Abstract
Purposes
There is a small minority of patients with occlusive carotid artery disease, who are at high-risk for general anesthesia because of their intolerance to carotid flow blockage, even if only for seconds, without neurologic deficit. Even <30 s of temporary clamping of the carotid arteries to deploy a shunt may prove eventful in this patient group. We define safe carotid endarterectomy after the insertion of a novel shunt that we made from simple medical equipment in this patient population.
Methods
Among 65 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy between March 2010 and December 2012, 5 (7.7 %; 3 men and 2 women; age range 56–77 years) could not tolerate carotid clamping. We used an alternative carotid shunt, made by us from simple equipment in our clinic, during surgery for these patients.
Results
Two patients had bilateral lesions and the remainder had unilateral disease. The degree of stenosis ranged from 70 to 95 %. Temporary carotid clamping resulted in neurologic events, such as loss of consciousness in all and tremor in one, in <10 s (range, from immediately to 8 s after clamping). Full neurologic function was regained 15–30 s after releasing the clamps. All of the patients tolerated the procedures well with the support of our novel shunt. Shunt flow was adequate in all patients and no neurologic deterioration occurred after carotid clamping. The mean carotid clamp time was 28.11 ± 14.19 min. There was no mortality and all patients were followed up for a mean period of 9.3 ± 3.6 months, uneventfully.
Conclusions
An alternative, simple shunt, which is easily constructed in the operating room or clinic, using an angiocatheter, a three-way stopcock, and a serum line can provide adequate cerebral flow and permit safe carotid endarterectomy for those rare patients with carotid artery stenosis, who cannot tolerate even seconds of carotid occlusion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Felli MM, Alunno A, Castiglione A, Malaj A, Faccenna F, Jabbour J, et al. CEA versus CAS: short-term and mid-term results. Int Angiol. 2012;31(5):420–6.
Moore WS. Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid angioplasty cui bono. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39(Suppl 1):S44–8.
Alpagut U, Ugurlucan M, Kafali E, Ali Sayin O, Demir T, Basaran M, et al. Aneurysm of the kinked extracranial internal carotid artery case report and review of the literature. Acta Chir Belg. 2005;105(4):407–9.
Leong BD, Naresh G, Hanif H, Lee SK, Zainal AA, Sara CM. Endovascular management of axillosubclavian artery injuries: report of three cases. Surg Today. 2013;43(8):918–22.
Kalko Y, Kafali E, Aydin U, Kafa U, Kosker T, Basaran M, et al. Surgery of the carotid artery: local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia. Acta Chir Belg. 2007;107(1):53–7.
Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;7(4):CD000190. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000190.pub2.
Guy Bianchi P, Tolva V, Dalainas I, Bertoni G, Cireni L, Trimarchi S, et al. Immediate conversion to CAS after neurological intolerance at cross-clamping test during CEA: a preliminary experience. Int Angiol. 2012;31(1):22–7.
McCleary AJ, Dearden NM, Dickson DH, Watson A, Gough MJ. The differing effects of regional and general anaesthesia on cerebral metabolism during carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;12(2):173–81.
Schechter MA, Shortell CK, Scarborough JE. Regional versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program perspective. Surgery. 2012;152(3):309–14.
Aburahma AF, Mousa AY, Stone PA. Shunting during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(5):1502–10.
Tambakis CL, Papadopoulos G, Sergentanis TN, Lagos N, Arnaoutoglou E, Labropoulos N, et al. Cerebral oximetry and stump pressure as indicators for shunting during carotid endarterectomy: comparative evaluation. Vascular. 2011;19(4):187–94.
Kret MR, Young B, Moneta GL, Liem TK, Mitchell EL, Azarbal AF, et al. Results of routine shunting and patch closure during carotid endarterectomy. Am J Surg. 2012;203(5):613–7.
Goodney PP, Wallaert JB, Scali ST, Stone DH, Patel V, Shaw P, et al. Vascular Study Group of New England. Impact of practice patterns in shunt use during carotid endarterectomy with contralateral carotid occlusion. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(1):61–71.
Estruch-Pérez MJ, Plaza-Martínez A, Hernández-Cádiz MJ, Soliveres-Ripoll J, Solaz-Roldán C, Morales-Suarez-Varela MM. Interaction of cerebrovascular disease and contralateral carotid occlusion in prediction of shunt insertion during carotid endarterectomy. Arch Med Sci. 2012;8(2):236–43.
Wisman PP, Nolthenius RP, Tromp SC, Kelder JC, de Vries JP. Longer time interval between carotid cross-clamping and shunting is associated with increased 30-day stroke and death rate. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011;45(4):335–9.
Nanba T, Ogasawara K, Nishimoto H, Fujiwara S, Kuroda H, Sasaki M, et al. Postoperative cerebral white matter damage associated with cerebral hyperperfusion and cognitive impairment after carotid endarterectomy: a diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(5–6):358–67.
Montisci R, Sanfilippo R, Bura R, Branca C, Piga M, Saba L. Status of the circle of Willis and intolerance to carotid cross-clamping during carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;45(2):107–12.
Acknowledgments
We thank Ms. Melike Yazar for her technical support during the extracorporeal shunt flow studies and Mr Robert Moore for reading the script.
Conflict of interest
Murat Ugurlucan and the co-authors of this paper have no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ugurlucan, M., Filik, M.E., Caglar, I.M. et al. Carotid endarterectomy using a “home-constructed” shunt for patients intolerant to cross-clamping. Surg Today 45, 284–289 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0896-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0896-2