centers
- \({\mathrm{fcen}}_{i}\):
-
Index set of the sample point selected as the \({i}\text{th}\) grouping center
- \(\alpha\):
-
Weight set of Fisher mixed distribution
- \({\alpha }_{i}\):
-
Weight of the \({i}\text{th}\) independent Fisher distribution
- \(\kappa\):
-
Fisher constant
- \({\kappa }_{i}\):
-
Fisher constant of the \({i}\text{th}\) independent distribution
- \(\varphi\):
-
Dip direction
- \(\theta\):
-
Dip
- \(\overline{\varphi }\):
-
Mean dip direction
- \(\overline{\theta }\):
-
Mean dip
- \(f\):
-
Fisher probability density function
- \({\gamma }_{ij}\):
-
Affiliation of the \({i}\text{th}\) normal vector belonging to the \({j}\text{th}\) Fisher distribution
- \(L\):
-
Maximum likelihood function
- \(H\):
-
Lower bound of L
- \(G\left({\kappa }_{j}\right)\):
-
Partial derivative of H to \({\kappa }_{j}\)
- \(lr\):
-
NR-EM learning rate
- \(\mathrm{coef}\):
-
Reduce coefficient of \(lr\)
- \(\mathrm{Neig}\_{\mathrm{cen}}_{i}\):
-
Set of normal vectors in the neighborhood of the \({i}\text{th}\) grouping center
- \(|\mathrm{Neig}\_{\mathrm{cen}}_{i}|\):
-
Element number in \(\mathrm{Neig}\_{\mathrm{cen}}_{i}\)
- \({R}_{i}\):
-
Mean vector of \(\mathrm{Neig}\_{\mathrm{cen}}_{i}\)
- \({\varphi }_{c}\):
-
Grouping center dip direction
- \({\theta }_{c}\):
-
Grouping center dip
- \({\varphi }_{s}\):
-
Sample point dip direction
- \({\theta }_{c}\):
-
Sample point dip
- \({x}_{c}\):
-
Coordinate x of grouping centers
- \({y}_{c}\):
-
Coordinate y of grouping centers
- \({z}_{c}\):
-
Coordinate z of grouping centers
- \(Rot\):
-
Rotation matrix
- \({\theta }_{c}^{\mathrm{^{\prime}}}\):
-
Grouping center dip after rotation
- \({x}_{c}\mathrm{^{\prime}}\):
-
Coordinate x of grouping centers after rotation
- \({y}_{c}\mathrm{^{\prime}}\):
-
Coordinate y of grouping centers after rotation
- \({z}_{c}\mathrm{^{\prime}}\):
-
Coordinate z of grouping centers after rotation
- \({\mathrm{prob}}_{sc}\):
-
Neighbor density of the \({c}\text{th}\) Fisher distribution at the \({s}\text{th}\) sample point
- \(ng\):
-
Number of Gaussian quadrature points
- \({\widetilde{\theta }}_{j}\):
-
Gaussian quadrature value of the \({j}\text{th}\) dip
- \({\widetilde{\varphi }}_{i}\):
-
Gaussian quadrature value of the \({i}\text{th}\) dip direction
- \(k\):
-
Grouping number
- \(\mathrm{Sgp}\):
-
Grouping score set of different group numbers
- \({\mathrm{Sgp}}_{k}\):
-
Grouping score set with group number k
- \({\mathrm{Fit}}_{k}\):
-
Fitting accuracy of the Fisher mixed distribution with group number k
- \({\mathrm{Domi}}_{k}\):
-
Dominance of the Fisher mixed distribution with group number k
- \({\mathrm{Prob}}_{i}\):
-
Predicted neighbor density of the \({i}\text{th}\) sample point
- \({\mathrm{Truth}}_{i}\):
-
True neighbor density of the \({i}\text{th}\) sample point
- \({k}_{\mathrm{opt}}\):
-
Optimal group number
- \(\mathrm{Gp}\):
-
Grouping label set of sample points
- \(g{p}_{si}\):
-
Grouping label set of the \({i}\text{th}\) sample point
- \(G{p}_{\mathrm{vec}}\):
-
Grouping label set of normal vectors
- \(g{p}_{vi}\):
-
Grouping label of the \({i}\text{th}\) normal vector
- \({v}_{\mathrm{par}}\):
-
Variation ratio of parameter par during two adjacent NR-EM iteration steps defined as \({v}_{par}=\frac{|pa{r}_{t+1}-pa{r}_{t}|}{|pa{r}_{t+1}|}\)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, K., Wu, W., Liu, Y. et al. OCFMD: An Automatic Optimal Clustering Method of Discontinuity Orientation Based on Fisher Mixed Distribution. Rock Mech Rock Eng 57, 1735–1763 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03587-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03587-7