Skip to main content
Log in

A new postoperative pain management (intravenous acetaminophen: Acelio®) leads to enhanced recovery after esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposes

To investigate the efficacy of postoperative scheduled intravenous acetaminophen to reduce the opioid use and enhance the recovery after esophagectomy.

Methods

A propensity score-matched population was created using the 93 and 69 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer before and after the introduction of postoperative scheduled intravenous acetaminophen, and the short-term clinical outcomes were compared.

Results

Significant defervescence was demonstrated in the Acetaminophen group (A-group) compared with control group (C-group) during the perioperative period (p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were observed in the postoperative inflammatory parameters. The incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the groups. The number of PCA pushes and the frequency of using other non-opioid analgesics were significantly smaller in the A-group than in the C-group (p < 0.05). Both daily and cumulative opioid uses were significantly smaller in the A-group than in the C-group (p < 0.05). The time to first flatus was significantly shorter in the A-group than in the C-group (p < 0.001). The day of first walking after surgery was significantly earlier in the A-group than in the C-group (1.0 versus 2.0 days, p = 0.003). The ICU stay (2.86 versus 3.61 days, p < 0.001) and the hospital stay (21.5 versus 26.0 days, p = 0.061) tended to be shorter in the A-group than in the C-group.

Conclusions

Postoperative scheduled intravenous acetaminophen decreased the rate of opioid use without increasing the intensity of postoperative pain and may be a feasible new pain management option in the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol following esophagectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhauq A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005;24(3):466–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248(2):189–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen K, Kehlet H, Lund CM. Post-operative recovery profile after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, observational study of a multimodal anaesthetic regime. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51(4):464–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ohkura Y, Haruta S, Shindoh J, Tanaka T, Ueno M, Udagawa H. Effectiveness of postoperative intravenous acetaminophen (Acelio) after gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(44):e5352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, editors. International Union Against Cancer. Oesophagus including oesophagogastric junction. “TNM classification of malignant tumours”. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. pp. 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Candiotti K, Singla N, Wininger S. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, parallel-group, multiple-dose study of the efficacy and safety of intravenous acetaminophen over 48 h for the treatment of postoperative pain after gynecologic surgery. In: American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 33rd Annual Spring Pain Meeting & Work shops; 2008.

  7. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. Publish: May 28, 2009 (v4.03: June 14, 2010). http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_8.5x11.pdf.

  8. Akiyama H, Miyazono H, Tsurumaru M, Hashimoto C, Kawamura T. Use of the stomach as an esophageal substitute. Ann Surg. 1978;188:606–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Udagawa H, Ueno M, Kinoshita Y. Rationale for video-assisted radical esophagectomy. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;57:127–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Udagawa H, Ueno M, Shinohara H, Haruta S, Nakagawa M, Tsurumaru M. The importance of grouping of lymph node stations and rationale of three-field lymphoadenectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106(6):742–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohkura Y, Ueno M, Iizuka T, Haruta S, Tanaka T, Udagawa H. Factors predicting effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(15):e3365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bjorkman DJ, Kimmey MB. Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastrointestinal disease: pathophysiology, treatment and prevention. Dig Dis. 1995;13(2):119–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Scott G, Susan F. Use of intravenous acetaminophen in the treatment of postoperative pain. J Peri Anesthesia Nurs. 2011;26(2):74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zafar N, Davies R, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR. The evolution of analgesia in an ‘accelerated’ recovery programme for resectional laparoscopic colorectal surgery with anastomosis. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:119–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Millo J, Sgromo B, Marshall RE, Maynard ND. Enhanced recovery for esophagectomy: a systemic review and evidence-based guidelines. Ann surg. 2014;259(3):413–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Honda M, Daiko H, Kinoshita T, Fujita T, Shibasaki H, Nishida T. Minimally invasive resection of synchronous thoracic esophageal and gastric carcinomas followed by reconstruction: a case report. Surg Case Rep. 2015;1(1):12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Erika Ohkura for her English proofreading of our manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception: YO, JS, and MU. Data accumulation: all authors. Data analysis: YO, JS, and MU. Writing of the manuscript: all authors. Critical revision: YO, JS, MU, and HU.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Ohkura.

Ethics declarations

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all of the patients for the publication of this report.

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohkura, Y., Shindoh, J., Ueno, M. et al. A new postoperative pain management (intravenous acetaminophen: Acelio®) leads to enhanced recovery after esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Today 48, 502–509 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1616-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1616-5

Keywords

Navigation