Skip to main content
Log in

Carotid endarterectomy using a “home-constructed” shunt for patients intolerant to cross-clamping

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposes

There is a small minority of patients with occlusive carotid artery disease, who are at high-risk for general anesthesia because of their intolerance to carotid flow blockage, even if only for seconds, without neurologic deficit. Even <30 s of temporary clamping of the carotid arteries to deploy a shunt may prove eventful in this patient group. We define safe carotid endarterectomy after the insertion of a novel shunt that we made from simple medical equipment in this patient population.

Methods

Among 65 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy between March 2010 and December 2012, 5 (7.7 %; 3 men and 2 women; age range 56–77 years) could not tolerate carotid clamping. We used an alternative carotid shunt, made by us from simple equipment in our clinic, during surgery for these patients.

Results

Two patients had bilateral lesions and the remainder had unilateral disease. The degree of stenosis ranged from 70 to 95 %. Temporary carotid clamping resulted in neurologic events, such as loss of consciousness in all and tremor in one, in <10 s (range, from immediately to 8 s after clamping). Full neurologic function was regained 15–30 s after releasing the clamps. All of the patients tolerated the procedures well with the support of our novel shunt. Shunt flow was adequate in all patients and no neurologic deterioration occurred after carotid clamping. The mean carotid clamp time was 28.11 ± 14.19 min. There was no mortality and all patients were followed up for a mean period of 9.3 ± 3.6 months, uneventfully.

Conclusions

An alternative, simple shunt, which is easily constructed in the operating room or clinic, using an angiocatheter, a three-way stopcock, and a serum line can provide adequate cerebral flow and permit safe carotid endarterectomy for those rare patients with carotid artery stenosis, who cannot tolerate even seconds of carotid occlusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Felli MM, Alunno A, Castiglione A, Malaj A, Faccenna F, Jabbour J, et al. CEA versus CAS: short-term and mid-term results. Int Angiol. 2012;31(5):420–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore WS. Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid angioplasty cui bono. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39(Suppl 1):S44–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alpagut U, Ugurlucan M, Kafali E, Ali Sayin O, Demir T, Basaran M, et al. Aneurysm of the kinked extracranial internal carotid artery case report and review of the literature. Acta Chir Belg. 2005;105(4):407–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leong BD, Naresh G, Hanif H, Lee SK, Zainal AA, Sara CM. Endovascular management of axillosubclavian artery injuries: report of three cases. Surg Today. 2013;43(8):918–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalko Y, Kafali E, Aydin U, Kafa U, Kosker T, Basaran M, et al. Surgery of the carotid artery: local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia. Acta Chir Belg. 2007;107(1):53–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;7(4):CD000190. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000190.pub2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guy Bianchi P, Tolva V, Dalainas I, Bertoni G, Cireni L, Trimarchi S, et al. Immediate conversion to CAS after neurological intolerance at cross-clamping test during CEA: a preliminary experience. Int Angiol. 2012;31(1):22–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McCleary AJ, Dearden NM, Dickson DH, Watson A, Gough MJ. The differing effects of regional and general anaesthesia on cerebral metabolism during carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;12(2):173–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schechter MA, Shortell CK, Scarborough JE. Regional versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program perspective. Surgery. 2012;152(3):309–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aburahma AF, Mousa AY, Stone PA. Shunting during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(5):1502–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tambakis CL, Papadopoulos G, Sergentanis TN, Lagos N, Arnaoutoglou E, Labropoulos N, et al. Cerebral oximetry and stump pressure as indicators for shunting during carotid endarterectomy: comparative evaluation. Vascular. 2011;19(4):187–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kret MR, Young B, Moneta GL, Liem TK, Mitchell EL, Azarbal AF, et al. Results of routine shunting and patch closure during carotid endarterectomy. Am J Surg. 2012;203(5):613–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodney PP, Wallaert JB, Scali ST, Stone DH, Patel V, Shaw P, et al. Vascular Study Group of New England. Impact of practice patterns in shunt use during carotid endarterectomy with contralateral carotid occlusion. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(1):61–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Estruch-Pérez MJ, Plaza-Martínez A, Hernández-Cádiz MJ, Soliveres-Ripoll J, Solaz-Roldán C, Morales-Suarez-Varela MM. Interaction of cerebrovascular disease and contralateral carotid occlusion in prediction of shunt insertion during carotid endarterectomy. Arch Med Sci. 2012;8(2):236–43.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wisman PP, Nolthenius RP, Tromp SC, Kelder JC, de Vries JP. Longer time interval between carotid cross-clamping and shunting is associated with increased 30-day stroke and death rate. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011;45(4):335–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nanba T, Ogasawara K, Nishimoto H, Fujiwara S, Kuroda H, Sasaki M, et al. Postoperative cerebral white matter damage associated with cerebral hyperperfusion and cognitive impairment after carotid endarterectomy: a diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(5–6):358–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Montisci R, Sanfilippo R, Bura R, Branca C, Piga M, Saba L. Status of the circle of Willis and intolerance to carotid cross-clamping during carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;45(2):107–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ms. Melike Yazar for her technical support during the extracorporeal shunt flow studies and Mr Robert Moore for reading the script.

Conflict of interest

Murat Ugurlucan and the co-authors of this paper have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Ugurlucan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ugurlucan, M., Filik, M.E., Caglar, I.M. et al. Carotid endarterectomy using a “home-constructed” shunt for patients intolerant to cross-clamping. Surg Today 45, 284–289 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0896-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0896-2

Keywords

Navigation