Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen in drainage venous blood is not a sensitive predictor of metachronous hepatic metastasis for patients with colorectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To establish whether the serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in drainage venous blood (d-CEA) is a better predictor of prognosis or survival than the preoperative CEA level in peripheral venous blood (p-CEA), and how these two CEA levels compare as predictive factors for metachronous hepatic metastasis.

Methods

We examined specimens of peripheral and drainage venous blood from 119 patients with colorectal cancer.

Results

There was a strong positive correlation between p-CEA and d-CEA levels. The 5-year survival rates were 81.5% and 80.2% for patients with normal p-CEA and d-CEA levels (≤5 ng/ml), respectively, and 68.4% and 71.1% for those with abnormal p-CEA and d-CEA levels (>5 ng/ml). The p-CEA and d-CEA levels were both normal in seven of ten patients with metachronous hepatic metastasis. The CEA gradient between the d-CEA and p-CEA levels (d-p CEA gradient) was not a significant predictive factor for hepatic metastases.

Conclusions

There was virtually no change between preoperative p-CEA and d-CEA levels. These findings suggest that the d-CEA level is not a predictor for metachronous hepatic metastasis and that measuring p-CEA levels is sufficient in the surveillance of colorectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pokorny RM, Hunt L, Galandiuk S. What’s new with tumor markers for colorectal cancer? Dig Surg 2000;17:209–215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCall JL, Black RB, Rich CA, Harvey JR, Baker RA, Watts JM, et al. The value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in predicting recurrent disease following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:875–881.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman JM, Cheung RJ, Weinberg DS. Surveillance after colorectal cancer resection. Lancet 2000;355:395–399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duffy MJ. Carcinoembryonic antigen as a marker for colorectal cancer: is it clinically useful? Clin Chem 2001;47:624–630.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldstein MJ, Mitchell EP. Carcinoembryonic antigen in the staging and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Invest 2005;23:338–351.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hotokezaka M, Jimi S, Hidaka H, Ikeda T, Uchiyama S, Nakashima S, et al. Factors influencing outcome after surgery for stage IV colorectal cancer. Surg Today 2008;38:784–789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Takagawa R, Fujii S, Ohta M, Nagano Y, Kunisaki C, Yamagishi S, et al. Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level as a predictive factor of recurrence after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:3433–3439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanellos I, Zacharakis E, Kanellos D, Pramateftakis MG, Tsahalis T, Altsitsiadis E, et al. Prognostic significance of CEA levels and detection of CEA mRNA in draining venous blood in patients with colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2006;94:3–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tabuchi Y, Deguchi H, Imanishi K, Saitoh Y. Carcinoembryonic antigen levels of peripheral and draining venous blood in patients with colorectal cancer. Correlation with survival. Cancer 1992; 69:2411–2417.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tabuchi Y, Deguchi H, Imanishi K, Saitoh Y. Colorectal cancer patients with high risk of hematogenous metastasis: correlation with CEA levels in peripheral and draining venous blood during the period of operation. J Surg Oncol 1991;47:87–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Waisberg J, Contim-Neto L, Oliveira Mda S, Matheus Cde O, Nagashima CA, Goffi FS. Determination of carcinoembryonic antigen levels in peripheral and draining venous blood in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Arq Gastroenterol 2004;41:88–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kutun S, Celik A, Hatiboglu C, Ulucanlar H, Cetin A. Carcinoembryonic antigen to detect hepatic metastases of colorectal cancers. Surg Today 2003;33:590–594.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wagner JS, Adson MA, Van Heerden JA, Adson MH, Ilstrup DM. The natural history of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. A comparison with resective treatment. Ann Surg 1984;199: 502–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang JY, Lu CY, Chu KS, Ma CJ, Wu DC, Tsai HL, et al. Prognostic significance of pre- and postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur Surg Res 2007;39:245–250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hohenberger P, Schlag PM, Gerneth T, Herfarth C. Pre- and postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen determinations in hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Predictive value and implications for adjuvant treatment based on multivariate analysis. Ann Surg 1994;219:135–143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gobbi PG, Valentino F, Berardi E, Tronconi C, Brugnatelli S, Luinetti O, et al. New insights into the role of age and carcinoembryonic antigen in the prognosis of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2008;98:328–334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bakalakos EA, Burak WE Jr, Young DC, Martin EW Jr. Is carcino-embryonic antigen useful in the follow-up management of patients with colorectal liver metastases? Am J Surg 1999;177:2–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Park YA, Lee KY, Kim NK, Baik SH, Sohn SK, Cho CW. Prognostic effect of perioperative change of serum carcinoembryonic antigen level: a useful tool for detection of systemic recurrence in rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:645–650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Carriquiry LA, Piñeyro A. Should carcinoembryonic antigen be used in the management of patients with colorectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:921–929.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, Fielding LP. American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group. Cancer 2000;88:1739–1757.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mariani G, Carmellini M, Bonaguidi F, Benelli MA, Toni MG. Serum CEA monitoring in the follow-up of colorectal cancer patients with negative preoperative serum CEA. Eur J Cancer 1980;16:1099–1103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hara M, Kanemitsu Y, Hirai T, Komori K, Kato T. Negative serum carcinoembryonic antigen has insufficient accuracy for excluding recurrence from patients with Dukes C colorectal cancer: analysis with likelihood ratio and posttest probability in a follow-up study. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:1675–1680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Katoh H, Yamashita K, Kokuba Y, Satoh T, Ozawa H, Hatate K, et al. Diminishing impact of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in prognosis of Dukes’ C colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 2008;28:1933–1941.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Haraguchi M, Komuta K, Akashi A, Matsuzaki S, Furui J, Kanematsu T. Elevated IL-8 levels in the drainage vein of resectable Dukes’ C colorectal cancer indicate high risk for developing hepatic metastasis. Oncol Rep 2002;9:159–165.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haraguchi M, Komuta K, Akashi A, Furui J, Kanematsu T. Occurrence of hematogenous metastasis and serum levels of thymidine phosphorylase in colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep 2003;10:1207–1212.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haraguchi M, Komuta K, Ueda T, Akashi A, Minami S, Furui J, et al. Prognostic significance of the serum thymidine phosphorylase levels in venous blood drainage specimens in patients with colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2008;55:418–421.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ueda T, Furui J, Komuta K, Yamaguchi J, Yamamoto M, Furukawa K, et al. Detection of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in the mesenteric vein of patients with resectable colorectal cancer. Surg Today 1998;28:701–706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Akashi A, Komuta K, Haraguchi M, Ueda T, Okudaira S, Furui J, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in the mesenteric vein is not a predictor of hepatic metastasis in patients with resectable colorectal cancer: a long-term study. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46:1653–1658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bessa X, Piñol V, Castellví-Bel S, Piazuelo E, Lacy AM, Elizalde JI, et al. Prognostic value of postoperative detection of blood circulating tumor cells in patients with colorectal cancer operated on for cure. Ann Surg 2003;237:368–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tabuchi Y, Deguchi H, Imanishi K, Saitoh Y. Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen levels between portal and peripheral blood in patients with colorectal cancer. Correlation with histopathologic variables. Cancer 1987;59:1283–1288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tabuchi Y, Deguchi H, Saitoh Y. Carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 levels of peripheral and draining venous blood in colorectal cancer patients. Correlation with histopathologic and immunohistochemical variables. Cancer 1988;62:1605–1613.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haraguchi, M., Fujita, F., Torashima, Y. et al. The serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen in drainage venous blood is not a sensitive predictor of metachronous hepatic metastasis for patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Today 40, 745–751 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-009-4205-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-009-4205-4

Key words

Navigation