Skip to main content
Log in

Telerehabilitation is as effective as outpatient visits in the management of early osteoarthritis knee and mechanical low backache

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Teleconsultation services can be used to overcome the barriers imposed by the Covid-19 pandemic in providing basic orthopaedic rehabilitation services. Aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation provided via outpatient and teleconsultation in patients with mechanical low backache (LBA) and early osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint utilizing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. The satisfaction level of patients receiving teleconsultation will also be assessed.

Methodology

This study was a hospital-based prospective observational study. The study’s participants were divided into two groups (Outpatient and Teleconsultation, respectively), and each group was further divided into two subgroups of 100 participants each (Knee-pain subgroup 1; LBA subgroup 2). SF-12 questionnaire, visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, and functional outcome scores (KOOS score for knee pain and the modified Oswestry Disability Index-MODI for LBA) were assessed at initial presentation and 6 months follow-up. Participants’ satisfaction for teleconsultation service was assessed at final follow-up by 5 points Likert scale (5, very satisfied; 1, very dissatisfied).

Results

Mean consultation time was significantly longer in the outpatient group (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference in the VAS score, KOOS score (58.0 ± 7.6 vs. 57.8 ± 9.2; p = 0.893), and MODI Score (24.7 ± 13.3 vs. 27.4 ± 12.4; p = 0.128) between the corresponding subgroups of the two groups at final follow-up. Eighty-seven percentage of the participants were satisfied (Likert score ≥ 4) with the teleconsultation services.

Conclusion

Teleconsultation is equally effective to that as face-to-face outpatient consultation in the rehabilitation of patients with early OA knee and mechanical LBA.

Level of study

Level 2, Prospective comparative study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lezak BA, Cole PA, Schroder LK, Cole PA (2020) Global experience of orthopaedic trauma surgeons facing COVID-19: a survey highlighting the global orthopaedic response. Int Orthop 44:1519–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04644-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh K, Kondal D, Mohan S, Jaganathan S, Deepa M, Venkateshmurthy NS et al (2021) Health, psychosocial, and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with chronic conditions in India: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10708-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanghera J, Pattani N, Hashmi Y, Varley KF, Cheruvu MS, Bradley A et al (2020) The impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the mental health of healthcare workers in a hospital setting—a systematic review. J Occup Health. https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12175

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Stuijfzand S, Deforges C, Sandoz V, Sajin CT, Jaques C, Elmers J et al (2020) Psychological impact of an epidemic/pandemic on the mental health of healthcare professionals: a rapid review. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09322-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Institute of Medicine (1996) Telemedicine: a guide to assessing telecommunications for health care. The National Academies Press, Washington. https://doi.org/10.17226/5296

  6. Behmanesh A, Sadoughi F, Mazhar FN, Joghataei MT, Yazdani S (2020) Tele-orthopaedics: a systematic mapping study. J Telemed Telecare. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X20919308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buvik A, Bugge E, Knutsen G, Småbrekke A, Wilsgaard T (2019) Patient reported outcomes with remote orthopaedic consultations by telemedicine: a randomised controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare 25:451–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X18783921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tousignant M, Moffet H, Nadeau S, Mérette C, Boissy P, Corriveau H et al (2015) Cost analysis of in-home telerehabilitation for post-knee arthroplasty. J Med Internet Res. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3844

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Buvik A, Bergmo TS, Bugge E, Smaabrekke A, Wilsgaard T, Olsen JA (2019) Cost-effectiveness of telemedicine in remote orthopedic consultations: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. https://doi.org/10.2196/11330

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Pastora-Bernal JM, Martín-Valero R, Barón-López FJ, Estebanez-Pérez MJ (2017) Evidence of benefit of telerehabitation after orthopedic surgery: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6836

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Buvik A, Bugge E, Knutsen G, Småbrekke A, Wilsgaard T (2016) Quality of care for remote orthopaedic consultations using telemedicine: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1717-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Haukipuro K, Ohinmaa A, Winblad I, Linden T, Vuolio S (2000) The feasibility of telemedicine for orthopaedic outpatient clinics—a randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare 6:193–198. https://doi.org/10.1258/1357633001935347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohinmaa A, Vuolio S, Haukipuro K, Winblad I (2002) A cost-minimization analysis of orthopaedic consultations using videoconferencing in comparison with conventional consulting. J Telemed Telecare 8:283–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x0200800507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tousignant M, Boissy P, Moffet H, Corriveau H, Cabana F, Marquis F et al (2011) Patients’ satisfaction of healthcare services and perception with in-home telerehabilitation and physiotherapists’ satisfaction toward technology for post-knee arthroplasty: an embedded study in a randomized trial. Telemed J E Health 17:376–382. https://doi.org/10.1089/TMJ.2010.0198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vesterby MS, Pedersen PU, Laursen M, Mikkelsen S, Larsen J, Søballe K et al (2017) Telemedicine support shortens length of stay after fast-track hip replacement: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Orthop 88:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1256939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kane LT, Thakar O, Jamgochian G, Lazarus MD, Abboud JA, Namdari S et al (2020) The role of telehealth as a platform for postoperative visits following rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 29:775–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eichler S, Salzwedel A, Rabe S, Mueller S, Mayer F, Wochatz M et al (2019) The effectiveness of telerehabilitation as a supplement to rehabilitation in patients after total knee or hip replacement: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. https://doi.org/10.2196/14236

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dent PA, Wilke B, Terkonda S, Luther I, Shi GG (2020) Validation of teleconference-based goniometry for measuring elbow joint range of motion. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6925

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanaka MJ, Oh LS, Martin SD, Berkson EM (2020) Telemedicine in the era of COVID-19: the virtual orthopaedic examination. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102:e57. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.00609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jansen T, Gathen M, Touet A, Goost H, Wirtz DC, Burger C et al (2021) Spine examination during COVID-19 pandemic via video consultation. Z Orthop Unfall 159:193–201. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1283-7160

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mani S, Sharma S, Singh DKA (2021) Concurrent validity and reliability of telerehabilitation-based physiotherapy assessment of cervical spine in adults with non-specific neck pain. J Telemed Telecare 27:88–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X19861802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Satin AM, Lieberman IH (2020) The virtual spine examination: telemedicine in the era of COVID-19 and beyond. Global Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220947744

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Iyer S, Shafi K, Lovecchio F, Turner R, Albert TJ, Kim HJ et al (2020) The spine physical examination using telemedicine: strategies and best practices. Global Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220944129

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cottrell MA, Russell TG (2020) Telehealth for musculoskeletal physiotherapy. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 48:102193. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSKSP.2020.102193

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Werneke MW, Deutscher D, Hayes D, Grigsby D, Mioduski JE, Resnik LJ (2022) Is telerehabilitation a viable option for people with low back pain? Associations between telerehabilitation and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Phys Ther 102:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/PTJ/PZAC020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eccleston C, Blyth FM, Dear BF, Fisher EA, Keefe FJ, Lynch ME et al (2020) Managing patients with chronic pain during the COVID-19 outbreak: considerations for the rapid introduction of remotely supported (eHealth) pain management services. Pain 161:889–893. https://doi.org/10.1097/J.PAIN.0000000000001885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Monaghesh E, Hajizadeh A (2020) The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12889-020-09301-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Adamse C, Dekker-Van Weering MGH, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, Stuiver MM (2018) The effectiveness of exercise-based telemedicine on pain, physical activity and quality of life in the treatment of chronic pain: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 24:511–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X17716576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Turolla A, Rossettini G, Viceconti A, Palese A, Geri T (2020) Musculoskeletal physical therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: is telerehabilitation the answer? Phys Ther 100:1260–1264. https://doi.org/10.1093/PTJ/PZAA093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lovo S, Harrison L, O’connell ME, Trask C, Bath B (2019) Experience of patients and practitioners with a team and technology approach to chronic back disorder management. J Multidiscip Healthc 12:855–869. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S208888

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Melian C, Frampton C, Wyatt MC, Kieser D (2021) Teleconsultation in the management of elective orthopedic and spinal conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic: prospective cohort study of patient experiences. JMIR Form Res 2021(5):e28140. https://doi.org/10.2196/28140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Azma K, RezaSoltani Z, Rezaeimoghaddam F, Dadarkhah A, Mohsenolhosseini S (2018) Efficacy of tele-rehabilitation compared with office-based physical therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial. J Telemed Telecare 24:560–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X17723368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moffet H, Tousignant M, Nadeau S, Mérette C, Boissy P, Corriveau H et al (2015) In-home telerehabilitation compared with faceto-face rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. J Bone and Joint Surg-Am 97:1129–1141. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.01066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Elbert NJ, Van Os-Medendorp H, Van Renselaar W, Ekeland AG, Hakkaart-Van Roijen L, Raat H et al (2014) Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ehealth interventions in somatic diseases: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Med Internet Res. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2790

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. De La Torre-Diéz I, López-Coronado M, Vaca C, Aguado JS, De Castro C (2015) Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review. Telemed E-Health 21:81–85. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2014.0053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Luo X, George ML, Kakouras I, Edwards CL, Pietrobon R, Richardson W et al (1976) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain. Spine (Phila Pa) 2003(28):1739–1745. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000083169.58671.96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Törmälehto S, Mononen ME, Aarnio E, Arokoski JPA, Korhonen RK, Martikainen J (2018) Health-related quality of life in relation to symptomatic and radiographic definitions of knee osteoarthritis: data from osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) 4-year follow-up study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12955-018-0979-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lawford BJ, Delany C, Bennell KL, Hinman RS (2018) “I was really sceptical… But it worked really well”: a qualitative study of patient perceptions of telephone-delivered exercise therapy by physiotherapists for people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 26:741–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOCA.2018.02.909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization was performed by [TG, PKS]. Methodology was done by [TG, LD, GS]. Formal analysis and investigation were conducted by [GS, PKS, LD]. Writing—original draft preparation was written by [LD, GS]. Writing—review and editing was done by [TG, LD]. Resources were provided by [TG]. Supervision was conducted by [TG].

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tarun Goyal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Ethical approval

The institutional ethics committee approved the study.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, L., Sharma, P.K., Singh, G. et al. Telerehabilitation is as effective as outpatient visits in the management of early osteoarthritis knee and mechanical low backache. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 34, 405–413 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03673-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03673-0

Keywords

Navigation