Abstract
Introduction
The aim of the present study was to define the medium-term outcomes following total hip replacement (THR) for hip fracture.
Methods
We prospectively followed up 92 patients who underwent THR for a displaced hip fracture over a 3-year period between 2007 and 2010. These patients were followed up at 5 years using the Oxford Hip Score, Short-Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire and satisfaction questionnaire. These outcomes were compared to the short-term outcomes previously reported at 2 years to determine any significant differences.
Results
Mean follow-up was at 5.4 years with a mean age at follow-up of 76.5 years. Seventy-four patients (80%) responded. Patients reported excellent functional outcomes and satisfaction (mean Oxford Hip Score 40.3; SF-12 Physical Health Composite Score 44.0; SF-12 Mental Health Composite Score 46.2; mean satisfaction 90%). The rates of dislocation (2%), deep infection (2%) and revision (3%) were comparable to those quoted for elective THR. When compared with 2-year follow-up, there were no statistically significant adverse changes in outcome parameters.
Conclusions
Medium-term outcomes for THR after hip fracture in fit older patients are excellent, and these results demonstrate that the early proven benefits of this surgery are sustained into the midterm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF (2006) Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(2):249–260
Blomfeldt R, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S, Söderqvist A, Tidermark J (2005) Comparison of internal fixation with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures. Randomized, controlled trial performed at four years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(8):1680–1688
Hopley C, Stengel D, Ekkernkamp A, Wich M (2010) Primary total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older patients: systematic review. BMJ 340:c2332
Macaulay W, Nellans KW, Garvin KL, Iorio R, Healy WL, Rosenwasser MP (2008) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: winner of the Dorr award. J Arthroplasty 23:2–8
Ravikumar KJ, Marsh G (2000) Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur—13 year results of a prospective randomised study. Injury 31:793–797
Mouzopoulos G, Stamatakos M, Arabatzi H et al (2008) The four-year functional result after a displaced subcapital hip fracture treated with three different surgical options. Int Orthop 32:367–373
Anakwe RE, Middleton SD, Jenkins PJ et al (2012) Total hip replacement in hip fracture patients: a matched cohort study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73(3):738–742
Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E et al (2004) Patient reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg 86:801–808
Gosens T, Hoefnagels NH, de Vet RC, van Langelaan EJ, Bulstra SK, Geesink RG (2005) The “Oxford Heup Score”: the transition and validation of a questionnaire into Dutch to evaluate the results of total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 76:204–211
Ng CY, Ballantyne JA, Brenkel IJ (2007) Quality of life and functional outcome after primary total hip replacement. A five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(7):868–873
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) (2009) Management of hip fracture in older people. A national clinical guideline. (SIGN publication no. 111). http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign111.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2016
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2011) The management of hip fracture in adults. (NICE clinical guideline 124). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg124/resources/guidance-hip-fracture-pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2016
Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P III et al (2005) Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(9):2122–2130
Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M (2011) Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthroplasty 26:209–213
Scottish Arthroplasty Project (2014) Biennial Report. http://www.arthro.scot.nhs.uk/docs/2014-08-12-SAP-Report.pdf?1. Accessed 20 Mar 2016
Gregory RJ, Wood DJ, Stevens J (1992) Treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures with total hip replacement. Injury 83:168–170
Hollingworth W, Todd CJ, Parker MJ (1996) The cost of treating hip fractures in the twenty-first century: short report. Osteoporos Int 6(Suppl. 2):13–15
Stewart NA, Chantrey J, Blankley SJ, Boulton C, Moran CG (2011) Predictors of 5 year survival following hip fracture. Injury 42(11):1253–1256
Le Manach Y, Collins G, Bhandari M, Bessissow A, Boddaert J, Khiami F et al (2015) Outcomes after hip fracture surgery compared with elective total hip replacement. JAMA 314(11):1159–1166
Barrett J, Losina E, Baron JA, Mahomed NN, Wright J, Katz JN (2005) Survival following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(9):1965–1971
Holmberg S (1992) Life expectancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 7(2):183–186
National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland (2014) 11th Annual report. http://www.hqip.org.uk/assets/NCAPOP-Library/NCAPOP-2014-15/NJR-11th-Annual-Report-2014.pdf Accessed 31 Mar 2016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Middleton, S.D., McNiven, N., Anakwe, R.E. et al. Medium-term patient-reported outcomes after total hip replacement for displaced hip fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27, 917–921 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-1907-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-1907-y